Securement methods for peripheral venous catheters to prevent failure: A randomised controlled pilot trial

Journal of Vascular Access

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 237-244

  Marsh, Nicole ^a,b   Webster, Joan ^a,b,c   Flynn, Julie ^a,b   Mihala, Gabor ^b   Hewer, Barbara ^a   Fraser, John ^b,c   Rickard, Claire M ^a,b,c  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Intravenous; Occlusive dressings; Randomised controlled trial; Securement device; Tissue adhesives; Vascular access devices

Indexed keywords

POLYURETHAN; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLISTER; BLOCKAGE; BORDERED POLYURETHANE DRESSING; CATHETER COMPLICATION; CATHETER FAILURE; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETER; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RASH; STANDARD POLYURETHANE DRESSING; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SUTURELESS SECUREMENT DEVICE; SWELLING; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CATHETERIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE FAILURE; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; OCCLUSIVE DRESSING; QUEENSLAND; RISK FACTOR; TIME FACTOR; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE;

ADULT; AGED; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYURETHANES; QUEENSLAND; RISK FACTORS; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE ADHESIVES; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES;

EID: 84930246001     PISSN: 11297298     EISSN: 17246032     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000348     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bolton D. Improving peripheral cannulation practice at an NHS Trust. Br J Nurs. 2010;19(21):1346, 1348-50.
2. Rickard CM, McCann D, Munnings J, McGrail MR. Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):53.
3. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9847): 1066-1074.
4. Hoffmann KK, Weber DJ, Samsa GP, Rutala WA. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A metaanalysis of the infection risks. JAMA. 1992;267(15):2072-2076.
5. Webster J, Gillies D, O’Riordan E, Sherriff KL, Rickard CM. Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD003827.
6. Schears GJ. Summary of product trials for 10, 164 patients: comparing an intravenous stabilizing device to tape. J Infus Nurs. 2006;29(4):225-231.
7. Bausone-Gazda D, Lefaiver CA, Walters SA. A randomized controlled trial to compare the complications of 2 peripheral intravenous catheter-stabilization systems. J Infus Nurs. 2010;33(6): 371-384.
8. Callaghan S, Copnell B, Johnston L. Comparison of two methods of peripheral intravenous cannula securement in the pediatric setting. J Infus Nurs. 2002;25(4):256-264.
9. Wilkinson JN, Fitz-Henry J. Securing epidural catheters with Histoacryl glue. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(3):324.
10. Wilkinson JN, Sheikh N, Jayamaha J. Tissue adhesive as an alternative to sutures for securing central venous catheters. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(9):969-970.
11. Wilkinson JN, Chikhani M, Mortimer K, Gill SJ. The antimicrobial effect of Histoacryl skin adhesive. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(12): 1382-1384.
12. Simonova G, Rickard CM, Dunster KR, Smyth DJ, McMillan D, Fraser JF. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives—effective securement technique for intravascular catheters: in vitro testing of safety and feasibility. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(3): 460-466.
13. Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(2):180-191.
14. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2005;4(4):287-291.
15. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011:1-83.
16. INS. Infusion Nurses Society. J Infus Nurs. 2011;34(1S):1-110.
17. Tuffaha HW, Rickard CM, Webster J, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12(1):51-58.
18. Stranz M, Kastango ESRMF. A review of pH and osmolarity. Int J Pharm Compd. 2002;6(3):216-220.
19. Forni C, D’Alessandro F, Gambino O, et al. [Effectiveness of the transparent sterile dressing vs standard to fix the peripheral venous catheter (PVC) on the incidence of phlebitis. A randomized controlled trial]. Assist Inferm Ric. 2012;31(2):63-69.