Human embryo cryopreservation-methods, timing, and other considerations for optimizing an embryo cryopreservation program

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 128-144

  Sparks, Amy E T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

blastocyst; cryopreservation; embryo; pronuclear stage; slow freezing; vitrification

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FREEZING; HUMAN; HUMAN EMBRYO; VITRIFICATION; BLASTOCYST; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFERTILITY; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT;

BENCHMARKING; BLASTOCYST; CRYOPRESERVATION; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VITRIFICATION;

EID: 84930007684     PISSN: 15268004     EISSN: 15264564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546826     Document Type: Article

References (152)

1. Ahlström A., Westin C., Wikland M., Hardarson T. Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology. Hum Reprod: 2013; 28 5 1199 1209
2. Ahlström A., Westin C., Reismer E., Wikland M., Hardarson T. Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 12 3289 3296
3. Racowsky C., Combelles C. M., Nureddin A., et al. Day 3 and day 5 morphological predictors of embryo viability. Reprod Biomed Online: 2003; 6 3 323 331
4. Gardner D. K., Lane M., Stevens J., Schlenker T., Schoolcraft W. B. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril: 2000; 73 6 1155 1158
5. El-Toukhy T., Khalaf Y., Braude P. IVF results: optimize not maximize. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2006; 194 2 322 331
6. Min J. K., Breheny S. A., MacLachlan V., Healy D. L. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod: 2004; 19 1 3 7
7. Reynolds M. A., Schieve L. A. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996-2002. Hum Reprod: 2006; 21 3 694 700
8. Gerris J., De Neubourg D., De Sutter P., Van Royen E., Mangelschots K., Vercruyssen M. Cryopreservation as a tool to reduce multiple birth. Reprod Biomed Online: 2003; 7 3 286 294
9. Schnorr J. A., Doviak M. J., Muasher S. J., Jones H. W. Jr. Impact of a cryopreservation program on the multiple pregnancy rate associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril: 2001; 75 1 147 151
10. Tiitinen A., Halttunen M., Härkki P., Vuoristo P., Hyden-Granskog C. Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 6 1140 1144
11. Bhattacharya S., Kamath M. S. Reducing multiple births in assisted reproduction technology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol: 2014; 28 2 191 199
12. Griesinger G., von Otte S., Schroer A., et al. Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study. Hum Reprod: 2007; 22 5 1348 1352
13. Queenan J. T. Jr. Embryo freezing to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol: 2000; 169 1-2 79 83
14. Pattinson H. A., Hignett M., Dunphy B. C., Fleetham J. A. Outcome of thaw embryo transfer after cryopreservation of all embryos in patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril: 1994; 62 6 1192 1196
15. Oktay K., Buyuk E., Davis O., Yermakova I., Veeck L., Rosenwaks Z. Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: IVF and embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 1 90 95
16. Fuller B., Paynter S. Fundamentals of cryobiology in reproductive medicine. Reprod Biomed Online: 2004; 9 6 680 691
17. Leibo S. P., Pool T. B. The principal variables of cryopreservation: solutions, temperatures, and rate changes. Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 2 269 276
18. Nagy Z. P., Vajta G., Chang C-C, Kort H. The human embryo: vitrification. In: Gardner D. K., Weissman A., Howles C. M., Shoham Z., eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd ed. London, UK Informa: 2009; 275 287
19. Arav A., Zeron Y., Leslie S. B., Behboodi E., Anderson G. B., Crowe J. H. Phase transition temperature and chilling sensitivity of bovine oocytes. Cryobiology: 1996; 33 6 589 599
20. Leibo S. P., Martino A., Kobayashi S., Pollard J. W. Stage-dependent sensitivity of oocytes and embryos to low temperatures. Anim Reprod Sci: 1996; 42 45 53
21. Ghetler Y., Yavin S., Shalgi R., Arav A. The effect of chilling on membrane lipid phase transition in human oocytes and zygotes. Hum Reprod: 2005; 20 12 3385 3389
22. Songsasen N., Yu I. J., Ratterree M. S., VandeVoort C. A., Leibo S. P. Effect of chilling on the organization of tubulin and chromosomes in rhesus monkey oocytes. Fertil Steril: 2002; 77 4 818 825
23. Bianchi V., Coticchio G., Fava L., Flamigni C., Borini A. Meiotic spindle imaging in human oocytes frozen with a slow freezing procedure involving high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod: 2005; 20 4 1078 1083
24. Pedro P. B., Yokoyama E., Zhu S. E., et al. Permeability of mouse oocytes and embryos at various developmental stages to five cryoprotectants. J Reprod Dev: 2005; 51 2 235 246
25. Mazur P. Kinetics of water loss from cells at subzero temperatures and the likelihood of intracellular ice freezing. J Gen Physiol: 1963; 47 347 369
26. Mazur P., Leibo S. P., Chu E. HY. A two-factor hypothesis of freezing injury. Evidence from Chinese hamster tissue-culture cells. Exp Cell Res: 1972; 71 2 345 355
27. Kleinhans F. W., Mazur P. Comparison of actual vs. synthesized ternary phase diagrams for solutes of cryobiological interest. Cryobiology: 2007; 54 2 212 222
28. Rall W. F., Meyer T. K. Zona fracture damage and its avoidance during the cryopreservation of mammalian embryos. Theriogenology: 1989; 31 3 683 692
29. Gao D., Critser J. K. Mechanisms of cryoinjury in living cells. ILAR J: 2000; 41 4 187 196
30. Rall W. F. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos, gametes and ovarian tissue. Current issues and progress. In: Wolf D. P., Zelinski-Wooten M., eds. Assisted Fertilization and Nuclear Transfer in Mammals. Totowa, NJ Humana Press: 2001; 173 187
31. Bielanski A. A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices. Theriogenology: 2012; 77 3 467 482
32. Lindberg A., Ortman K., Alenius S. Seroconversion of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) in dairy heifers after embryo transfer. In: Forsberg M., Greve T., Gustafsson H., Katila T., Kindahl H., Ropstad E., eds. 14th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, Stockholm, Sweden; 2000; 250
33. Drew T. W., Sandvik T., Wakeley P., Jones T., Howard P. BVD virus genotype 2 detected in British cattle. Vet Rec: 2002; 151 18 551 552
34. Bielanski A., Nadin Davis S., Sapp T., Lutze-Wallace C. Viral contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology: 2000; 40 110 116
35. Bielanski A., Bergeron H., Lau P. C., Devenish J. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology: 2003; 46 2 146 152
36. Shaw J. M., Kola I., MacFarlane D. R., Trounson A. O. An association between chromosomal abnormalities in rapidly frozen 2-cell mouse embryos and the ice-forming properties of the cryoprotective solution. J Reprod Fertil: 1991; 91 1 9 18
37. Houghton F. D., Barr K. J., Walter G., et al. Functional significance of gap junctional coupling in preimplantation development. Biol Reprod: 2002; 66 5 1403 1412
38. Vincent C., Johnson M. H. Cooling, cryoprotectants, and the cytoskeleton of the mammalian oocyte. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol: 1992; 14 73 100
39. Ahn H. J., Sohn I. P., Kwon H. C., Jo D. H., Park Y. D., Min C. K. Characteristics of the cell membrane fluidity, actin fibers, and mitochondrial dysfunctions of frozen-thawed two-cell mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev: 2002; 61 4 466 476
40. Van den Abbeel E., Camus M., Van Waesberghe L., Devroey P., Van Steirteghem A. C. Viability of partially damaged human embryos after cryopreservation. Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 9 2006 2010
41. Rienzi L., Nagy Z. P., Ubaldi F., et al. Laser-assisted removal of necrotic blastomeres from cryopreserved embryos that were partially damaged. Fertil Steril: 2002; 77 6 1196 1201
42. Karow A. M. Jr. Cryopreservation: pharmacological considerations. In: Karow Am, Abouna G. J., Humphries eds. Organ Preservation for Transplantation. Boston, MA Little Brown: 1974; 86 107
43. Agca Y., Liu J., Peter A. T., Critser E. S., Critser J. K. Effect of developmental stage on bovine oocyte plasma membrane water and cryoprotectant permeability characteristics. Mol Reprod Dev: 1998; 49 4 408 415
44. Kasai M., Edashige K. Movement of water and cryoprotectants in mouse oocytes and embryos at different stages: relevance to cryopreservation. In: Chian R. C., Quinn P., eds. Fertility Cryopreservation. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press: 2010; 16 23
45. Sales A. D., Lobo C. H., Carvalho A. A., Moura A. A., Rodrigues A. PR. Structure, function, and localization of aquaporins: their possible implications on gamete cryopreservation. Genet Mol Res: 2013; 12 4 6718 6732
46. Xiong Y., Tan Y. J., Xiong Y. M., et al. Expression of aquaporins in human embryos and potential role of AQP3 and AQP7 in preimplantation mouse embryo development. Cell Physiol Biochem: 2013; 31 4-5 649 658
47. Alpha Scientists In Reproductive Medicine The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online: 2012; 25 2 146 167
48. Edgar D. H., Gook D. A. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update: 2012; 18 5 536 554
49. Veeck Gosden L. L., Berrios R., Bodine R., Clarke R. M., Zaninovic N. The human embryo: slow freezing. In: Gardner D. K., Weissman A., Howles C. M., Shoham Z., eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd ed. London, UK Informa: 2009; 275 287
50. Tucker M. J., Liebermann J. Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. A User's Manual and Trouble-Shooting Guide. London, UK Informa: 2007
51. Mazur P. Equilibrium, quasi-equilibrium, and nonequilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos. Cell Biophys: 1990; 17 1 53 92
52. Schneider U. Cryobiological principles of embryo freezing. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer: 1986; Feb;3 1 3 9
53. Testart J., Lassalle B., Belaisch-Allart J., et al. High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril: 1986; 46 2 268 272
54. Leibo S. P. A one-step in situ dilution method for frozen-thawed bovine embryos. Cryo Lett: 1983; 4 387 400
55. Fahy G. M., MacFarlane D. R., Angell C. A., Meryman H. T. Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. Cryobiology: 1984; 21 4 407 426
56. Reed M. L., Said A-H, Thompson D. J., Caperton C. L. Large-volume vitrification of human biopsied and non-biopsied blastocysts: a simple, robust technique for cryopreservation. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2014
57. Yavin S., Arav A. Measurement of essential physical properties of vitrification solutions. Theriogenology: 2007; 67 1 81 89
58. Trounson A., Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature: 1983; 305 5936 707 709
59. Lassalle B., Testart J., Renard J. P. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril: 1985; 44 5 645 651
60. Fahy G. M., Rall W. F. Vitrification: an overview. Tucker M. J., Liebermann J., eds. Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. A User's Manual and Trouble-Shooting Guide. London, UK Informa: 2007
61. Rall W. F., Fahy G. M. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 degrees C by vitrification. Nature: 1985; 313 6003 573 575
62. Rall W. F. Factors affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology: 1987; 24 5 387 402
63. Kola I., Kirby C., Shaw J., Davey A., Trounson A. Vitrification of mouse oocytes results in aneuploid zygotes and malformed fetuses. Teratology: 1988; 38 5 467 474
64. Quinn P., Kerin J. FP. Experience with the cryopreservation of human embryos using the mouse as a model to establish successful techniques. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf: 1986; 3 1 40 45
65. Kuzan F. B., Quinn P. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos. In: Wolf D. P., ed. In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. A Manual of Basic Technique. New York, NY Plenum Press: 1988
66. Trounson A., Sjöblom P. Cleavage and development of human embryos in vitro after ultrarapid freezing and thawing. Fertil Steril: 1988; 50 2 373 376
67. Ali J., Shelton J. N. Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos. J Reprod Fertil: 1993; 99 2 471 477
68. Martino A., Songsasen N., Leibo S. P. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol Reprod: 1996; 54 5 1059 1069
69. Kuwayama M., Hamano S., Nagai T. Vitrification of bovine blastocysts obtained by in vitro culture of oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro. J Reprod Fertil: 1992; 96 1 187 193
70. Kasai M., Komi J. H., Takakamo A., Tsudera H., Sakurai T., Machida T. A simple method for mouse embryo cryopreservation in a low toxicity vitrification solution, without appreciable loss of viability. J Reprod Fertil: 1990; 89 1 91 97
71. Kuleshova L., Gianaroli L., Magli C., Ferraretti A., Trounson A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod: 1999; 14 12 3077 3079
72. Gardner D. K., Schoolcraft W. B., Wagley L., Schlenker T., Stevens J., Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod: 1998; 13 12 3434 3440
73. Arav A. Vitrification of oocyte and embryos. In: Lauria A., Gandolfi F., eds. New Trends in Embryo Transfer. Cambridge, UK Portland Press: 1992; 255 264
74. Vajta G., Nagy Z. P. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online: 2006; 12 6 779 796
75. AbdelHafez F., Xu J., Goldberg J., Desai N. Vitrification in open and closed carriers at different cell stages: assessment of embryo survival, development, DNA integrity and stability during vapor phase storage for transport. BMC Biotechnol: 2011; 11 29
76. Valbuena D., Póo M. E., Aguilar-Gallardo C., et al. Comparison of Cryotip vs. Cryotop for mouse and human blastomere vitrification. Fertil Steril: 2012; 97 1 209 217
77. Wong K. M., Mastenbroek S., Repping S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril: 2014; 102 1 19 26
78. Edgar D. H., Archer J., McBain J., Bourne H. Embryonic factors affecting outcome from single cryopreserved embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online: 2007; 14 6 718 723
79. Surrey E., Keller J., Stevens J., Gustofson R., Minjarez D., Schoolcraft W. Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques. Reprod Biomed Online: 2010; 21 3 411 417
80. Kolibianakis E. M., Venetis C. A., Tarlatzis B. C. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol: 2009; 21 3 270 274
81. Loutradi K. E., Kolibianakis E. M., Venetis C. A., et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril: 2008; 90 1 186 193
82. AbdelHafez F. F., Desai N., Abou-Setta A. M., Falcone T., Goldfarb J. Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online: 2010; 20 2 209 222
83. Patrizio P., Sakkas D. From oocyte to baby: a clinical evaluation of the biological efficiency of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril: 2009; 91 4 1061 1066
84. Jones H. W. Jr, Jones D., Kolm P. Cryopreservation: a simplified method of evaluation. Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 3 548 553
85. Gardner D. K., Vella P., Lane M., Wagley L., Schlenker T., Schoolcraft W. B. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril: 1998; 69 1 84 88
86. Noyes N., Reh A., McCaffrey C., Tan O., Krey L. Impact of developmental stage at cryopreservation and transfer on clinical outcome of frozen embryo cycles. Reprod Biomed Online: 2009; 19 03 9 15
87. Shapiro B. S., Daneshmand S. T., Garner F. C., Aguirre M., Hudson C., Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 2 344 348
88. Beier H. M., Beckman J. O. German Embryo Protection Act: Gesetz zum Schutz von Embryonen (Embryonenshutzgesetz-EschG). Hum Reprod: 1991; 6 605 606
89. Germond M., Senn A. A law affecting medically assisted procreation is on the way in Switzerland. J Assist Reprod Genet: 1999; 16 7 341 343
90. Fugger E. F., Bustillo M., Katz L. P., Dorfmann A. D., Bender S. D., Schulman J. D. Embryonic development and pregnancy from fresh and cryopreserved sibling pronucleate human zygotes. Fertil Steril: 1988; 50 2 273 278
91. Horne G., Critchlow J. D., Newman M. C., Edozien L., Matson P. L., Lieberman B. A. A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 3 542 547
92. Senn A., Vozzi C., Chanson A., De Grandi P., Germond M. Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage. Fertil Steril: 2000; 74 5 946 952
93. Queenan J. T. Jr, Veeck L. L., Toner J. P., Oehninger S., Muasher S. J. Cryopreservation of all prezygotes in patients at risk of severe hyperstimulation does not eliminate the syndrome, but the chances of pregnancy are excellent with subsequent frozen-thaw transfers. Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 7 1573 1576
94. Griesinger G., Schultz L., Bauer T., Broessner A., Frambach T., Kissler S. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a freeze-all strategy: a prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 6 2029 2033, 2033.e1
95. Ferraretti A. P., Gianaroli L., Magli C., Fortini D., Selman H. A., Feliciani E. Elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: efficiency and safety. Hum Reprod: 1999; 14 6 1457 1460
96. Damario M. A., Hammitt D. G., Session D. R., Dumesic D. A. Embryo cryopreservation at the pronuclear stage and efficient embryo use optimizes the chance for a liveborn infant from a single oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril: 2000; 73 4 767 773
97. Marrs R. P., Greene J., Stone B. A. Potential factors affecting embryo survival and clinical outcome with cryopreserved pronuclear human embryos. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2004; 190 6 1766 1771, discussion 1771-1772
98. Macas E., Imthurn B., Borsos M., Rosselli M., Maurer-Major E., Keller P. J. Impairment of the developmental potential of frozen-thawed human zygotes obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril: 1998; 69 4 630 635
99. Damario M. A., Hammitt D. G., Galanits T. M., Session D. R., Dumesic D. A. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implications for timing of the freeze. Fertil Steril: 1999; 72 6 1049 1054
100. Nagy Z. P., Liu J., Joris H., Devroey P., Van Steirteghem A. Time-course of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in human oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod: 1994; 9 9 1743 1748
101. Beyer D. A., Amari F., Diedrich K., Al Hasani S. Embryo survival after vitrification of 2 PN oocytes. Mid East Fertil Soc: 2011; 16 45 49
102. Al-Hasani S., Ozmen B., Koutlaki N., Schoepper B., Diedrich K., Schultze-Mosgau A. Three years of routine vitrification of human zygotes: is it still fair to advocate slow-rate freezing? Reprod Biomed Online: 2007; 14 3 288 293
103. Kuwayama M., Vajta G., Ieda S., Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online: 2005; 11 5 608 614
104. Edgar D. H., Bourne H., Speirs A. L., McBain J. C. A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 1 175 179
105. Prades M., Golmard J-L, Schubert B., Poirot C. Embryo cryopreservation: proposal for a new indicator of efficiency. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 2 577 82.e1, 2
106. Hartshorne G. M., Wick K., Elder K., Dyson H. Effect of cell number at freezing upon survival and viability of cleaving embryos generated from stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod: 1990; 5 7 857 861
107. Salumets A., Suikkari A. M., Mäkinen S., Karro H., Roos A., Tuuri T. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod: 2006; 21 9 2368 2374
108. Solé M., Santaló J., Rodríguez I., et al. Correlation between embryological factors and pregnancy rate: development of an embryo score in a cryopreservation programme. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2011; 28 2 129 136
109. Guerif F., Bidault R., Cadoret V., Couet M. L., Lansac J., Royere D. Parameters guiding selection of best embryos for transfer after cryopreservation: a reappraisal. Hum Reprod: 2002; 17 5 1321 1326
110. Van Landuyt L., Van de Velde H., De Vos A., et al. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human day 3 embryos. Hum Reprod: 2013; 28 11 2943 2949
111. Nagy Z. P., Taylor T., Elliott T., Massey J. B., Kort H. I., Shapiro D. B. Removal of lysed blastomeres from frozen-thawed embryos improves implantation and pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril: 2005; 84 6 1606 1612
112. Rienzi L., Ubaldi F., Iacobelli M., et al. Developmental potential of fully intact and partially damaged cryopreserved embryos after laser-assisted removal of necrotic blastomeres and post-thaw culture selection. Fertil Steril: 2005; 84 4 888 894
113. Jericho H., Wilton L., Gook D. A., Edgar D. H. A modified cryopreservation method increases the survival of human biopsied cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 3 568 571
114. Edgar D. H., Karani J., Gook D. A. Increasing dehydration of human cleavage-stage embryos prior to slow cooling significantly increases cryosurvival. Reprod Biomed Online: 2009; 19 4 521 525
115. Wood M. J., Mollison J., Harrild K., et al. A pragmatic RCT of conventional versus increased concentration sucrose in freezing and thawing solutions for human embryos. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 8 1987 1996
116. Fasano G., Fontenelle N., Vannin A-S., et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2014; 31 2 241 247
117. Cobo A., de los Santos M. J., Castellò D., Gámiz P., Campos P., Remohí J. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles. Fertil Steril: 2012; 98 5 1138 46.e1
118. Desai N., Abdelhafez F., Bedaiwy M. A., Goldberg J., Falcone T., Goldfarb J. Clinical pregnancy and live births after transfer of embryos vitrified on day 3. Reprod Biomed Online: 2010; 20 6 808 813
119. Balaban B., Urman B., Ata B., et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod: 2008; 23 9 1976 1982
120. Wilding M. G., Capobianco C., Montanaro N., et al. Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2010; 27 9-10 549 554
121. Liu S. Y., Teng B., Fu J., Li X., Zheng Y., Sun X. X. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos. Hum Reprod: 2013; 28 8 2093 2100
122. Guerif F., Lemseffer M., Bidault R., et al. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Hum Reprod: 2009; 24 5 1051 1058
123. Ryan G. L., Sparks A. E., Sipe C. S., Syrop C. H., Dokras A., Van Voorhis B. J. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril: 2007; 88 2 354 360
124. Marsh C. A., Farr S. L., Chang J., et al. Trends and factors associated with the Day 5 embryo transfer, assisted reproductive technology surveillance, USA, 2001-2009. Hum Reprod: 2012; 27 8 2325 2331
125. Gardner D. K., Schoolcraft W. B. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R., Mortimer D., eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Infertility and Genetics Beyond. Carnforth, UK Parthenon Press: 1999; 378 388
126. Van Landuyt L., Stoop D., Verheyen G., et al. Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policy. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 3 527 534
127. Goto S., Kadowaki T., Tanaka S., Hashimoto H., Kokeguchi S., Shiotani M. Prediction of pregnancy rate by blastocyst morphological score and age, based on 1,488 single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 3 948 952
128. Honnma H., Baba T., Sasaki M., et al. Trophectoderm morphology significantly affects the rates of ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage in frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril: 2012; 98 2 361 367
129. Van den Abbeel E., Camus M., Verheyen G., Van Waesberghe L., Devroey P., Van Steirteghem A. Slow controlled-rate freezing of sequentially cultured human blastocysts: an evaluation of two freezing strategies. Hum Reprod: 2005; 20 10 2939 2945
130. Liebermann J., Tucker M. J. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril: 2006; 86 1 20 26
131. Liebermann J. Vitrification: a simple and successful method for cryostorage of human blastocysts. In: Wolkers W. F., Oldenhof H., eds. Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY Springer: 2015; 305 319
132. Levens E. D., Whitcomb B. W., Hennessy S., James A. N., Yauger B. J., Larsen F. W. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril: 2008; 90 6 2138 2143
133. Mukaida T., Oka C., Goto T., Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod: 2006; 21 12 3246 3252
134. Hiraoka K., Hiraoka K., Kinutani M., Kinutani K. Blastocoele collapse by micropipetting prior to vitrification gives excellent survival and pregnancy outcomes for human day 5 and 6 expanded blastocysts. Hum Reprod: 2004; 19 12 2884 2888
135. Cohen J., Simons R. F., Edwards R. G., Fehilly C. B., Fishel S. B. Pregnancies following the frozen storage of expanding human blastocysts. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf: 1985; 2 2 59 64
136. Gardner D. K., Lane M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update: 1997; 3 4 367 382
137. Ménézo Y. JR. Blastocyst freezing. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 2004; 115 01 S12 S15
138. Behr B., Gebhardt J., Lyon J., Milki A. A. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril: 2002; 77 4 697 699
139. Veeck L. L., Bodine R., Clarke R. N., et al. High pregnancy rates can be achieved after freezing and thawing human blastocysts. Fertil Steril: 2004; 82 5 1418 1427
140. Richter K. S., Shipley S. K., McVearry I., Tucker M. J., Widra E. A. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos. Fertil Steril: 2006; 86 4 862 866
141. Shapiro B. S., Daneshmand S. T., Restrepo H., Garner F. C., Aguirre M., Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril: 2013; 99 2 389 392
142. Yokota Y., Sato S., Yokota M., Yokota H., Araki Y. Birth of a healthy baby following vitrification of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril: 2001; 75 5 1027 1029
143. Sansinena M., Santos M. V., Zaritzky N., Chirife J. Numerical simulation of cooling rates in vitrification systems used for oocyte cryopreservation. Cryobiology: 2011; 63 1 32 37
144. Roy T. K., Bradley C. K., Bowman M. C., McArthur S. J. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Fertil Steril: 2014; 101 5 1294 1301
145. Hashimoto S., Amo A., Hama S., Ito K., Nakaoka Y., Morimoto Y. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Hum Reprod: 2013; 28 6 1528 1535
146. Mukaida T., Nakamura S., Tomiyama T., et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts using CryoLoops: clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 2 384 391
147. Li Z., Wang Y. A., Ledger W., Edgar D. H., Sullivan E. A. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod: 2014; 29 12 2794 2801
148. Maheshwari A., Pandey S., Shetty A., Hamilton M., Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril: 2012; 98 2 368 77.e1, 9
149. Maheshwari A., Bhattacharya S. Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time? Hum Reprod: 2013; 28 1 6 9
150. Cohen J., Alikani M. The time has come to radically rethink assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online: 2013; 27 4 323 324
151. Barnhart K. T. Introduction: are we ready to eliminate the transfer of fresh embryos in in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril: 2014; 102 1 1 2
152. Rama Raju G. A., Haranath G. B., Krishna K. M., Prakash G. J., Madan K. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online: 2005; 11 4 434 437