Crosslinked cellulose thin film composite nanofiltration membranes with zero salt rejection

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 491, Issue , 2015, Pages 132-137

  Puspasari, Tiara ^a   Pradeep, Neelakanda ^a   Peinemann, Klaus Viktor ^a  

^a KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Nanofiltration; Organic molecule separation; Regenerated cellulose membrane; Trimethylsilyl cellulose; Zero NaCl rejection

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; CROSSLINKING; DESALINATION; NANOCOMPOSITE FILMS; NANOFILTRATION; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

FILTRATION EXPERIMENTS; ORGANIC MOLECULES; PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY; RECOVERY AND PURIFICATIONS; REGENERATED CELLULOSE; THIN FILM COMPOSITES; TRIMETHYLSILYL CELLULOSE; ZERO NACL REJECTION;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

ACETONE; CELLULOSE; CHLOROFORM; CYCLOHEXANE; HEXANE; HYDROGEN; HYDROXYL GROUP; ORGANIC SOLVENT; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUGAR; TETRAHYDROFURAN; TOLUENE; TRIMETHYLSILYL DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTACT ANGLE; CROSS LINKING; DESALINATION; FILM; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROPHILICITY; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFABRICATION; NANOFILTRATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATION; SILYLATION; SOLUTE; STEREOSPECIFICITY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

CELLULOSE FILM; FILTRATION; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUGAR; THIN FILMS;

EID: 84930640217     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gagliardi M. Global markets and technologies for nanofiltration 2014, BCC Research.
2. IHS Chemical Economics Handbook, Sodium chloride 2013, SRI International.
3. Freger V., Arnot T.C., Howell J.A. Separation of concentrated organic/inorganic salt mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 178:185-193.
4. Avlonitis S.A., Poulios I., Sotiriou D., Pappas M., Moutesidis K. Simulated cotton dye effluents treatment and reuse by nanofiltration. Desalination 2008, 221:259-267.
5. Abe Y., Mochizuki A. Hemodialysis membrane prepared from cellulose/N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide solution. II. Comparative studies on the permeation characteristics of membranes prepared from N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide and cuprammonium solutions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89:333-339.
6. Liang S., Zhang L., Xu J. Morphology and permeability of cellulose/chitin blend membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287:19-28.
7. Liu S., Zeng J., Tao D., Zhang L. Microfiltration performance of regenerated cellulose membrane prepared at low temperature for wastewater treatment. Cellulose 2010, 17:1159-1169.
8. Mao Y., Zhou J., Cai J., Zhang L. Effects of coagulants on porous structure of membranes prepared from cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279:246-255.
9. Xiong X., Duan J., Zou W., He X., Zheng W. A pH-sensitive regenerated cellulose membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363:96-102.
10. Yang G., Xiong X., Zhang L. Microporous formation of blend membranes from cellulose/konjac glucomannan in NaOH/thiourea aqueous solution. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 201:161-173.
11. Cooper G.K., Sandberg K.R., Hinck J.F. Trimethylsilyl cellulose as precursor to regenerated cellulose fiber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1981, 26:3827-3836.
12. Kontturi E., Osterberg M. Cellulose Model Films: Challenges in Preparation 2009, 57-74. ACS symposium series, Oxford University Press, Washington, DC,.
13. Schaub M., Wenz G., Wegner G., Stein A., Klemm D. Ultrathin films of cellulose on silicon wafers. Adv. Mater. 1993, 5:919-922.
14. Timmermann J. Entwicklung und Charakterisierung einer neuartigen Cellulosekompositmembran fuer die Ultrafiltration, Diplomarbeit 1998, TU Hamburg-Harburg, Germany.
15. Ali O. High Performance Regenerated Cellulose Membranes from Trimethylsilyl Cellulose 2013, A Master thesis, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
16. Schempp W., Krause T., Seifried U., Koura A. Herstellung Hochsubstituierter Trimethylsilylcellulosen im System Dimethylacetamid/Lithiumchlorid. Das Papier 1984, 12:607-610.
17. Köhler S., Liebert T., Heinze T. Interactions of ionic liquids with polysaccharides. VI. Pure cellulose nanoparticles from trimethylsilyl cellulose synthesized in ionic liquids. J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46:4070-4080.
18. Mormann W., Wezstein M. Trimethylsilylation of cellulose in ionic liquids. Macromol. Biosci. 2009, 9:369-375.
19. Kontturi E., Thüne P.C., Niemantsverdriet J.W. Cellulose model surfaces simplified preparation by spin coating and characterization by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2003, 19:5735-5741.
20. Mohan T., Kargl R., Doliška A., Vesel A., Köstler S., Ribitsch V., Stana-Kleinschek K. Wettability and surface composition of partly and fully regenerated cellulose thin films from trimethylsilyl cellulose. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 358:604-610.
21. Jing S.-Y., Lee H.-J., Choi C.K. Chemical bond structure on Si-OC composite films with a low dielectric constant deposited by using inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2002, 41:769-773.
22. Rojas J., Azevedo E. Functionalization and crosslinking of microcrystalline cellulose in aqueous media: a safe and economic approach. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2011, 8.
23. Suto S., Suzuki K. Crosslinked hydroxypropyl cellulose films retaining cholesteric liquid crystalline order: 2. Anisotropic swelling behaviour in water. Polymer 1997, 38:391-396.
24. Wang Y.H., Hsieh Y.-L. Cellulose functionalization by glutaraldehyde (GA). Polym. Preprints. 2001, 42:520-521.
25. Rinaldi R., Schüth F. Acid hydrolysis of cellulose as the entry point into biorefinery schemes. ChemSusChem 2009, 2:1096-1107.
26. Battista O.A. Hydrolysis and crystallization of cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1950, 42:502-507.
27. Bargeman G., Vollenbroek J.M., Straatsma J., Schroën C., Boom R.M. Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247:11-20.
28. Bouchoux A., Balmann H.R.-D., Lutin F. Nanofiltration of glucose and sodium lactate solutions: variations of retention between single-and mixed-solute solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 258:123-132.
29. Mohammad A.W., Basha R.K., Leo C.P. Nanofiltration of glucose solution containing salts: Effects of membrane characteristics, organic component and salts on retention. J. Food Eng. 2010, 97:510-518.
30. Wang X.-L., Shang W.-J., Wang D.-X., Wu L., Tu C.-H. Characterization and applications of nanofiltration membranes: state of the art. Desalination 2009, 236:316-326.
31. Escoda A., Fievet P., Lakard S., Szymczyk A., Déon S. Influence of salts on the rejection of polyethyleneglycol by an NF organic membrane: pore swelling and salting-out effects. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 347:174-182.
32. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance-a general assessment. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1998, 76:885-893.