Issue-Specific Engagement: How Facebook Contributes to Opinion Leadership and Efficacy on Energy and Climate Issues

Journal of Information Technology and Politics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 200-218

  Vraga, Emily K ^a   Anderson, Ashley A ^b   Kotcher, John E ^a   Maibach, Edward W ^a,c  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^c Mason s Center for Climate Change Communication   (United States)

Author keywords

Advocacy; climate change; environmental communication; opinion leadership; political efficacy; social media

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930033969     PISSN: 19331681     EISSN: 1933169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1034910     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. E.Aronson,, C.Fried,, & J.Stone, (1991). Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1636–1638. doi:10.2105/AJPH.81.12.1636
2. M.R.Auer,, Y.Zhang,, & P.Lee, (2014). The potential of microblogs for the study of public perceptions of climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/wcc.273
3. A.Bandura, (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
4. G.Baym,, & C.Shah, (2011). Circulating struggle: The on-line flow of environmental advocacy clips from The Daily Show and The Colbert Report.Information, Communication & Society, 14(7), 1017–1038. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.554573
5. A.B.Becker,, K.E.Dalrymple,, D.Brossard,, D.A.Scheufele,, & A.C.Gunther, (2010). Getting citizens involved: How controversial policy debates stimulate issue participation during a political campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 181–203. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edp047
6. D.J.Bem, (1972). Self-perception theory. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7. W.L.Bennett, (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20–39. doi:10.1177/0002716212451428
8. W.L.Bennett,, & S.Iyengar, (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
9. L.Bode,, E.K.Vraga,, P.Borah,, & D.V.Shah, (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 414–429. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12048
10. T.Bolsen,, & T.J.Leeper, (2013). Self-interest and attention to news among issue publics. Political Communication, 30, 329–348. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737428
11. T.L.Childers, (1986). Assessment of the psychometric properties of an opinion leadership scale. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 184–188. doi:10.2307/3151666
12. J.Cho,, D.V.Shah,, J.M.McLeod,, D.M.McLeod,, R.M.Scholl,, & M.R.Gotlieb, (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19, 66–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x
13. P.E.Converse, (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D.A.Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York, NY: Free Press.
14. R.J.Dalton, (2009). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
15. Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015, January 9). Social media update 2014—Demographics of key social networking platforms. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/demographics-of-key-social-networking-platforms-2/
16. R.E.Dunlap,, & A.M.McCright, (2008). A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment, 50(5), 26–35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35
17. W.P.Eveland,, & K.E.Cooper, (2013). An integrated model of communication influence on beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supp. 3). doi:10.1073/pnas.1212742110
18. Facebook (n.d.). How news feed works. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/help/327131014036297/
19. L.Feldman,, A.Leiserowitz,, & E.Maibach, (2011). The science of satire: The Daily Show and The Colbert Report as sources of public attention to science and the environment. In A.Amarasingam (Ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news (pp. 25–46). Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.
20. L.Feldman,, E.W.Maibach,, C.Roser-Renouf,, & A.Leiserowitz, (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17, 3–31. doi:10.1177/1940161211425410
21. J.Fernandes,, M.Giurcanu,, K.W.Bowers,, & J.C.Neely, (2010). The writing on the wall: A content analysis of college students’ Facebook groups for the 2008 presidential election. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 653–675. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516865
22. L.Festinger, (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
23. S.Gaby,, & N.Caren, (2012). Occupy online: How cute old men and Malcolm X recruited 400,000 US users to OWS on Facebook. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural, and Political Protest, 11, 367–374. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.708858
24. H.Gil de Zúñiga,, I.Bachmann,, S.-H.Hsu,, & J.Brundidge, (2013). Expressive versus consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538–1559.
25. H.Gil de Zúñiga,, N.Jung,, & S.Valenzuela, (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
26. T.Gnambs,, & B.Batinic, (2013). The roots of interpersonal influence: A mediated moderation model for knowledge and traits as predictors of opinion leadership. Applied Psychology, 62, 597–618. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00497
27. D.M.Gromet,, H.Kunreuther,, & R.P.Larrick, (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23). doi:10.1073/pnas.1218453110
28. L.C.Hamilton, (2011). Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104, 231–242. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
29. Hampton, K. N., Sessions Goulet, L., Marlow, C., & Rainie, L. (2012). Why most Facebook users get more than they give: The effect of Facebook “power users” on everybody else. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Facebook-users.aspx
30. J.D.Hmielowski,, L.Feldman,, T.A.Myers,, A.Leiserowitz,, & E.Maibach, (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 866–883. doi:10.1177/0963662513480091
31. S.S.Ho,, A.R.Binder,, A.B.Becker,, P.Moy,, D.A.Scheufele,, D.Brossard,, & A.C.Gunther, (2011). The role of perceptions of media bias in general and issue-specific political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 343–374. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.491933
32. L.H.Hoffman,, P.E.Jones,, & D.G.Young, (2013). Does my comment count? Perceptions of political participation in an online environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2248–2256. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.010
33. L.H.Hoffman,, & T.L.Thomson, (2009). The effect of television viewing on adolescents’ civic participation: Political efficacy as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53, 3–21. doi:10.1080/08838150802643415
34. B.Hogan,, & A.Quan-Haase, (2010). Persistence and change in social media. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 309–315. doi:10.1177/0270467610380012
35. K.Ikeda,, T.Kobayashi,, & M.Hoshimoto, (2008). Does political participation make a difference? The relationship between political choice, civic engagement, and political efficacy. Electoral Studies, 27, 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.004
36. E.Katz, (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, 61–78.
37. K.Kenski,, & N.J.Stroud, (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50, 173–192.
38. Kim, Y., Chen, H-T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2607–2614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.005
39. M.J.Kushin,, & M.Yamamoto, (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 608–630. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516863
40. P.F.Lazarsfeld,, B.Berelson,, & H.Gaudet, (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
41. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Politics and global warming, Spring 2014. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Politics_and_Global_Warming.pdf
42. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Hmielowski, J. (2011). Politics and global warming: Democrats, Republicans, Independents and the Tea Party. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/PoliticsGlobalWarming2011.pdf
43. E.Litt, (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56, 330–345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
44. A.E.Marwick,, & D.boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
45. A.M.McCright,, & R.E.Dunlap, (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
46. A.M.McCright,, R.E.Dunlap,, & C.Xiao, (2013). Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change, 119, 1–8. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9
47. L.R.Men,, & W.H.S.Tsai, (2013). Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement on social networking sites in China. Public Relations Review, 39, 13–22.
48. Mitchell, A., Kiley, J., Gottfried, J., & Guskin, E. (2013, October 24). The role of news on Facebook: Common yet incidental. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2013/10/24/the-role-of-news-on-facebook/
49. D.C.Mutz, (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
50. T.A.Myers, (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 297–310.
51. New America Foundation. (2012). Social media buttons in comment sections. Retrieved from http://www.democracyfund.org/media/uploaded/ENP_Buttons_Report.pdf
52. R.G.Niemi,, S.C.Craig,, & F.Mattei, (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1407–1413.
53. E.C.Nisbet, (2006). The engagement model of opinion leadership: Testing validity within a European context. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 3–30. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh100
54. M.C.Nisbet,, & J.E.Kotcher, (2009). A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication, 30, 328–354. doi:10.1177/1075547008328797
55. J.A.Obar,, P.Zube,, & C.Lampe, (2012). Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 1–25.
56. E.Pariser, (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
57. C.S.Park, (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1641–1648. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044
58. N.Park,, K.F.Kee,, & S.Valenzuela, (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 729–733. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
59. J.Penney, (2014). Social media and symbolic action: Exploring participation in the Facebook red equal sign profile picture campaign. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12092
60. N.Petrovic,, J.Madrigano,, & L.Zaval, (2014). Motivating mitigation: When health matters more than climate change. Climatic Change, 126, 245–254. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1192-2
61. Pew Research Center (2012, September 4). Politics on social networking sites. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/09/04/politics-on-social-networking-sites
62. Pew Research Center. (2013, November 1). GOP deeply divided over climate change. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2013/11/01/gop-deeply-divided-over-climate-change/
63. R.Pingree, (2007). How messages affect their senders: A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation. Communication Research, 17, 439–461. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00306.x
64. V.Price,, C.David,, B.Goldthorpe,, M.M.Roth,, & J.N.Cappella, (2006). Locating the issue public: The multi-dimensional nature of engagement with health care reform. Political Behavior, 28, 33–65.
65. J.Raacke,, & J.Bonds-Raacke, (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 169–174. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0056.
66. Robbins, I. P. (2013, June 18). What is the meaning of “like”? The first amendment implications of social-media expression. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2281881
67. C.H.Roch, (2005). The dual roots of opinion leadership. Journal of Politics, 67, 110–131. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00310.x
68. Rolfe-Redding, J., Maibach, E. W., Feldman, L., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). Republicans and climate change: An audience analysis of predictors for belief and policy preferences (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2026002). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2026002
69. G.D.Saxton,, & R.D.Waters, (2014). What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community-building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 280–299.
70. D.V.Shah,, & D.A.Scheufele, (2006). Explicating opinion leadership: Nonpolitical dispositions, information consumption, and civic participation. Political Communication, 23, 1–22. doi:10.1080/10584600500476932
71. M.D.Slater, (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
72. T.Sun,, S.Youn,, G.Wu,, & M.Kuntaraporn, (2006). Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): An exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1104–1127. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00310.x
73. K.Thorson, (2012). What does it mean to be a good citizen? Citizenship vocabularies as resources for action. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 70–85. doi:10.1177/0002716212453264
74. K.Thorson,, K.Driscoll,, B.Ekdale,, S.Edgerly,, L.G.Thompson,, A.Schrock,, … C.Wells, (2013). YouTube, Twitter and the Occupy Movement: Connecting content and circulation practices. Information, Communication, and Society, 16, 421–451.
75. K.Thorson,, E.K.Vraga,, & N.Kligler-Vilenchik, (2014). Don’t push your opinions on me: Young citizens and political etiquette on Facebook. In J.A.Hendricks & D.Schill (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and social media: An analysis of the 2012 campaign (pp. 74–93). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
76. S.Verba,, K.L.Schlozman,, & H.F.Brady, (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. J.Vitak,, P.Zube,, A.Smock,, C.T.Carr,, N.Ellison,, & C.Lampe, (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107–114. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
78. G.Weimann, (1991). The influentials: Back to the concept of opinion leaders? Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 267–279. doi:10.1086/269257
79. S.Wu,, J.M.Hofman,, W.A.Mason,, & D.J.Watts, (2011). Who says what to whom on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 705–714). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1963405.1963504