The relationship between manuscript title structure and success: Editorial decisions and citation performance for an ecological journal

Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1970-1980

  Fox, Charles W ^a,c   Burns, C Sean ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c Functional Ecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional Ecology; Citation analysis; Editorial review; Peer review; Writing style

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929653199     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20457758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1480     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aleixandre-Benavent, R., V. Montalt-Resurecció, and J. C. Valderrama-Zurián . 2014. A descriptive study of inaccuracy in article titles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journals. Scientometrics 101:781-791. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1296-5.
2. Ball, R. 2009. Scholarly communication in transition: the use of question marks in the titles of scientific articles in medicine, life sciences and physics 1966-2005. Scientometrics 79:667-679. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1984-5.
3. Beel, J., and B. Gipp . 2009. Google Scholar's ranking algorithm: an introductory overview. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics 1: 230-241.
4. Buter, R. K., and A. F. van Raan . 2011. Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: an analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact. J. Inform. 5:608-617. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.008.
5. Cronin, B. 2014. Meta-life. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65:431-432. doi: 10.1002/asi.23237.
6. Diener, R. A. 1984. Informational dynamics of journal article titles. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 35:222-227. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630350405.
7. Falagas, M. E., A. Zarkali, D. E. Karageorgopoulos, V. Bardakas, and M. N. Mavros . 2013. The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. PLoS ONE 8:e49476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049476.
8. Francl, M. 2014. Laughing matter. Nat. Chem. 6:1-2. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1827.
9. Gasparyan, A. Y., L. Ayvazyan, H. Blackmore, and G. D. Kitas . 2011. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol. Int. 31:1409-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3.
10. Grant, M. J. 2013. What makes a good title? Health Info. Libr. J. 30:259-260. doi: 10.1111/hir.12049.
11. Graur, D. 2014. Peer review: payback time for referee refusal. Nature 505:483. doi: 10.1038/505483a.
12. Habibzadeh, F., and M. Yadollahie . 2010. Are shorter titles more attractive for citations? Cross-sectional study of 22 scientific journals. Croat. Med. J. 51:165-170. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.165.
13. Hartley, J. 2007. Planning that title: practices and preferences for titles with colons in academic articles. Libr. Info. Sci. Res. 29:553-568. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.05.002.
14. Haslam, N., L. Ban, L. Kaufmann, S. Loughnan, K. Peters, J. Whelan, et al. 2008. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics 76:169-185. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1892-8.
15. Jacques, T. S., and N. J. Sebire . 2010. The impact of article titles on citation hits: an analysis of general and specialist medical journals. JRSM Short Rep. 1:2. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2009.100020.
16. Jamali, H. R., and M. Nikzad . 2011. Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics 88:653-661. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0412-z.
17. Jasienski, M. 2009. Garfield's demon and "surprising" or "unexpected" results in science. Scientometrics 78:347-353. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1979-2.
18. Kumar, M. J. 2013. Making your research paper discoverable: title plays the winning trick. IETE Tech. Rev. 30:361-363. doi: 10.4103/0256-4602.123113.
19. Lajtha, K., and P. C. Baveye . 2010. How should we deal with the growing peer-review problem? Biogeochemistry 101:1-3. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9530-6.
20. Leimu, R., and J. Koricheva . 2005. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.010.
21. Lewison, G., and J. Hartley . 2005. What's in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons. Scientometrics 63:341-356. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0216-0.
22. Liumbruno, G. M., C. Velati, P. Pasqualetti, and M. Franchini . 2013. How to write a scientific manuscript for publication. Blood Transfus. 11:217. doi: 10.2450/2012.0247-12.
23. Mack, C. 2012. How to write a good scientific paper: title, abstract, and keywords. J. Micro-Nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS 11:020101. doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.11.2.020101.
24. Méndez, D. I., M. Á. Alcaraz, and F. Salager-Meyer . 2014. Titles in English-medium astrophysics research articles. Scientometrics 98:2331-2351. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1174-6.
25. Merrill, E., and A. Cox . 2014. Reviewer overload and what we can do about it. J. Wildl. Manag. 78:961-962. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.763.
26. Paiva, C. E., J. P. D. S. N. Lima, and B. S. R. Paiva . 2012. Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often. Clinics 67:509-513. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)17.
27. Rodríguez, K., and J. A. Moreiro . 1996. The growth and development of research in the field of ecology as measured by dissertation title analysis. Scientometrics 35:59-70.
28. Rostami, F., A. Mohammadpoorasl, and M. Hajizadeh . 2014. The effect of characteristics of title on citation rates of articles. Scientometrics 98:2007-2010. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1118-1.
29. Sagi, I., and E. Yechiam . 2008. Amusing titles in scientific journals and article citation. J. Inform. Sci. 34:680-687. doi: 10.1177/0165551507086261.
30. Seglen, P. O. 1992. The skewness of science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 43:628-638. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628:AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0.
31. Stremersch, S., I. Verniers, and P. C. Verhoef . 2007. The quest for citations: drivers of article impact. J. Marketing 71:171-193.
32. Thelwall, M., A. Tsou, S. Weingart, K. Holmberg, and S. Haustein . 2013. Tweeting links to academic articles. Int. J. Scientom. Inform. Bibliom. 17. Available via http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v17i1p1.html
33. Tite, L., and S. Schroter . 2007. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61:9-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049817.
34. Vieira, E. S., and J. A. N. F. Gomes . 2010. Citations to scientific articles: its distribution and dependence on the article features. J. Informetr. 4:13. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.002.
35. Webster, G. D., P. K. Jonason, and T. O. Schember . 2009. Hot topics and popular papers in evolutionary psychology: analyses of title words and citation counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979-2008. Evol. Psychol. 7:348-362. doi: none.
36. van Wesel, M., S. Wyatt, and J. ten Haaf . 2014. What a difference a colon makes: how superficial factors influence subsequent citation. Scientometrics 98:1601-1615. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1154-x.
37. Whissell, C. 2009. The trend toward more attractive and informative titles: American Psychologist 1946-2010. Psychol. Rep. 110:427-444. doi:10.2466/17.28.PR0.110.2.427-444.
38. Whissell, C. 2013. Titles in highly ranked multidisciplinary psychology journals 1966-2011: more words and punctuation marks allow for the communication of more information. Psychol. Rep. 113:969-986. doi: 10.2466/28.17.PR0.113x30z5.
39. White, A. 1991. A further exploration of title size and author number. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42:384-385. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<384:AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G.
40. White, A., and N. R. Hernandez . 1991. Increasing field complexity revealed through article title analyses. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42:731-734. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199112)42:10<731:AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-W.
41. Yitzhaki, M. 1994. Relation of title length of journal articles to number of authors. Scientometrics 30:321-332. doi: 10.1007/BF02017231.