Methodologies for model-free data interpretation of civil engineering structures

Computers and Structures

Volumn 88, Issue 7-8, 2010, Pages 467-482

  Posenato, Daniele ^a   Kripakaran, Prakash ^b   Inaudi, Daniele ^a   Smith, Ian F C ^b  

^a SMARTEC SA   (Switzerland)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Clustering; Data interpretation; Pattern recognition; Principal component analyses; Signal processing; Structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES; CIVIL STRUCTURE; CLUSTERING; CLUSTERING DATA; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; COMPLEX STRUCTURE; DATA INTERPRETATION; FULL-SCALE STRUCTURES; MISSING DATA; MODEL FREE; ROBUST REGRESSIONS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRONG CORRELATION;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; DAMAGE DETECTION; HEALTH; LIGHT MEASUREMENT; MONITORING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSORS; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS);

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

EID: 77049093410     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Glišić B., and Inaudi D. Fibre optic methods for structural health monitoring (2008), John Wiley & Sons
2. Sohn H., Czarneski J.A., and Farrar C.R. Structural health monitoring using statistical process control. J Struct Eng 126 11 (2000) 1356-1363
3. Lanata L, Del Grosso A. Damage detection algorithms for continuous static monitoring: review and comparison. In: Proceeding of third European conference of structural control. Wien, Austria, John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
4. Moyo P., and Brownjohn J.M.W. Detection of anomalous structural behaviour using wavelet analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 16 2-3 (2002) 429-445
5. Sun Z., and Chang C.C. Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. J Struct Eng, ASCE 128 10 (2002) 1354-1361
6. Han J.G., Ren W.X., and Sun Z.S. Wavelet packet based damage identification of beam structures. Int J Solids Struct 42 (2005) 6610-6627
7. Guo J., Chen Y., and Sun B.N. Experimental study of structural damage identification based on WPT and coupling N. J Zhejiang Univers Sci A 6A 7 (2005) 663-669
8. Omenzetter P., Brownjohn J.M.W., and Moyo P. Identification of unusual events in multi-channel bridge monitoring data. Mech Syst Signal Process 18 (2004) 409-430
9. Farrar CR, Sohn H, Robertson AN. Applications of nonlinear system identification to structural health monitoring. In: Proceeding second European workshop structural health monitoring; 2004. pp. 59-67.
10. Omenzetter P., and Brownjohn J.M.W. Application of time series analysis for bridge health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 15 (2006) 129-138
11. Lu Y., and Gao F. A novel time-domain auto-regressive model for structural damage diagnosis. J Sound Vibr 291 1-2 (2006) 349-368
12. Nair K.K., Kiremidjan A.S., and Law K.H. Time series based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure. J Sound Vibr 291 1 (2006) 349-368
13. Wang Z., and Ong K.C.G. Autoregressive coefficients based Hotelling's T2 control chart for structural health monitoring. Comput Struct 86 19-20 (2008) 1918-1935
14. Deraemaeker A., Reynders E., De Roeck G., and Kullaa J. Vibration-based structural health monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment. Mech Syst Signal Process 22 (2008) 34-56
15. Posenato D., Lanata F., Inaudi D., and Smith I.F.C. Model-free data interpretation for continuous monitoring of complex structures. Adv Eng Inform 22 1 (2008) 135-144
16. Cavalini Jr. A.A., Franco V.R., Gonsalez C.G., Lopes Jr. V., and De Melo G.P. Noise influence on damage detection through modal state observers methodology. Tema Tend Mater Appl Comput 9 2 (2008) 195-204
17. Galvanetto U., and Violaris G. Numerical investigation of a new damage detection method based on proper orthogonal decomposition. Mech Syst Signal Process 21 (2007) 1346-1361
18. Bakhtiari-Nejad F., Rahai A., and Esfandiari A. A structural damage detection method using static noisy data. Eng Struct 27 12 (2005) 1784-1793
19. Wei W, Tang Y. A generic neural network approach for filling missing data in data mining. In: IEEE international conference on systems man and cybernetics, vol. 1; 2003. p. 862-7.
20. Emam K.E., and Birk A. Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measure of software requirements analysis process capability. IEEE Trans Software Eng 26 6 (2000) 541-566
21. Schafer J.L., and Graham J.W. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7 2 (2002) 147-177
22. Song Q., and Shepperd M. A new imputation method for small software project data sets. J Syst Software 80 1 (2007) 51-62
23. Hruschka ER, Hruschka Jr ER, Ebecken NFF. Evaluating a nearest-neighbor method to substitute continuous missing values. In: Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence, Perth, LNAI 2903; 2003. p. 723-34.
24. Batista G.E.A.P.A., and Monard M.C. An analysis of four missing data treatment methods for supervised learning. Appl Artif Intell 17 (2003) 519-533
25. Jönsson P., and Wohlin C. Benchmarking k-nearest neighbour imputation with homogeneous Likert data source. Emp Software Eng 11 3 (2006) 463-489
26. Feng H.A.B., Chen G.C., Yin C.D., Yang B.B., and Chen Y.E. A SVM regression based approach to filling in missing values. Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems (KES05). Lect Notes Comput Sci 3683 (2005) 581-587
27. Arteaga F., and Ferrer A. Framework for regression-based missing data imputation methods in on-line MSPC. J Chemomet 19 8 (2005) 439-447
28. Sharma S.C., and Allipuram R. Duration and frequency of seasonal traffic counts. J Transport Eng 119 3 (1993) 344-359
29. Zhong M., and Sharma S. Matching hourly, daily, and monthly traffic patterns to estimate missing volume data, transportation research record. J Transport Res Board 1957 (2006) 32-42
30. Barret V., and Lewis T. Outliers in statistical data. 3rd ed. (1994), John Wiley
31. Burke S. Missing values, outliers, robust statistics and non-parametric methods. LCGC Eur Online Suppl Statist Data Anal 14 2 (2005) 19-24
32. Penny K.I., and Jolliffe I.T.M. A comparison of multivariate outlier detection methods for clinical laboratory safety data. The Statistician 50 3 (2001) 295-308
33. Ben-Gal I.E. Outlier detection. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery Handbook (2005) 131-146
34. Yenduri S., and Iyengar S.S. Performance evaluation of imputation methods for incomplete datasets. Int J Software Eng 17 1 (2007) 127-152
35. Glišić B., Posenato D., and Inaudi D. Integrity monitoring of an old steel bridge using fiber optic distributed sensors based on Brillouin scattering. Proc SPIE 6531 (2007) 65310P
36. FIGG Bridge Engineers. Bridging the Mississippi; the new I-35W bridge, Judith Dupre; 2008.
37. Lanata F., and Posenato D. A multi-algorithm procedure for damage location and quantification in the field of continuous static monitoring of structures. Key Eng Mater 347 (2007) 89-94
38. Omenzetter P, Brownjohn JMW. Application of time series and Kalman filtering for structural health monitoring of a bridge. In: Proceeding of second European workshop on structural health monitoring, Munich, Germany; 2004. p. 836-43.
39. Brownjohn JMW, Moyo P, Omenzetter P, Chakraboorty S. Interpreting data from bridge performance and health monitoring systems. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management, Kyoto, Japan; 2004. p. 561-72.
40. Farrar CR, Worden K, Todd MD, Park G, Nichols J, Adams DE, et al. Nonlinear system identification for damage detection, Los Alamos National Laboratory report, LA-14353; 2007.
41. Hou Z., Noori M., and Amand R.St. Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. J Eng Mech Div, Am Soc Civ Eng 12 7 (2000) 677-683
42. Daubechies I. Ten lectures on wavelets (1992), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia 357
43. Maeck J., and De Roeck G. Damage assessment using vibration analysis on the Z24-bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 17 1 (2003) 133-142
44. Nethal J. A review of robust regression and diagnostic procedures in linear regression. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica 21 2 (2005) 209-224
45. Andersen R. Modern methods for robust regression (2008), Sage University Inc. p. 152
46. Berry M., and Linoff G. Mastering data mining (2000), John Wiley & Sons
47. Witten I, Eibe F. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann; 2005. ISBN 0120884070.
48. Idé T, Papadimitriou S, Vlachos M. Computing correlation anomaly scores using stochastic nearest neighbors, Omaha, USA, ICDM; 2007. p. 523-8.
49. Lanata F. Damage detection algorithms for continuous static monitoring of structures. PhD thesis, University of Genoa, Italy; 2005.
50. Glisic B, Posenato D, Inaudi D, Figini A. Structural health monitoring method for curved concrete bridge box girders. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 6932; 2008. p. 693204.
51. Bergmeister K., and Santa U. Global monitoring concept for bridges. Proc SPIE 3995 (2000) 14-25
52. Inaudi D, Glisic B. Long-gage sensor topologies for structural monitoring, 1st fib congress on concrete structures in the 21st century, Osaka, Japan. 2, Session, vol. 15(15-16); 2002 [on conference CD].
53. Smith I.F.C., and Saitta S. Improving knowledge of structural system behavior through multiple models. J Struct Eng 134 4 (2008) 553-561
54. Kripakaran P., and Smith I.F.C. Configuring and enhancing measurement systems for damage identification. Adv Eng Informat 24 4 (2009)