Use of autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 534-541

  Kulkarni, Anita R ^a   Sears, Erika Davis ^c   Atisha, Dunya M ^c   Alderman, Amy K ^c  

^a

^b United States

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; REIMBURSEMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURGICAL FLAPS; TIME; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; BREAST NEOPLASMS; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISMS; SURGICAL FLAPS; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84883594238     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ae03e     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Albornoz CR, McCarthy CM, Pusic A.L., et al. A Paradigm Shift in United States Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Rates of Implant Use. Paper presented at: 91st Annual Meeting of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons; April 14 through 17, 2012; San Francisco, Calif.
2. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Report of the 2011 Plastic Surgery Statistics. Available at: http://www.plasticsur-gery.org/news-and-resources/ statistics.html. Accessed June 1, 2011.
3. Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair N.S., Chung KC. Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 1408-1413.
4. Fink A. How to Sample in Surveys. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2003.
5. Dillman D. Mail and Telephone Surveys. New York: Wiley; 1978.
6. Wilkins EG, Alderman AK Breast reconstruction practices in North America: Current trends and future priorities. Semin Plast Surg. 2004; 18: 149-155.
7. Kruper L, Holt A, Xu X.X., et al. Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy: Patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction in Southern California. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 2158-2165.
8. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 1585-1595.
9. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery J.C., Kim M., Davis JA. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 769-776.
10. Saulis AS, Mustoe TA, Fine NA A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Comparison of three common procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 1669-1676; discussion 1677. (Pubitemid 46632045)
11. Tønseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, Abyholm FE, Stavem K. Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61: 1188-1194.
12. Craft RO, Colakoglu S, Curtis M.S., et al. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1417-1424.
13. Bodin F, Zink S, Lutz J.C., Kadoch V., Wilk A, Bruant-Rodier C.Which breast reconstruction procedure provides the best long-term satisfaction? (in French). Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2010; 55: 547-552.
14. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee J.F., et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1-8.
15. Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig B.A., Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 2697-2704.
16. Han E, Johnson N, Glissmeyer M., et al. Increasing incidence of bilateral mastectomies: The patient perspective. Am J Surg. 2011; 201: 615-618.
17. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund E.H., Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: A trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 5203-5209. (Pubitemid 350232251)
18. Jones NB, Wilson J, Kotur L., Stephens J, Farrar WB, Agnese DM. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: An increasing trend at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 2691-2696.
19. Sbitany H, Amalfi AN, Langstein HN Preferences in choosing between breast reconstruction options: A survey of female plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1781-1789.
20. Quinn McGlothin TD. Breast surgery as a specialized practice. Am J Surg. 2005; 190: 264-268. (Pubitemid 40967938)
21. Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R., et al. Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons: Results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1796-1803.
22. Losken A, Nahabedian MY Oncoplastic breast surgery: Past, present, and future directions in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 969-972.
23. th Portuguese Senology Congress, Vilamoura, 2009. Breast 2010; 19: 538-540.
24. Hernanz F, Santos R. Incorporating the surgical treatment of symptomatic macromastia into a breast cancer unit: Could this be a useful management policy? Breast 2011; 20: 190-191.
25. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Morrow M, et al Receipt of delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: Do women revisit the decision? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 1748-1756.