North or south? Phylogenetic and biogeographic origins of a globally distributed avian clade

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 89, Issue , 2015, Pages 151-159

  Dos Remedios, Natalie ^a,b   Lee, Patricia L M ^c,d   Burke, Terry ^b   Székely, Tamás ^a   Küpper, Clemens ^b  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ancestral area analysis; Charadrius; Mitochondrial DNA; Nuclear genes; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ANARHYNCHUS FRONTALIS; AVES; CHARADRIIDAE; CHARADRIUS; CHARADRIUS MORINELLUS; THINORNIS NOVAESEELANDIAE; THINORNIS RUBRICOLLIS;

GENETIC MARKER;

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; CHARADRIIFORMES; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CHARADRIIFORMES; GENETIC MARKERS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84929659400     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Argüelles-Ticó, A., 2011. Sexual selection: breeding systems and melanin-based plumage colouration in plovers Charadrius spp. PhD Thesis, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
2. Avise J.C. Phylogeography: retrospect and prospect. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36:3-15.
3. Avise J.C., Walker D. Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 1998, 265:457-463.
4. Baker A.J., Pereira S.L., Paton T.A. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of Charadriiformes genera: multigene evidence for the Cretaceous origin of at least 14 clades of shorebirds. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:205-209.
5. Baker A.J., Yatsenko Y., Tavares E.S. Eight independent nuclear genes support monophyly of the plovers: the role of mutational variance in gene trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 65:631-641.
6. Bantock T.M., Prys-Jones R.T.P., Lee P.L.M. New and improved molecular sexing for museum bird specimens. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2008, 8:519-528.
7. Barth J.M.I., Matschiner M., Robertson B.C. Phylogenetic position and subspecies divergence of the endangered New Zealand Dotterel (Charadrius obscurus). PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e78068.
8. Bock W.J. A generic review of the plovers (Charadriinae, Aves). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 1958, 118:27-97.
9. Brito P.H., Edwards S.V. Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica 2009, 135:439-455.
10. Chesser R.T. Molecular systematics of the rhinocryptid genus Pteroptochos. Condor 1999, 101:439-446.
11. Christian P.D., Christidis L., Schodde R. Biochemical systematics of the Australian dotterels and plovers (Charadriiformes, Charadriidae). Aust. J. Zool. 1992, 40:225-233.
12. Chung Y., Ané C. Comparing two Bayesian methods for gene tree/species tree reconstruction: simulations with incomplete lineage sorting and horizontal gene transfer. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60:261-275.
13. Corl A., Ellegren H. Sampling strategies for species trees: the effects on phylogenetic inference of the number of genes, number of individuals, and whether loci are mitochondrial, sex-linked, or autosomal. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 67:358-366.
14. Davis A. Status, distribution, and population trends of the New Zealand Shore Plover Thinornis novaeseelandiae. Notornis 1994, 41:179-194.
15. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:e68. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020068.
16. Delany S., Scott D., Dodman T., Stroud D. An atlas of wader populations in Africa and Western Eurasia 2009, Wetlands International, Wageningen.
17. Delsuc F., Brinkmann H., Philippe H. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6:361-375.
18. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
19. Drummond A.J., Suchard M.A., Xie D., Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1969-1973.
20. Edwards S.V., Cameron Devitt S.E., Fujita M.K. Phylogeography. Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology 2012, 557-565. University of California Press, Berkeley. A. Hastings, L. Gross (Eds.).
21. Ericson P.G., Envall I., Irestedt M., Norman J.A. Inter-familial relationships of the shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) based on nuclear DNA sequence data. BMC Evol. Biol. 2003, 3:16.
22. Fain M.G., Houde P. Multilocus perspectives on the monophyly and phylogeny of the order Charadriiformes (Aves). BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:35.
23. Fain M.G., Krajewski C., Houde P. Phylogeny of "core Gruiformes" (Aves: Grues) and resolution of the Limpkin-Sungrebe problem. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 43:515-529.
24. Ferreira M.A.R., Suchard M.A. Bayesian analysis of elapsed times in continuous-time Markov chains. Can. J. Stat. 2008, 36:355-368.
25. Graul W.D. Possible functions of head and breast markings in Charadriinae. Wilson Bull. 1973, 85:60-70.
26. Hayman P., Marchant J., Prater T. Shorebirds: An Identification Guide to the Waders of the World 1986, Croom Helm, London.
27. Heled J., Drummond A.J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:570-580.
28. Holt B.G., Lessard J.P., Borregaard M.K., Fritz S.A., Araújo M.B., Dimitrov D., Fabre P.H., Graham C.H., Graves G.R., Jønsson K.A., et al. An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 2013, 339:74-78.
29. Hunt R.M. Global climate and the evolution of large mammalian carnivores during the later Cenozoic in North America. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2004, 285:139-156.
30. IUCN, 2014. IUCN Red list of threatened species. Version 2014.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org.
31. Jarvis E.D., Mirarab S., Aberer A.J., Li B., Houde P., Li C., Ho S.Y.W., Faircloth B.C., Nabholz B., Howard J.T., et al. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 2014, 346:1320-1331.
32. Johnson J.R., Faries K.M., Rabenold J.J., Crowhurst R.S., Briggler J.T., Koppelman J.B., Eggert L.S. Polymorphic microsatellite loci for studies of the Ozark hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi). Conserv. Genet. 2009, 10:1795-1797.
33. Joseph L., Lessa E.P., Christidis L. Phylogeny and biogeography in the evolution of migration: shorebirds of the Charadrius complex. J. Biogeogr. 1999, 26:329-342.
34. Kerr K.C., Stoeckle M.Y., Dove C.J., Weigt L.A., Francis C.M., Hebert P.D. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007, 7:535-543.
35. Kerr K.C., Birks S.M., Kalyakin M.V., Red'kin Y.A., Koblik E.A., Hebert P.D. Filling the gap - COI barcode resolution in eastern Palearctic Birds. Front. Zool. 2009, 6:29.
36. Knowles L.L., Chan Y.H. Resolving species phylogenies of recent evolutionary radiations. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2008, 95:224-231.
37. Kubatko L.S. Identifying hybridization events in the presence of coalescence via model selection. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:478-488.
38. Küpper C., Burke T., Székely T., Dawson D.A. Enhanced cross-species utility of conserved microsatellite markers in shorebirds. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:502.
39. Lee P.L.M., Prys-Jones R.P. Extracting DNA from museum bird eggs, and whole genome amplification of archive DNA. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008, 8:551-560.
40. Lemmon A.R., Brown J.M., Stanger-Hall K., Lemmon E.M. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:130-145.
41. Lislevand T., Thomas G.H. Limited male incubation ability and the evolution of egg size in shorebirds. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2:206-208.
42. Livezey B.C. Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 160:567-618.
43. Maclean G.L. Problems of display postures in the Charadrii (Aves: Charadriiformes). Afr. Zool. 1972, 7:57-74.
44. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2015. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.02. http://mesquiteproject.org.
45. Maguire K.C., Stigall A.Y. Paleobiogeography of Miocene Equinae of North America: a phylogenetic biogeographic analysis of the relative roles of climate, vicariance, and dispersal. Palaeogeog. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2008, 267:175-184.
46. Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W., Schwartz, T., 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, pp. 1-8.
47. Mirarab S., Bayzid M.S., Boussau B., Warnow T. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree. Science 2014, 346:1250463.
48. Nicholls J.A., Double M.C., Rowell D.M., Magrath R.D. The evolution of cooperative and pair breeding in thornbills Acanthiza (Pardalotidae). J. Avian Biol. 2000, 31:165-176.
49. Nielsen B.P. Affinities of Eudromias morinellus (L.) to the genus Charadrius L. Ornis Scand. 1975, 6:65-82.
50. Nye T.M.W., Liò P., Gilks W.R. A novel algorithm and web-based tool for comparing two alternative phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:117-119.
51. Nylander J.A.A. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author 2004, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
52. Owens I.P.F., Dixon A., Burke T., Thompson D.B.A. Strategic paternity assurance in the sex-role reversed Eurasian dotterel (Charadrius morinellus): behavioral and genetic evidence. Behav. Ecol. 1995, 6:14-21.
53. Piersma T., Wiersma P. Family Charadriidae (plovers). Handbook of the Birds of the World. Hoatzin to Auks 1996, vol. 3:384-442. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
54. Rheindt F.E., Székely T., Edwards S.V., Lee P.L., Burke T., Kennerley P.R., Bakewell D.N., Alrashidi M., Kosztolányi A., Weston M.A., et al. Conflict between genetic and phenotypic differentiation: the evolutionary history of a 'lost and rediscovered' shorebird. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e26995.
55. Richardson D.S., Jury F.L., Blaakmeer K., Komdeur J., Burke T. Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: the Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10:2263-2273.
56. Roure B., Baurain D., Philippe H. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:197-214.
57. Rozen S., Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods in Molecular Biology: Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols 2000, vol. 132:365-386. Humana Press, New Jersey.
58. Schweizer M., Seehausen O., Hertwig S.T. Macroevolutionary patterns in the diversification of parrots: effects of climate change, geological events and key innovations. J. Biogeogr. 2011, 38:2176-2194.
59. *and Other Methods) 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
60. Székely T., Freckleton R.P., Reynolds J.D. Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:12224-12227.
61. Székely T., Cuthill I.C., Yezerinac S., Griffiths R., Kis J. Brood sex ratio in the Kentish plover. Behav. Ecol. 2004, 15:58-62.
62. Székely, T., Kosztolányi, A., Küpper, C., 2008. Practical guide for investigating breeding ecology of Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus, Version 3. Unpublished Report, University of Bath. http://www.bath.ac.uk/bio-sci/biodiversity-lab/pdfs/KP_Field_Guide_v3.pdf.
63. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:2731-2739.
64. Thomas G.H., Wills M.A., Székely T. A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. BMC Evol. Biol. 2004, 4:28.
65. Thomas G.H., Freckleton R.P., Székely T. Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:1619-1624.
66. Thomas G.H., Lanctot R.B., Székely T. Can intrinsic factors explain population declines in North American breeding shorebirds? A comparative analysis. Anim. Conserv. 2006, 9:252-258.
67. Thomas G.H., Székely T., Reynolds J.D. Sexual conflict and the evolution of breeding systems in shorebirds. Adv. Stud. Behav. 2007, 37:279-342.
68. van de Kam J., Ens B., Piersma T., Zwarts L. Shorebirds: An Illustrated Behavioural Ecology 2004, KNNV Publishers, Utrecht, Netherlands.
69. Vaughan R. Plovers 1980, Terance Dalton Ltd., Lavenham, UK.
70. Vincze O., Székely T., Küpper C., AlRashidi M., Amat J.A., Argüelles-Ticó A., Burgas D., Burke T., Cavitt J., Figuerola J., et al. Local environment but not genetic differentiation influences biparental care in ten plover populations. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e60998.
71. Xia X. DAMBE5: a comprehensive software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:1720-1728.
72. Yu Y., Harris A.J., He X. S-DIVA (Statistical Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis): a tool for inferring biogeographic histories. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 56:848-850.
73. Yu, Y., Harris, A.J., He, X., 2014. RASP (Reconstruct Ancestral State in Phylogenies) 3.0. http://mnh.scu.edu.cn/soft/blog/RASP.
74. Zachos J.C., Shackleton N.J., Revenaugh J.S., Pälike H., Flower B.P. Climate response to orbital forcing across the Oligocene-Miocene boundary. Science 2001, 292:274-278.