Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial

European Urology

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 419-425

  Tonttila, Panu P ^a   Lantto, Juha ^a   Pääkkö, Eija ^a   Piippo, Ulla ^a   Kauppila, Saila ^a   Lammentausta, Eveliina ^a   Ohtonen, Pasi ^a   Vaarala, Markku H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Diagnosis; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate specific antigen

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; KALLIKREIN; KALLIKREIN-RELATED PEPTIDASE 3, HUMAN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; BIOPSY; BLOOD; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FINLAND; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INTERVENTIONAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY; UPREGULATION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; FINLAND; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; KALLIKREINS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; UP-REGULATION;

EID: 84930019665     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. K.K. Hodge, J.E. McNeal, M.K. Terris, and T.A. Stamey Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate J Urol 142 1989 71 74
2. A. Heidenreich, P.J. Bastian, J. Bellmunt, and et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent - update 2013 Eur Urol 65 2014 124 137
3. K.A. Roehl, J.A. Antenor, and W.J. Catalona Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study J Urol 167 2002 2435 2439
4. S.L. Conti, M. Dall'era, V. Fradet, J.E. Cowan, J. Simko, and P.R. Carroll Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer J Urol 181 2009 1628 1633
5. N. Suardi, A. Briganti, A. Gallina, and et al. Testing the most stringent criteria for selection of candidates for active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer BJU Int 105 2010 1548 1552
6. S. Rais-Bahrami, M.M. Siddiqui, B. Turkbey, and et al. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer J Urol 190 2013 1721 1727
7. C.M. Hoeks, J.O. Barentsz, T. Hambrock, and et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging Radiology 261 2011 46 66
8. P. Puech, E. Potiron, L. Lemaitre, and et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens Urology 74 2009 1094 1099
9. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, C. Allen, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting Eur Urol 59 2011 477 494
10. W.J. Catalona, A.W. Partin, K.M. Slawin, and et al. Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial JAMA 279 1998 1542 1547
11. S.Y. Eskicorapci, D.E. Baydar, C. Akbal, and et al. An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer Eur Urol 45 2004 444 448
12. N.J. van As, N.M. de Souza, S.F. Riches, and et al. A study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance Eur Urol 56 2009 981 987
13. V. Fradet, J. Kurhanewicz, J.E. Cowan, and et al. Prostate cancer managed with active surveillance: role of anatomic MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging Radiology 256 2010 176 183
14. H.A. Vargas, O. Akin, T. Franiel, and et al. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness Radiology 259 2011 775 784
15. D. Margel, S.A. Yap, N. Lawrentschuk, and et al. Impact of multiparametric endorectal coil prostate magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates: a prospective cohort study J Urol 187 2012 1247 1252
16. C.M. Moore, V. Kasivisvanathan, S. Eggener, and et al. Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an international working group Eur Urol 64 2013 544 552
17. J.W. Nix, B. Turkbey, A. Hoang, and et al. Very distal apical prostate tumours: identification on multiparametric MRI at 3 tesla BJU Int 110 2012 E694 E700
18. D. Volkin, B. Turkbey, A.N. Hoang, and et al. Multiparametric MRI and subsequent MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy increase the detection of anteriorly located prostate cancers BJU Int 114 2014 E43 E49
19. J.J. Fütterer, A. Briganti, P. De Visschere, and et al. Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature Eur Urol 68 2015 1045 1053
20. C.M.A. Hoeks, M.G. Schouten, J.G.R. Bomers, and et al. Three-tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers Eur Urol 62 2012 902 909
21. W.J. van de Ven, C.A. Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, T. Hambrock, J.O. Barentsz, and H.J. Huisman Simulated required accuracy of image registration tools for targeting high-grade cancer components with prostate biopsies Eur Radiol 23 2013 1401 1407
22. Y. Hu, H.U. Ahmed, Z. Taylor, and et al. MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions Med Image Anal 16 2012 687 703
23. P. Puech, O. Rouviere, R. Renard-Penna, and et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy-prospective multicenter study Radiology 268 2013 461 469
24. N.B. Delongchamps, M. Peyromaure, A. Schull, and et al. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies J Urol 189 2013 493 499
25. J.S. Wysock, A.B. Rosenkrantz, W.C. Huang, and et al. A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial Eur Urol 66 2014 343 351
26. I.G. Schoots, M.J. Roobol, D. Nieboer, C.H. Bangma, E.W. Steyerberg, and M.G.M. Hunink Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Urol 68 2015 438 450
27. J.B. Lattouf, R.L. Grubb III, S.J. Lee, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer BJU Int 99 2007 1041 1046
28. J. Haffner, L. Lemaitre, P. Puech, and et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection BJU Int 108 2011 E171 E178
29. M. Valerio, I. Donaldson, M. Emberton, and et al. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review Eur Urol 68 2015 8 19
30. M.R. Pokorny, M. de Rooij, E. Duncan, and et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies Eur Urol 66 2014 22 29