Term limits and the dismantling of state legislative professionalism

Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-275

  Kousser, Thad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929747373     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614088     Document Type: Book

References (323)

1. Abbott, Frank Frost. 1902. A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions.Boston: Athenaeum.
2. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections. American Journal of Political Science42:55-96.
3. American Political Science Association. Committee on American Legislatures. 1954. American State Legislatures: Report of the Committee on American Legislatures, ed. Belle Zeller. New York: Crowell.
4. Anderson, William D., Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, and Valeria Sinclair Chapman. 2000. Navigating Rough Waters: Modeling Member Effectiveness in the U.S. House of Representatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
5. Arrow, Kenneth. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
6. Balla, Steven. 2001. Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations. American Politics Research29:221-245.
7. Barge, Elizabeth. 2001. Term Limits Affect Legislative Career Paths. Institute of Governmental Studies Public Affairs Report42, no. 3:12.
8. Basham, Patrick. 2001. Assessing the Term Limits Experiment: California and Beyond. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, no. 413.
9. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. What to Do (and What Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review89:634-647.
10. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science42:1260-1288.
11. Beier, Robert. 1979. Speaker Says He’ll Keep Job. Albuquerque Journal, January 14.
12. Bell, Charles G., and Charles M. Price. 1980. California Government Today: Politics ofReform. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey.
13. Berry, Frances Stokes, and William D. Berry. 1990. State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis. American Political Science Review84:395-415.
14. Berry, Frances Stokes, and William D. Berry. 1992. Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity. American Journal of Political Science36:715-742.
15. Berry, William D., Michael B. Berkman, and Stuart Schneiderman. 2000. Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries. American Political Science Review94:859-874.
16. Block, A. G. 1998. The Minnies. California Journal29:6-15.
17. Booth, Alison L., and Stephen E. Satchell. 1992. Apprenticeships and Job Tenure: A Competing Risks Model with Time-Varying Covariates. Discussion Paper in Economics.Birkbeck College, University of London.
18. Broder, David S. 2000. Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money.New York: Harcourt.
19. Brokaw, Brian, 2002. Committee Chair Research Overview. Institute of Governmental Studies Research Brief, May 9.
20. Brokaw, Brian, Keith Jobson, and Paul Vercruyssen. 2001. Knowledge and Power in the Post Term Limits Era: The Effects of Term Limits on Committee Chief Consultants in the California Legislature. Unpublished paper, University of California, Berkeley.
21. Bulger, William M. 1997. While the Music Lasts: My Life in Politics.Boston: Faber and Faber.
22. Bustillo, Miguel. 1999. Political Kingmaker Wants the Crown. Los Angeles Times, August 29.
23. Cain, Bruce E. 1995. Political Science and the Term Limits Debate. In Election Law: Cases and Materials, ed. Daniel Hays Lowenstein. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic.
24. Cain, Bruce E. 1997. Epilogue: Seeking Consensus among Conflicting Electorates. In Governing California: Politics, Government, and Public Policy in the Golden State, ed. Gerald C. Lubenow and Bruce E. Cain. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
25. Cain, Bruce E., and Thad Kousser. Forthcoming. Adapting to Term Limits: Recent Experiences and New Directions. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
26. Cain, Bruce E., and Marc Levin. 1999. Term Limits. Annual Review of Political Science2:163-188.
27. California Journal Press. 1989. California Political Almanac, 1989-90. Sacramento: California Journal Press.
28. California Journal Press. 1991. California Political Almanac, 1991-92,2nd ed. Sacramento: California Journal Press.
29. California Journal Press. 1993. California Political Almanac, 1993-94,3rd ed. Sacramento: California Journal Press.
30. California Journal Press. 1997a. California Political Almanac, 1997-98,6th ed. Sacramento: California Journal Press.
31. California Journal Press. 1997b. Roster and Government Guide.Sacramento: Statenet.
32. California Journal Press. 1999. California Political Almanac, 1999-2000,7th ed. Sacramento: California Journal Press.
33. California Legislative Counsel. 1966. Detailed Analysis by the Legislative Counsel. Sacramento: California Secretary of State.
34. California Legislature. 2000. Bill Information. Http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgibin/pagequery?type=sen_bilinfo&site=sen&title=Bill+Information, accessed April 2000.
35. Capell, Elizabeth A. 1996. The Impact of Term Limits on the California Legislature: An Interest Group Perspective. In Legislative Term Limits: Public Choice Perspectives, ed. Bernard Grofman. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic.
36. Caress, Stanley M. 1996. The Impact of Term Limits on Legislative Behavior: An Examination of Transitional Legislatures. PS: Political Science and Politics29:671-677.
37. Carey, John M. 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Carey, John M., Gary F. Moncrief, Richard G. Niemi, and Lynda W. Powell. 2003. Term Limits in the State Legislatures: Results from a New Survey of the 50 States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 2003.
39. Carey, John M., Richard G. Niemi, and Lynda W. Powell. 1998. The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly23:271-300.
40. Carey, John M., Richard G. Niemi, and Lynda W. Powell. 2000. Term Limits in the State Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
41. Carmines, Edward. 1974. The Mediating Influence of State Legislatures on the Linkage between Interparty Competition and Welfare Policies. American Political Science Review68:1118-1124.
42. Chaffey, Douglas Camp, and Malcolm E. Jewell. 1972. Selection and Tenure of State Legislative Party Leaders: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Politics34:1278-1286.
43. Chi, Keon S., and Drew Leatherby. 1998. State Legislative Term Limits. Solutions: Policy Options for State Decision-Makers6.
44. Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio. 1984. The Political Reliability of Italian Governments: An Exponential Survival Model. American Political Science Review78:318-337.
45. Citizens Conference on State Legislatures. 1971. State Legislatures: An Evaluation of their Effectiveness.New York: Praeger.
46. Clair, Jim. 1998. Impact of Term Limits on Legislative Fiscal Agency Staff: Maine’s Experience Thus Far. Paper presented at the Michigan House fiscal agency seminar, October 26, 1998.
47. Clucas, Richard A. 1995. The Speaker’s Electoral Connection: Willie Brown and the California Assembly. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
48. Clucas, Richard A. 2000. California: The New Amateur Politics. Paper presented at the conference on Coping with Term Limits: Ohio and the Nation, Columbus, Ohio, April 12-13.
49. Clucas, Richard A. 2001. Principal-Agent Theory and the Power of State House Speakers. Legislative Studies Quarterly26:319-338.
50. Cohen, Linda. 1995. Terms of Office, Legislative Structure, and Collective Incentives. In Constitutional Reform in California: Making State Government More Effective and Responsive, ed. Bruce E. Cain and Roger G. Noll. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
51. Cohen, Linda, and Matthew L. Spitzer. 1996. Term Limits and Representation. In Legislative Term Limits: Public Choice Perspectives, ed. Bernard Grofman. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic.
52. Collie, Melissa P. 1994. Legislative Structure and Its Effects. In Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System, ed. Joel H. Silbey. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
53. Colorado General Assembly. 1989. Journal of the House of Representatives of the First Regular Session of the 57th General Assembly of the State of Colorado. Denver: Colorado General Assembly.
54. Colorado General Assembly. 1990. Senate Journal of the Second Regular Session of the 57th General Assembly of the State of Colorado.Denver: Colorado General Assembly.
55. Colorado General Assembly. 1999a. Journal of the House of Representatives of the First Regular Session of the 62nd General Assembly of the State of Colorado. Denver: Colorado General Assembly.
56. Colorado General Assembly. 1999b. Senate Journal of the First Regular Session of the 62nd General Assembly of the State of Colorado. Denver: Colorado General Assembly.
57. Colorado General Assembly. 2002. Prior Session Information. Http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/house/prevsess.htm, accessed February 2002.
58. Colorado Legislative Council. 1999. Focus Colorado: Economic and Revenue Forecast, 1999-2004.Denver: Colorado Legislative Council.
59. Colorado Office of State Planning and Budgeting. 2001. Statewide Budget Issues: An Overview.Denver: Office of State Planning and Budgeting.
60. Cooke, Sarah. 2004. Wyoming Supreme Court Overturns State Term Limits Law. Associated Press, May 4.
61. Cooper, Claire. 1980. Roberti Takes over Senate. Sacramento Bee, December 2.
62. Council of State Governments, Committee on Legislative Processes and Procedures. 1946. Our State Legislatures: Report of the Committee on Legislative Processes and Procedures. Chicago: Council of State Governments.
63. Council of State Governments. 1960. The Book of the States, 1960-1961, vol. 13. Chicago: Council of State Governments.
64. Council of State Governments. 1970. The Book of the States, 1970-1971, vol. 18. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.
65. Council of State Governments. 1984. The Book of the States, 1984-1985, vol. 25. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.
66. Council of State Governments. 1992. The Book of the States, 1992-1993, vol. 29. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.
67. Council of State Governments. 1998. The Book of the States, 1998-1999, vol. 32. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.
68. Council of State Governments. 2000a. CSG State Directory, Directory I, Elective Officials. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments (earlier editions titled State Elective Officials and the Legislatures).
69. Council of State Governments. 2000b. CSG State Directory, Directory II, Legislative Leadership, Committees, and Staff. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments (earlier editions titled State Legislative Leadership, Committees, and Staff).
70. Council of State Governments. 2000c. The Book of the States, 2000-2001, vol. 33. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.
71. Council of State Governments. 2001. CSG State Directory, Directory I, Elective Officials. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments (earlier editions titled State Elective Officials and the Legislatures).
72. Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz. 2002. Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Cox, Gary W., and Mathew McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
75. Dahl, Robert A. 1957. The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science3:201-215.
76. Dallek, Robert. 1991. Lone Star Rising: Lyndon Johnson and His Times, 1908-1960.New York: Oxford University Press.
77. Daniel, K., and John R. Lott. 1997. Term Limits and Electoral Competitiveness: Evidence from California’s State Legislative Races. Public Choice 90:165-184.
78. Dawson, Richard E., and James Robinson. 1963. Interparty Competition, Economic Variables, and Welfare Policies in the American States. Journal of Politics15:265-289.
79. Detwiler, Peter. 2003. How Often Do Governors Say No? Unpublished document provided to the author, October 14.
80. Deukmejian, George. 1988. Governor’s Budget, 1988-1989. Sacramento, Calif.: Department of Finance.
81. Diermeier, Daniel. 1995. Commitment, Deference, and Legislative Institutions. American Political Science Review89:344-355.
82. Drage, Jennifer, Rich Jones, Karl T. Kurtz, Nancy Rhyme, and Brian Weberg. 2000. Leadership Selection in the Era of Term Limits. Paper presented at the conference on Coping with Term Limits: Ohio and the Nation. Columbus, Ohio, April 12-13.
83. Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties.New York: Wiley.
84. Dye, Thomas R. 1966. Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States.Chicago: Rand McNally.
85. Ehrenhalt, Alan. 1992. The United States of Ambition.New York: Times Books.
86. Eichstaedt, Peter. 1986. Smalley Voted Senate Leader. Santa Fe New Mexican, June 24.
87. Elazar, Daniel. 1984. American Federalism.New York: Harper and Row.
88. Enemark, Daniel P., and John Andrew Cross. 2002. Term Limits in the California State Legislature: Pre/Post Term Limits Analysis of Enemark and Cross Bill Tracking Data. Institute of Governmental Studies Policy Brief, May 14.
89. Engle, Gunvor. 1989. Assembly Final History, 1987-1988, vols. 1-2. Sacramento California Legislature.
90. Erikson, Robert S., John P. McIver, and Gerald C. Wright, Jr. 1989. Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United States. American Political Science Review83:729-750.
91. Erikson, Robert S., John P. McIver, and Gerald C. Wright, Jr. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
92. Eu, March Fong. 1982. Statement of the Vote, November 2, 1982. Sacramento, Calif.: Secretary of State.
93. Eu, March Fong. 1990. California Ballot Pamphlet: General Election, November 6, 1990. Sacramento, Calif.: Secretary of State.
94. Eyestone, Robert. 1977. Confusion, Diffusion, and Innovation. American Political Science Review71:441-447.
95. Fadeley, Edward N., and Grattan Kerans. 1983. Journal and Calendars of the Senate and House, Regular Session, Sixty-second Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon.Salem: Oregon Legislative Assembly.
96. Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
97. Feustel, Bruce, and Rich Jones. 2001. Legislator Training 101. State Legislatures Magazine, September.
98. Finke, Doug. 2002. GOP Senators Float Budget Plan. Peoria Journal Star, April 24.
99. Flynn, Jack. 1988. Capitol Government Reports, January 21.
100. Foster, John L. 1978. Regionalism and Innovation in the American States. Journal of Politics40:179-187.
101. Francis, Wayne L. 1989. The Legislative Committee Game: A Comparative Analysis of Fifty States.Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
102. Freeman, Patricia K. 1995. A Comparative Analysis of Speaker Career Patterns in U.S. State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly10:365-376.
103. Garrett, Elizabeth. 1996. Term Limitations and the Myth of the Citizen-Legislator. Cornell Law Review81:623-697.
104. Gerber, Elizabeth. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
105. Giannettino, Judy. 1982. Rep. Sanchez Closes Distance on House Speaker Samberson. Santa Fe New Mexican, November 29.
106. Gierzynski, Anthony, and David A. Breaux. 1998. The Financing Role of Parties. In Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, ed. Joel A. Thompson and Gary F. Moncrief. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
107. Gilmour, John B., and Paul Rothstein. 1994. Term Limitation in a Dynamic Model of Partisan Balance. American Journal of Political Science38:770-796.
108. Goehlert, Robert U., and Frederick W. Musto. 1985. State Legislatures: A Bibliography. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-Clio Information Services.
109. Gordon, Sanford C. 2000. A Frailty Model of Negatively Dependent Competing Risks. Working paper posted atwww.polmeth.calpoly.edu.
110. Gove, Samuel K. 1977. The Implications of Legislative Reform in Illinois. In Legislative Reform and Public Policy, ed. Susan Welch and John G. Peters. New York: Praeger.
111. Gray, Virginia. 1973. Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study. American Political Science Review67:1174-1185.
112. Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
113. Green, Donald P., and Ian Shapiro. 1996. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
114. Harrie, Dan. 1994. Salt Lake Tribune, March 10, local, B5.
115. Health Care Financing Administration. 1998. The Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Press release issued by HCFA on July 17.
116. Health Care Financing Administration. 2001. State Children’s Health Insurance Program Approved Plan Files. Www.hcfa.gov/init/chpa=map.htm, accessed February 2001.
117. Heard, Alexander. 1966. Reform: Limits and Opportunities. In State Legislatures in American Politics, ed. Alexander Heard. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
118. Herzberg, Donald G., and Alan Rosenthal, eds. 1971. Strengthening the States: Essays on Legislative Reform.New York: Doubleday.
119. Hickock, Eugene W., Jr., 1992. The Reform of State Legislatures and the Changing Character of Representation. New York: University Press of America. Chapter 4: The Transformation of State Legislatures.
120. Hill, Elizabeth G. 1997. California Spending Plan, 1997-1998.Sacramento: Legislative Analyst.
121. Hill, Kim Quaile, and Kenneth Mladenka. 1992. Democratic Governance in American States and Cities. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
122. Hofferbert, Richard 1.1966. The Relations between Public Policy and Some Structural and Environmental Variables. American Political Science Review60:7382.
123. Huber, John D., and Charles R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations ofBureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
124. Huitt, Ralph. 1961. Democratic Party Leadership in the Senate. American Political Science Review55:331-344.
125. Hummels, Mark. 2000. Surveillance Video Shows Lawmakers Fighting. Santa Fe New Mexican, July 13.
126. Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission. 2001. FY 2002 Budget Summary. Springfield: Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission.
127. Illinois Legislative Research Unit. 2002. General Assembly Workloads, 1981 to 2001. Springfield: Illinois Legislative Research Unit.
128. Initiative and Referendum Institute. 2001. Http://www.iandrinstitute.org, accessed November 2001.
129. Jacob, Herbert. 1966. Dimensions of State Politics. In State Legislatures in American Politics, ed. Alexander Heard. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
130. Jacob, Paul. 1995. From the Voters with Care. Excerpted in Election Law: Cases and Materials, ed. Daniel Hays Lowenstein. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.
131. Jacobs, John. 1995. A Rage for Justice.Berkeley: University of California Press.
132. Jacobson, Gary. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
133. Jewell, Malcolm E. 1969. The State Legislatures: Politics and Practice, 2nd ed. New York: Random House.
134. Jewell, Malcolm E. 1989. The Durability of Leadership. State Legislatures15:1011,21.
135. Jewell, Malcolm E., and Marcia Lynn Whicker. 1994. Legislative Leadership in the American States.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
136. Joens, David A. 2000. Almanac of Illinois Politics-2000. Springfield: Institute for Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Springfield.
137. Jones, Bill. 2000. Statement of the Vote, November 7, 2000.Sacramento Calif.: Secretary of State.
138. Jones, Rich. 1992. The State Legislatures. In Council of State Governments, The Book of the States, 1992-1993, vol. 29. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.
139. Karch, Andrew. 2002. Introduction: The Politics of Innovation in the American States. Manuscript.
140. Karnig, Albert K., and Lee Sigelman. 1975. State Legislative Reform and Public Policy: Another Look. Western Political Quarterly28:548-553.
141. Kennedy, Leo F. 1970. Legislative Organization and Services. In Council of State Governments, The Book of the States, 1970-1971, vol. 18. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.
142. Kernell, Sam. 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
143. Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
144. King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
145. King, Gary, James E. Alt, Nancy Elizabeth Burns, and Michael Laver. 1990. A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science34:846-871.
146. Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
147. Kneale, David H. 1989. Senate Final History, 1987-1988, vols. 1-2. Sacramento: California Legislature.
148. Koepke, Jennifer, Anka Lee, and Robb McFadden. 2001. Term Limits: The Quality of Freshmen Committee Chairs Examined. Unpublished paper, University of California, Berkeley.
149. Kousser, Thad. 2002a. Politics, Economics, and State Policy: Discretionary Medicaid Spending, 1980-1993. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, August.
150. Kousser, Thad. 2002b. Redesigning Democracies: How Term Limits and Professionalization Reshape America’s State Legislatures. Ph.D. diss., University of California at Berkeley.
151. Kousser, Thad, 2002c. Term Limits and Legislator Performance. In The Test of Time: Coping with Legislative Term Limits, ed. Rick Farmer, John David Rausch, and John C. Green. Lanham, Md.: Lexington.
152. Kousser, Thad, and Ray LaRaja. 2000. How Do Campaign Finance Laws Shape Fundraising Patterns and Electoral Outcomes? Evidence from the American States. Presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C.
153. Kravitz, Walter. 1965. The Influence of the House Rules Committee on Legislation in the 87th Congress. In Congressional Reform: Problems and Prospects, ed. Joseph H. Clark. New York: Thomas Crowell.
154. Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
155. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
156. Kristol, William. 1995. Term Limitations: Breaking Up the Iron Triangle. Excerpted in Election Law: Cases and Materials, ed. Daniel Hays Lowenstein. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic.
157. Law, Steve. 2001a. Critics Offer Alternatives to Term Limits. Statesman Journal, February 15.
158. Law, Steve. 2001b. Initiator of Term Limits Casts Long Shadow. Statesman Journal, February 13.
159. Law, Steve. 2001c. Lawmaking Talent Lost through Revolving Door. Statesman Journal, February 13.
160. Law, Steve. 2001d. Term Limits Garner Mixed Results. Statesman Journal, February 13.
161. Law, Steve. 2001e. Term Limits Help Rookies Soar. Statesman Journal, February 13.
162. Law, Steve. 2001f. Term Limits Shorten Path to Top. Statesman Journal, February 13.
163. Legislative Counsel Committee. State of Oregon. 1983. Oregon Revised Statutes, 1983 Edition. Salem: Legislative Counsel Committee, State of Oregon.
164. Legislative Counsel Committee. State of Oregon. 1999. Oregon Revised Statutes, 1999 Edition. Salem: Legislative Counsel Committee, State of Oregon.
165. Legislative Fiscal Office. 1999. Budget Highlights: Legislatively Adopted 19992001 Budget. Salem, Ore.: Legislative Fiscal Office.
166. LeLoup, Lance T. 1978. Reassessing the Mediating Impact of Legislative Capability. American Political Science Review72:616-621.
167. Londregan, John, and James M. Snyder. 1995. Comparing Committee and Floor Preferences. In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, ed. Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
168. Luther, Claudia, and Tracy Wood. 1980. Brown Claims Votes to Win Speakership. Los Angeles Times, November 25, p. 66.
169. Maass, Arthur. 1983. Congress and the Common Good.New York: Basic Books.
170. MacRae, Duncan, Jr., and Hugh D. Price. 1959. Scale Positions and “Power” in the Senate. Behavioral Science5:212-218.
171. Magleby, David. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
172. Maine Legislature. 2000. History and Final Disposition, 118th Legislature, Regular Session. Http://janus.state.me.us/legis/lio/history118th1/Histframe.htm, accessed April 2000.
173. Maine Legislature. 2002. Legislative Website. Http://janus.state.me.us/legis, accessed May 2002.
174. Maine People’s Resource Center. 1987. A Citizen’s Guide to the Maine Legislature. Portland: Maine People’s Resource Center.
175. Maine People’s Resource Center. 1991. A Citizen’s Guide to the 115th Maine Legislature. Portland: Maine People’s Resource Center.
176. Maine People’s Resource Center. 1997. A Citizen’s Guide to the 118th Maine Legislature. Portland: Maine People’s Resource Center.
177. Maine People’s Resource Center. 2001. A Citizen’s Guide to the 120th Maine Legislature, 2001-2002, 9th ed. Portland: Maine People’s Resource Center.
178. Maine State Legislature. Office of Fiscal and Program Review. 2002. General Fund Budgets v. Actuals: FY1975-FY 2003. Augusta, Me.: Office of Fiscal and Program Review.
179. Malbin, Michael J., and Thomas L. Gais. 1998. The Day after Reform: Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons from the American States. Albany, N.Y.: Rockefeller Institute.
180. Maltzman, Forrest, 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
181. Margolis, Larry. 1971. Revitalizing State Legislatures. In Strengthening the States: Essays in Legislative Reform, ed. Donald G. Herzberg and Alan Rosenthal. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
182. Marshall, Lynn, and Kim Murphy. 2002. Idaho Officials Repeal Term Limit Legislation. Los Angeles Times, February 2, p. 77.
183. Martorano. Nancy. 2001. Using State Legislative Rules of Procedure to Test Existing Theories of Legislative Organization. Presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
184. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
185. McGraw, Kate. 1979. Martinez Moving to Avoid Speakership Battle. Santa Fe New Mexican, January 5.
186. Miller, Clem. 1962. Member of the House: Letters of a Congressman, ed. John W. Baker. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
187. Mintrom, Michael. 1997. Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation. American Journal of Political Science41:738-770.
188. Moen, Matthew C., and Kenneth T. Palmer. 2000. Maine: The Cutting Edge of Term Limits. Paper prepared for delivery at seminar on Coping with Term Limits Conference, Columbus, Ohio, April 12-13.
189. Moncrief, Gary, Richard G. Niemi, and Linda W. Powell. Forthcoming. “Time, Term Limits, and Turnover: Trends in Membership Turnover in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly.
190. Mooney, Christopher Z. 1994. Measuring U.S. State Legislative Professionalism: An Evaluation of Five Indices. State and Local Government Review26: 70-78.
191. Morrow, James D. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
192. Mosk, Matthew. 2002. Western Md. Still Awaiting Takeoff: Tourism Slow to Come Despite Aid from State. Washington Post, March 18, pp. B1, B4.
193. Myerson, Roger B. 1991. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
194. Nash, John F. 1950. The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica18:155-162.
195. Nash, John F. 1953. Two-Person Cooperative Games. Econometrica 21:128-140.
196. National Conference of State Legislatures. 1992. Inside the Legislative Process. Denver, Colo.: National Conference of State Legislatures.
197. National Conference of State Legislatures. 1997. Time Enough? States Respond to Term Limits.New York: Millbank Memorial Fund.
198. National Conference of State Legislatures. 1999a. Members Termed Out, 1996-2000. Denver, Colo.: National Conference of State Legislatures.
199. National Conference of State Legislatures. 1999b. Term Limits in Maine: Summary of Interviews. Denver, Colo.: National Conference of State Legislatures.
200. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2001. Size of State Legislative Staff: 1979, 1988 and 1996. Http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/about/stf1.htm, accessed June 2001.
201. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2002a. Elections Data Tables, electronic format. Denver, Colo.: National Conference of State Legislatures.
202. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2002b. Summaries of Court Decisions. Http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/about/terms.htm, accessed February 2002.
203. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2002c. Summary and Citations of State Term Limit Laws. Http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/about/citations.htm, accessed February 2002.
204. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2002d. Term Limited States by Year Enacted and Year of Impact. Http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/about/states.htm, accessed February 2002.
205. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2003. Term Limits. Http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/about/states.htm, accessed November 2003.
206. National Legislative Conference. 1961. American State Legislatures in MidTwentieth Century: Final Report of the Committee on Legislative Processes and Procedures of the National Legislative Conference. Chicago: Council of State Governments.
207. Nelson, Albert J. 1991. Emerging Influentials in State Legislatures: Women, Blacks, and Hispanics. New York: Praeger.
208. Neustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership.New York: Wiley.
209. New Mexico Legislative Council Service. 1999. The Highlights of the Forty-fourth Legislature, First Session and First Special Session, 1999.Santa Fe: New Mexico Legislative Council Service.
210. New Mexico Rural Electric Cooperatives. 1999.1999 Legislative Almanac.Santa Fe: New Mexico Rural Electric Cooperatives.
211. Nicholson, Walter. 1998. Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions,7th ed. Fort Worth, Tex.: Dryden.
212. Office of the Legislative Counsel. 1999. Seventieth Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon Statistical Summary, with Comparative Tables from 1987 to 1997.Salem: Office of the Legislative Counsel.
213. Office of Legislative Legal Services. 1989. Digest of Bills Enacted by the Fifty-seventh General Assembly, 1989 First Regular Session. Denver, Colo.: Office of Legislative Legal Services.
214. Office of Legislative Legal Services. 1990. Digest of Bills Enacted by the Fifty-seventh General Assembly, 1990, Second Regular Session. Denver, Colo.: Office of Legislative Legal Services.
215. Office of Policy and Legal Analysis. 1995. Joint Standing Committee Bill Summaries, State of Maine, 117th Regular Session, First Session. Augusta: Office of Policy and Legal Analysis, Maine Legislature.
216. Office of Policy and Legal Analysis. 1996. Joint Standing Committee Bill Summaries, State ofMaine, 117th Regular Session, Second Session. Augusta: Office of Policy and Legal Analysis, Maine Legislature.
217. Office of Policy and Legal Analysis. 1997. A Summary of Legislation for the Joint Standing Committees of the 118th Maine Legislature, First Regular and Special Sessions. Augusta: Office of Policy and Legal Analysis, Maine Legislature.
218. Office of Policy and Legal Analysis. 1998. A Summary ofLegislation for the Joint Standing Committees of the 118th Maine Legislature, Second Regular Session and Second Special Session. Augusta: Office of Policy and Legal Analysis, Maine Legislature.
219. Office of Policy and Legal Analysis. 1999. A Summary ofLegislation for the Joint Standing Committees of the 119th Maine Legislature, First Regular Session. Augusta: Office of Policy and Legal Analysis, Maine Legislature.
220. Office of Policy and Legal Analysis. 2000. A Summary of Legislation for the Joint Standing Committees of the 119th Maine Legislature, Second Regular Session. Augusta: Office of Policy and Legal Analysis, Maine Legislature.
221. Olson, David J. 1992. Term Limits Fail in Washington: The 1991 Battleground. In Limiting Legislative Terms, ed. Gerald Benjamin and Michael Malbin. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
222. Ordeshook, Peter C. 1986. Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
223. Oregon Archives Division. 1985. Oregon Blue Book.Salem: Oregon Archives Division.
224. Oregon House. 2001. General Legislative Summary, Measures Referred to House Committees. Www.leg.state.or.us/99reg/pubs/hsetb.txt, accessed September 2001.
225. Oregon Legislative Fiscal Office. 1999. Budget Highlights: Legislatively Adopted Budget, 1999-2001. Salem: Oregon Legislative Fiscal Office.
226. Oregon, Office of the Secretary of State. 1997. Oregon Blue Book, 1997-1998. Salem: Office of the Secretary of State.
227. Oregon Senate. 2001. General Legislative Summary, Measures Referred to Senate Committees. Www.leg.state.or.us/99reg/pubs/sentb.txt, accessed September 2001.
228. Oregon State Legislature. 2002. Welcome to the Oregon State Legislature. Http://www.leg.state.or.us, accessed May 2002.
229. Orr, Shannon, Eric Rader, Jean-Philippe Faletta, Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson, Charles Elder, Lyke Thompson, John Strate, and Richard Elling. 2001. A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment in the States: Research on Term Limits in Michigan. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4.
230. Osborne, Martin J., and Ariel Rubinstein. 1990. Bargaining and Markets. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
231. Overby, L. Marvin, and Thomas A. Kazee. 2000. Outlying Committees in the Statehouse: An Examination of the Prevalence of Committee Outliers in State Legislatures. Journal of Politics62:701-728.
232. Palmer, Kenneth T., G. Thomas Taylor, and Marcus A. Librizzi. 1992. Maine Politics and Government.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
233. Persily, Nathaniel, Thad Kousser, and Pat Egan. 2002. The Complicated Impact of One Person, One Vote on Political Competition and Representation. University of North Carolina Law Review80, no. 4.
234. Petracca, Mark. 1991. Pro: It’s Time to Return to “Citizen-Legislators.” San Francisco Chronicle, March 26.
235. Petracca, Mark. 1992. Rotation in Office: The History of an Idea. In Limiting Legislative Terms, ed. Gerald Benjamin and Michael Malbin. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
236. Petracca, Mark. 1996. A Legislature in Transition: The California Experience with Term Limits. Working paper 96-1. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
237. Polsby, Nelson W. 1975. Legislatures. In Governmental Institutions and Processes, Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3, ed. Fred L. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
238. Polsby, Nelson W. 1984. Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
239. Polsby, Nelson W. 1986. Congress and the Presidency. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
240. Polsby, Nelson W. 1990. No, It’ll Shift Power to the Unelected. Los Angeles Times, September 27.
241. Polsby, Nelson W. 1993. Restoration Comedy. Yale Law Journal102:1515-1526.
242. Polsby, Nelson W., and Eric Schickler. 2001. Landmarks in the Study of Congress since 1945: Sketches for an Informal History? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
243. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1985. A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis. American Journal of Political Science29:357-384.
244. Price, Charles M. 1992. The Guillotine Comes to California: Term-Limit Politics in the Golden State. In Limiting Legislative Terms, ed. Gerald Benjamin and Michael Malbin. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
245. Primo, David. 2002. Rethinking Political Bargaining: Policymaking with a Single Proposer. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization18:411-427.
246. Rausch, John David. 1996. The Politics of Term Limitations. In Constitutional Politics in the States: Contemporary Controversies and Historical Patterns, ed. G. Alan Tarr. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood.
247. Richardson, James. 1996. Willie Brown: A Biography.Berkeley: University of California Press.
248. Riker, William H., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1973. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
249. Ritt, Leonard. 1973. State Legislative Reform: Does It Matter?American Politics Quarterly1:499-510.
250. Ritt, Leonard. 1977. The Policy Impact of Legislative Reform: A 50-State Analysis. In Legislative Reform and Public Policy, ed. Susan Welch and John G. Peters. New York: Praeger.
251. Robertson, John. 1979. Martinez Fills Committee Posts. Santa Fe New Mexican, January 7.
252. Roeder, Phillip W. 1979. State Legislative Reform: Determinants and Policy Consequences. American Politics Quarterly7:51-70.
253. Rohde, David. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
254. Romer, Thomas, and Howard Rosenthal. 1978. Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo. Public Choice 33:27-43.
255. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1980. Risk Taking and Reelection: Does Federalism Promote Innovation?Journal of Legal Studies9:593-616.
256. Rosenthal, Alan. 1971. The Consequences of Legislative Staffing. In Strengthening the States: Essays in Legislative Reform, ed. Donald G. Herzberg and Alan Rosenthal. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
257. Rosenthal, Alan. 1974. Legislative Performance in the States: Explorations of Committee Behavior.New York: Free Press.
258. Rosenthal, Alan. 1998. The Decline of Representative Democracy: Process, Participation, and Power in State Legislatures. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
259. Rosenthal, Alan, Karl T. Kurtz, John Hibbing, and Burdett Loomis. 2001. The Case for Representative Democracy: What Americans Should Know about Their Legislatures. Denver, Colo.: National Conference of State Legislatures.
260. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures.New York: Oxford University Press.
261. Rothenberg, Stuart. 1992. Transplanting Term Limits: Political Mobilization and Grass-Roots Politics. In Limiting Legislative Terms, ed. Gerald Benjamin and Michael Malbin. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
262. Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica 50:97-109.
263. Rubinstein, Ariel. 1985. A Bargaining Model with Incomplete Information about Time Preferences. Econometrica53:1151-1172.
264. Ryan, George H. 1999. Illinois State Budget, Fiscal Year 2000.Springfield: Bureau of the Budget.
265. Ryan, Leo J. 1966. Argument against Proposition No. 1-a.Sacramento: California Secretary of State.
266. Schabarum, Peter F. 1992. Enough Is Enough: Term Limits in California. California: Modernage Marketing Services.
267. Schevill, Ferdinand. 1936. History of Florence from the Founding of the City through the Renaissance. New York: Frederick Ungar.
268. Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
269. Selten, Reinhart. 1975. Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games. International Journal of Game Theory4:25-55.
270. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science23:27-59.
271. Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power. American Political Science Review81:85-104.
272. Simon, Lucinda. 1987. The Climb to Leadership: Career Paths and Personal Choices. State Government60:245-251.
273. Sittig, Robert F. 1977. A Perspective on State Legislative Reform. In Legislative Reform and Public Policy, ed. Susan Welch and John G. Peters. New York: Praeger.
274. Snyder, James M. 1992. Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings. Legislative Studies Quarterly11:47-63.
275. Sprague, Mike. 2004. State Term Limits Show Progress, Fall Short of Goal. Pasadena Star News, February 8.
276. Squire, Peverill. 1988. Member Career Opportunities and the Internal Organization of Legislatures. Journal of Politics 50:726-744.
277. Squire, Peverill. 1992a. Changing State Legislative Leadership Careers. In Changing Patterns in State Legislative Careers, ed. Joel A. Thompson and Gary F. Moncrief. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
278. Squire, Peverill. 1992b. Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly17:69-79.
279. State of California. Department of Finance. 2001. California Current Population Survey Report: March 2000 Data.Sacramento: Department of Finance.
280. State of Colorado. 1989a. Journal of the House of Representatives, Fifty-seventh General Assembly, First Regular Session. Denver: State of Colorado.
281. State of Colorado. 1989b. Journal of the Senate, Fifty-seventh General Assembly, First Regular Session. Denver: State of Colorado.
282. State of Colorado. 1990a. Journal of the House of Representatives, Fifty-seventh General Assembly, Second Regular Session. Denver: State of Colorado.
283. State of Colorado. 1990b. Journal of the Senate, Fifty-seventh General Assembly, Second Regular Session. Denver: State of Colorado.
284. State of Maine. 1987. Legislative Documents and Papers of the 113th First Regular Session.Augusta: Legislative Information Office.
285. State of Maine. 1988. History and Final Disposition of Legislative Documents of the 113th Second Regular Session. Augusta: Legislative Information Office.
286. State Policy Documentation Project. 2001a. Findings in Brief: Time Limits. Www.spdp.org/tanf/timelimits/timelimitexpl.htm, accessed January 2001.
287. State Policy Documentation Project. 2001b. State Policies Regarding TANF Work Activities and Requirements. Www.spdp.org/tanf/work/worksumm.htm, accessed January 2001.
288. Steinberg, David. 1973. “Mama Lucy Gang” Rules House. Albuquerque Journal, March 4, p. F7.
289. Steinberg, David. 1977. Dissidents in House Get Short Hands. Albuquerque Journal, January 16.
290. Storey, Robert. 1983. Sanchez Solidifies Control. Santa Fe New Mexican, January 21.
291. Straayer, John A. 1990. The Colorado General Assembly.Niwot: University Press of Colorado.
292. Straayer, John A. 2000. Legislative Term Limits in Colorado: Lots of Commotion, Limited Consequences? Paper prepared for delivery at the conference on Coping with Term Limits, Columbus, Ohio, April 12-13.
293. Straayer, John. 2002. Colorado: Lots of Commotion, Limited Consequences. In The Test of Time: Coping with Legislative Term Limits, ed. Rick Farmer, John David Rausch, and John C. Green. Lanham, Md.: Lexington.
294. Strumph, Koleman S. 2000. Does Government Decentralization Increase Policy Innovation? Paper presented at the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics Conference.
295. Thompson, Joel A. 1986. State Legislative Reform: Another Look, One More Time, Again. Polity 19:27-41.
296. Thompson, Joel A., and Gary F. Moncrief. 1992. The Evolution of the State Legislature: Institutional Change and Legislative Careers. In Changing Patterns in State Legislative Careers, ed. Joel A. Thompson and Gary F. Moncrief. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
297. Thorley, John. 1996. Athenian Democracy. London and New York: Routledge.
298. Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2001. clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Http://gking.harvard.edu, accessed August 2001.
299. Tothero, Rebecca A. 2000. The Effect of Term Limits on Legislative Behavior in Michigan and Ohio: Roll-Call Voting and the Last Term of Office. Paper presented at the conference on Coping with Term Limits: Ohio and the Nation, Columbus, Ohio, April 2000.
300. U.S. Census Bureau. 1999. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1999,199th ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
301. U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2001, 121st ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
302. U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2002, 122nd ed. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
303. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 1995. 115 S.Ct.1842, 131 L. Ed. 2d 881.
304. Van Der Slik, Jack R., ed. 1990. Almanac of Illinois Politics-1990.Springfield: Illinois Issues.
305. Van Vechten, Renee Bukovchik. 2000. Amateur or Professional? The California Legislature in the Term Limits Era. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association. San Jose, California, March 2000.
306. Van Vechten, Renee Bukovchik. 2001. Taking the Politics Out of Politics? State Legislative Term Limits and Institutional Political Reform in Twentieth-Century California. Ph.D. diss., University of California at Irvine.
307. Verhovek, Sam Howe. 2001. In State Legislatures, 2nd Thoughts on Term Limits. New York Times, May 21, pp. A1, A15.
308. Wahlke, John C. 1966. Organization and Procedure. In State Legislatures in American Politics, ed. Alexander Heard. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
309. Walker, Jack L. 1969. The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. American Political Science Review63:880-899.
310. White, Darryl, and Brian Kidney. 1989. California Legislature at Sacramento, 1989-1990 Regular Session.Sacramento: California Legislature.
311. Will, George F. 1992. Restoration: Congress, Term Limits, and the Recovery of Deliberative Democracy.New York: Free Press.
312. Wilson, Woodrow, Ed. 2001. Term Limits and Legislator Efficacy. Unpublished paper, University of California at Berkeley.
313. Wilson, Woodrow, 1885. Congressional Government. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
314. Winters, Richard F. 1976. Party Control and Policy Change. American Journal of Political Science20:597-636.
315. Wong, Peter. 2001a. Courtney Files for Reelection. Statesman Journal, July 24.
316. Wong, Peter. 2001b. Term Limits Overturned in Court. Statesman Journal, July 21.
317. Wright, Gerald C., Robert S. Erikson, and John P. McIver. 1985. Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data. Journal of Politics47:469-489.
318. Wunnicke, Pat, and Sharon Randall. 1986. Leadership 1980s Style. State Legislatures12:26-29.
319. Yang, Kelly. 2001. Term Limits Don’t Deserve All the Credit for Electing Women to the Legislature. Institute of Governmental Studies Research Brief, December 15.*****
320. Yang, Kelly. 2002a. Expert Staff, Not Political Patronage, Removed by Prop. 140. Institute of Governmental Studies Research Brief, February 4.
321. Yang, Kelly. 2002b. Percentage of Termed-Out Members Who Run for Other Office.Institute of Governmental Studies Research Brief, April 9.
322. Yang, Kelly. 2002c. Term Limits Have Minimal Effect on Minority Representation. Institute of Governmental Studies Research Brief, February 22.
323. Zeiger, Richard. 1990. Rating Legislators. California Journal21:133-141.