The generating function approach for peptide identification in spectral networks

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 353-366

  Guthals, Adrian ^a   Boucher, Christina ^b   Bandeira, Nuno ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Colorado State University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

algorithms; computational molecular biology; databases; probability; statistical models

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PEPTIDE LIBRARY;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84929659747     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2014.0165     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bairoch, A., Apweiler, R., Wu, C.H., et al. 2008. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D190-D195
2. Bandeira, N., Clauser, K.R., and Pevzner, P.A. 2007a. Shotgun protein sequencing: assembly of peptide tandem mass spectra from mixtures of modified proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1123-1134
3. Bandeira, N., Tang, H., Bafna, V., et al. 2004. Shotgun protein sequencing by tandem mass spectra assembly. Anal. Chem. 76, 7221-7233
4. Bandeira, N., Tsur, D., Frank, A., et al. 2007b. Protein identification by spectral networks analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 6140-6145
5. Carver, J.J., Kaufman, I., and Bandeira, N. 2013. MassIVE. UCSD Center for Comp. Mass Spec., ftp: //.msv000078529: a@massive.ucsd.edu .
6. Carver, J.J., Guthals, A., and Bandeira, N. 2014. CCMS. UCSD Center for Comp. Mass Spec., http://proteomics.ucsd.edu/software/starGF.htm
7. Castellana, N.E., Payne, S.H., Shen, Z., et al. 2008. Discovery and revision of Arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 21034-21038
8. Chourey, K., Nissen, S., Vishnivetskaya, T., et al. 2013. Environmental proteomics reveals early microbial community responses to biostimulation at a uranium- And nitrate-contaminated site. Proteomics 13, 2921-2930
9. Clauser, K.R. 2014. Spectrum Mill. Agilent Technologies. http://www.chem.agilent.com
10. Craig, R., and Beavis, R.C. 2004. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20, 1466-1467
11. Dancík, V., Addona, T.A., Clauser, K.R., et al. 1999. De novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. J. Comput. Biol. 6, 327-342
12. Edelmann, M.J. 2011. Strong cation exchange chromatography in analysis of posttranslational modifications: innovations and perspectives. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 1-7
13. Elias, J.E., and Gygi, S.P. 2007. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207-214
14. Eng, J.K., McCormack, A.L., and Yates, J.R. 1994. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976-989
15. Frank, A.M., Bandeira, N., Shen, Z., et al. 2008. Clustering millions of tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 7, 113-122
16. Frank, A.M., Savitski, M.M., Nielsen, M.L., et al. 2007. De novo peptide sequencing and identification with precision mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 6, 114-123
17. Gupta, N., Bandeira, N., Keich, U., et al. 2011. Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 22, 1111-1120
18. Guthals, A., and Bandeira, N. 2012. Peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry with alternate fragmentation modes. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 550-557
19. Guthals, A., Clauser, K.R., and Bandeira, N. 2012a. Shotgun protein sequencing with meta-contig assembly. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, 1084-1096
20. Guthals, A., Clauser, K.R., Frank, A.M., et al. 2013. Sequencing-grade de novo analysis of MS/MS triplets (CID/HCD/.ETD) from overlapping peptides. J. Proteome Res. 12, 2846-2857
21. Guthals, A., Watrous, J.D., Dorrestein, P.C., et al. 2012b. The spectral networks paradigm in high throughput mass spectrometry. Mol. Biosyst. 8, 2535-2544
22. Jagtap, P., McGowan, T., Bandhakavi, S., et al. 2012. Deep metaproteomic analysis of human salivary supernatant. Proteomics 12, 992-1001
23. Jeong, K., Kim, S., and Bandeira, N. 2012. False discovery rates in spectral identification. BMC Bioinformatics 13 Suppl 1, S2
24. Kessner, D., Chambers, M., Burke, R., et al. 2008. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 24, 2534-2536
25. Kim, S., Gupta, N., and Pevzner, P.A. 2008. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 7, 3354-3363
26. Kim, S., Mischerikow, N., Bandeira, N., et al. 2010. The generating function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD pairs of tandem mass spectra: applications to database search. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 2840-2852
27. Nesvizhskii, A.I. 2010. A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 73, 2092-2123
28. Perkins, D.N., Pappin, D.J., Creasy, D.M., et al. 1999. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551-3567
29. Pevzner, P.A., Dancík, V., and Tang, C.L. 2000. Mutation-Tolerant protein identification by mass spectrometry. J. Comput. Biol. 7, 777-787
30. Swaney, D.L., Wenger, C.D., and Coon, J.J. 2010. Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometrybased proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 9, 1323-1329
31. Tabb, D.L., MacCoss, M.J., Wu, C.C., et al. 2003. Similarity among tandem mass spectra from proteomic experiments: detection, significance, and utility. Anal. Chem. 75, 2470-2477