Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 135, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 937-946

  Matros, Evan ^a   Albornoz, Claudia R ^a   Razdan, Shantanu N ^a   Mehrara, Babak J ^a   Macadam, Sheina A ^a   Ro, Teresa ^a   Mccarthy, Colleen M ^a   Disa, Joseph J ^a   Cordeiro, Peter G ^a   Pusic, Andrea L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION TREE; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORATOR FLAP; PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION TREES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORATOR FLAP; QUALITY OF LIFE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930173042     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001134     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013 131 15 23
2. Millard DR Jr, Principlization of Plastic Surgery 1987 Boston Little, Brown
3. Bottero L, Lefaucheur JP, Fadhul S, Raulo Y, Collins ED, Lantieri L, Electromyographic assessment of rectus abdominis muscle function after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004 113 156 161
4. Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1997 50 322 330
5. Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010 126 1438 1453
6. Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part I. Unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010 126 1142 1153
7. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA, Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: A trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 2007 25 5203 5209
8. Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2009 27 1362 1367
9. Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013 131 320e 326e
10. Kulkarni AR, Sears ED, Atisha DM, Alderman AK, Use of autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013 132 534 541
11. Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, Lee G, Curtin C, Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J 2013 19 463 469
12. Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, A paradigm shift in United States breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013 131 320e 326e
13. Congress of the United States of America Affordable Care Act. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2012
14. Grover R, Padula WV, Van Vliet M, Ridgway EB, Comparing five alternative methods of breast reconstruction surgery: A cost-Effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013 132 709e 723e
15. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ, Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009 124 345 353
16. Wormald JC, Wade RG, Figus A, The increased risk of adverse outcomes in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction compared to unilateral reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014 67 143 156
17. Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, Hu Q, Van Zee K, The impact of post-mastectomy radiotherapy on two-stage implant breast reconstruction: An analysis of long term surgical outcomes, aesthetic results, and satisfaction over 13 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014 134 588 595
18. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC, Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002 109 2265 2274
19. Lam TC, Hsieh F, Boyages J, The effects of postmastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy on immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013 132 511 518
20. Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013 132 1383 1391
21. Thoma A, Veltri K, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, Duku E, Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-Effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004 113 1650 1661
22. Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX, How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ 1992 146 473 481
23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Expanding patient-centered care to empower patients and assist providers: Research in action. Available at: http://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/patient-centered/ria-issue5/ria-issue5.html. Accessed January 31, 2014
24. Gopie JP, Hilhorst MT, Kleijne A, Women's motives to opt for either implant or DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011 64 1062 1067
25. Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R, Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons: Results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011 127 1796 1803
26. Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS, Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009 123 1408 1413
27. Brazier JE, Rowen D, Mavranezouli I, Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome). Health Technol Assess 2012 16 1 114