Twentieth-century English: History, variation, and standardization

Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation, and Standardization

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-244

  Mair, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929733822     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486951     Document Type: Book

References (207)

1. Aarts, Flor, and Bas Aarts. 2002. “Relative whom: ‘a mischief-maker.’” In Andreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie, and Hans-Martin Lehmann, eds. Text types and corpora. Tübingen: Narr. 123-130.
2. Aitchison, Jean. 1991. Language change: progress or decay? 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Aitchison, Jean. 2003. “From Armageddon to war: the vocabulary of terrorism.” In Jean Aitchison and Diana M. Lewis, eds. New media language. London: Routledge. 193-203.
4. Algeo, John. 1988. “British and American grammatical differences.” International Journal of Lexicography 1: 1-31.
5. Algeo, John. ed. 1991. Fifty years among the new words: a dictionary of neologisms, 1941- Algeo, John. ed. 1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Algeo, John. ed.1998. “Vocabulary.” In Suzanne Romaine, ed. The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. IV, 1776-1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 57-91.
7. Amis, Kingsley. 1997. The King's English: a guide to modern usage. London: Harper-Collins.
8. Ammon, Ulrich. 1998a. Ist Deutsch noch internationale Wissenschaftssprache? Englisch auch für die Lehre an den deutschsprachigen Hochschulen. Berlin: de Gruyter.
9. Ammon, Ulrich. ed. 1998b. Variationslinguistik ¼ Linguistics of variation ¼ La linguistique variationelle. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
10. Arnaud, René. 1983. “On the progress of the progressive in the private correspondence of famous British people (1800-1880).” In Sven Jacobson, ed. Papers from the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. 83-91.
11. Ayto, John. 1999. Twentieth-century words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Baayen, R. Harald, and Antoinette Renouf. 1996. “Chronicling The Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper.” Language 72: 69-96.
13. Bailey, Richard W. 1996. Nineteenth century English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
14. Barber, Charles. 1964. Linguistic change in present-day English. London and Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
15. Barnhart, Robert K., Sol Steinmetz, and Clarence L. Barnhart. 1990. Third Barnhart dictionary of new English. New York: Wilson.
16. Baron, Naomi S. 2003. “Why email looks like speech: proofreading, pedagogy and public face.” In Jean Aitchison and Diana M. Lewis, eds. New media language. London: Routledge. 85-94.
17. Barry, John A. 1991. Technobabble. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Bauer, Laurie. 1994. Watching English change: an introduction to the study of linguistic change in standard Englishes in the twentieth century. London: Longman.
19. Bauer, Laurie. 2002. “Inferring variation and change from public corpora.” In Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, eds. The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. 97-111.
20. Bell, Alan. 1988. “The British base and the American connection in New Zealand media English.” American Speech 63: 326-344.
21. Berg, Thomas. 1999. “Stress variation in British and American English.” World Englishes 18: 123-143.
22. Berglund, Ylva. 2000. “Gonna and going to in the spoken component of the British National Corpus.” In Christian Mair and Marianne Hundt, eds. Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 35-49.
23. Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Biber, Douglas. 2003. “Compressed noun-phrase structures in newspaper discourse: the competing demands of popularization vs. economy.” In Jean Aitchison and Diana M. Lewis, eds. New media language. London: Routledge. 169-181.
25. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Drift and evolution of English style: a history of three genres.” Language 65: 487-517.
26. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics: investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan, and Dwight Atkinson. 1993. “ARCHER and its challenges: compiling and exploring a representative corpus of historical English registers.” In Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie, and Peter Schneider, eds. Creating and using language corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 1-13.
28. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
29. Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
30. Bodine, Ann. 1975. “Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: singular ‘they’, sexindefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’.” Language in Society 4: 129-146.
31. Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Aspects of language. New York: Harcourt Brace.
32. Bolinger, Dwight. 1980. Language: the loaded weapon. London: Longman.
33. Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul. 2002. Race and the rise of standard American. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34. Brinton, Laurel. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems: aspectualizers and postverbal particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Burchfield, Robert. 1989. Unlocking the English language. London: Faber & Faber.
36. Burchfield, Robert.. 1996. The new Fowler's modern English usage. First edited by Henry Watson Fowler. Revised edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37. Bynon, Theodora. 1977. Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Carver, Craig M. 1987. American regional dialects: a word geography. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
39. Chafe, Wallace. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. Claudius, R. Howard. 1925/1926. “Different-to, from, or than?” American Speech 1: 446.
41. Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
42. Compes, Isabel, Silvia Kutscher, and Carmen Rudorf. 1993. Pfade der Grammatikalisierung: ein systematischer Überblick. Working paper 17. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.
43. Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Danchev, Andrei, and Merja Kytö. 1994. “The construction be going to þ infinitive in Early Modern English.” In Dieter Kastovsky, ed. Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 59-77.
46. Danchev, Andrei, and Merja Kytö. 2001. “The go-futures in English and French viewed as an areal feature.” NOWELE: Studies in North-Western European Language Evolution 40: 29-60.
47. Dekeyser, Xavier. 1975. Number and case relations in 19th century British English: a comparative study of grammar and usage. Antwerp: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.
48. Denison, David. 1998. “Syntax.” In Suzanne Romaine, ed. The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. IV, 1776-1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 92-329.
49. Dennis, Leah. 1940. “The progressive tense: frequency of its use in English.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 55: 855-865.
50. Depraetere, Ilse. 2003. “On verbal concord with collective nouns in British English.” English Language and Linguistics 7: 1-43.
51. Depraetere, Ilse, and An Verhulst. Forthcoming. “Must and have to in ICE-GB; a survey of its meanings.” Dorsey, Brian. 2000. Spirituality, sensuality, literality: blues, jazz, and rap as music and poetry. Wien: Braumüller.
52. Eagleson, Robert D. 1989. “Popular and professional attitudes to prestige dialects.” In Peter Collins and David Blair, eds. Australian English: the language of a new society.
53. St, Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press. 150-157.
54. Elias, Norbert. 1976 [1939]. Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation: soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. 2 vols. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. English translation The civilizing process: sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. [Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.] Elias, Norbert.
55. Elias, Norbert. 1989. Studien über die Deutschen: Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, ed. Michael Schröter. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
56. Ellis, Alexander J. 1869-1889. On early English pronunciation: with especial reference to Shakspere and Chaucer. London: Trübner.
57. Elsness, Johan. 1997. The perfect and the preterite in contemporary and earlier English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. forthcoming. “Colonial lead? On the development of the present perfect/ preterite opposition in American and British English.” In Günter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlüter, eds. Grammatical differences between British and American English.
58. Erdmann, Peter. 1997. The for to construction in English. Frankfurt: Lang.
59. Fabricius, Anne. 2002. “Ongoing change in modern RP: evidence for the disappearing stigma of t-glottalling.” English World-Wide 23: 115-136.
60. Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
61. Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.
62. Fanego, Teresa. 1996a. “The development of gerunds as objects of subject-control verbs in English (1400-1760).” Diachronica 13: 29-62.
63. Fanego, Teresa. 1996b. “On the historical developments of English retrospective verbs.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 97: 71-79.
64. Fischer, Olga. 1988. “The rise of the for NP to V construction: an explanation.” In Graham Nixon and John Honey, eds. An historic tongue: studies in English in memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge. 67-88.
65. Foster, Brian. 1968. The changing English language. London: Macmillan.
66. Fowler, Joy. 1986. “The social stratification of (r) in New York City department stores, 24 years after Labov.” Ms., New York University.
67. Frank, Roberta. 1988. “‘Interdisciplinary’: the first half century.” In Eric G. Stanley and T. F. Hoad, eds. Words: for Robert Burchfield's sixty-fifth birthday. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 91-101.
68. Gimson, Albert C. 1967. “Preface.” In Daniel Jones. Everyman's English pronouncing dictionary: containing over 58,000 words in international phonetic transcription. 13th edition. London: Dent. Givo´n, Talmy, and LynneYang.
69. Gimson, Albert C. 1994. “The rise of theEnglish get-passive.” In Barbara Fox and Paul J. Hopper, eds. Voice: form and function. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 119-149.
70. Görlach, Manfred. 1999. English in nineteenth century England: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Görlach, Manfred. 2001. A dictionary of European anglicisms: a usage dictionary of anglicisms in sixteen European languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Greenbaum, Sidney. 1986. “The Grammar of contemporary English and A comprehensive grammar of the English language.” In Gerhard Leitner, ed. The English reference grammar. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 6-14.
73. Greenbaum, Sidney, and Janet Whitcut. 1988. Longman guide to English usage. London: Longman.
74. Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. (English translation Theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2000, 2001.)
75. Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
76. Harrington, Jonathan, Sallyanne Palethorpe, and Catherine Watson. 2000. “Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas Broadcasts.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30: 63-78.
77. Hatcher, Anna. 1943. “Mr. Howard amuses easy.” Modern LanguageNotes, 1 (January): 8-17.
78. Hawkins, John. 1986. A comparative typology of English and German: unifying the contrasts. London: Croom Helm.
79. Heacock, Paul, and Carol-June Cassidy. 1998. “Translating a dictionary from British to American.” In Hans Lindquist, Staffan Klintborg, Magnus Levin, and Maria Estling, eds. The major varieties of English: papers from MAVEN 97, Växjö, 20-22 November 1997. Växjö: University of Växjö Press. 93-99.
80. Hempl, George. 1904. “President's address.” PMLA 19: xxxi-liii.
81. Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1995. The de-moralization of society: from Victorian virtues to modern values. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit.
82. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1994. Age of extremes: a history of the short twentieth century. London: Joseph.
83. Hobsbawm, Eric. 2003. Interesting times: a twentieth-century life. London: Abacus.
84. Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2004. “Using the OED quotations database as a corpus-a linguistic appraisal.” ICAME Journal 28: 17-30.
85. Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Howard, Philip. 1984. The state of the language: English observed. London: Hamilton.
87. Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88. Hughes, Geoffrey. 1988. Words in time: a social history of the English vocabulary. Oxford: Blackwell.
89. Hughes, Geoffrey. 1991. Swearing: a social history of foul language, oaths and profanity in English. Oxford: Blackwell.
90. Hughes, Geoffrey. 2000. A history of English words. Oxford: Blackwell.
91. Hundt, Marianne. 1998a. New Zealand English grammar-fact or fiction? A corpus-based study in morphosyntactic variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
92. Hundt, Marianne. 1998b. “It is important that this study (should) be based on the analysis of parallel corpora: on the use of the mandative subjunctive in four major varieties of English.” In Hans Lindquist, Staffan Klintborg, Magnus Levin, and Maria Estling, eds. The major varieties of English: papers from MAVEN 97, Växjö, 20-22 November 1997. Växjö: Växjö University Press. 159-173.
93. Hundt, Marianne. 2001. “What corpora tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions.” Studies in Language 25: 49-87.
94. Hundt, Marianne. 2004. “Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English.” English Language and Linguistics 8: 47-69.
95. Hundt, Marianne. 2006. English mediopassive constructions: a cognitive, corpus-based study of their origin, spread and current status. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
96. Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair. 1999. “‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: the corpusbased approach to language change in progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4: 221-242.
97. Iyeiri, Yoko, Michiko Yaguchi, and Hiroko Okabe. 2004. “To be different from or to be different than in present-day American English.” English Today 20(3): 29-33.
98. Jagger, J. Hubert. 1940. English in the future. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.
99. James, Henry. 1905. “The question of our speech,” The question of our speech/the lesson of Balzac: two lectures. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.
100. Jay, Martin. 1998. Cultural semantics: keywords of our time. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
101. Jenkins, Jennifer. 2003. World Englishes: a resource book for students. London: Routledge.
102. Jespersen, Otto. 1909-1949. A modern English grammar on historical principles. 7 vols. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
103. Johansson, Stig, and Knut Hofland. 1989. Frequency analysis of English vocabulary and grammar: based on the LOB corpus. Oxford: Clarendon.
104. Jones, Daniel. 1924 [1917]. “Preface.” In Daniel Jones. Everyman's English pronouncing dictionary. London: Dent.
105. Josey, Meredith Pugh. 2004. “A sociolinguistic study of variation and change on the Island of Martha's Vineyard.” PhD, New York University.
106. Jucker, Andreas H. 1992. Social stylistics: syntactic variation in British newspapers. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
107. Kennedy, Graeme D. 1998. An introduction to corpus linguistics. London: Longman.
108. Kjellmer, Göran. 1985. “Help to/help y revisited.” English Studies 66: 156-161.
109. Krapp, George Philip. 1969 [1919]. The pronunciation of standard English in America. New York: AMS Reprints.
110. Kretzschmar, William A. 2004. “Regional dialects.” In Edward A. Finegan and John R. Rickford, eds. Language in the USA: Themes for the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 39-57.
111. Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English modals: a corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
112. Kytö, Merja, and Suzanne Romaine. 1997. “Competing forms of adjective comparison in Modern English: What could be more quicker and easier and more effective?” In Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, eds. To explain the present: studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. 329-352.
113. Kytö, Merja, and Suzanne Romaine. 2000. “Adjective comparison and standardization processes in American and British English from 1620 to the present.” In Laura Wright, ed. The development of standard English 1300-1800: theories, descriptions, conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 171-194.
114. Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center of Applied Linguistics.
115. Labov, William. 1981. “What can be learned about change in progress from synchronic description?” In David Sankoff and Henrietta Cedergren, eds. Variation omnibus.
116. Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research. 177-201.
117. Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. I, Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
118. Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. II, Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
119. Labov, William, Sharon Ash, and Charles Boberg. 2006. The atlas of North American English: phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
120. Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. “Modality on the move: the English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992.” In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank R. Palmer, eds. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 223-240.
121. Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. “Recent grammatical change in English: data, description, theory.” In Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg, eds. Advances in corpus linguistics: papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23). Amsterdam: Rodopi. 61-81.
122. Leech, Geoffrey, and Jonathan Culpeper. 1997. “The comparison of adjectives in recent British English.” In Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, eds. To explain the present: studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. 353-374.
123. Leech, Geoffrey, and Nicholas Smith. 2005. “Recent grammatical change in written English: some preliminary findings of a comparison of American and British English.” In Antoinette Renouf, ed. The changing face of corpus linguistics: papers from the 24th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 24). Amsterdam: Rodopi. 185-204.
124. Lehmann, Christian. 1991. “Grammaticalisation and related changes in contemporary German.” In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, eds. Approaches to grammaticalisation, vol II. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 493-535.
125. Levin, Magnus. 2001. Agreement with collective nouns in English. Lund: Lund University Press.
126. Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
127. Lewis, Clive Staples. 1960 [1932]. Studies in words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
128. Liedtke, Ernst. 1910. Die numerale Auffassung der Kollektiva im Laufe der englischen Sprachgeschichte. Königsberg: Karg & Manneck.
129. Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
130. Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: acquisition, change, and evolution. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
131. McMahon, Michael K. C. 1998. “Phonology.” In Suzanne Romaine, ed. The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. IV, 1776-1997. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 373-535.
132. Mair, Christian. 1994. “Crosslinguistic semantic motivation for the use of a grammatical construction in English and German: X is impossible to do/X ist unmöglich zu schaffen.” Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 29: 5-15.
133. Mair, Christian. 1995. “Changing patterns of complementation, and concomitant grammaticalisation, of the verb help in present-day British English.” In Bas Aarts and Charles F. Meyer, eds. The verb in contemporary English: theory and description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 258-272.
134. Mair, Christian. 1997a. “Parallel corpora: a real-time approach to the study of language change in progress.” In Magnus Ljung, ed. Corpus-based studies in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 195-209.
135. Mair, Christian. 1997b. “The spread of the going-to-future in written English: a corpus-based investigation into language change in progress.” In Raymond Hickey and Stanisław Puppel, eds. Language history and linguistic modelling: a festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1537-1543.
136. Mair, Christian. 2001. “Early or late origin for begin þ V-ing? Using the OED on CD-Rom to settle a dispute between Visser and Jespersen.” Anglia: Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 119: 606-610.
137. Mair, Christian. 2002. “Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: a real-time study based on matching text corpora.” English Language and Linguistics 6: 105-131.
138. Mair, Christian, and Marianne Hundt. 1995. “Why is the progressive becoming more frequent in English? A corpus-based investigation of language change in progress.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 43: 111-122.
139. Mair, Christian, and Geoffrey Leech. 2006. “Current Changes.” In Bas Aarts and April McMahon, eds. The handbook of English linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
140. Mair, Christian, Marianne Hundt, Nicholas Smith, and Geoffrey Leech. 2002. “Shortterm diachronic shifts in part-of-speech frequencies: a comparison of the tagged LOB and F-LOB corpora.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7: 245-264.
141. Matthews, Brander. 1921. Essays on English. New York: Scribners.
142. Matthews, Richard. 1993. “‘Copping it’ or ‘bloody asking for it’: the get-passive and related constructions.” In Richard Matthews, Papers on semantics and grammar. Frankfurt: Lang. 11-54.
143. Mencken, H. L. 1963. The American language. 4th edition. Revised by Raven I. McDavid. New York: Knopf.
144. Meyer, Charles F. 2002. English corpus linguistics: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
145. Meyer, Charles F. 2003. “The Lexis/Nexis database as historical corpus.” Presentation at the 24th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Guernsey (Channel Islands), 24 April 2003, handout.
146. Meyerhoff, Miriam, and Nancy Niedzielski. 2003. “The globalization of vernacular variation.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: 524-555.
147. Michaels, Leonard, and Christopher Ricks, eds. 1980. The state of the language. Berkeley: University of California Press.
148. Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy. 1991. Authority in language: investigating language prescription and standardisation. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
149. Mish, Frederick C., ed. 1986. 12,000 words: a supplement to Webster's Third New International Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
150. Misztal, Barbara A. 2000. Informality: social theory and contemporary practice. London: Routledge.
151. Mondorf, Britta. 2003. “Support for more-support.” In Günter Rohdenburg and Britta Mondorf, eds. Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 251-304.
152. Mossé, Fernand. 1947. Esquisse d’une histoire de la langue anglaise. Lyon: éditions IAC. Mugglestone, Lynda. 2003. “Talking proper”: the rise of accent as social symbol. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon.
153. Mühleisen, Susanne. 2003. “Towards global diglossia? English in the sciences and the humanities.” In Christian Mair, ed. The politics of English as a world language: new horizons in postcolonial cultural studies. ASNEL Papers 7. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 107-118.
154. Myhill, John. 1995. “Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals.” Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 33: 157-211.
155. Nehls, Dietrich. 1988. “On the development of the grammatical category of verbal aspect in English.” In Josef Klegraf and Dietrich Nehls, eds. Essays on the English language and applied linguistics on the occasion of Gerhard Nickel's 60th birthday. Heidelberg: Groos. 173-198.
156. Nevalainen, Terttu, and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2003. Historical sociolinguistics: language change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.
157. Olofsson, Arne. 1990. “A participle caught in the act: on the prepositional use of following.” Studia Neophilologica 62: 23-35, 129-149.
158. Övergaard, Gerd. 1995. The mandative subjunctive in American and British English in the twentieth century. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.
159. Palmer, Frank Robert. 1990. Modality and the English modals. 2nd edition. London: Longman.
160. Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological productivity: structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
161. Plag, Ingo, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, and Harald Baayen. 1999. “Morphological productivity across speech and writing.” English Language and Linguistics 3: 209-228.
162. Potter, Simeon 1975. [1969]. Changing English. London: Deutsch. 2nd edition.
163. Price, Jenny. 2003. “The recording of vocabulary from the major varieties of English in the Oxford English Dictionary.” In Christian Mair, ed. The politics of English as a world language: new horizons in postcolonial cultural studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 121-136.
164. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
165. Raab-Fischer, Roswitha. 1995. “Löst der Genitiv die of-Phrase ab? Eine korpusgestützte Studie zum Sprachwandel im heutigen Englisch.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 43: 123-132.
166. Rayson, Paul, Geoffrey Leech, and Mary Hodges. 1997. “Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2: 133-152.
167. Rickford, John R., Thomas A. Wasow, Norma Mendoza-Denton, and Juli Espinoza. 1995. “Syntactic variation and change in progress: loss of the verbal coda in topic restricting as far as constructions.” Language 71: 102-131.
168. Ricks, Christopher, ed. 1991. The state of the language: 1990s edition. London: Faber and Faber.
169. Ripman, Walter. 1924. “Preface.” In Daniel Jones. Everyman's English pronouncing dictionary. London: Dent.
170. Roach, Peter, and James Hartman. 1997. “Preface.” In Daniel Jones. English pronouncing dictionary. 15th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
171. Romaine, Suzanne, ed. 1998. The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. IV, 1776-1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
172. Romaine, Suzanne, and Deborah Lange. 1991. “The use of like as amarker of reported speech and thought: a case of grammaticalization in progress.” American Speech 66: 227-279.
173. Rosenbach, Anette. 2002. Genitive variation in English: conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
174. Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: an introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
175. Scheible, Silke. 2005. “Upgrading, downsizing & Co: revitalising a moribund word formation pattern in twentieth century English.” Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 30: 177-200.
176. Serpollet, Noëlle. 2001. “The mandative subjunctive in British English seems to be alive and kicking… Is this due to the influence of American English?” In Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson, Tony McEnery, Andrew Hardie, and Shereen Khoja, eds. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference. Lancaster University: UCREL Technical Papers 13: 531-542.
177. Siemund, Rainer. 1995. “‘For who the bell tolls’: Or, why corpus linguistics should carry the bell in the study of language change in present-day English.” Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20: 351-377.
178. Smith, Nicholas. 2002. “Ever moving on? The progressive in recent British English.” In Pam Peters, Peter Collins, and Adam Smith, eds. New frontiers of corpus research: papers from the twenty-first International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Sydney 2002. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 317-330.
179. Smith, Nicholas. 2003. “Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English.” In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank R. Palmer, eds. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 241-266.
180. Spears, Richard A., ed. 1993. NTC's dictionary of acronyms and abbreviations: the most useful and up-to-date guide to American English. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
181. Stark, Andrew. 1999. “Now feel the pain.” Review of Andrew Burstein, Sentimental democracy. Times Literary Supplement, 20 August: 6.
182. Strang, Barbara. 1970. A history of English. London: Routledge.
183. Stark, Andrew. 1982. “Some aspects of the history of the being construction.” In John Anderson, ed. Language form and linguistic variation: papers dedicated to Angus Mclntosh. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 427-474.
184. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2003. “Be going to vs. will/shall: does syntax matter?” Journal of English Linguistics 31: 295-323.
185. Taeymans, Martine. 2004. “An investigation into the marginal modals dare and need in British present-day English.” In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon, eds. Up and down the cline-the nature of grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 97-114.
186. Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
187. Trudgill, Peter. 1988. “Norwich revisited: recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect.” English World-Wide 9: 33-49.
188. Trudgill, Peter. 1990. The dialects of England. Oxford: Blackwell.
189. Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Dialects. London: Routledge.
190. Trudgill, Peter, and Jean Hannah. 2002. International English: a guide to varieties of standard English. 4th edition. London: Arnold.
191. Tsunoda, Minoru. 1983. “Les Langues internationales dans les publications scientifiques et techniques.” Sophia Linguistica 13: 144-155.
192. Tulloch, Sara. 1991. The Oxford dictionary of new words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
193. Upton, Clive, William A. Kretzschmar, and Rafal Konopka. 2001. The Oxford dictionary of pronunciation for current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
194. Visser, Frederikus Th. 1970-1978. An historical syntax of the English language. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill.
195. Vosberg, Uwe. 2004. “Cognitive complexity and the establishment of-ing constructions with retrospective verbs in Modern English.” In Marina Dossena and Charles Jones, eds. Insights into Late Modern English. Frankfurt: Lang. 197-220.
196. Wald, Benji, and Lawrence Besserman. 2002. “The emergence of the verb-verb compound in twentieth century English and twentieth century linguistics.” In Donka Minkova and Robert Stockwell, eds. Studies in the history of the English language: a millennial perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 417-447. Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, 1989.
197. Weiner, E. Judith, and William Labov. 1983. “Constraints on the agentless passive.” Journal of Linguistics 19: 29-58.
198. Wells, J. C. 2000. Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow: Longman.
199. Wells, John. 1997. “What's happening to Received Pronunciation.” English Phonetics (English Phonetic Society of Japan) 1: 13-23.
200. Westin, Ingrid. 2002. Language change in English newspaper editorials. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
201. Westin, Ingrid, and Christer Geisler. 2002. “A multi-dimensional study of diachronic variation in British newspaper editiorials.” ICAME Journal 26: 133-152.
202. Wignell, Edel. 2002. “Get to go: this (prepositional) life.” Ozwords: newsletter of the Australian National Dictionary Centre (November): 7. Also available at www.anu. edu.au/andc/pubs/ozwords.php.
203. Williams, Raymond. [1976] 1983. Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.
204. Williams, Raymond. [1961] 1981. The long revolution. London: Chatto & Windus.
205. Wilson, Kenneth G. 1987. Van Winkle's return: changes in American English, 1966-1986.Hanover, CT: University Press of New England.
206. Wood, Frederick T. 1962. Current English usage. London: Macmillan.
207. Zandvoort, Reinhard W. 1957. Wartime English: materials for a linguistic history of World War II. Groningen: Wolters.