Term limits

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 2, Issue , 1999, Pages 163-188

  Cain, Bruce E ^a   Levin, Marc A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Legislators; Libertarianism; Populism; Progressivism; Republicanism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033474254     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.163     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alvarez RM, Saving JL. 1997. Deficits, Democrats, and distributive benefits: congressional elections and the pork barrel in the 1980s. Polit. Res. Q. 50:809-32
2. Bandow D. 1996. The Political Revolution That Wasn't: Why Term Limits Are Needed Now More Than Ever. Policy Anal. 259. Washington, DC: Cato Inst. 21 pp.
3. Bell D. 1998. Time's up: let the experiment begin as the Michigan legislature says farewell to experience. State Legis. 24: 24-29
4. Block A. 1993. "Nesting" in the Assembly does not refer to a comfort zone. Calif. J. 24:25-29
5. Boeckelman K, Corell G. 1996. An analysis of term limitation elections. See Grofman 1996, pp. 187-97
6. Brunelle J. 1997. The reign in Maine. State Legis. 23:28-29
7. Cain BE. 1996a. Term limits and local governments in California. See Grofman 1996, pp. 309-19
8. Cain BE. 1996b. The varying impact of legislative term limits. See Grofman 1996, pp. 21-36
9. Cain BE, Ferejohn J, Fiorina M. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. 268 pp.
10. Capell EA. 1996. The impact of term limits on the California Legislature: an interest group perspective. See Grofman 1996, pp. 67-85
11. Caress S. 1996. The impact of term limits on legislative behavior: an examination of transitional legislature. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. 29:671-77
12. Chadha A, Bernstein R. 1996. Why incumbents are treated so harshly: term limits for state legislators. Am. Polit. Q. 24:363-77
13. Chi K, Leatherby D. 1998. State legislative term limits. Solutions, Vol. 6. Lexington, KY: Counc. State Gov. 38 pp.
14. Cohen LR. 1995. Terms of office, legislative structure, and collective incentives. In Constitutional Reform in California: Making State Government More Effective and Responsive, BE Cain, RG Noll, pp. 239-61. Berkeley, CA: Inst. Gov. Stud.
15. Cohen LR, Spitzer ML. 1992. Term limits. Georgetown Law J. 80:477-522
16. Cohen LR, Spitzer ML. 1996. Term limits and representation. See Grofman 1996, pp. 47-65
17. Cox G, Morgenstern S. 1993. The increasing advantage of incumbency in the US states. Legis. Stud. Q. 18:495-514
18. Crane EH. 1991. Six and twelve: the case for serious term limits. Natl. Civic Rev. 80: 248-55
19. Daniel K, Lott JR. 1997. Term limits and electoral competitiveness: evidence from California's state legislative races. Public Choice 90:165-84
20. Donovan T, Snipp J. 1994. Support for legislative term limitations in California: group representation, partisanship, and campaign information. J. Polit. 56:492-501
21. Erikson RS. 1971. The advantage of incumbency in congressional elections. Polity 3: 395-405
22. Fay J, Christman R. 1994. Hell no, we won't go! California's local pols confront term limits. Natl. Civic Rev. 83:54-61
23. Fett PJ, Ponder DE. 1993. Congressional term limits, state legislative term limits and congressional turnover: a theory of change. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. 26:211-16
24. Francis W, Kenny L. 1997. Equilibrium projections of the consequences of term limits upon expected tenure, institutional turnover, and membership experience. J. Polit. 59:240-52
25. Fund JH. 1990. Term Limitation: an Idea Whose Time Has Come. Policy Anal. 141. Washington, DC: Cato Inst. 29 pp.
26. Garrett E. 1996. Term limitations and the myth of the citizen-legislator. Cornell Law Rev. 81:623-97
27. Gilmour J, Rothstein P. 1994. Term limitation in a dynamic model of partisan balance. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 38:770-96
28. Grofman B, ed. 1996. Legislative Term Limits: Public Choice Perspectives. Boston: Kluwer. 385 pp.
29. Gurwitt R. 1996. Greenhorn government. Governing 9:15-19
30. Hansen K. 1997a. Term limits for better or worse. State Legis. 23:50-57
31. Hansen K. 1997b. The third revolution. State Legis. 23:20-26
32. Hibbing JR. 1991. Congressional Careers: Contours of Life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. NC Press. 213 pp.
33. Hodson T, Jones R, Kurtz K, Moncrief G. 1995. Leaders and limits: changing patterns of state legislative leadership under term limits. Spectrum 68:6-15
34. Karp J. 1995. Explaining public support for legislative term limits. Public Opin. Q. 59: 373-91
35. King J. 1993. Term limits in Wyoming. Comp. State Polit. 14:1-18
36. Kristol W. 1993. Term limitations: breaking up the iron triangle. Harvard J. Law Public Policy 16:95-100
37. Kurfirst R. 1996. Term-limit logic: paradigms and paradoxes. Polity 29:119-41
38. Mann T. 1992. The wrong medicine: term limits won't cure what ails congressional elections. Brookings Rev. 10:23-25
39. Mayhew D. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. 194 pp.
40. Moncrief GF, Thompson JA, eds. 1992. Changing Patterns in State Legislative Careers. Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan. 237 pp.
41. Moncrief G, Thompson J, Haddon M, Hoyer R. 1992. For whom the bell tolls: term limits and state legislatures. Legis. Stud. Q. 17:37-47
42. Mondak J. 1995a. Focusing the term limits debate. Polit. Res. Q. 48:741-50
43. Mondak J. 1995b. Elections as filters: term limits and the composition of the US House. Polit. Res. Q. 48:701-27
44. Moore M, Hibbing J. 1996. Length of congressional tenure and federal spending: Were the voters of Washington State correct? Am. Polit. Q. 24:131-49
45. Muir WK. 1983. Legislature: California's School for Politics. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. 219 pp.
46. Noah RL. 1998. The limited legislature: the effects of term limits on state legislative organization. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., Berkeley. 245 pp.
47. Ornstein NJ. 1990. The permanent Democractic Congress. Public Interest 100:24-45
48. Payne J. 1991. Limiting government by limiting congressional terms. Public Interest 103:106-17
49. Petracca M. 1992. Why Political Scientists Oppose Term Limits. Briefing Pap. 14. Washington, DC: Cato Inst. 10 pp.
50. Petracca M. 1996. A Legislature in Transition: The California Experience with Term Limits. Working Pap. 96-1. Berkeley, CA: Inst. Gov. Stud. 47 pp.
51. Petracca M, Jump D. 1992. From coast to coast: the term limitation express. Natl. Civic Rev. 81:352-65
52. Petracca M, Smith P. 1990. How frequent is frequent enough? An appraisal of the four-year term for House members. Congr. Pres. 17:46-66
53. Polsby NW. 1975. Legislatures. In Handbook of Political Science: Governmental Institutions and Processes, 5:257-319. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
54. Polsby NW. 1991. Constitutional mischief: what's wrong with term limitations. Am. Prosp. 6:40-43
55. Polsby NW. 1993a. Restoration comedy: book review. Yale Law J. 102:1515-26
56. Polsby NW. 1993b. Some arguments against congressional term limitations. Harvard J. Law Public Policy 16:101-7
57. Reed WR, Schansberg DE. 1994. An analysis of the impact of congressional term limits. Econ. Inq. 32:79-91
58. Reed WR, Schansberg DE. 1995. The House under term limits: focusing on the big picture. Soc. Sci. Q. 76:734-40
59. Schrag P. 1996. The populist road to hell. Am. Prosp. 24:24-30
60. Southwell P. 1995. "Throwing the rascals out" versus "throwing in the towel": alienation, support for term limits, and congressional voting behavior. Soc. Sci. Q. 76:741-48
61. Stein RM, Bickers KN. 1994. Congressional elections and the pork barrel. J. Polit. 56: 377-400
62. Strubble R, Jahre ZW. 1991. Rotation in office: rapid but restricted to the House. Polit. Sci. Polit. 24:34-37