Generalizing from observations of mathematics teachers' instructional practice using the instructional quality assessment

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 270-279

  Wilhelm, Anne Garrison ^a   Kim, Sungyeun ^b  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Generalizability; Observation; Reliability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930513922     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.46.3.0270     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 170(3), 608-645.
2. Boston, M. (2012). Assessing instructional quality in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 76-104. doi:10.1086/666387
3. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York, NY: Springer.
4. Clauser, B. E., Harik, P., & Margolis, M. J. (2006). A multivariate generalizability analysis of data from a performance assessment of physicans' clinical skills. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(3), 173-191. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00012.x
5. Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. J. (2011). Towards an empricially grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 6-33.
6. Cobb, P., & Smith, T. M. (2008). District development as a means of improving mathematics teaching and learning at scale. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Vol. 3. Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 231-254). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
7. Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students' thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 167-180. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2302-6
8. Herlihy, C, Karger, E., Pollard, C, Hill, H. C, Kraft, M. A., Williams, M., & Howard, S. (2014). State and local efforts to investigate the validity and reliability of scores from teacher evaluation systems. Teachers College Record, 116(1). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=17292
9. Hill, H. C, Charalambos, C. Y, & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 56-64. doi:10.3102/0013189X12437203
10. Jackson, K. J., Garrison, A. L., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646-682. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0646
11. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teachers: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Retrieved from http://www.metproject.org/downioads/MET-Gathering-Feedback-Practioner-Brief.pdf
12. Matsumura, L. C, Gamier, H. E., Slater, S. C, & Boston, M. (2008). Toward measuring instructional interactions "at-scale."Educational Assessment, 13(4), 267-300. doi:10.1080/10627190802602541
13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
14. O'Connor, M. C, & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hichs (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York, NY: Cambridge Unversity Press.
15. Quint, J. C, Akey, T. M., Rappaport, S., & Willner, C. J. (2007). Instructional leadership, teaching quality, and student achievement: Suggestive evidence from three urban school districts. Retrieved from http://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full-406.pdf
16. Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315-342. doi:10.1111/0362-6784.00130
17. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 70(4), 313-340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675
19. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 455-488. doi:10.3102/00028312033002455
20. Sztajn, P., Wilson, P. H., Edgington, C, & Confrey, J. (2011). Learning trajectories and key instructional practices. In L. R. Wiest & T. Lamberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting, of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 434-442). Reno, NV. Retrieved from http://www.pmena.org/proceedings/PMENA%2033%202011%20Proceedings.pdf
21. Webb, N. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Haertel, E. H. (2007). Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics: Vol. 26. Psychometrics (pp. 81-124). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.