Personal data: how context shapes consumers’ data sharing with organizations from various sectors

Electronic Markets

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 95-108

  Roeber, Bjoern ^a   Rehse, Olaf ^a   Knorrek, Robert ^a   Thomsen, Benjamin ^a  

^a BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conjoint; Data protection; Digital identity; Personal data; Privacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930091097     PISSN: 10196781     EISSN: 14228890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-015-0183-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Acquisti, A. and Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, privacy on the Facebook, Privacy Enhancing Technology Workshops (PET), 1–22.
2. Acquisti, A., John, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2009). What is privacy worth? Twenty First Workshop on Information Systems and Economics (WISE).
3. Acquisti, A., John, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2011). Strangers on a plane: context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 858–875.
4. Bauer, C., Korunovska, J., Spiekermann, S. (2012). On the value of information – what facebook users are willing to pay. ECIS 2012 Proceedings, Paper 197.
5. Brown, K. (2011). Sony scrambles to limit hacking scandal; http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6678a986-758f-11e0-8492-00144feabdc0.html. Accessed on 26 Feb 2013.
6. Bughin, J. (2011). Digital user segmentation and privacy concerns. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 156–165.
7. Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42, 1150–1152.
8. Central Intelligence Agency (2012). The world factbook: Germany, Poland, Netherlands. Updated 2012, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook. Accessed 26 Feb 2013.
9. Cvrcek, D., Danezis, G., Kumpost, M., & Matya, V. (2006). A Study on the value of location privacy. Proceedings of the Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES ’06), 109–118.
10. Eurobarometer (2011), Special Eurobarometer 359, Attitudes on Data Protection and Electronic Identity in the European Union, Directorate-General Information Society and Media (INFSO), the Directorate-General Justice (JUST) and the Directorate-General JRC, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_359_en.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2013.
11. Hann, I.-H., Hui, K.-L., Lee, T. S. and Png, I. P. L. (2003). The value of online privacy: an empirical estimation. Working paper, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California.
12. Hinz, O., Gerstmeier, E., Tafreschi, O., Enzmann, M., Schneider, M. (2007) Customer loyalty programs and privacy concerns. 20th Bled eConference eMergence: Merging and Emerging Technologies, Processes, and Institutions.
13. Krasnova, H., Hildebrand, T., Guenther, O. (2009). Investigating the value of privacy in online social networks: conjoint analysis. Proceedings of International Conference On Information Systems (ICIS).
14. Maude, F. (2012). Open Government Partnership conference (OGP). Speech. http://www.guardian.co.uk/public-leaders-network/2012/apr/18/francis-maude-data-raw-material. Accessed 26 Feb 2013.
15. Medick, V., & Teevs, C. Datenskandal: Telekom soll BKA mit Millionen Kundendaten beliefert haben, http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/datenskandal-telekom-soll-bka-mit-millionen-kundendaten-beliefert-haben-a-617044.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2013.
16. Orme, B. K. (2002). Formulating attributes and levels in conjoint analysis. Research Paper Series, Sawtooth Software.
17. Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159–169.
18. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
19. World Economic Forum (2013), http://www.weforum.org/issues/rethinking-personal-data. Accessed 26 Feb 2013.