Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 416-421

  Price, Cathy J ^a   Friston, Karl J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGING TECHNIQUES; ITERATIVE METHODS; NEUROLOGY; PATIENT TREATMENT;

COGNITIVE ANATOMY;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MODEL; NERVE DEGENERATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0036823974     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01976-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Edelman G.M. Edelman G.M., Mountcastle V.B. The Mindful Brain. 1978;51-100 MIT Press.
2. Edelman G.M. The Remembered Present. A Biological Theory of Consciousness. 1989;Basic Books.
3. Tononi G., et al. Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;3257-3262.
4. Edelman G.M., Gally J.A. Deneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;13763-13768.
5. Marshall J.C., Newcombe F. Patterns of paralexia: a psycholinguistic approach. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2:1973;175-199.
6. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev. 96:1989;523-568.
7. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. Routes to object constancy: implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 36A:1984;385-415.
8. Hinton G., Sejnowski T. Learning and relearning in Boltzman machines. Rumelhart D., McClelland J. Parallel Distributed Processing. 1986;282-317 MIT Press.
9. McClelland J., et al. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex-Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol. Rev. 102:1995;419-457.
10. Petersen S.E., et al. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single word processing. Nature. 331:1988;585-589.
11. Penfield W., Roberts L. Speech and Brain Mechanism. 1959;Princeton University Press.
12. Ojemann G.A. Individual variability in cortical localization of language. J. Neurosurg. 50:1979;164-169.
13. Nobre A.C., et al. Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe. Nature. 372:1994;260-263.
14. Wada J., Rasmussen T. Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of speech dominance: experimental and clinical observations. J. Neurosurg. 17:1960;266-282.
15. Pascual-Leone A., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 354:1999;1229-1238.
16. Pascual-Leone A., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience-virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10:2000;232-237.
17. Marie, P. (1906a) Revision de la question de l'aphasie: La troisieme convolution frontale gauche ne joue aucun tole speciale dans la fonction du langage. Semaine Medicale 21, 241-247. (Repreinted in Cole, M.F. and Cole, M. eds., (1971), Pierre Marie's papers on speech disorders. New York: Hafner).
18. Marie P. Revision de la question de l'aphasie: Que faut-il penser des aphasies sous-corticales (aphasies pures)? Semaine Medicale. 26:1906b;493-500.
19. Lashley K.S. Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence. 1929;University of Chicago Press.
20. Lashley K.S. In search of the engram. Symposia for the Society for Experimental Biology, No, 4. 1950;Cambridge University Press.
21. Fodor J.A. The Modularity of Mind. 1983;MIT Press.
22. Vandenberghe R., et al. Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures. Nature. 383:1996;254-256.
23. Mummery C.J., et al. Disrupted temporal lobe connections in semantic dementia. Brain. 122:1999;61-73.
24. Price C.J., et al. Delineating necessary and sufficient neural systems with functional imaging studies of neuropsychological patients. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11:1999;4371-4382.
25. Price C.J., Friston K.J. Scanning patients on tasks they can perform. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8:1999;102-108.
26. Mummery C.J., et al. A voxel based morphometry study of semantic dementia. The relation of temporal lobe atrophy to cognitive deficit. Ann. Neurol. 47:2000;36-45.
27. Friston K.J., et al. Multi-subject fMRI studies and conjunction analysis. NeuroImage. 10:1999;385-396.
28. Price C.J., Friston K.J. Cognitive conjunctions: a new approach to brain activation experiments. Neuroimage. 5:1997;261-270.
29. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry - the methods. NeuroImage. 11:2000;805-821.
30. Howard, D. and Patterson, K. (1992) Pyramids and Palm Trees: A Test of Semantic Access from Pictures and Words, Thames Valley, Bury St Edmunds.