A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 891-903

  Flynn, Eric B ^a   Todd, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Active sensing; Bayesian statistics; Optimal sensor placement; Structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SENSING; ACTUATOR PLACEMENTS; BAYES RISK; BAYESIAN APPROACHES; BAYESIAN STATISTICS; DAMAGE PROBABILITY; DETECTION THEORY; GLOBAL OPTIMALITY; GUIDED ULTRASONIC WAVES; LINE-OF-SITE; MUTATION RATES; NONUNIFORM; OPTIMAL CONFIGURATIONS; OPTIMAL SENSOR; OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; PITCH-CATCH; PULSE ECHOES; STATISTICAL MODELS; TEST PROBLEM; TIME VARYING; TYPE II ERROR;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DAMAGE DETECTION; ERROR DETECTION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; HEALTH; HEALTH RISKS; SENSORS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONICS;

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

EID: 77949485858     PISSN: 08883270     EISSN: 10961216     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Park H.W., Sohn H., Law K.H., and Farrar C.R. Time reversal active sensing for health monitoring of a composite plate. Journal of Sound and Vibration 302 (2007) 50-66
2. S.R. Anton, G. Park, C.R. Farrar, D.J. Inman, On piezoelectric lamb wave-based structural health monitoring using instantaneous baseline measurements, in: Proceedings of SPIE: Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 65320B2007, 2007.
3. Farrar C.R., and Worden K. An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 365 February (2007) 303-315
4. Giurgiutiu V., Zagrai A.N., and Bao J.J. Piezoelectric wafer embedded active sensors for aging aircraft structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring 1 (2002) 41-61
5. Kammer D. Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 14 (1991) 251-259
6. Heredia-Zavoni E., and Esteva L. Optimal instrumentation of uncertain structural systems subject to earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 27 (1998)
7. H. Sohn, C.R. Farrar, F.M. Hemez, D.D. Skunk, S.W. Stinemates, B.R. Nadler, J.J. Czarnecki, A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature from 1996-2001, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13976-MS, 2004.
8. W.A. Maul, G. Kopasakis, L.M. Santi, Thomas S. Sowers, M. Chicatelli, Sensor selection and optimization for health assessment of aerospace systems, NASA/TM-2007-214822, 2007.
9. Worden K., and Burrows A.P. Optimal sensor placement for fault detection. Engineering Structures 23 (2001) 885-901
10. Lee B.C., and Staszewski W.J. Sensor location studies for damage detection with Lamb waves. Smart Materials and Structures 16 (2007) 399-408
11. H. Gaom, J.L. Rose, Ultrasonic sensor placement optimization in structural health monitoring using evolutionary strategy, in: Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 820, 2006, pp. 1687-1693.
12. Das S., Chattopadhyay A., and Zhou X. Acoustic based structural health monitoring for composites using optimal sensor placement: analysis and experiments. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 28 1 (2009) 83-97
13. Kay S.M. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing (1998), Prentice-Hall & PTR, New Jersey, USA
14. Mitchell M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
15. Norris A.N., and Vemula C. Scattering of flexural waves on thin plates. Journal of Sound and Vibration 181 1 (1995) 115-125
16. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 27 (2006) 861-874