Topic-based heterogeneous rank

Scientometrics

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 313-334

  Amjad, Tehmina ^a,b   Ding, Ying ^a,d   Daud, Ali ^b   Xu, Jian ^c   Malic, Vincent ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

^c SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Heterogeneous networks; Topic modeling; Topic sensitive ranking; Topic based rank

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930821438     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1601-y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics,56(2), 235–246.
2. Bergstrom, C. T., West, J. D., & Wiseman, M. A. (2008). The Eigenfactor™ metrics. Journal of Neuroscience,28(45), 11433–11434.
3. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research,3, 993–1022.
4. Bollen, J., Rodriquez, M. A., & Van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics,69(3), 669–687.
5. Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., & Redner, S. (2007). Finding scientific gems with Google’s PageRank algorithm. Journal of Informetrics,1(1), 8–15.
6. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. Lond. Taylor Graham 1984 1.
7. Davis, P. M. (2008). Eigenfactor: does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(13), 2186–2188.
8. Ding, Y. (2011a). Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(2), 236–245.
9. Ding, Y. (2011b). Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(3), 449–466.
10. Ding, Y., & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing & Management,47(1), 80–96.
11. Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (Eds.) (2014). Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Springer.
12. Ding, Y., Yan, E., Frazho, A., & Caverlee, J. (2009). PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(11), 2229–2243.
13. Fiala, D., Rousselot, F., & Ježek, K. (2008). PageRank for bibliographic networks. Scientometrics,76(1), 135–158.
14. Frandsen, T. F. (2007). Journal self-citations: Analysing the JIF mechanism. Journal of Informetrics,1(1), 47–58.
15. Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: a brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal,161(8), 979–980.
16. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric macro indicators. Scientometrics,59(3), 281–310.
17. Haveliwala, T. H. (2002). Topic-sensitive pagerank, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, pp. 517–526.
18. Hendrix, D. (2009). Institutional self-citation rates: A three year study of universities in the United States. Scientometrics,81(2), 321–331.
19. Hyland, K. (2003). Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,54(3), 251–259.
20. Katsaros, D., Akritidis, L., & Bozanis, P. (2009). The f index: Quantifying the impact of coterminal citations on scientists’ ranking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(5), 1051–1056.
21. Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM),46(5), 604–632.
22. Krauss, J. (2007). Journal self-citation rates in ecological sciences. Scientometrics,73(1), 79–89.
23. Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,58(9), 1303–1319.
24. Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(7), 1327–1336.
25. Li, Y., & Tang, J. (2008). Expertise search in a time-varying social network. In: Web-age information management, 2008. WAIM’08. The ninth international conference on. IEEE, pp. 293–300.
26. Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management,41(6), 1462–1480.
27. Liu, J.-G., Xuan, Z.-G., Dang, Y.-Z., Guo, Q., & Wang, Z.-T. (2007). Weighted network properties of Chinese nature science basic research. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,377(1), 302–314.
28. Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis. Information Processing & Management,44(2), 800–810.
29. Maslov, S., & Redner, S. (2008). Promise and pitfalls of extending Google’s PageRank algorithm to citation networks. Journal of Neuroscience,28(44), 11103–11105.
30. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Winograd, T. (1999). The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web.
31. Pal, S. K., & Narayan, B. L. (2005). A web surfer model incorporating topic continuity. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,17(5), 726–729.
32. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management,12(5), 297–312.
33. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., Markines, B., & Vespignani, A. (2009). Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists. Physical Review E,80(5), 056103.
34. Richardson, M., & Domingos, P. (2001). The intelligent surfer: Probabilistic combination of link and content information in PageRank. In: NIPS. pp. 1441–1448.
35. Sayyadi, H., & Getoor, L. (2009). FutureRank: Ranking scientific articles by predicting their future PageRank. In: SDM. SIAM, pp. 533–544.
36. Sun, Y., & Han, J. (2013). Meta-path-based search and mining in heterogeneous information networks. IEEE Tsinghua Science and Technology,18(4), 329–338.
37. Tang, J., Jin, R., & Zhang, J. (2008). A topic modeling approach and its integration into the random walk framework for academic search, in: Data Mining, 2008. ICDM’08. Eighth IEEE international conference on. IEEE, pp. 1055–1060.
38. Tsay, M. (2006). Journal self-citation study for semiconductor literature: synchronous and diachronous approach. Information Processing & Management,42(6), 1567–1577.
39. Van Raan, A. F. (2008). Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(10), 1631–1643.
40. West, J. D., Bergstrom, T. C., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2010). The eigenfactor metricsTM: A network approach to assessing scholarly journals. College and Research Libraries,71(3), 236–244.
41. Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(10), 2107–2118.
42. Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2010). Weighted citation: An indicator of an article’s prestige. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(8), 1635–1643.
43. Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). Discovering author impact: A PageRank perspective. Information Processing & Management,47(1), 125–134.
44. Yan, E., Ding, Y., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). P-Rank: An indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(3), 467–477.
45. Yang, Z., Tang, J., Zhang, J., Li, J., & Gao, B. (2009). Topic-level random walk through probabilistic model. In: Advances in data and web management. Springer, pp. 162–173.
46. Zhou, D., Orshanskiy, S. A., Zha, H., & Giles, C. L. (2007). Co-ranking authors and documents in a heterogeneous network. In: Data Mining, 2007. ICDM 2007. Seventh IEEE international conference on. IEEE, pp. 739–744.