Aquatic risk assessment of priority and other river basin specific pesticides in surface waters of Mediterranean river basins

Chemosphere

Volumn 135, Issue , 2015, Pages 394-402

  Silva, Emília ^a   Daam, Michiel A ^a   Cerejeira, Maria José ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Environmental quality standards; Mediterranean surface waters; Priority pesticides; Risk assessment; River basin specific pesticides

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; HERBICIDES; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); METABOLITES; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVERS; WATER CONSERVATION; WATERSHEDS;

AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS; EXTRAPOLATION TECHNIQUES; MEDITERRANEAN RIVERS; MEDITERRANEAN SURFACE WATERS; PRIORITY SUBSTANCES; RIVER BASINS; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVES;

RIVER POLLUTION;

2 AMINO 4 CHLORO 6 ETHYLAMINO 1,3,5 TRIAZINE; ALACHLOR; ATRAZINE; CHLORPYRIFOS; CLOFENVINFOS; CYANAZINE; DEETHYLATRAZINE; DICHLOBENIL; ENDOSULFAN; ETHOFUMESATE; LINDANE; METOLACHLOR; METRIBUZIN; MOLINATE; OXADIAZON; PENDIMETHALIN; PESTICIDE; PIRIMICARB; PROMETRYN; PROPANIL; PROPAZINE; SIMAZINE; SURFACE WATER; TERBUTRYN; TERBUTYLAZINE; TRIFLURALIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DANGEROUS GOODS; WATER POLLUTANT;

CATCHMENT; CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; METABOLITE; PESTICIDE; RIVER BASIN; RIVER POLLUTION; WATER CHEMISTRY; WATER QUALITY;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT; ARTICLE; CATCHMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MEDITERRANEAN RIVER BASIN; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVER BASIN; RURAL AREA; SOLID PHASE EXTRACTION; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER STANDARD; AGRICULTURE; ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; DANGEROUS GOODS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUROPEAN UNION; PORTUGAL; RIVER;

PORTUGAL;

AGRICULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUROPEAN UNION; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; PESTICIDES; PORTUGAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVERS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84930462608     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. APA, 2014. Planos de Gestão de Região Hidrográfica. (accessed 01.06.2014). http://www.apambiente.pt/?ref=16%26subref=7%26sub2ref=9%26sub3ref=834.
2. Batista S., Silva E., Galhardo S., Viana P., Cerejeira M.J. Evaluation of pesticide contamination of ground water in two agricultural areas of Portugal. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2002, 82(8-9):601-609. 10.1080/03067310290009488.
3. Brock T.C.M., Van Wijngaarden R.P.A. Acute toxicity tests with Daphnia magna, Americamysis bahia, Chironomus riparius and Gammarus pulex and implications of new EU requirements for the aquatic effect assessment of insecticides. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2012, 19(8):3610-3618. 10.1007/s11356-012-0930-0.
4. Campbell E., Palmer M.J., Shao Q., Warne M.St.J., Wilson D. BurrliOZ: A Computer Program for Calculating Toxicant Trigger Values for the ANZECC and ARMCANZ Water Quality Guidelines 2000, Perth, Western Australia.
5. Cerejeira M.J., Viana P., Batista S., Pereira T., Silva E., Valério M.J., Silva A., Ferreira M., Silva-Fernandes A.M. Pesticides in Portuguese surface and ground waters. Water Res. 2003, 37(5):1055-1063. 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00462-6.
6. Copernicus, 2014. Copernicus Land Monitoring Services. Corine Land Cover 2012. (accessed 01.06.2014). http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc-2012/view.
7. Daam M.A., Silva E., Leitão S., Trindade M.J., Cerejeira M.J. Does the actual standard of 0.1 μg/L overestimate or underestimate the risk of plant protection products to groundwater ecosystems?. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2010, 73(5):750-756. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.12.029.
8. DGAV, 2014. Informação sobre Vendas. (accessed 01.06.2014). http://www.dgv.min-agricultura.pt/portal/page/portal/DGV/genericos?generico=4218634%26cboui=4218634.
9. EC, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000, establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Union L 327 of 22.12.2001, pp. 1-73.
10. EC, 2001. Decision No 2455/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2001 establishing the list of priority substances in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union L 331 of 15.12.2001, pp. 1-5.
11. EC, 2003. Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR 20418 EN/2.
12. EC, 2008. Directive 2008/105/EC of European Parliament and Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/419/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EU. Off. J. Eur. Union L 348 of 24.12.2008, pp. 84-97.
13. EC, 2011. Technical Guidance for deriving Environmental Quality Standards. Guidance Document No. 27. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). European Commission, Technical Report - 2011-055.
14. EC, 2013. Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union L 226 of 24.08.2013, pp. 1-17.
15. EC, 2014a. Environment. Water. Strategies against chemical pollution of surface waters. (accessed 01.06.2014). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-dangersub/index.htm.
16. EC, 2014b. Environment. Water. Priority substances under the Water Framework Directive. (accessed 01.06.2014). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-dangersub/pri_substances.htm.
17. ECHA, 2008. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.10: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment. Guidance for the implementation of REACH. European Chemicals Agency. Helsinki, Finland.
18. EFSA, 2014. Rapporteur Member State assessment reports submitted for the EU peer review of active substances used in plant protection products. (accessed 01.05.2014). http://dar.efsa.europa.eu/dar-web/provision.
19. FOOTPRINT, 2014. The FOOTPRINT pesticide properties database. (accessed 01.05.2014). http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/iupac/index.htm.
20. Irmer, U., Rau, F., Arle, J., Claussen, U., Mohaupt, V., 2014. Ecological Environmental Quality Standards of "River Basin Specific Pollutants" in Surface Waters - Update and Development Analysis of a Comparison between EU Member States. Working Group Ecological Status. Report for the WFD CIS Working Group A Ecological Status (ECOSTAT), Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.
21. ISO, 2005. ISO/IEC 17025: General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO, Geneva.
22. Jaskulké E., Patty L., Bruchet A. Evaluations of pesticide residues in water. Pesticide Chemistry and Bioscience. The Food-Environmental Challenge 1999, 369-385. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK. G.T. Brooks, T.R. Roberts (Eds.).
23. Johnson, I., 2012. Comparative Study of Pressures and Measures in the Major River Basin Management Plans - Task 2c (Comparison of Specific Pollutants and EQS): Final Report. Report for the DG Environment European Commission, Report No.: UC 8981/1, Contract No. 070311/2011/603663/ETU/D1, WRc plc, Swindon, UK.
24. Klok, C., De Vries, P., Jongbloed, R., Tamis, J., 2012. Literature review on the sensitivity and exposure of marine and estuarine organisms to pesticides in comparison to corresponding fresh water species. Supporting Publications: EN-357.
25. Kuzmanović M., Ginebreda A., Petrović M., Barceló D. Risk assessment based prioritization of 200 organic micropollutants in 4 Iberian rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 503-504:289-299. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.056.
26. Lepper, P., 2005. Manual on the Methodological Framework to Derive Environmental Quality Standards for Priority Substances in accordance with Article 16 of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Fraunhofer-Institute Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Schmallenberg, Germany.
27. López-Doval J.C., De Castro-Català N., Andrés-Doménech I., Blasco J., Ginebreda A., Muñoz I. Analysis of monitoring programmes and their suitability for ecotoxicological risk assessment in four Spanish basins. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 440:194-203. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.035.
28. Mackay D. Multimedia Environmental Models. The Fugacity Approach 2001, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton. second ed.
29. Mackay D., Di Guardo A., Paterson S., Cowan C.E. Evaluating the environmental fate of a variety of types of chemicals using the EQC model. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15(9):1627-1637.
30. Malaj E., Von der Ohe P.C., Grote M., Kühne R., Mondy C.P., Usseglio-Polatera P., Brack W., Schäfer R.B. Organic chemicals jeopardize the health of freshwater ecosystems on the continental scale. Proc. Natl. Sci. 2014, 111(26):9549-9554. 10.1073/pnas.1321082111.
31. McBean C. A World Compendium. The Pesticide Manual 2012, British Crop Protection Council, Alton, UK. 16th ed.
32. Moschet C., Wittmer I., Simovic J., Junghans M., Piazzoli A., Singer H., Stamm C., Leu C., Hollender J. How a complete pesticide screening changes the assessment of surface water quality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48(10):5423-5432. 10.1021/es500371t.
33. NORMAN, 2014. Network of Reference Laboratories, Research Centres and related organisations for monitoring of emerging environmental substances. (accessed 01.05.2014). http://www.norman-%20network.net/.
34. RGA, 2001a. Recenseamento Geral da Agricultura 1999. Ribatejo e Oeste, Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa.
35. RGA, 2001b. Recenseamento Geral da Agricultura 1999. Beira Litoral, Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa.
36. RGA, 2001c. Recenseamento Geral da Agricultura 1999. Alentejo, Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa.
37. Schwarzenbach R.P., Escher B.I., Fenner K., Hofstetter T.B., Johnson C.A., Von Gunten U., Wehrli B. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 2006, 313(5790):1072-1077. 10.1126/science.1127291.
38. Silva E., Batista S., Viana P., Antunes P., Serôdio L., Cardoso A.T., Cerejeira M.J. Pesticides and nitrates in groundwater from oriziculture areas of the 'Baixo Sado' region (Portugal). Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2006, 86(13):955-972. 10.1080/03067310600833336.
39. Silva E., Mendes M.P., Ribeiro L., Cerejeira M.J. Exposure assessment of pesticides in a shallow groundwater of the Tagus vulnerable zone (Portugal): a multivariate statistical approach (JCA). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19(7):2667-2680. 10.1007/s11356-012-0761-z.
40. Silva E., Pereira A.C., Estalagem S.P., Moreira-Santos M., Ribeiro R., Cerejeira M.J. Assessing the quality of freshwaters in a protected area within the Tagus river basin district (central Portugal). J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41(5):1413-1426. 10.2134/jeq2012.0010.
41. Slobodnik J., Mrafkova L., Carere M., Ferrara F., Pennelli B., Schüürmann G., Von der Ohe P.C. Identification of river basin specific pollutants and derivation of environmental quality standards: a case study in the Slovak Republic. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 41:133-145. 10.1016/j.trac.2012.08.008.
42. SNIRH, 2014. Sistema Nacional de Informação de Recursos Hídricos. (accessed 01.05.2014). http://snirh.apambiente.pt/.
43. Tomlin C.D.S. A Worl Compendium. The Pesticide Manual 2006, British Crop Protection Council, Alton, UK. 14th ed.
44. US-EPA, 2014. ECOTOX Database. (accessed 01.05.2014). http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/.
45. Van den Brink P.J., Blake N., Brock T.C.M., Maltby L. Predictive value of species sensitivity distributions for effects of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2006, 12(4):645-674. 10.1080/10807030500430559.
46. Van Vlaardingen, P.L.A., Traas, T.P., Wintersen, A.M., Aldenberg, T., 2004. ETX 2.0. A program to calculate hazardous concentrations and fraction affected, based on normally distributed toxicity data. RIVM Report 601501028/2004, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
47. Van Wijngaarden R.P.A., Brock T.C.M., Van den Brink P.J. Threshold levels of insecticides in freshwater ecosystems, a review. Ecotoxicology 2005, 14(3):355-380. 10.1007/s10646-004-6371-x.
48. Van Wijngaarden R.P.A., Maltby L., Brock T.C.M. Acute tier-1 and tier-2 effect assessment approaches in the EFSA Aquatic Guidance Document: are they sufficiently protective for insecticides?. Pest Manage. Sci. 2014, 10.1002/ps.3937.
49. Von der Ohe P.C., Dulio V., Slobodnik J., De Deckere E., Kühne R., Ebert R.U., Ginebreda A., De Cooman W., Schüürmann G., Brack W. A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409(11):2064-2077. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.054.