Performance-based structural health monitoring through an innovative hybrid data interpretation framework

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 287-305

  Malekzadeh, M ^a   Atia, G ^b   Catbas, F N ^a  

^a University of Central Florida   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Data driven; FBG; Fiber optics; Hybrid analysis; Model free; Monitoring; Non parametric

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA INTEGRATION; FIBER BRAGG GRATINGS; FIBER OPTICS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONITORING; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SENSOR NETWORKS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DATA DRIVEN; FBG; HYBRID ANALYSIS; MODEL FREE; NON-PARAMETRIC;

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

EID: 84930934648     PISSN: 21905452     EISSN: 21905479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13349-015-0118-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds) (2004) Earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering. Crc Press, Boca Raton
2. Krawinkler H, Miranda E (2004) Performance-based earthquake engineering. In: Bertero VV, Bozorgnia Y. (eds) Earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, chap 9. CRC Press, Boca Raton
3. Priestley MJN (2000) Performance based seismic design. Bulletin of the New Zealand society for earthquake engineering 33(3):325–346
4. Frangopol DM, Kong JS, Gharaibeh ES (2001) Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. J Comput Civ Eng 15(1):27–34
5. Vink ET, Rabago KR, Glassner DA, Gruber PR (2003) Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks™ polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degrad Stab 80(3):403–419
6. Sage AP, Rouse WB (2011) Handbook of systems engineering and management. Wiley, New York
7. Chang PC, Flatau A, Liu SC (2003) Review paper: health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Struct Health Monit 2(3):257–267
8. Catbas FN, Shah M, Burkett J, Basharat A (2004) Challenges in structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Structural Control, pp 10–11
9. Aktan AE, Catbas FN, Grimmelsman KA, Tsikos CJ (2000) Issues in infrastructure health monitoring for management. J Eng Mech 126(7):711–724
10. Balageas D, Fritzen CP, Güemes A (2010) Structural health monitoring, vol 90. Wiley, New York
11. Brownjohn JM (2007) Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):589–622
12. Catbas FN, Susoy M, Frangopol DM (2008) Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data. Eng Struct 30(9):2347–2359
13. Flynn EB, Todd MD (2010) A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(4):891–903
14. Ko JM, Ni YQ (2005) Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Eng Struct 27(12):1715–1725
15. Catbas FN, Malekzadeh M, Khuc T (2013) Movable bridge maintenance monitoring. Report submitted to florida department of transportation, Contract No. BDK78-977-10
16. Spencer BF, Ruiz-Sandoval ME, Kurata N (2004) Smart sensing technology: opportunities and challenges. Struct Control Health Monit 11(4):349–368
17. Sohn H (2007) Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):539–560
18. Catbas FN, Gul M, Zaurin R, Gokce HB, Terrell T, Dumlupinar T, Maier D (2010) Long term bridge maintenance monitoring demonstration on a movable bridge: a framework for structural health monitoring of movable bridges
19. Jang S, Jo H, Cho S, Mechitov K, Rice JA, Sim SH, Agha G (2010) Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: deployment and evaluation. Smart Struct Syst 6(5–6):439–459
20. Malekzadeh M, Gul M, Catbas FN (2012) Use of FBG sensors to detect damage from large amount of dynamic measurements. In: topics on the dynamics of civil structures, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 273–281
21. Farrar CR, Lieven NA (2007) Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):623–632
22. Aktan AE, Tsikos CJ, Catbas FN, Grimmlsman K, Barrish R (1999) Challenges and opportunities in bridge health monitoring. In: Proceedings of 2nd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring vol 1(999). pp 461–473
23. Hall SR (1999) The effective management and use of structural health data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, pp 265–275
24. Sun FP, Chaudhry ZA, Rogers CA, Majmundar M, Liang C (1995) Automated real-time structure health monitoring via signature pattern recognition. In: Proceedings of SPIE smart structures and materials 1995: smart structures and integrated systems, vol 2443
25. Masri SF, Sheng LH, Caffrey JP, Nigbor RL, Wahbeh M, Abdel-Ghaffar AM (2004) Application of a web-enabled real-time structural health monitoring system for civil infrastructure systems. Smart Mater Struct 13(6):1269
26. Posenato D, Lanata F, Inaudi D, Smith IF (2008) Model-free data interpretation for continuous monitoring of complex structures. Adv Eng Inform 22(1):135–144
27. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hunter NF, Worden K (2001) Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Dyn Syst Meas Control 123(4):706–711
28. Sohn H, Czarnecki JA, Farrar CR (2000) Structural health monitoring using statistical process control. J Struct Eng 126(11):1356–1363
29. Farrar CR, Worden K (2012) Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. Wiley, New York
30. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review (No. LA–13070-MS). Los Alamos National Lab., NM, US
31. Liu TY, Chiang WL, Chen CW, Hsu WK, Lu LC, Chu TJ (2011) Identification and monitoring of bridge health from ambient vibration data. J Vib Control 17(4):589–603
32. Aktan AE, Farhey DN, Helmicki AJ, Brown DL, Hunt VJ, Lee KL, Levi A (1997) Structural identification for condition assessment: experimental arts. J Struct Eng 123(12):1674–1684
33. Catbas FN, Kijewski-Correa T (2013) Structural identification of constructed systems: collective effort toward an integrated approach that reduces barriers to adoption. J Struct Eng 139(10):1648–1652
34. Worden K, Manson G (2007) The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):515–537
35. Hu F, Hao Q (eds) (2012) Intelligent sensor networks: the integration of sensor networks, signal processing and machine learning. CRC Press, Boca Raton
36. Posenato D, Kripakaran P, Inaudi D, Smith IF (2010) Methodologies for model-free data interpretation of civil engineering structures. Comput Struct 88(7):467–482
37. Catbas FN, Gokce HB, Gul M (2012) Nonparametric analysis of structural health monitoring data for identification and localization of changes: concept, lab, and real-life studies. Structural Health Monitoring 11(5):613–626
38. Malekzadeh M, Gul M, Catbas FN (2013) Application of multivariate statistically based algorithms for civil structures anomaly detection. In Topics in Dynamics of Civil Structures, vol 4. Springer, New York, pp 289–298
39. Kwon IB, Malekzadeh M, Ma Q, Gokce H, Terrell TK, Fedotov A, Catbas FN (2011) Fiber optic sensor installation for monitoring of 4 span model bridge in UCF. In: rotating machinery, structural health monitoring, shock and vibration, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 383–388
40. Malekzadeh M, Gul M, Kwon IB, Catbas FN (2014) An integrated approach for structural health monitoring using an in-house built fiber optic system and non-parametric data analysis. Smart Structures and Systems vol 14(5), pp 917–942. doi:10.12989/sss.2014.14.5.917
41. Laory I, Trinh TN, Smith IF (2011) Evaluating two model-free data interpretation methods for measurements that are influenced by temperature. Adv Eng Inform 25(3):495–506
42. Posenato D, Lanata F, Inaudi D, Smith IF (2006) Model free interpretation of monitoring data. In: intelligent computing in engineering and architecture, Springer, Berlin, pp 529–533
43. Santos JP, Orcesi AD, Crémona C, Silveira P (2014) Baseline-free real-time assessment of structural changes. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, pp 1–17, (ahead-of-print)
44. Gokce HB, Catbas FN, Gul M, Frangopol DM (2013) Structural identification for performance prediction by considering uncertainties through a family of models. J Struct Eng ASCE 139(10):1703–1716
45. Catbas FN, Gokce HB, Frangopol DM (2013) Predictive analysis by incorporating uncertainty through a family of models calibrated with structural health monitoring data. J Eng Mech ASCE 139(6):712–724
46. Poor HV (1988) An introduction to signal detection and estimation, vol 1. Springer, New York, p 559
47. Kano M, Hasebe S, Hashimoto I, Ohno H (2001) A new multivariate statistical process monitoring method using principal component analysis. Comput Chem Eng 25(7):1103–1113