Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: An affective cognitive neuroscience perspective

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue MAY, 2015, Pages

  de Borst, Aline W ^a   de Gelder, Beatrice ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action perception; Emotion perception; fMRI; Naturalistic stimuli; Social interaction; Uncanny valley; Virtual characters; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930934130     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00576     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Aguado, L., Román, F. J., Rodríguez, S., Diéguez-Risco, T., Romero-Ferreiro, V., and Fernández-Cahill, M. (2013). Learning of facial responses to faces associated with positive or negative emotional expressions. Span. J. Psychol. 16, E24. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.31
2. Albrecht, S., and Carbon, C. C. (2014). The Fluency Amplification Model: fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations. Acta Psychol. 148, 195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.002
3. Apps, M. A. J., and Tsakiris, M. (2014). The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 41, 85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.029
4. Banakou, D., Groten, R., and Slater, M. (2013). Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 12846-12851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306779110
5. Bartels, A., and Zeki, S. (2004). Functional brain mapping during free viewing of natural scenes. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 75-85. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10153
6. Bartels, A., Zeki, S., and Logothetis, N. K. (2008). Natural vision reveals regional specialization to local motion and to contrast-invariant, global flow in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 18, 705-717. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm107
7. Burleigh, T. J., Schoenherr, J. R., and Lacroix, G. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 759-771. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.021
8. Campanella, S., and Belin, P. (2007). Integrating face and voice in person perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 535-543. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.001
9. Chaminade, T., and Cheng, G. (2009). Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics. J. Physiol. 103, 286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.08.011
10. Chaminade, T., Hodgins, J., and Kawato, M. (2007). Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 206-216. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm017
11. Chaminade, T., Zecca, M., Blakemore, S. J., Takanishi, A., Frith, C. D., Micera, S., et al. (2010). Brain response to a humanoid robot in areas implicated in the perception of human emotional gestures. PLoS ONE 5:e11577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011577
12. Cheetham, M., and Jancke, L. (2013). Perceptual and category processing of the uncanny valley hypothesis' dimension of human likeness: some methodological issues. J. Vis. Exp. 76, e4375. doi: 10.3791/4375
13. Cheetham, M., Pavlovic, I., Jordan, N., Suter, P., and Jancke, L. (2013). Category processing and the human likeness dimension of the uncanny valley hypothesis: eye-tracking data. Front. Psychol. 4:108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00108
14. Cheetham, M., Pedroni, A. F., Antley, A., Slater, M., and Jäncke, L. (2009). Virtual milgram: empathic concern or personal distress? Evidence from functional MRI and dispositional measures. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3:29. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.029.2009
15. Cheetham, M., Suter, P., and Jäncke, L. (2011). The human likeness dimension of the "uncanny valley hypothesis": behavioural and functional MRI findings. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:126. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00126
16. Cheetham, M., Suter, P., and Jäncke, L. (2014). Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the uncanny valley: more like a "Happy Valley". Front. Psychol. 5:1219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01219
17. Cohen, M. S., Kosslyn, S. M., Breiter, H. C., DiGirolamo, G. J., Thompson, W. L., Anderson, A. K., et al. (1996). Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI. Brain 119, 89-100. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.1.89
18. Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel-now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 59-70. doi: 10.1038/nrn2555
19. de Borst, A. W., Sack, A. T., Jansma, B. M., Esposito, F., de Martino, F., Valente, G., et al. (2012). Integration of "what" and "where" in frontal cortex during visual imagery of scenes. Neuroimage 60, 47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.005
20. de Gelder, B., Böcker, K. B., Tuomainen, J., Hensen, M., and Vroomen, J. (1999). The combined perception of emotion from voice and face: early interaction revealed by human electric brain responses. Neurosci. Lett. 260, 133-136. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00963-X
21. de Gelder, B., de Borst, A. W., and Watson, R. (2014). The perception of emotion in body expressions. WIREs Cogn. Sci. 6, 149-158. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1335
22. de Gelder, B., Teunisse, J.-P., and Benson, P. J. (1997). Categorical perception of facial expressions: categories and their internal structure. Cogn. Emot. 11, 1-23. doi: 10.1080/026999397380005
23. de Gelder, B., and Vroomen, J. (2000a). The perception of emotions by ear and by eye. Cogn. Emot. 14, 289-311. doi: 10.1080/026999300378824
24. de Gelder, B., and Vroomen, J. (2000b). Bimodal emotion perception: integration across separate modalities, cross-modal perceptual grouping or perception of multimodal events? Cogn. Emot. 14, 321-324. doi: 10.1080/026999300378842
25. Dimberg, U., and Petterson, M. (2000). Facial reactions to happy and angry facial expressions: evidence for right hemisphere dominance. Psychophysiology 37, 693-696. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3750693
26. Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., and Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 11, 86-89. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00221
27. Dyck, M., Winbeck, M., Leiberg, S., Chen, Y., Gur, R. C., and Mathiak, K. (2008). Recognition profile of emotions in natural and virtual faces. PLoS ONE 3:e3628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003628
28. Elkins, A. C., and Derrick, D. C. (2013). The sound of trust: voice as a measurement of trust during interactions with embodied conversational agents. Group Decis. Negot. 22, 897-913. doi: 10.1007/s10726-012-9339-x
29. Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., and Morgan, J. L. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychol. Rev. 116, 752-782. doi: 10.1037/a0017196
30. Formisano, E., Linden, D. E., Di Salle, F., Trojano, L., Esposito, F., Sack, A. T., et al. (2002). Tracking the mind's image in the brain I: time-resolved fMRI during visuospatial mental imagery. Neuron 35, 185-194. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00747-X
31. Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 815-836. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
32. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 127-138. doi: 10.1038/nrn2787
33. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., and Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119, 593-609. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.2.593
34. Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., and Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 191-197. doi: 10.1038/72140
35. Harnard, S. (1987). "Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: a critical overview," in Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, ed. S. Harnad (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 1-25.
36. Hasson, U., Furman, O., Clark, D., Dudai, Y., and Davachi, L. (2008a). Enhanced intersubject correlations during movie viewing correlate with successful episodic encoding. Neuron 57, 452-462. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.009
37. Hasson, U., Yang, E., Vallines, I., Heeger, D. J., and Rubin, N. (2008b). A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 2539-2550. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5487-07.2008
38. Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., and Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 303, 1634-1640. doi: 10.1126/science.1089506
39. Huisin't Veld, E. M., Van Boxtel, G. J., and de Gelder, B. (2014a). The Body Action Coding System I: muscle activations during the perception and expression of emotion. Soc. Neurosci. 9, 249-264. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.890668
40. Huisin't Veld, E. M., Van Boxtel, G. J., and de Gelder, B. (2014b). The Body Action Coding System II: muscle activations during the perception and expression of emotion. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8:330. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00330
41. Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., and Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 3:e79. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079
42. Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G., and Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images. Neuron 28, 979-990. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00168-9
43. Ishida, H., Suzuki, K., and Grandi, L. C. (2014). Predictive coding accounts of shared representations in parieto-insular networks. Neuropsychologia 70, 442-454. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.020
44. Kanwisher, N., Stanley, D., and Harris, A. (1999). The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals. Neuroimage 10, 183-187. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199901180-00035
45. Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., and Frith, C. D. (2007a). The mirror-neuron system: a Bayesian perspective. Neuroimage 18, 619-623. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3281139ed0
46. Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., and Frith, C. D. (2007b). Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn. Process. 8, 159-166. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2
47. Kilner, J., Hamilton, A. F., and Blakemore, S. J. (2007c). Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion. Soc. Neurosci. 2, 158-166. doi: 10.1080/17470910701428190
48. Kilner, J., Paulignan, Y., and Blakemore, S. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr. Biol. 13, 522-525. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9
49. Klasen, M., Kenworthy, C. N., Mathiak, K. A., Kircher, T. T. J., and Mathiak, K. (2011). Supramodal representation of emotions. J. Neurosci. 31, 13635-13643. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2833-11.2011
50. Lahnakoski, J. M., Glerean, E., Salmi, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Sams, M., Hari, R., et al. (2012). Naturalistic fMRI mapping reveals superior temporal sulcus as the hub for the distributed brain network for social perception. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:233. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00233
51. Liberman, A. M. (1996). Speech: A Special Code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Liberman, A. M., Hariris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., and Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J. Exp. Psychol. 54, 358-368. doi: 10.1037/h0044417
53. Likowski, K. U., Mühlberger, A., Gerdes, A. B., Wieser, M. J., Pauli, P., and Weyers, P. (2012). Facial mimicry and the mirror neuron system: simultaneous acquisition of facial electromyography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:214. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00214
54. Llobera, J., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., and Slater, M. (2013). The relationship between virtual body ownership and temperature sensitivity. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130300. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0300
55. Looser, C. E., and Wheatley, T. (2010). The tipping point of animacy: how, when and where we perceive life in a face. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1854-1862. doi: 10.1177/0956797610388044
56. Lucas, G. M., Gratch, J., King, A., and Morency, L.-P. (2014). It's only a computer: virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.043
57. MacDorman, K. F. (2005). Androids as an experimental apparatus: Why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? CogSci-2005 Workshop: Towards Social Mechanisms of Android Science, 106-118.
58. MacDorman, K. F., and Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interact. Stud. 7, 297-337. doi: 10.1075/is.7.3.03mac
59. Martini, M., Perez-Marcos, D., and Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2014). Modulation of pain threshold by virtual body ownership. Eur. J. Pain 18, 1040-1048. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.00451.x
60. McDonnell, R., Breidt, M., and Bülthoff, H. H. (2012). Render me real? Investigating the effect of render style on the perception of animated virtual humans. ACM Trans. Graph. 31:91. doi: 10.1145/2185520.2185587
61. Mellet, E., Tzourio, N., Crivello, F., Joliot, M., Denis, M., and Mazoyer, B. (1996). Functional anatomy of spatial mental imagery generated from verbal instructions. J. Neurosci. 16, 6504-6512.
62. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67, 371-378. doi: 10.1037/h0040525
63. Mitchell, W. J., Szerszen, K. A., Lu, A. S., Schermerhorn, P. W., Scheutz, M., and Macdorman, K. F. (2011). A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley. i-Perception 2, 10-12. doi: 10.1068/i0415
64. Moore, R. K. (2012). A Bayesian explanation of the 'uncanny valley' effect and related psychological phenomena. Sci. Rep. 2: 864. doi: 10.1038/srep00864
65. Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy 7, 33-35. [Republished in IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, June 2012, 98-100].
66. Moser, E., Derntl, B., Robinson, S., Fink, B., Gur, R. C., and Grammer, K. (2007). Amygdala activation at 3T in response to human and avatar facial expressions of emotions. J. Neurosci. Methods 161, 126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.016
67. Nishimoto, S., Vu, A. T., Naselaris, T., Benjamini, Y., Yu, B., and Gallant, J. L. (2011). Reconstructing visual experiences from brain activity evoked by natural movies. Curr. Biol. 21, 1641-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031
68. O'Craven, K. M., and Kanwisher, N. (2000). Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 1013-1023. doi: 10.1162/08989290051137549
69. Oztop, E., Franklin, D. W., Chaminade, T., and Cheng, G. (2005). Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? Int. J. HR 2, 537-559. doi: 10.1142/S0219843605000582
70. Peck, T. C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S. M., and Slater, M. (2013). Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 779-787. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016
71. Piwek, L., McKay, L. S., and Pollick, F. E. (2014). Empirical evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis fails to confirm the predicted effect of motion. Cognition 130, 271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.001
72. Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R., and Heyes, C. (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 632-640. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.020
73. Press, C., Gillmeister, H., and Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2509-2514. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0774
74. Rizzo, A. A., Neumann, U., Enciso, R., Fidaleo, D., and Noh, J. Y. (2012). Performance-driven facial animation: basic research on human judgments of emotional state in facial avatars. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 4, 471-487. doi: 10.1089/109493101750527033
75. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 661-670. doi: 10.1038/35090060
76. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., and Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 332-339. doi: 10.1038/nrn1651
77. Sarkheil, P., Goebel, R., Schneider, F., and Mathiak, K. (2013). Emotion unfolded by motion: a role for parietal lobe in decoding dynamic facial expressions. Soc Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 950-995. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss092
78. Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., and Frith, C. (2011). The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 413-422. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr025
79. Sciutti, A., Bisio, A., Nori, F., Metta, G., Fadiga, L., Pozzo, T., et al. (2012). Measuring human-robot interaction through motor resonance. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 4, 223-234.
80. Sel, A. (2014). Predictive codes of interoception, emotion, and the self. Front. Psychol. 5:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00189
81. Seth, A. K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007
82. Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., et al. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE 1:e39. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000039
83. Slater, M., Lotto, B., Arnold, M. M., and Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2009). How we experience immersive virtual environments: the concept of presence and its measurements. Annu. Psicol. 40, 193-210.
84. Slater, M., Rovira, A., Southern, R., Swapp, D., Zhang, J. J., Campbell, C., et al. (2013). Bystander responses to a violent incident in an immersive virtual environment. PLoS ONE 8:e52766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052766
85. Slater, M., Spanlang, B., and Corominas, D. (2010). Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence. ACM Trans. Graph. 29:92. doi: 10.1145/1778765.1778829
86. Stienen, B. M. C., Tanaka, A., and de Gelder, B. (2011). Emotional voice and emotional body postures influence each other independently of visual awareness. PLoS ONE 6:e25517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025517
87. Tai, Y. F., Scherfler, C., Brooks, D. J., Sawamoto, N., and Castiello, U. (2004). The human premotor cortex is 'mirror' only for biological actions. Curr. Biol. 14, 117-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.005
88. Tapus, A., Tapus, C., and Mataric, M. J. (2008). User-robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intell. Serv. Robot. 1, 169-183. doi: 10.1007/s11370-008-0017-4
89. Tay, B., Jung, Y., Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality stereotypes in human-robot interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014
90. Thompson, J. C., Trafton, J. G., and McKnight, P. (2011). The perception of humanness from the movements of synthetic agents. Perception 40, 695-704. doi: 10.1068/p6900
91. Tikka, P., Väljamäe, A., de Borst, A. W., Pugliese, R., Ravaja, N., Kaipainen, M., et al. (2012). Enactive cinema paves way for understanding complex real-time social interaction in neuroimaging experiments. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:298. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00298
92. Travers, P. (2001). Final Fantasy. Available at: http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/final-fantasy-20010706 [accessed August 1, 2014].
93. Trojano, L., Grossi, D., Linden, D. E., Formisano, E., Hacker, H., Zanella, F. E., et al. (2000). Matching two imagined clocks: the functional anatomy of spatial analysis in the absence of visual stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 10, 473-481. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.5.473
94. Vander Wyck, B. C., Hudac, C. M., Carter, E. J., Sobel, D. M., and Pelphrey, K. A. (2009). Action understanding in the superior temporal sulcus region. Psychol. Sci. 20, 771-777. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02359.x
95. Watson, R., and de Gelder, B. (2014). Investigating Implicit Crossmodal Decoding of Body-Voice Emotion Using Multivoxel Pattern Analysis. Program No. 724.15/HH6, 2014 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience.
96. Waugh, R. (2012). Living doll? 'Geminoid F' is most convincing 'robot woman' ever - she has 65 facial expressions, talks and even sings. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2128115/Living-doll-Geminoid-F-convincing-robot-woman-facial-expressions-talks-sings.html [accessed August 1, 2014].
97. Weyers, P., Muhlberger, A., Hefele, C., and Pauli, P. (2006). Electromyographic responses to static and dynamic avatar emotional facial expressions. Psychophysiology 43, 450-453. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00451.x
98. Weyers, P., Muhlberger, A., Kund, A., Hess, U., and Pauli, P. (2009). Modulation of facial reactions to avatar emotional faces by nonconscious competition priming. Psychophysiology 46, 328-335. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00771.x
99. Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655-664. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00679-2
100. Yamada, Y., Kawabe, T., and Ihaya, K. (2013). Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the "uncanny valley" phenomenon. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 55, 20-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00538.x
101. Zucker, N. L., Green, S., Morris, J. P., Kragel, P., Pelphrey, K. A., Bulik, C. M., et al. (2011). Hemodynamic signals of mixed messages during a social exchange. Neuroreport 22, 413-418. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283455c23