Pulsed marker method for real-time detection of reverse osmosis membrane integrity loss

Desalination

Volumn 370, Issue , 2015, Pages 25-32

  Surawanvijit, Sirikarn ^a   Thompson, John ^a   Rahardianto, Anditya ^a   Frenkel, Val ^b   Cohen, Yoram ^a  

^a Engineering IV   (United States)

^b Erler and Kalinowski Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Fluorescent marker; Log removal value; Membrane integrity breach; Membrane integrity monitoring; Reverse osmosis; Water reuse

Indexed keywords

DESALINATION; FIBER OPTIC SENSORS; FLUORESCENCE; POTABLE WATER; REVERSE OSMOSIS; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WATER CONSERVATION;

FLUORESCENT MARKERS; LOG REMOVAL VALUE; MEMBRANE INTEGRITY; PERMEATE CONCENTRATIONS; REAL-TIME ASSESSMENT; REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS; REVERSE OSMOSIS TREATMENTS; WATER REUSE;

MEMBRANES;

BIOMARKER; DESALINATION; DETECTION METHOD; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; POLLUTION MONITORING; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84929630537     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Greenlee L.F., et al. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 2009, 43(9):2317-2348.
2. US EPA Guidelines for Water Reuse: Appendix A: State Reuse Regulations and Guidelines 2004.
3. Wintgens T., et al. The role of membrane processes in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse. Desalination 2005, 178(1-3):1-11.
4. Kitis M., et al. Microbial removal and integrity monitoring of RO and NF membranes. J. AWWA 2003, 95(12):105.
5. Allegeier S., Alspach B., Vickers J. Membrane Filtration Guidance Manual 2005, USEPA, Cincinnati, OH.
6. Glater J., Hong S.-k., Elimelech M. The search for a chlorine-resistant reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 1994, 95(3):325-345.
7. Glater J., et al. Reverse osmosis membrane sensitivity to ozone and halogen disinfectants. Desalination 1983, 48(1):1-16.
8. Gabelich C.J., et al. Enhanced oxidation of polyamide membranes using monochloramine and ferrous iron. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 258(1-2):64-70.
9. Mi B., et al. Removal of biological and non-biological viral surrogates by spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane elements with intact and compromised integrity. Water Res. 2004, 38(18):3821-3832.
10. Lozier J. Microbial Removal and Integrity Monitoring of High-pressure Membranes 2003, Awwa Research Foundation, Denver, CO.
11. Theng-Theng Fong E.K.L. Enteric viruses of humans and animals in aquatic environments: health risks, detection, and potential water quality assessment tools. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2005, 69(2):357-371.
12. Kumar M., Adham S., DeCarolis J. Reverse osmosis integrity monitoring. Desalination 2007, 214(1-3):138-149.
13. DeCarolis J., et al. Integrity and Performance Evaluation of New Generation Desalting Membranes During Municipal Wastewater Reclamation 2005, Water Environment Federation.
14. Adham S., et al. Monitoring the integrity of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 1998, 119(1-3):143-150.
15. Watson M. Water Repurification Project: Final Report on Membrane Pre-qualification Pilot Study 1997.
16. März F., Scheer R., Graf E. Use of a laser diffraction particle counter to monitor integrity of reverse osmosis membranes and its inefficiency to detect bacteria in product water. Int. J. Pharm. 1990, 61(1-2):57-66.
17. Guo H., et al. Low-pressure membrane integrity tests for drinking water treatment: a review. Water Res. 2010, 44(1):41-57.
18. Troester M., et al. Laser-induced breakdown-detection for reliable online monitoring of membrane integrity. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 466:313-321.
19. USBR Evaluation of Methods for Monitoring the Integrity of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Systems 2000, (Denver, CO).
20. Adham S., Kumar M., DeCarolis J. Comparative Evaluation of MS-2 Virus Rejection Capabilities of a Newly Developed Membrane in the First and Second Stages of RO Treatment 2004, N.W.R. Institute (Ed.).
21. Sakaji R.H. California Surface Water Treatment Alternative Filtration Technology Demonstration Report 2001, California Department of Health Services.
22. ASTM Standard Practice for Detecting Leaks in Reverse Osmosis Devices 2003.
23. Kitis, et al. Evaluation of Biologic and Non-biologic Methods for Assessing Virus Removal by and Integrity of High Pressure Membrane Systems 2003, vol. 3. IWA Publishing, London, ROYAUME-UNI, (X, 449 pp.).
24. Lovins W., Taylor J.S., Hong S.K. Micro-organism rejection by membrane systems. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, 19(6):453-465.
25. Guo H., et al. Application of magnetic nanoparticles for UF membrane integrity monitoring at low-pressure operation. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 350(1-2):172-179.
26. Grabow W. Bacteriophages: update on application as models for viruses in water. Water SA 2001, 27:251-268.
27. Behrens, et al. Toxicological and ecotoxicological assessment of water tracers. Hydrogeol. J. 2001, 9(3):321-325.
28. Cohen Y., et al. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 46(3):802-812.
29. Kim S., et al. Crossflow membrane filtration of interacting nanoparticle suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284(1-2):361-372.
30. Field M.S., et al. An assessment of the potential adverse properties of fluorescent tracer dyes used for groundwater tracing. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1995, 38(1):75-96.
31. Flury M., Wai N.N. Dyes as tracers for vadose zone hydrology. Rev. Geophys. 2003, 41(1):1002.
32. Magal E., et al. The use of fluorescent dyes as tracers in highly saline groundwater. J. Hydrol. 2008, 358(1-2):124-133.
33. Smart P.L., Laidlaw I.M.S. An evaluation of some fluorescent dyes for water tracing. Water Resour. Res. 1977, 13(1):15-33.
34. Uchymiak M., et al. A novel RO ex situ scale observation detector (EXSOD) for mineral scale characterization and early detection. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 291(1-2):86-95.
35. Taylor G. Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 1953, The Royal Society.
36. Bird R.B., Stewart W.E., Lightfoot E.N. Transport Phenomena 2007, John Wiley & Sons.
37. Kargol A. Modified Kedem-Katchalsky equations and their applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 174(1):43-53.
38. Lyster E., Cohen Y. Numerical study of concentration polarization in a rectangular reverse osmosis membrane channel: permeate flux variation and hydrodynamic end effects. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 303(1-2):140-153.
39. Sutzkover I., Hasson D., Semiat R. Simple technique for measuring the concentration polarization level in a reverse osmosis system. Desalination 2000, 131(1-3):117-127.
40. Avlonitis S., Hanbury W.T., Hodgkiess T. Chlorine degradation of aromatic polyamides. Desalination 1992, 85(3):321-334.