Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1383-1391

  Chang, Edward I ^a   Chang, Eric I ^a   Soto Miranda, Miguel A ^a   Zhang, Hong ^a   Nosrati, Naveed ^a   Robb, Geoffrey L ^a   Chang, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; FASCIA; FEMALE; FREE TISSUE GRAFT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGICAL MESH; TRANSPLANTATION; WOUND CLOSURE; HERNIA, ABDOMINAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY;

ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES; ADULT; BREAST; FASCIA; FEMALE; FREE TISSUE FLAPS; HERNIA, ABDOMINAL; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL MESH; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;

EID: 84889086655     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a805a3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, et al. Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2158-2164.
2. Yao K, Stewart AK, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP. Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: A report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2554-2562.
3. Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a survival advantage in high-risk women with a personal history of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2702-2709.
4. Brewster AM, Bedrosian I, Parker PA, et al. Association between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer outcomes by hormone receptor status. Cancer 2012;118:5637-5643.
5. Chung A, Huynh K, Lawrence C, Sim MS, Giuliano A. Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and unilateral total mastectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2600-2606.
6. Metcalfe KA, Lubinski J, Ghadirian P, et al.; Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. Predictors of contra-lateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: The Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1093-1097.
7. Kaas R, Verhoef S, Wesseling J, et al. Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Very low risk for subsequent breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:488-492.
8. Yi M, Meric-Bernstam F, Middleton LP, et al. Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer 2009;115:962-971.
9. Crosby MA, Garvey PB, Selber JC, et al. Reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1025-1033.
10. Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM fap and free DIEP fap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:737-746; discussion 747.
11. Wu LC, Bajaj A, Chang DW, Chevray PM. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM faps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:702-709.
12. Garvey PB, Salavati S, Feng L, Butler CE. Abdominal donor-site outcomes for medial versus lateral deep inferior epigastric artery branch perforator harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2198-2205.
13. Wan DC, Tseng CY, Anderson-Dam J, Dalio AL, Crisera CA, Festekjian JH. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM faps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP fap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:367-374.
14. Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM faps on the abdominal wall: Part I. Unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1142-1153.
15. Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM faps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1438-1453.
16. Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A, et al. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP fap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1133-1141.
17. Zendejas B, Moriarty JP, O'Byrne J, Degnim AC, Farley DR, Boughey JC. Cost-effectiveness of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus routine surveillance in patients with unilateral breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2993-3000.
18. Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP fap reconstruction: A meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:752-764.
19. Ochoa O, Chrysopoulo M, Nastala C, Ledoux P, Pisano S. Abdominal wall stability and fap complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator fap breast reconstruction: Does body mass index make a difference? Analysis of 418 patients and 639 faps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:21e-33e.
20. Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, Dalio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free fap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1519-1526.
21. Nelson JA, Fosnot J, Selber JC, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Age and abdominal wall strength: Assessing the aging abdominal wall after autologous breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2013;33:14-23.