Neural networks for analysis of trabecular bone in osteoarthritis

Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 90-100

  Khovanova, Natalia A ^a   Shaikhina, Torgyn ^a   Mallick, Kajal K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Bone; Mechanical properties; Modeling; Structural properties; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BACKPROPAGATION; BACKPROPAGATION ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BONE VOLUME FRACTION; INTER-DEPENDENCIES; LEVENBERG MARQUARDT BACK PROPAGATION ALGORITHMS; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SPACE; PHYSICOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; STRUCTURAL MODEL INDICES; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; TRABECULAR THICKNESS;

BONE;

EID: 84930189998     PISSN: 20459858     EISSN: 20459866     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/bbn.14.00006     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Gibson, L. J.; Ashby, M. F.; Harley, B. A. Cellular Materials in Nature and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
2. Galante, J.; Rostoker, W.; Ray, R. D. Physical properties of trabecular bone. Calcified Tissue Research1970, 5, 236–246.
3. Hildebrand, T.; Laib, A.; Muller, R.; Dequeker, J.; Ruegsegger, P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research: The Official Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research1999, 14, 1167–1174.
4. Carter, D. R.; Hayes, W. C. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science1976, 194, 1174–1176.
5. Hoffler, C. E.; Moore, K. E.; Kozloff, K.; Zysset, P. K.; Brown, M. B.; Goldstein, S. A. Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. Bone2000, 26, 603–609.
6. Kopperdahl, D. L.; Keaveny, T. M. Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics1998, 31, 601–608.
7. Morgan, E. F.; Bayraktar, H. H.; Keaveny, T. M. Trabecular bone modulus–density relationships depend on anatomic site. Journal of Biomechanics2003, 36, 897–904.
8. Crane, G. J.; Fazzalari, N. L.; Parkinson, I. H.; Vernon-Roberts, B. Age-related changes in femoral trabecular bone in arthrosis. Acta Orthopaedica1990, 61, 421–426.
9. Ding, M.; Odgaard, A.; Linde, F.; Hvid, I. Age-related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Research2002, 20, 615–621.
10. Kabel, J.; Van Rietbergen, B.; Odgaard, A.; Huiskes, R. Constitutive relationships of fabric, density, and elastic properties in cancellous bone architecture. Bone1999, 25, 481–486.
11. Keyak, J. H.; Rossi, S. A. Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress-and strain-based failure theories. Journal of Biomechanics2000, 33, 209–214.
12. Silva, M. J.; Keaveny, T. M.; Hayes, W. C. Computed tomography–based finite element analysis predicts failure loads and fracture patterns for vertebral sections. Journal of Orthopaedic Research1998, 16, 300–308.
13. Geris, L. Computational Modeling in Tissue Engineering. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013.
14. Hudson, D. L.; Cohen, M. E. Neural Networks and Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Engineering. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2000.
15. Trmal, J.; Zelinka, J.; Müller, L. Adaptation of a feedforward artificial neural network using a linear transform. In Text, Speech and Dialogue (Sojka, P.; Horák, A.; Kopeček, I.; Pala, K. (eds.)). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, 423–430.
16. Kursin, A. Neural network: input anticipation may lead to advanced adaptation properties. In Artificial Neural Networks and Neural Information Processing – ICANN/ICONIP2003 (Kaynak, O.; Alpaydin, E.; Oja, E.; Xu, L. (eds.)). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003, 779–785.
17. Someren, M.; Hagen, S. Machine learning and reinforcement learning. In Do Smart Adaptive Systems Exist? (Gabrys, B.; Leiviskä, K.; Strackeljan, J. (eds.)). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, 81–104.
18. Smith, M. Neural Networks for Statistical Modeling. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993.
19. Hall, L. O.; Liu, X.; Bowyer, K. W.; Banfield, R. Why are neural networks sometimes much more accurate than decision trees: an analysis on a bio-informatics problem. IEEE International Conference2003, 3, 2851–2856.
20. Mallick, K. K. Freeze casting of porous bioactive glass and bioceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society2009, 92, 85–94.
21. Mallick, K. K.; Winnett, J. Preparation and characterization of porous Bioglass® and PLLA scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Journal of the American Ceramic Society2012, 95, 2680–2686.
22. Mallick, K. K.; Winnett, J.; van Grunsven, W.; Lapworth, J.; Reilly, G. C. Three-dimensional porous bioscaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: fabrication via adaptive foam reticulation and freeze casting techniques, characterization, and cell study. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A2012, 100, 2948–2959.
23. Lee, S. J.; Atala, A. Scaffold technologies for controlling cell behavior in tissue engineering. Biomedical Materials2013, 8, 1–2.
24. Hambli, R. Apparent damage accumulation in cancellous bone using neural networks. Journal of the mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials2011, 4, 868–878.
25. Zadpoor, A. A.; Campoli, G.; Weinans, H. Neural network prediction of load from the morphology of trabecular bone. Applied Mathematical Modelling2013, 37, 5260–5276.
26. Perilli, E.; Baleani, M.; Öhman, C.; Baruffaldi, F.; Viceconti, M. Structural parameters and mechanical strength of cancellous bone in the femoral head in osteoarthritis do not depend on age. Bone2007, 41, 760–768.
27. Hyvärinen, A.; Karhunen, J.; Oja, E. Independent Component Analysis. New York: Wiley, 2004.
28. Goulet, R. W.; Goldstein, S. A.; Ciarelli, M. J.; Kuhn, J. L.; Brown, M.; Feldkamp, L. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics1994, 27, 375–389.
29. Öhman, C.; Baleani, M.; Perilli, E.; Dall’Ara, E.; Tassani, S.; Baruffaldi, F.; Viceconti, M. Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements. Journal of Biomechanics2007, 40, 2426–2433.
30. Haykin, S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1999.
31. Wilamowski, B. M. Neural network architectures and learning algorithms. Industrial Electronics Magazine, IEEE2009, 3, 56–63.
32. Hagan, M. T.; Demuth, H. B.; Beale, M. H. Neural Network Design. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole, 1996.
33. Wackerly, D. D.; Mendenhall, W.; Scheaffer, R. L. Mathematical Statistics With Applications. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2008.
34. Taylor, J. G. Neural Networks and Their Applications. UNICOM, 1996.
35. Stone, M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological)1974, 111–147.
36. White, H. Artificial Neural Networks: Approximation and Learning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
37. Cohen, J.; Cohen, S. G.; West, W. C.; Aiken, L. S. Applied Multiple Regression: Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2003.
38. Brause, R. W. Medical analysis and diagnosis by neural networks. In Medical Data Analysis. Heidelberg: Springer, 2001, 1–13.
39. Dong, D.; McAvoy, T. J. Nonlinear principal component analysis-based on principal curves and neural networks. Computers & Chemical Engineering1996, 20, 65–78.
40. McCalden, R. W.; McGeough, J. A. Age-related changes in the compressive strength of cancellous bone. The relative importance of changes in density and trabecular architecture. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery1997, 79, 421–427.
41. Gibson, L. J. Biomechanics of cellular solids. Journal of Biomechanics2005, 38, 377–399.
42. Beale, M. Adapt network with weight and bias learning rules – MATLAB adaptwb. See http://www.mathworks.co.uk/help/nnet/ref/adaptwb.html for further details. Accessed 09/03/2014.
43. Peteiro-Barral, D.; Guijarro-Berdiñas, B. A study on the scalability of artificial neural networks training algorithms using multiple-criteria decision-making methods. In Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (Rutkowski, L.; Korytkowski, M.; Scherer, R.; Tadeusiewicz, R.; Zadeh, L.; Zurada, J. (eds.)). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, 162–173.