Dynamic Control of Response Criterion in Premotor Cortex during Perceptual Detection under Temporal Uncertainty

Neuron

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1067-1077

  Carnevale, Federico ^a   deLafuente, Victor ^b   Romo, Ranulfo ^c,d   Barak, Omri ^e   Parga, Néstor ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE NEUROBIOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^c EL COLEGIO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

^d INSTITUTO DE FISIOLOGÍA CELULAR   (Mexico)

^e TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL POPULATION; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; HAPLORHINI; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANIMAL; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REACTION TIME; UNCERTAINTY; VISION;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HAPLORHINI; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTOR CORTEX; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; UNCERTAINTY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84930243913     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Buonomano D.V., Maass W. State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:113-125.
2. Carnevale F., de Lafuente V., Romo R., Parga N. Internal signal correlates neural populations and biases perceptual decision reports. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:18938-18943.
3. Carnevale F., de Lafuente V., Romo R., Parga N. An optimal decision population code that accounts for correlated variability unambiguously predicts a subject's choice. Neuron 2013, 80:1532-1543.
4. Correa A., Lupiáñez J., Tudela P. Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2005, 12:328-334.
5. Coull J.T., Nobre A.C. Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2008, 18:137-144.
6. Cunningham J.P., Yu B.M. Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17:1500-1509.
7. de Lafuente V., Romo R. Neuronal correlates of subjective sensory experience. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1698-1703.
8. de Lafuente V., Romo R. Neural correlate of subjective sensory experience gradually builds up across cortical areas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:14266-14271.
9. Forstmann B.U., Brown S., Dutilh G., Neumann J., Wagenmakers E.J. The neural substrate of prior information in perceptual decision making: a model-based analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00040.
10. Ghose G.M., Bearl D.W. Attention directed by expectations enhances receptive fields in cortical area MT. Vision Res. 2010, 50:441-451.
11. Ghose G.M., Maunsell J.H. Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing. Nature 2002, 419:616-620.
12. Gilbert C.D., Sigman M. Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron 2007, 54:677-696.
13. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics 1966, Volume 1974. Wiley, New York.
14. Hanks T.D., Mazurek M.E., Kiani R., Hopp E., Shadlen M.N. Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:6339-6352.
15. Hoerzer G.M., Legenstein R., Maass W. Emergence of complex computational structures from chaotic neural networks through reward-modulated Hebbian learning. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24:677-690.
16. Jaeger H., Haas H. Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Science 2004, 304:78-80.
17. Janssen P., Shadlen M.N. A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:234-241.
18. Jaramillo S., Zador A.M. The auditory cortex mediates the perceptual effects of acoustic temporal expectation. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:246-251.
19. Karmarkar U.R., Buonomano D.V. Timing in the absence of clocks: encoding time in neural network states. Neuron 2007, 53:427-438.
20. Katzner S., Treue S., Busse L. Improving behavioral performance under full attention by adjusting response criteria to changes in stimulus predictability. J.Vis. 2012, 12:1.
21. Laje R., Buonomano D.V. Robust timing and motor patterns by taming chaos in recurrent neural networks. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:925-933.
22. Leon M.I., Shadlen M.N. Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque. Neuron 2003, 38:317-327.
23. Louie K., Wilson M.A. Temporally structured replay of awake hippocampal ensemble activity during rapid eye movement sleep. Neuron 2001, 29:145-156.
24. Luce R.D. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization 1986, University Press, Oxford.
25. Maass W., Joshi P., Sontag E.D. Computational aspects of feedback in neural circuits. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3:e165.
26. Mante V., Sussillo D., Shenoy K.V., Newsome W.T. Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex. Nature 2013, 503:78-84.
27. Nobre A.C. Orienting attention to instants in time. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1317-1328.
28. Nobre A.C., Correa A., Coull J.T. The hazards of time. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17:465-470.
29. Rao V., DeAngelis G.C., Snyder L.H. Neural correlates of prior expectations of motion in the lateral intraparietal and middle temporal areas. J.Neurosci. 2012, 32:10063-10074.
30. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 2008, 20:873-922.
31. Renart A., Machens C.K. Variability in neural activity and behavior. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014, 25:211-220.
32. Rohenkohl G., Cravo A.M., Wyart V., Nobre A.C. Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory information. J.Neurosci. 2012, 32:8424-8428.
33. Romo R., de Lafuente V. Conversion of sensory signals into perceptual decisions. Prog. Neurobiol. 2013, 103:41-75.
34. Scheibe C., Schubert R., Sommer W., Heekeren H.R. Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of prior probability on response preparation. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:758-770.
35. Shenoy K.V., Sahani M., Churchland M.M. Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 36:337-359.
36. Simen P., Contreras D., Buck C., Hu P., Holmes P., Cohen J.D. Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions. J.Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2009, 35:1865-1897.
37. Steinmetz P.N., Roy A., Fitzgerald P.J., Hsiao S.S., Johnson K.O., Niebur E. Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing in primate somatosensory cortex. Nature 2000, 404:187-190.
38. Stokes M.G., Kusunoki M., Sigala N., Nili H., Gaffan D., Duncan J. Dynamic coding for cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. Neuron 2013, 78:364-375.
39. Summerfield C., Koechlin E. A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference. Neuron 2008, 59:336-347.
40. Sussillo D., Abbott L.F. Generating coherent patterns of activity from chaotic neural networks. Neuron 2009, 63:544-557.
41. Sussillo D., Abbott L.F. Transferring learning from external to internal weights in echo-state networks with sparse connectivity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e37372.
42. Sussillo D., Barak O. Opening the black box: low-dimensional dynamics in high-dimensional recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. 2013, 25:626-649.