Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over left angular gyrus modulates the predictability gain in degraded speech comprehension

Cortex

Volumn 68, Issue , 2015, Pages 100-110

  Hartwigsen, Gesa ^a,b,c   Golombek, Thomas ^a,b   Obleser, Jonas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

K factor; Language; Parietal cortex; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Virtual lesion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGULAR GYRUS; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PREDICTION; REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SPEECH; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PARIETAL LOBE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930867997     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ardila A., Concha M., Rosselli M. Angular gyrus syndrome revisited: acalculia, finger agnosia, right-left disorientation and semantic aphasia. Aphasiology 2000, 14:743-754.
2. Binder J., Desai R. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2011, 15:527-536.
3. Binder J., Desai R., Graves W., Conant L. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:2767-2796.
4. Blair K.P., Rosenberg-Lee M., Tsang J.M., Schwartz D.L., Menon V. Beyond natural numbers: negative number representation in parietal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:7.
5. Bonner M., Peelle J., Cook P., Grossman M. Heteromodal conceptual processing in the angular gyrus. NeuroImage 2013, 71:175-186.
6. Boothroyd A., Nittrouyer S. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 84(1):101-114.
7. Braun A.R., Guillemin A., Hosey L., Varga M. The neural organization of discourse - an (H2O)-O-15-PET study of narrative production in English and American sign language. Brain 2001, 124:2028-2044.
8. Buchsbaum B., D'Esposito M. The search for the phonological store: from loop to convolution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:762-778.
9. Bushara K.O., Weeks R.A., Ishii K., Catalan M.J., Tian B., Rauschecker J.P., et al. Modality-specific frontal and parietal areas for auditory and visual spatial localization in humans. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:759-766.
10. Cabeza R., Ciaramelli E., Olson I.R., Moscovitch M. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:613-625.
11. Cai Q., Van der Haegen L., Brysbaert M. Complementary hemispheric specialization for language production and visuospatial attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2013, 110:E322-E330.
12. Ciaramelli E., Grady C.L., Moscovitch M. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (atom) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1828-1851.
13. Clos M., Langner R., Meyer M., Oechslin M., Zilles K., Eickhoff S. Effects of prior information on decoding degraded speech: an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping 2014, 35:61-74.
14. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2nd ed.
15. Corbett F., Jefferies E., Ehsan S., Lambon R. Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: evidence from the non-verbal domain. Brain 2009, 132:2593-2608.
16. Davis M.H., Ford M.A., Kherif F., Johnsrude I.S. Does semantic context benefit speech understanding through "top-down" processes? Evidence from time-resolved sparse fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(12):3914-3932.
17. Davis M., Johnsrude I. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23:3423-3431.
18. Dronkers N., Wilkins D., Van Valin J.R., Redfern B., Jaeger J. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition 2004, 92:145-177.
19. Erb J., Henry M., Eisner F., Obleser J. Auditory skills and brain morphology predict individual differences in adaptation to degraded speech. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:2154-2164.
20. Erb J., Henry M., Eisner F., Obleser J. The brain dynamics of rapid perceptual adaptation to adverse listening conditions. Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33:10688-10697.
21. Golestani N., Hervais-Adelman A., Obleser J., Scott S. Semantic versus perceptual interactions in neural processing of speech-in-noise. NeuroImage 2013, 79:52-61.
22. Gough P., Nobre A., Devlin J. Dissociating linguistic processes in the left inferior frontal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:8010-8016.
23. Greenwood D.D. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990, 87:2592-2605.
24. Hartwigsen G., Baumgaertner A., Price C.J., Koehnke M., Ulmer S., Siebner H.R. Phonological decisions require both the left and right supramarginal gyri. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107:16494-16499.
25. Hartwigsen G., Bestmann S., Ward N.S., Woerbel S., Mastroeni C., Granert O., et al. Left dorsal premotor cortex and supramarginal gyrus complement each other during rapid action reprogramming. Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:16162-16171.
26. Hartwigsen G., Price C.J., Baumgaertner A., Geiss G., Koehnke M., Ulmer S., et al. The right posterior inferior frontal gyrus contributes to phonological word decisions in the healthy brain: evidence from dual-site TMS. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3155-3163.
27. Hartwigsen G., Siebner H.R. Probing the involvement of the right hemisphere in language processing with online transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy volunteers. Aphasiology 2012, 26:1131-1152.
28. Hartwigsen G., Siebner H.R., Stippich C. Preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Current Medical Imaging Reviews 2010, 6:220-231.
29. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 2004, 92:67-99.
30. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8:393-402.
31. Ischebeck A., Zamarian L., Schocke M., Delazer M. Flexible transfer of knowledge in mental arithmetic-an fMRI study. NeuroImage 2009, 44:1103-1112.
32. Jacquemot C., Scott S. What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:480-486.
33. Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N., Elliott L.L. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1977, 61:1337-1351.
34. Kaelin-Lang A. Motorisch evoziertes Potenzial (MEP) - eine Einführung. Das TMS-Buch, Handbuch der transkraniellen Magnetstimulation 2007, 60-68. Springer, Heidelberg. H.R. Siebner, U. Ziemann (Eds.).
35. Kuhn S., Schmiedek F., Schott B., Ratcliff R., Heinze H.J., Duzel E., et al. Brain areas consistently linked to individual differences in perceptual decision-making in younger as well as older adults before and after training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:2147-2158.
36. Lau E., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:920-933.
37. McGettigan C., Faulkner A., Altarelli I., Obleser J., Baverstock H., Scott S.K. Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: behavioural and neural interactions. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(5):762-776.
38. Molholm S., Sehatpour P., Mehta A., Shpaner M., Gomez-Ramirez M., Ortigue S., et al. Audio-visual multisensory integration in superior parietal lobule revealed by human intracranial recordings. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:721-729.
39. Obleser J. Putting the listening brain in context. Language and Linguistics Compass 2014, (in press). 10.1111/lnc3.12098.
40. Obleser J., Kotz S.A. Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:633-640.
41. Obleser J., Wise R.J., Dresner M.A., Scott S.K. Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:2283-2289.
42. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
43. Peelle J. The hemispheric lateralization of speech processing depends on what "speech" is: a hierarchical perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:309.
44. Pichora-Fuller M., Schneider B., Daneman M. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 97:593-608.
45. Pisoni D. Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception. Ear and Hearing 2000, 21:70-78.
46. Price C.J. The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010, 1191:62-88.
47. Price C.J., Friston K.J. Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:416-421.
48. Raettig T., Kotz S.A. Auditory processing of different types of pseudo-words: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 2008, 39:1420-1428.
49. Rauschecker J., Scott S. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12:718-724.
50. Rosen S. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 1992, 336:367-373.
51. Rosenthal R. Effect sizes: Pearson's correlation, its display via the BESD, and alternative indices. American Psychologist 1991, 46(10):1086-1087.
52. Rossi S., Hallett M., Rossini P.M., Pascual-Leone A. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120:2008-2039.
53. Scott S., Blank C., Rosen S., Wise R. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123:2400-2406.
54. Scott S., Rosen S., Lang H., Wise R. Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech a positron emission tomography study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:1075-1083.
55. Seghier M. The angular gyrus: multiple functions and multiple subdivisions. Neuroscientist 2013, 19:43-61.
56. Seghier M.L., Fagan E., Price C.J. Functional subdivisions in the left angular gyrus where the semantic system meets and diverges from the default network. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:16809-16817.
57. Sehm B., Schnitzler T., Obleser J., Groba A., Ragert P., Villringer A., et al. Facilitation of inferior frontal cortex by tDCS induces perceptual learning of severely degraded speech. Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33(40):15868-15878.
58. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270:303-304.
59. Shannon R.V., Fu Q.J., Galvin J. The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2004, 552:50-54.
60. Sparing R., Buelte D., Meister I.G., Paus T., Fink G.R. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies. Human Brain Mapping 2008, 29:82-96.
61. Stickney G., Assmann P. Acoustic and linguistic factors in the perception of bandpass-filtered speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2001, 109:1157-1165.
62. Strauss A., Kotz S.A., Obleser J. Narrowed expectancies under degraded speech: revisiting the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25:1383-1395.
63. Turken A.U., Dronkers N.F. The neural architecture of the language comprehension network: converging evidence from lesion and connectivity analyses. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2011, 5:1.
64. Vigneau M., Beaucousin V., Hervé P.Y., Duffau H., Crivello F., Houdé O., et al. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. NeuroImage 2006, 30:1414-1432.