Life cycle and economic assessments of engineered osmosis and osmotic dilution for desalination of Haynesville shale pit water

Desalination

Volumn 369, Issue , 2015, Pages 188-200

  Coday, Bryan D ^a   Miller Robbie, Leslie ^a   Beaudry, Edward G ^b   Munakata Marr, Junko ^a   Cath, Tzahi Y ^a  

^a Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

^b Hydration Technology Innovations   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineered osmosis; Forward osmosis; Hydraulic fracturing; Life cycle assessment; Wastewater treatment; Water reuse

Indexed keywords

DEEP OIL WELL DRILLING; DEEP WELL DISPOSAL; DESALINATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; HYDRAULIC FRACTURING; LIFE CYCLE; OSMOSIS; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTEWATER DISPOSAL; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER TREATMENT; WELL DRILLING;

ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS; FORWARD OSMOSIS; FRACTURING OPERATIONS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY; WATER REUSE; WATER TRANSPORTATION;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

DESALINATION; DILUTION; DRILLING; HYDRAULIC FRACTURE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; OSMOSIS; WASTEWATER;

EID: 84930225393     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.028     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Clark C.E., Horner R.M., Harto C.B. Life cycle water consumption for shale gas and conventional natural gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:11829-11836.
2. Rahm B.G., Riha S.J. Toward strategic management of shale gas development: regional, collective impacts on water resources. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2012, 17:12-23.
3. US Environmental Protection Agency Plan to study the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, EPA/600/R-11/122 http://www2.epa.gov/hfstudy/plan-study-potential-impacts-hydraulic-fracturing-drinking-water-resources-epa600r-11122.
4. Ground Water Protection Council State oil and natural gas regulations designed to protect water resources http://www.gwpc.org/sites/default/files/state_oil_and_gas_regulations_designed_to_protect_water_resources_0.pdf.
5. Wiseman H. Untested waters: the rise of hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas production and the need for revisit regulation. Fordham Environ. Law Rev. 2009, 20:115.
6. In Fracking's wake: new rules are needed to protect our health and environment from contaminated wastewater 2012, 11. (http://www.nrdc.org/energy/fracking-wastewater.asp).
7. Mauter M.S., Palmer V.R. Expert elicitation of trends in Marcellus oil and gas wastewater management. J. Environ. Eng. 2014, 140:2-9.
8. Zoback M., Kitasei S., Copithorne B. Addressing the environmental risks from shale gas development. Nat. Gas Sustain. Energy Initiative 2010, 21:1-18.
9. Gregory K.B., Vidic R.D., Dzombak D.A. Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements 2011, 7:181-186.
10. Lutz B.D., Lewis A.N., Doyle M.W. Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus Shale gas development. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49:647-656.
11. Vengosh A., Jackson R.B., Warner N., Darrah T.H., Kondash A. A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:8334-8348.
12. Novel and emerging technologies for produced water treatment http://www2.epa.gov/hfstudy/novel-and-emerging-technologies-produced-water-treatment-march-30-2011.
13. Fakhru'l-Razi A., Pendashteh A., Abdullah L.C., Biak D.R.A., Madaeni S.S., Abidin Z.Z. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170:530-551.
14. Olsson O., Weichgrebe D., Rosenwinkel K.-H. Hydraulic fracturing wastewater in Germany: composition, treatment, concerns. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 70:3895-3906.
15. Lee R., Seright R., Hightower M., Sattler A., Cather M., McPherson B., Wrotenbery L., Martin D., Whitworth M. Whitworth, Strategies for Produced Water Handling in New Mexico, Ground Water Protection Council Produced Water Conference, Colorado Springs, CO 2002.
16. Miller D.J., Huang X., Li H., Kasemset S., Lee A., Agnihotri D., Hayes T., Paul D.R., Freeman B.D. Fouling-resistant membranes for the treatment of flowback water from hydraulic shale fracturing: a pilot study. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 437:265-275.
17. Coday B.D., Xu P., Beaudry E.G., Herron J., Lampi K., Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination 2014, 333:23-35.
18. Coday B.D., Cath T.Y. Forward osmosis: novel desalination of produced water and fracturing flowback. J. AWWA 2014, 106:37-38.
19. Shaffer D.L., Arias Chavez L.H., Ben-Sasson M., Romero-Vargas Castrillón S., Yip N.Y., Elimelech M. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:9569-9583.
20. Zhao S., Zou L., Tang C.Y., Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:1-21.
21. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
22. Hutchings N.R., Appleton E.W., McGinnis R.A. Making high quality frac water out of oilfield waste. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 2010 2010.
23. Hickenbottom K.L., Hancock N.T., Hutchings N.R., Appleton E.W., Beaudry E.G., Xu P., Cath T.Y. Forward osmosis treatment of drilling mud and fracturing wastewater from oil and gas operations. Desalination 2013, 312:60-66.
24. Cath T.Y., Hancock N.T., Lundin C.D., Hoppe-Jones C., Drewes J.E. A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 362:417-426.
25. Phuntsho S., Shon H.K., Hong S., Lee S., Vigneswaran S. A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:172-181.
26. McGinnis R.L., Hancock N.T., Nowosielski-Slepowron M.S., McGurgan G.D. Pilot demonstration of the NH3/CO2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines. Desalination 2013, 312:67-74.
27. McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:8625-8629.
28. Khayet M. Use of osmosis technologies and their recent advances in education. INTED2014 Proc 2014, 2244-2254.
29. Cath T.Y., Gormly S., Beaudry E.G., Flynn M.T., Adams V.D., Childress A.E. Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space: part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 257:85-98.
30. Cath T.Y., Adams D., Childress A.E. Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space: II. Combined direct osmosis, osmotic distillation, and membrane distillation for treatment of metabolic wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 257:111-119.
31. Li X.-M., Zhao B., Wang Z., Xie M., Song J., Nghiem L., He T., Yang C., Li C., Chen G. Water reclamation from shale gas drilling flow-back fluid using a novel forward osmosis-vacuum membrane distillation hybrid system. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 69:1036-1044.
32. Yun T., Koo J.-W., Sohn J., Lee S. Pressure assisted forward osmosis for shale gas wastewater treatment. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 54:829-837.
33. Tangsubkul N., Parameshwaran K., Lundie S., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Environmental life cycle assessment of the microfiltration process. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:214-226.
34. Stokes J., Horvath A. LCA methodology and case study life cycle energy assessment of alternative water supply systems. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2006, 11:335-343.
35. Vince F., Aoustin E., Bréant P., Marechal F. LCA tool for the environmental evaluation of potable water production. Desalination 2008, 220:37-56.
36. Rodriguez-Garcia G., Molinos-Senante M., Hospido A., Hernandez-Sancho F., Moreira M.T., Feijoo G. Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2011, 45:5997-6010.
37. Hancock N.T., Black N.D., Cath T.Y. A comparative life cycle assessment of hybrid osmotic dilution desalination and established seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation processes. Water Res. 2012, 46:1145-1154.
38. Thiel G.P., Tow E.W., Banchik L.D., Chung H.W., Lienhard J.H. Energy consumption in desalinating produced water from shale oil and gas extraction. Desalination 2015, 366:94-112.
39. ISO Standard 14040 - Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework 2006, International Organization of Standardization, Geneva.
40. ISO Standard 14044 - Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines 2006, International Organization of Standardization, Geneva.
41. Slutz J., Anderson J., Broderick R., Horner P. Key shale gas water management strategies: an economic assessment tool. APPEA International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in oil and gas Exploration and Production, Perth, Australia, 2012 2012.
42. Clark C., Han J., Burnham A., Dunn J., Wang M. Life-cycle Analysis of Shale gas and Natural gas 2012, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), (http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/EE/813.PDF).
43. Finnveden G., Hauschild M.Z., Ekvall T., Guinee J., Heijungs R., Hellweg S., Koehler A., Pennington D., Suh S. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 91:1-21.
44. Stokes J., Horvath A. Life-cycle assessment of urban water provision: tool and case study in California. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2010, 17:15-24.
45. Bare J., Young D., Hopton M. Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) 2012, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, (http://www.nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P100HN53.pdf).
46. Diesel generator fuel burn calculator http://www.hardydiesel.com/generator-fuel-consumption-calculator.html.
47. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
48. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354:123-133.
49. Hoek E.M., Elimelech M. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:5581-5588.
50. Song L., Elimelech M. Theory of concentration polarization in crossflow filtration. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1995, 91:3389-3398.
51. Lee S., Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365:34-39.
52. Mi B., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:292-302.
53. Zou S., Gu Y., Xiao D., Tang C.Y. The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 366:356-362.
54. Helal A., El-Nashar A., Al-Katheeri E., Al-Malek S. Optimal design of hybrid RO/MSF desalination plants Part I: modeling and algorithms. Desalination 2003, 154:43-66.
55. Ryberg M., Vieira M.D., Zgola M., Bare J., Rosenbaum R.K. Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1. Clean Technol. Environ. 2014, 16:329-339.
56. Raluy R.G., Serra L., Uche J., Valero A. Life cycle assessment of water production technologies-part 2: reverse osmosis desalination versus the Ebro River Water Transfer (9pp). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2005, 10:346-354.
57. SimaPro database manual; Methods library, Amersfoort, The Netherlands http://www.pre-sustainability.com/simapro-database-and-methods-library.