Completing bacterial genome assemblies: Strategy and performance comparisons

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Liao, Yu Chieh ^a   Lin, Shu Hung ^a   Lin, Hsin Hung ^a  

^a NATIONAL HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DNA;

ALGORITHM; BACTERIAL GENOME; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHMS; DNA, BACTERIAL; GENOME, BACTERIAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84929993004     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep08747     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Finotello, F. et al. Comparative analysis of algorithms for whole-genome assembly of pyrosequencing data. Briefings in Bioinformatics doi:10.1093/bib/bbr063 (2011).
2. Quail, M. A. et al. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics 13, 341, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-341 (2012).
3. Ferrarini, M. et al. An evaluation of the PacBio RS platform for sequencing and de novo assembly of a chloroplast genome. BMC Genomics 14, 670, doi:10.1186/ 1471-2164-14-670 (2013).
4. Koren, S. et al. Reducing assembly complexity of microbial genomes with singlemolecule sequencing. Genome Biol 14, R101, doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r101 (2013).
5. Eid, J. et al. Real-time DNAsequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323, 133-138, doi:10.1126/science.1162986 (2009).
6. Ribeiro, F. J. et al. Finished bacterial genomes from shotgun sequence data. Genome Res 22, 2270-2277, doi:10.1101/gr.141515.112 (2012).
7. Koren, S. et al. Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads. Nature biotechnology doi:10.1038/nbt.2280 (2012).
8. Bashir, A. et al. A hybrid approach for the automated finishing of bacterial genomes. Nature biotechnology doi:10.1038/nbt.2288 (2012).
9. Prjibelski, A. D. et al. ExSPAnder: a universal repeat resolver for DNA fragment assembly. Bioinformatics 30, i293-i301, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu266 (2014).
10. Boetzer, M. & Pirovano, W. SSPACE-LongRead: scaffolding bacterial draft genomes using long read sequence information. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 211, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-211 (2014).
11. Chin, C. S. et al.Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10, 563-569, doi:10.1038/nmeth.2474 (2013).
12. Shibata, T. F. et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Burkholderia sp. Strain RPE64, Bacterial Symbiont of the Bean Bug Riptortus pedestris. Genome announcements 1, doi:10.1128/genomeA.00441-13 (2013).
13. Ku, C., Lo, W. S., Chen, L. L. & Kuo, C. H. Complete Genome Sequence of Spiroplasma apis B31T (ATCC 33834), a Bacterium Associated with May Disease of Honeybees (Apis mellifera). Genome announcements 2, doi:10.1128/ genomeA.01151-13 (2014).
14. Utturkar, S. M. et al. Evaluation and validation of de novo and hybrid assembly techniques to derive high quality genome sequences. Bioinformatics doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/btu391 (2014).
15. Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072-1075, doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/btt086 (2013).
16. Husemann, P. & Stoye, J. r2cat: synteny plots and comparative assembly. Bioinformatics 26, 570-571, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp690 (2010).
17. Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. Journal of computational biology: a journal of computational molecular cell biology 19, 455-477, doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 (2012).
18. Myers, E. W. A Whole-Genome Assembly of Drosophila. Science 287, 2196-2204, doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2196 (2000).
19. Magoc, T. et al. GAGE-B: An Evaluation of Genome Assemblers for Bacterial Organisms. Bioinformatics doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt273 (2013).
20. Brown, S. D. et al. Comparison of single-molecule sequencing and hybrid approaches for finishing the genome of Clostridium autoethanogenum and analysis of CRISPR systems in industrial relevant Clostridia. Biotechnology for biofuels 7, 40, doi:10.1186/1754-6834-7-40 (2014).
21. Ku, C., Lo, W. S., Chen, L. L. & Kuo, C. H. Complete genomes of two dipteranassociated spiroplasmas provided insights into the origin, dynamics, and impacts of viral invasion in spiroplasma. Genome biology and evolution 5, 1151-1164, doi:10.1093/gbe/evt084 (2013).
22. Brown, S. D. et al. Genome Sequences of Industrially Relevant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain M3707, Isolated from a Sample of Distillers Yeast and Four Haploid Derivatives. Genome announcements 1, doi:10.1128/genomeA.00323-13 (2013).
23. Junemann, S. et al. GABenchToB: A Genome Assembly Benchmark Tuned on Bacteria and Benchtop Sequencers. PLoS One 9, e107014, doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0107014 (2014).
24. Berlin, K. et al. Assembling Large Genomes with Single-Molecule Sequencing and Locality Sensitive Hashing. bioRxiv, doi:10.1101/008003 (2014).