Computerized training system for ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture on abnormal spine models: a randomized controlled trial;Un système de formation informatisé pour réaliser une ponction lombaire échoguidée sur des modèles de colonne vertébrale anormale: une étude randomisée contrôlée

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 62, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 777-784

  Keri, Zsuzsanna ^a   Sydor, Devin ^a   Ungi, Tamas ^a   Holden, Matthew S ^a   McGraw, Robert ^a   Mousavi, Parvin ^a   Borschneck, Daniel P ^a   Fichtinger, Gabor ^a   Jaeger, Melanie ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; LUMBAR PUNCTURE; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; NEEDLE INSERTION TIME; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURAL SUCCESS RATE; REAL TIME ULTRASOUND SCANNER; RESIDENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TISSUE INJURY; TOTAL PROCEDURE TIME; ULTRASOUND GUIDED LUMBAR PUNCTURE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; NEEDLE; PROCEDURES; PUNCTURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINE; TEACHING;

ADULT; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SPINAL PUNCTURE; SPINE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84930416415     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0367-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Peterson MA, Abele J. Bedside ultrasound for difficult lumbar puncture. J Emerg Med 2005; 28: 197-200.
2. Chin KJ, Chan VW, Ramlogan R, Perlas A. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with a challenging spinal anatomy: two case reports. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 252-5.
3. Shaikh F, Brzezinski J, Alexander S, et al. Ultrasound imaging for lumbar punctures and epidural catheterisations: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013; 346: f1720.
4. Chen CP, Lew HL, Tsai WC, Hung YT, Hsu CC. Ultrasound-guided injection techniques for the low back and hip joint. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: 860-7.
5. Smith HM, Kopp SL, Johnson RL, Long TR, Cerhan JH, Hebl JR. Looking into learning: visuospatial and psychomotor predictors of ultrasound-guided procedural performance. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012; 37: 441-7.
6. Shanks D, Wong RY, Roberts JM, Nair P, Ma IW. Use of simulator-based medical procedural curriculum: the learner’s perspectives. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10: 77.
7. Sydor DT, Naik VN. Simulation and competency-based medical education: “showing how”. In: Sherbino J, Frank JR (Eds.) Educational Design: A CanMEDS guide for the health professions. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2011: 59-64.
8. Ungi T, Sargent D, Moult E, et al. Perk Tutor: an open-source training platform for ultrasound-guided needle insertions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012; 59: 3475-81.
9. Moult E, Ungi T, Welch M, Lu J, McGraw RC, Fichtinger G. Ultrasound-guided facet joint injection training using Perk Tutor. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2013; 8: 831-6.
10. Bartha L, Lasso A, Pinter C, Ungi T, Keri Z, Fichtinger G. Open-source surface mesh-based ultrasound-guided spinal intervention simulator. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2013; 8: 1043-51.
11. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30: 1323-41.
12. Yeo CT, Ungi T. U-Thainual P, Lasso A, McGraw RC, Fichtinger G. The effect of augmented reality training on percutaneous needle placement in spinal facet joint injections. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011; 58: 2031-7.
13. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011; 86: 706-11.
14. Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Simulation in surgical education. CMAJ 2010; 182: 1191-6.
15. Nix CM, Margarido CB, Awad IT, et al. A scoping review of the evidence for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013; 38: 471-80.
16. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O’Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2697-701.
17. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 146-50.
18. Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 33-7.
19. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 458-63.
20. Kessler DO, Arteaga G, Ching K, et al. Interns’ success with clinical procedures in infants after simulation training. Pediatrics 2013; 131: e811-20.
21. Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe neurologic complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 950-9.
22. Datta V, Chang A, Mackay S, Darzi A. The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 70-3.