A randomized controlled trial to compare the complications of 2 peripheral intravenous catheter-stabilization systems

Journal of Infusion Nursing

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 371-384

  Bausone Gazda, Dawn ^a   Lefaiver, Cheryl A ^a   Walters, Shelley Ann ^b  

^a ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b 3M COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVICE; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHLEBITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKIN MANIFESTATION; VEIN CATHETERIZATION;

CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFUSION PUMPS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; TIME FACTORS; TRAUMA CENTERS;

EID: 78649658344     PISSN: 15331458     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e3181f85be2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. McNeill EE, Hines NL, Phariss R. A clinical trial of a new all-in-one peripheral-short catheter. J Assoc Vascular Access. 2009;14(1):46-51.
2. Schears GJ. Summary of product trials for 10,164 patients: comparing an intravenous stabilizing device to tape. J Infus Nurs. 2006; 29(4):225-231.
3. Smith B. Peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times: a comparison of 3 securement methods for implementation of a 96-hour scheduled change protocol. J Infus Nurs. 2006;29(1):14-17.
4. Alexander M, Corrigan A, Gorski L, Hankins J, Perucca R, eds. Infusion Nursing: An Evidence-Based Approach. St Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010:430.
5. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion nursing standards of practice. J Infus Nurs. 2006;29(1)(suppl):S1-S90.
6. Catney MR, Hillis S, Wakefield B, et al. Relationship between peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time and the development of phlebitis and infiltration. J Infus Nurs. 2001;24(5):332-341.
7. Royer T. Improving short peripheral IV outcomes: a clinical trial of two securement methods. J Assoc Vascular Access. 2003;8(4):45-49.
8. Sheppard K, LeDesma M, Morris NL, O'Connor K. A prospective study of two intravenous catheter securement techniques in a skilled nursing facility. J Intraven Nurs. 1999;22(3):151-156.
9. Rosenthal K. Get a hold on costs and safety with securement devices. Nurs Manage. 2005;36(5):52-54.
10. Wolosin R. Largest study of patient satisfaction ever conducted: The Press Ganey Satisfaction Report, Vol. VII. South Bend, IN: Press Ganey Associates; 2003.
11. Schears G. New standards to improve catheter stabilization and patient and worker safety. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2006;26(4):15-18.
12. Wood D. A comparative study of two securement techniques for short peripheral intravenous catheters. J Intraven Nurs. 1997;20(6): 280-285.
13. Webster J, Clarke S, Paterson D, et al. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;337:a339.
14. White SA. Peripheral intravenous therapy-related phlebitis rates in an adult population. J Intraven Nurs. 2001;24(1):19-24.
15. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006;295(10): 1152-1160.
16. Powell J, Tarnow KG, Perucca R. The relationship between peripheral intravenous catheter indwell time and the incidence of phlebitis. J Infus Nurs. 2008;31(1):39-45.
17. Palefski SS, Stoddard GJ. The infusion nurse and patient complication rates of peripheral-short catheters: a prospective evaluation. J Intraven Nurs. 2001;24(2):113-123.