Source apportionment of the anthropogenic increment to ozone, formaldehyde, and nitrogen dioxide by the path-integral method in a 3D model

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 6751-6759

  Dunker, Alan M ^a   Koo, Bonyoung ^b   Yarwood, Greg ^b  

^a A M Dunker LLC   (United States)

^b ENVIRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; EMISSION CONTROL; FORMALDEHYDE; NITROGEN OXIDES; QUANTUM THEORY; URBAN GROWTH;

ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS; ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCES; COMPREHENSIVE AIR QUALITY MODEL WITH EXTENSIONS; FIRST-ORDER SENSITIVITY; LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES; PATH INTEGRAL METHOD; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

FORMALDEHYDE; NITROGEN DIOXIDE; OZONE; AIR POLLUTANT; NITRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NITRITE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AIR QUALITY; EMISSION CONTROL; FORMALDEHYDE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; NITROGEN DIOXIDE; OZONE; POINT SOURCE; POLLUTANT SOURCE; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

ARTICLE; EXHAUST GAS; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; MOTOR VEHICLE; PATH INTEGRAL METHOD; PROCEDURES; AIR POLLUTANT; ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

AIR POLLUTANTS; FORMALDEHYDE; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITRATES; NITRITES; NITROGEN DIOXIDE; OZONE; UNITED STATES; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 84930647898     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00467     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cross-State Air Pollution Rule; Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2011. http://www.epa.gov/airtransport/CSAPR/.
2. Barna, M. G.; Schichtel, B. A.; Gebhart, K. A.; Malm, W. C. Modeling regional sulfate during the BRAVO study: Part 2. Emission sensitivity simulations and source apportionment Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 2423-2435
3. Tong, D. Q.; Mauzerall, D. L. Summertime state-level source-receptor relationships between nitrogen oxides emissions and surface ozone concentrations over the continental United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 7976-7984
4. Wang, H.; Jacob, D. J.; LeSager, P.; Streets, D. G.; Park, R. J.; Gilliland, A. B.; van Donkelaar, A. Surface ozone background in the United States: Canadian and Mexican pollution influences Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 1310-1319
5. Burr, M. J.; Zhang, Y. Source apportionment of fine particulate matter over the Eastern U.S. Part I: Source sensitivity simulations using CMAQ with the brute force method Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2011, 2, 300-317
6. Chen, T.-F.; Chang, K.-H.; Tsai, C.-Y. Modeling direct and indirect effect of long range transport on atmospheric PM2.5 levels Atmos. Environ. 2014, 89, 1-9
7. Stein, U.; Alpert, P. Factor separation in numerical simulations J. Atmos. Sci. 1993, 50, 2107-2115
8. Tao, Z.; Larson, S. M.; Williams, A.; Caughey, M.; Wuebbles, D. J. Area, mobile, and point source contributions to ground level ozone: a summer simulation across the continental USA Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 1869-1877
9. Li, G.; Bei, N.; Zavala, M.; Molina, L. T. Ozone formation along the California-Mexican border region during Cal-Mex 2010 field campaign Atmos. Environ. 2014, 88, 370-389
10. Yarwood, G.; Morris, R. E.; Yocke, M. A.; Hogo, H.; Chico, T. Development of a methodology for source apportionment of ozone concentration estimates from a photochemical grid model, 89th Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association, Nashville, TN, June 23-28, 1996; Paper 96-TA23A.06.
11. Dunker, A. M.; Yarwood, G.; Ortmann, J. P.; Wilson, G. M. Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a three-dimensional air quality model Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 2593-2964
12. Mysliwiec, M. J.; Kleeman, M. J. Source apportionment of secondary airborne particulate matter in a polluted atmosphere Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 5376-5384
13. Wagstrom, K. M.; Pandis, S. N.; Yarwood, G.; Wilson, G. M.; Morris, R. E. Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport model Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 5650-5659
14. Wang, Z. S.; Chien, C. J.; Tonnesen, G. S. Development of a tagged species source apportionment algorithm to characterize three-dimensional transport and transformation of precursors and secondary pollutants J. Geophys. Res. 2009, 114, D21206
15. Kwok, R. H. F.; Napelenok, S. L.; Baker, K. R. Implementation and evaluation of PM2.5 source contribution analysis in a photochemical model Atmos. Environ. 2013, 80, 398-407
16. Bowman, F. M.; Seinfeld, J. H. Ozone productivity of atmospheric organics J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 5309-5324
17. Bowman, F. M. A multi-parent assignment method for analyzing atmospheric chemistry mechanisms Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 2519-2533
18. Cohan, D. S.; Hakami, A.; Hu, Y.; Russell, A. G. Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6739-6748
19. Koo, B.; Wilson, G. M.; Morris, R. E.; Dunker, A. M.; Yarwood, G. Comparison of source apportionment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air quality model Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 6669-6675
20. Itahashi, S.; Uno, I.; Kim, S. Seasonal source contributions of tropospheric ozone over East Asia based on CMAQ-HDDM Atmos. Environ. 2013, 70, 204-217
21. Dunker, A. M. Path-integral method for the source apportionment of photochemical pollutants Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 2014, 7, 1-29
22. Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx); ENVIRON International Corporation: Novato, CA, 2014. http://www.CAMx.com.
23. Vijayaraghavan, K.; Lindhjem, C.; DenBleyker, A.; Tai, E.; Shah, T.; Alvarez, Y.; Koo, B.; Yarwood, G. Source apportionment of emissions from light duty gasoline vehicles and other sources in the United States for ozone and particulate matter. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2014, submitted for publication
24. Isaacson, E.; Keller, H. B. Analysis of Numerical Methods; J. Wiley: New York, 1966.
25. Engineering Fundamentals: Abscissas and Weights of Gauss-Legendre Integration; WOLFRAM Mathmatica: Sunnyvale, CA. http://www.efunda.com/math/num-integration/findgausslegendre.cfm.
26. Dunker, A. M. The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 2385-2393
27. Yang, Y.-J.; Wilkinson, J. G.; Russell, A. G. Fast, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional photochemical models Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 2859-2868
28. Dunker, A. M.; Yarwood, G.; Ortmann, J. P.; Wilson, G. W. The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model-implementation, accuracy, and efficiency Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 2965-2976
29. Yarwood, G.; Rao, S.; Yocke, M.; Whitten, G. Z. Updates to the Carbon Bond Chemical Mechanism: CB05; Final Report for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2005. http://www.camx.com/publ/pdfs/CB05-Final-Report-120805.pdf.
30. Skamarock, W. C.; Klemp, J. B.; Dudhia, J.; Gill, D. O.; Barker, D. M.; Duda, M. G.; Huang, X.-Y.; Wang, W.; Powers, J. G. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR/TN-475+STR; Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research: Cambridge, MA, 2008. http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw-v3.pdf.
31. Emmons, L. K.; Walters, S.; Hess, P. G.; Lamarque, J.-F.; Pfister, G. G.; Fillmore, D.; Granier, C.; Guenther, A.; Kinnison, D.; Laepple, T.; Orlando, J.; Tie, X.; Tyndall, G.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Baughcum, S. L.; Kloster, S. Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related Chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4) Geosci. Model Dev. 2010, 3, 43-67
32. Technical Guidance on the Use of MOVES2010 for Emission Inventory Preparation in State Implementation Plans and Transportation Conformity, EPA-420-B-10-023; Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2010. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/420b10023.pdf.
33. LEV 3 Inventory Database Tool, Version 9h; California Air Resources Board (ARB): Sacramento, CA, 2011. http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/clean-cars/clean-cars-ab1085/lev3-inv-dbase-v9h.accdb.
34. Predictive Model Spreadsheets containing 2011 Amendments; California Air Resources Board (ARB): Sacramento, CA, 2012. http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/gasoline/premodel/premodel.htm.
35. Heavy-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas (HDGHG) Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling, Technical Support Document, EPA-420-R-11-008; Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2011. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420r11008.pdf.
36. Guenther, A.; Karl, T.; Harley, P.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Palmer, P. I.; Geron, C. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature) Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006, 6, 3181-3210
37. Vijayaraghavan, K.; Lindhjem, C.; DenBleyker, A.; Nopmongcol, U.; Grant, J.; Tai, E.; Yarwood, G. Effects of light duty gasoline vehicle emission standards in the United States on O3 and particulate matter Atmos. Environ. 2012, 60, 109-120
38. Zhang, L.; Jacob, D. J.; Downey, N. V.; Wood, D. A.; Blewitt, D.; Carouge, C. C.; van Donkelaar, A.; Jones, D. B. A.; Murray, L. T.; Wang, Y. Improved estimate of the policy-relevant background ozone in the United States using the GEOS-Chem global model with 1/2° × 2/3° horizontal resolution over North America Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 6769-6776
39. Emery, C.; Jung, J.; Downey, N.; Johnson, J.; Jimenez, M.; Yarwood, G.; Morris, R. Regional and global modeling estimates of policy relevant background ozone over the United States Atmos. Environ. 2012, 47, 206-217