Tradeoff Evaluation Improves Comparative Life Cycle Assessment: A Photovoltaic Case Study

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 710-718

  Prado Lopez, Valentina ^a   Wender, Ben A ^a   Seager, Thomas P ^a   Laurin, Lise ^b   Chester, Mikhail ^a   Arslan, Erdem ^b  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b EarthShift in Kittery ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

comparative life cycle assessment (LCA); decision making; interpretation; result communication; trade off; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

AMORPHOUS FILMS; AMORPHOUS SILICON; CADMIUM TELLURIDE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SILICON SOLAR CELLS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMPARATIVE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCHES; INTERPRETATION; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); PHOTOVOLTAIC TECHNOLOGY; TRADE OFF; UNCERTAINTY;

LIFE CYCLE;

COMMUNICATION NETWORK; DATA INTERPRETATION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; INORGANIC COMPOUND; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TRADE-OFF; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84930443639     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12292     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dias, L. C. and A. R. Domingues. 2014. On multi-criteria sustainability assessment: Spider-gram surface and dependence biases. Applied Energy 113: 159–163.
2. Finnveden, G., M. Z. Hauschild, T. Ekvall, J. Guinee, R. Heijungs, S. Hellweg, A. Koehler, D. Pennington, and S. Suh. 2009. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 91(1): 1–21.
3. Goedkoop, M., R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. DeSchryver, J. Struijs, and R. van Zelm. 2009. ReCiPe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, 1st ed. Report 1: Characterisation, 2009. www.pre-sustainability.com/download/misc/ReCiPe_main_report_final_27-02-2009_web.pdf Accessed 30 November 2014.
4. Heal, G. 2000. Valuing the future: Economic theory and sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Heijungs, R. and R. Kleijn. 2001. Numerical approaches towards life cycle interpretation five examples. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6(3): 141–148.
6. Heijungs, R., J. Guinée, R. Kleijn, and V. Rovers. 2007. Bias in normalization: Causes, consequences, detection and remedies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(4): 211–216.
7. Heijungs, R., S. Suh, and R. Kleijn. 2005. Numerical approaches to life cycle interpretation—The case of the Ecoinvent'96 database. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(2): 103–112.
8. Herrmann, I. T. and A. Moltesen. 2014. Does it matter which life cycle assessment (LCA) tool you choose?—A comparative assessment of SimaPro and GaBi. Journal of Cleaner Production 86: 163–169.
9. Herrmann, I. T., M. Z. Hauschild, M. D. Sohn, and T. E. McKone. 2014. Confronting uncertainty in life cycle assessment used for decision support. Journal of Industrial Ecology 18(3): 366–379.
10. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006. ISO 14044: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
11. Ison, S., S. Peake, and S. Wall. 2002. Environmental issues and policies. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
12. Jungbluth, N., M. Stucki, K. Flury, R. Frischknecht, and S. Büsser. 2012. Life cycle inventories of photovoltaics. Uster, Switzerland: ESU-services Ltd. www.esu-services.ch/fileadmin/download/publicLCI/jungbluth-2012-LCI-Photovoltaics.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2015.
13. Lautier, A., R. K. Rosenbaum, M. Margni, J. Bare, P. O. Roy, and L. Deschênes. 2010. Development of normalization factors for Canada and the United States and comparison with European factors. Science of the Total Environment 409(1): 33–42.
14. Lewandowska, A., Z. Foltynowicz, and A. Podlesny. 2004. Comparative LCA of industrial objects. Part 1: LCA data quality assurance—Sensitivity analysis and pedigree matrix. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(2): 86–89.
15. Lloyd, S. M. and R. Ries. 2007. Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: A survey of quantitative approaches. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(1): 161–179.
16. Muller, S., P. Lesage, A. Ciroth, A. C. Mutel, B. P. Weidema, and R. Samson. 2014. The application of the pedigree approach to the distributions foreseen in Ecoinvent v3. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment http://lca-net.com/publications/show/application-pedigree-approach-distributions-foreseen-ecoinvent-v3/. Accessed 20 March 2015.
17. O'Hagan, A., C. E. Buck, A. Daneshkhah, J. R. Eiser, P. H. Garthwaite, D. J. Jenkinson, J. E. Oakley, and T. Rakow. 2006. Uncertain judgements: Eliciting experts’ probabilities. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Prado, V., K. Rogers, and T. P. Seager. 2012. Integration of MCDA tools in valuation of comparative life cycle assessment. In: Life cycle assessment handbook: A guide for environmentally sustainable products, edited by M. A. Curran. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Prado-Lopez, V., T. P. Seager, M. Chester, L. Laurin, M. Bernardo, and S. Tylock. 2014. Stochastic multi-attribute analysis (SMAA) as an interpretation method for comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(2): 405–416.
20. Reap, J., F. Roman, S. Duncan, and B. Bras. 2008. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(5): 374–388.
21. Refsgaard, J. C., J. P. van der Sluijs, A. L. Højberg, and P. A. Vanrolleghem. 2007. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process—A framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(11): 1543–1556.
22. Rogers, K. and T. P. Seager. 2009. Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: A case study on alternative transportation fuels. Environmental Science & Technology 43(6): 1718–1723.
23. Weidema, B. P. and M. S. Wesnæs. 1996. Data quality management for life cycle inventories—An example of using data quality indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 4(3–4): 167–174.
24. Weidema, B. P., C. Bauer, R. Hischier, C. Mutel, T. Nemecek, J. Reinhard, C. O. Vadenbo, and G. Wernet. 2013. Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Dübendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories.
25. Wender, B. A., R. W. Foley, T. A Hottle, J. Sadowski, V. Prado-Lopez, D. A. Eisenberg, L. Laurin, and T. P. Seager. 2014a. Anticipatory life-cycle assessment for responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(2): 200–207.
26. Wender, B. A., R. W. Foley, V. Prado-Lopez, D. Ravikumar, D. A. Eisenberg, T. A. Hottle, J. Sadowski, et al. 2014b. Illustrating anticipatory life cycle assessment for emerging photovoltaic technologies. Environmental Science & Technology 48(18): 10531–10538.