Sepsis in the Severely Immunocompromised Patient

Current Infectious Disease Reports

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Kalil, Andre C ^a   Opal, Steven M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Immunocompromised host; Neutropenia; Neutropenic fever; Sepsis; Septic shock; Solid organ transplant infections

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY; CLINICAL FEATURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PATIENT; INFECTION RISK; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; LIVER ALLOGRAFT; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LUNG ALLOGRAFT; LUNG TRANSPLANTATION; MORTALITY; NEUTROPENIA; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK;

EID: 84930003888     PISSN: 15233847     EISSN: 15343146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11908-015-0487-4     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. 2013; 369: 840-852.
2. Legrand M, Max A, Peigne V, et al. Survival in neutropenic patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(1):43–9.
3. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):e56–93.
4. Kern WV. Risk assessment and treatment of low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(2):533–40.
5. Jeddi R, Achour M, Amor RB, et al. Factors associated with severe sepsis: prospective study of 94 neutropenic febrile episodes. Hematology. 2010;15(1):23–32.
6. Kalil AC, Syed A, Rupp ME, et al. Is bacteremic sepsis associated with higher mortality in transplant recipients than in nontransplant patients? A matched case-control propensity-adjusted study. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(2):216–22. This study compared patients who had a solid organ transplant and sepsis to patients who did not have organ transplant but had sepsis. They were matched by age, gender, and hospital unit location at the time of blood culture collection. The results showed a statistically significant higher survival rates for septic patients who had organ transplantation than that those without transplantation, after accounting for disease severity and co-morbidities.
7. Penack O, Becker C, Buchheidt M, et al. Management of sepsis in neutropenic patients: 2014 updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases working party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(7):1083–95. This evidence-based review is the most recent national set of guidelines established as a set of recommendations to manage the febrile neutropenic patient. The guideline favors early antibiotic therapy directed towards the most likely pathogens with appropriate therapy guided by local susceptibilty patterns of common bacterial pathogens.
8. Masaoka T. Evidence-based recommendations for antimicrobial use in febrile neutropenia in Japan. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39 Suppl 1:S49.
9. Viscoli C on behalf of the EORTC international antimicrobial therapy group. Management of infection in cancer patients. Euro J Cancer. 2002;38 suppl 4:82–7.
10. Legrand M, Max A, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E, Gachot B. The strategy of antibiotic use in critically ill neutropenic cancer patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:1–22.
11. Hanberger H, Giske CG, Giamarello H. When and how to cover for resistant gram-negative bacilli in severe sepsis and septic shock. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011;31(5):416–25.
12. Pop-Vicas A, Opal SM. The clinical impact of multidrug resistant gram-negative bacilli in the management of septic shock. Virulence. 2014;5(1):1–7. This review paper discusses the problem of multidrug resistant bacterial pathogens and provides some recommendations on how to treat these infections in criticall ill patients.
13. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. The surviving sepsis guidelines: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637.
14. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB, et al. The multinational association of supportive care in cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3038–51.
15. Sickles EA, Greene WH, Wiernik PH. Clinical presentation of infection in granulocytopenic patients. Arch Intern Med. 1975;135:715–9.
16. Sepkowitz KA. Treatment of patients with hematologic neoplasm, fever, neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40 suppl 4:S253–256.
17. Rolston KV. Challenges in the treatment of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in patients with cancer and neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40 suppl 4:S246–252.
18. Pizzo PA, Hathorn JW, Hiemenz J, et al. A randomized trial comparing ceftazidime alone with combination antibiotic therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:552–8.
19. Paul M, Soares-Weiser K, Grozinsky S, Leibovici L. Beta-lactam versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in cancer patients with neutropaenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD003038.
20. Vardakas KZ, Samonis G, Chrysanthopoulou SA, et al. Role of glycopeptides as part of initial empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(7):431–9.
21. Paul M, Dickstein Y, Borok S, et al. Empirical antibiotics targeting gram-positive bacteria for the treatment of febrile neutropenic with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD003914. This systematic review finds that the addition of empiric antibiotics that target gram-positive bacterial pathogens does not result in improved survival rates in febrile neutropenic patients when compared to antibacterial regimens that initiate coverage of these pathogens only after their presence are documented by bacterial cultures.
22. Bow EJ. Neutropenic fever syndromes in patients undergoing cytotoxic therapy for acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Semin Hematol. 2009;46:259–68.
23. Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, et al. Mortality, morbidity and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer. 2006;106:2258–226.
24. Bosmann M, Ward PA. The inflammatory response in sepsis. Trends Immunol. 2013;34:129–36.
25. Opal SM, van der Poll T. Endothelial barrier dysfunction in septic shock. J Intern Med. 2014. doi:10.1111./joim.12331. This basic review details the nature of the endothelial barrier in the microcirculation and the factors that disupt the barrier function in septic shock. New molecular targets have been recently identified that might offer new treatment options for immunocompromised patients with septic shock.
26. Skvarc M, Stubjar D, Rogina P, Kaasch AJ. Non-culture-based methods to diagnose bloodstream infections: does it work? Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2013;3(2):97–104.
27. Yahav D, Paul M, Fraser A, et al. Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:338–48.
28. Kim PM, Wu YT, Cooper C, et al. Meta-analysis of a possible signal of increased mortality associated with cefepime use. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:381–9.
29. Kalil AC. Is cefepime safe for clinical use? A Bayesian viewpoint. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:1207–9.
30. Carlet J, Cohen J, Calandra T, Opal SM, Masur H. Sepsis, time to reconsider the concept. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(3):964–7.
31. Vincent J-L, Opal SM, Marshall JC, Tracey KJ. Sepsis definitions: time for change. Lancet. 2013;381:774–5.
32. Opal SM, Dellinger RP, Vincent J-L, Masur H, Angus DC. The next generation of sepsis clinical trial designs: what is next after the demise of recombinant human activated protein C? Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1714–21. This clinical review discusses the difficulties encountered in the study of new anti-sepsis drugs in clinical trials and offers some suggestions on how to improve future clinical trials.
33. Deutchman CS, Tracey KJ. Sepsis: current dogma and new perspectives. Immunity. 2014;40:463–75. This is an excellent review of the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms that result in septic shock and offers some new ways to address the problem from a mechanistic perspective.
34. Gomez H, Ince C, DeBacker D, Pickkers P, Payen D, Hotchkiss J, et al. A unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics, and the tubular cell adaptation to injury. Shock. 2014;41(1):3–11. This basic review argues that the problem of sepsis at the cellular level is that cells functionallly loose their ability to maintain their specialized functions in tissues and retreat into a de-differentiated state for individual cell survival.
35. Mehta D, Ravindran K, Kuebler W. Novel regulators of endothelial barrier function. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2014;307:L924–35. This paper reviews the structure and function of intercellular gap junctions between endothelial cells in health and disease.
36. Kumar A, Paladugu B, Haery C, et al. Timing of antibiotic administration in relation to duration of shock is a critical determinant of survival in a murine model of E. coli sepsis: association with serum lactate and inflammatory cytokines. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:251–8.
37. Hotchkiss RS, Opal SM. Immunotherapy for sepsis: a new approach against an ancient foe. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):87–9.
38. Chahin A, Opal S, Zorzopulos J, et al. The novel immunotherapeutic oligodeoxynucleotide IMT504 protects neutropenic animals from fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia and sepsis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(2):1225–9. This experimental study demonstrates that specific short sequences of oligonucleotides can function as immunostimulants and improve the prognosis of experimental animals with febrile neutropenic systemic infections. Whether this strategy will work in neutropenic sepsis remains to be tested in clinical trials.
39. Kalil AC, Dakroub H, Freifeld AG. Sepsis and solid organ transplantation. Curr Drug Targets. 2007;8(4):533–41.
40. Trzeciak S, Sharer R, Piper D, et al. Infections and severe sepsis in solid-organ transplant patients admitted from a university-based ED. The Am J Emergency Med. 2004;22(7):530–3.
41. Hsu RB, Chang CI, Fang CT, Chang SC, Wang SS, Chu SH. Bloodstream infection in heart transplant recipients: 12-year experience at a university hospital in Taiwan. Euro J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2011;40(6):1362–7.
42. Candel FJ, Grima E, Matesanz M, et al. Bacteremia and septic shock after solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation Proc. 2005;37(9):4097–9.
43. Wan Q, Ye Q, Zhou J. Mortality predictors of bloodstream infections in solid-organ transplant recipients. Exp Clin Trans. 2013;11(3):211–4.
44. Bodro M, Sabe N, Tubau F, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of bacteremia caused by drug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens in solid-organ transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2013;96(9):843–9. This study analyzed a cohort of solid organ transplant patients who developed bacteremia with ESKAPE organisms and concluded that the following factors were independently associated with ESKAPE infection: prior transplantation, septic shock, and prior antibiotic therapy.
45. Linares L, Garcia-Goez JF, Cervera C, Almela M, Sanclemente G, Cofan F, et al. Early bacteremia after solid organ transplantation. Trans Proc. 2009;41(6):2262–4.
46. Malinis MF, Mawhorter SD, Jain A, Shrestha NK, Avery RK, van Duin D. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in solid organ transplant recipients: evidence for improved survival when compared with nontransplant patients. Transplantation. 2012;93(10):1045–50.
47. Shoham S, Marr KA. Invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Future Microbiol. 2012;7(5):639–55.
48. van Hal SJ, Marriott DJ, Chen SC, Nguyen Q, Sorrell TC, Ellis DH, et al. Candidemia following solid organ transplantation in the era of antifungal prophylaxis: the Australian experience. Trans Infect Dis. 2009;11(2):122–7.
49. Kalil AC, Levitsky J, Lyden E, Stoner J, Freifeld AG. Meta-analysis: the efficacy of strategies to prevent organ disease by cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(12):870–80.
50. Chuang P, Parikh CR, Langone A. Urinary tract infections after renal transplantation: a retrospective review at two US transplant centers. Clin Trans. 2005;19(2):230–5.
51. Schmaldienst S, Dittrich E, Horl WH. Urinary tract infections after renal transplantation. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12(2):125–30.
52. Wagener MM, Yu VL. Bacteremia in transplant recipients: a prospective study of demographics, etiologic agents, risk factors, and outcomes. Am J Infect Control. 1992;20(5):239–47.
53. Warren JW, Platt R, Thomas RJ, Rosner B, Kass EH. Antibiotic irrigation and catheter-associated urinary-tract infections. N Engl J Med. 1978;299(11):570–3.
54. Koneru B, Selby R, O’Hair DP, Tzakis AG, Hakala TR, Starzl TE. Nonobstructing colonic dilatation and colon perforations following renal transplantation. Arch Surg. 1990;125(5):610–3.
55. Andreoni KA, Pelletier RP, Elkhammas EA, et al. Increased incidence of gastrointestinal surgical complications in renal transplant recipients with polycystic kidney disease. Transplantation. 1999;67(2):262–6.
56. Dominguez Fernandez E, Albrecht KH, et al. Prevalence of diverticulosis and incidence of bowel perforation after kidney transplantation in patients with polycystic kidney disease. Transpl Int. 1998;11(1):28–31.
57. Abbott KC, Oliver 3rd JD, Hypolite I, et al. Hospitalizations for bacterial septicemia after renal transplantation in the United States. Am J Nephrol. 2001;21(2):120–7.
58. Kusne S, Dummer JS, Singh N, et al. Infections after liver transplantation. An analysis of 101 consecutive cases. Medicine. 1988;67(2):132–43.
59. George DL, Arnow PM, Fox AS, et al. Bacterial infection as a complication of liver transplantation: epidemiology and risk factors. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13(3):387–96.
60. Koivusalo A, Isoniemi H, Salmela K, Hockerstedt K. Biliary complications in 100 adult liver transplantations: a retrospective clinical study. Transpl Int. 1994;7 Suppl 1:S119–20.
61. Collins LA, Samore MH, Roberts MS, Luzzati R, Jenkins RL, Lewis WD, et al. Risk factors for invasive fungal infections complicating orthotopic liver transplantation. J Infect Dis. 1994;170(3):644–52.
62. Paya CV, Hermans PE, Washington 2nd JA, et al. Incidence, distribution, and outcome of episodes of infection in 100 orthotopic liver transplantations. Mayo Clinic Proc. 1989;64(5):555–64.
63. Patel R, Paya CV. Infections in solid-organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10(1):86–124.
64. Newell KA, Millis JM, Arnow PM, et al. Incidence and outcome of infection by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus following orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1998;65(3):439–42.
65. Tachopoulou OA, Vogt DP, Henderson JM, Baker M, Keys TF. Hepatic abscess after liver transplantation: 1990-2000. Transplantation. 2003;75(1):79–83.
66. Hsu JL, Enser JJ, McKown T, et al. Outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in recipients of solid abdominal organ transplants. Clin Trans. 2014;28(2):267–73. This study evaluated solid organ transplant patients who developed Clostridium difficile infection and found that the risk factors for clinical failure at 14 days were vasopressor support, previous Clostridium difficile infection, and treatment with vancomycin. Three-quarters of all transplant patients were clinically cured at 14 days.
67. Tsapepas DS, Martin ST, Miao J, et al. Clostridium difficile infection, a descriptive analysis of solid organ transplant recipients at a single center. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;80(4):239–344
68. Corensek MJ, Stewart RW, Keys TF, Mehta AC, McHenry MC, Goormastic M. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for pneumonia following cardiac transplantation. Transplantation. 1988;46(6):860–5.
69. Cisneros JM, Munoz P, Torre-Cisneros J, et al. Pneumonia after heart transplantation: a multi-institutional study. Spanish Transplantation Infection Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27(2):324–31.
70. Myers TJ, Khan T, Frazier OH. Infectious complications associated with ventricular assist systems. ASAIO J. 2000;46(6):S28–36.
71. Montoya JG, Giraldo LF, Efron B, et al. Infectious complications among 620 consecutive heart transplant patients at Stanford University Medical Center. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(5):629–40.
72. Hofflin JM, Potasman I, Baldwin JC, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Remington JS. Infectious complications in heart transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(2):209–16.
73. Horvath J, Dummer S, Loyd J, Walker B, Merrill WH, Frist WH. Infection in the transplanted and native lung after single lung transplantation. Chest. 1993;104(3):681–5.
74. Kramer MR, Marshall SE, Starnes VA, Gamberg P, Amitai Z, Theodore J. Infectious complications in heart-lung transplantation. Analysis of 200 episodes. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(17):2010–6.
75. Maurer JR, Tullis DE, Grossman RF, Vellend H, Winton TL, Patterson GA. Infectious complications following isolated lung transplantation. Chest. 1992;101(4):1056–9.
76. Hadjiliadis D, Sporn TA, Perfect JR, Tapson VF, Davis RD, Palmer SM. Outcome of lung transplantation in patients with mycetomas. Chest. 2002;121(1):128–34.
77. Smith PC, Slaughter MS, Petty MG, Shumway SJ, Kshettry VR, Bolman RM, 3rd. Abdominal complications after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplantation 1995;14:44–51
78. Venuta F, Boehler A, Rendina EA, et al. Complications in the native lung after single lung transplantation. Euro J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 1999;16(1):54–8.
79. Stewart S, McNeil K, Nashef SA, Wells FC, Higenbottam TW, Wallwork J. Audit of referral and explant diagnoses in lung transplantation: a pathologic study of lungs removed for parenchymal disease. J Heart Lung Trans. 1995;14(6 Pt 1):1173–86.