Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: Which one is better?

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 270-274

  Kolibianakis, Efstratios M ^a,b   Venetis, Christos A ^a   Tarlatzis, Basil C ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

^b PAPAGEORGIOU GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Greece)

Author keywords

Blastocyst; Cryopreservation; Embryo; Slow freezing; Vitrification

Indexed keywords

BLASTOCYST; CLINICAL TRIAL; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FREEZING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURVIVAL RATE; THAWING; VITRIFICATION;

CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO CULTURE TECHNIQUES; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 67650325145     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283297dd6     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 1983; 305:707-709.
2. Michelmann HW, Nayudu P. Cryopreservation of human embryos. Cell Tissue Bank 2006; 7:135-141.
3. Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, et al. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod BioMed Online 2005; 11:434-437.
4. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod BioMed Online 2005; 11:608-614.
5. Zheng WT, Zhuang GL, Zhou CQ, et al. Comparison of the survival of human biopsied embryos after cryopreservation with four different methods using nontransferable embryos. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:1615-1618.
6. Huang CC, Lee TH, Chen SU, et al. Successful pregnancy following blastocyst cryopreservation using super-cooling ultra-rapid vitrification. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:122-128.
7. Bernal DP, Chang CC, Colturato LF, et al. Evaluation of blastocyst recuperation, implantation and pregnancy rates after vitrification/warming or slow freezing/thawing cycles. Fertil Steril 2008; 90:S277-S278.
8. Griesinger G, Dafopoulos K, Schultze-Mosgau A, et al. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) truly the best? Hum Reprod 2004; 19:1239-1241.
9. Tedder RS, Zuckerman MA, Goldstone AH, et al. Hepatitis B transmission from contaminated cryopreservation tank. Lancet 1995; 346:137-140.
10. Belva F, Henriet S, Van den Abbeel E, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:2227-2238.
11. Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Fertil Steril 2008; 90:186-193.
12. Balaban B, Urman B, AtaB, et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:1976-1982.
13. Li Y, Chen ZJ, Yang H, et al. Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2007; 42:753-755.
14. Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:20-26.
15. Liebermann J, Nawroth F, Isachenko V, et al. Potential importance of vitrification in reproductive medicine. Biol Reprod 2002; 67:1671-1680.
16. Kruskal W. Miracles and statistics: the casual assumption of independence. J Am Stat Assoc 1988; 83:929-937.
17. Wang JX. Life table (survival) analysis to generate cumulative pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction: an alternative method of calculating the cumulative pregnancy rate in assisted reproduction technology. Hum Reprod 2006; 21:1 -2.