The hemodynamic response to somatosensory stimulation in mice depends on the anesthetic used: Implications on analysis of mouse fMRI data

NeuroImage

Volumn 116, Issue , 2015, Pages 40-49

  Schlegel, Felix ^a   Schroeter, Aileen ^a   Rudin, Markus ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; BOLD fMRI; Electrical stimulation; Event related design; Hemodynamic response function; Non linear regression

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; ISOFLURANE; MEDETOMIDINE; PROPOFOL; URETHAN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUBIC SPLINE MODEL; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FOUR HALF COSINE MODEL; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GENERAL LINEAR MODEL; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HEMODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OXYGEN SATURATION; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE DISTENTION; RANDOMLY SPACED SINGLE PULSE TRAIN STIMULATION; SECONDARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; SPM MODEL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THALAMUS; ANIMAL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; C57BL MOUSE; DRUG EFFECTS; HINDLIMB; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANESTHETICS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HINDLIMB; ISOFLURANE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDETOMIDINE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PROPOFOL; URETHANE;

EID: 84929580549     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, Springer Series in Statistics 1998, 199-213. Springer, NY. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0. E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, G. Kitagawa (Eds.).
2. Bandettini P.A., Birn R.M., Kelley D., Saad Z.S. Dynamic nonlinearities in BOLD contrast: neuronal or hemodynamic. Int. Congr. Ser. 2002, 1235:73-85. 10.1016/S0531-5131(02)00174-7.
3. Bosshard S.C., Baltes C., Wyss M.T., Mueggler T., Weber B., Rudin M. Assessment of brain responses to innocuous and noxious electrical forepaw stimulation in mice using BOLD fMRI. Pain 2010, 151:655-663. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.025.
4. Boynton G.M., Engel S.A., Glover G.H., Heeger D.J. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:4207-4221.
5. Boynton G.M., Engel S.A., Heeger D.J. Linear systems analysis of the fMRI signal. Neuroimage 2012, 62:975-984. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.082.
6. Buxton R.B., Wong E.C., Frank L.R. Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39:855-864. 10.1002/mrm.1910390602.
7. Cenic A., Craen R.A., Howard-Lech V.L., Lee T.Y., Gelb A.W. Cerebral blood volume and blood flow at varying arterial carbon dioxide tension levels in rabbits during propofol anesthesia. Anesth. Analg. 2000, 90:1376-1383. 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00021.
8. Chen G., Saad Z.S., Nath A.R., Beauchamp M.S., Cox R.W. FMRI group analysis combining effect estimates and their variances. Neuroimage 2012, 60:747-765. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.060.
9. Chen G., Saad Z.S., Britton J.C., Pine D.S., Cox R.W. Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis. Neuroimage 2013, 73:176-190. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.047.
10. Devonshire I.M., Papadakis N.G., Port M., Berwick J., Kennerley A.J., Mayhew J.E.W., Overton P.G. Neurovascular coupling is brain region-dependent. Neuroimage 2012, 59:1997-2006. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.050.
11. Devor A., Hillman E.M.C., Tian P., Waeber C., Teng I.C., Ruvinskaya L., Shalinsky M.H., Zhu H., Haslinger R.H., Narayanan S.N., Ulbert I., Dunn A.K., Lo E.H., Rosen B.R., Dale A.M., Kleinfeld D., Boas D.A. Stimulus-induced changes in blood flow and 2-deoxyglucose uptake dissociate in ipsilateral somatosensory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:14347-14357. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4307-08.2008.
12. Friston K.J., Mechelli A., Turner R., Price C.J. Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the Balloon model, Volterra kernels, and other hemodynamics. Neuroimage 2000, 12:466-477. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0630.
13. Grandjean J., Schroeter A., Batata I., Rudin M. Optimization of anesthesia protocol for resting-state fMRI in mice based on differential effects of anesthetics on functional connectivity patterns. Neuroimage 2014, 102(Pt 2):838-847. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.043.
14. Handwerker D.A., Ollinger J.M., D'Esposito M. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1639-1651.
15. Hara K., Harris R.A. The anesthetic mechanism of urethane: the effects on neurotransmitter-gated ion channels. Anesth. Analg. 2002, 94:313-318. 10.1213/00000539-200202000-00015.
16. Hennig J., Nauerth A., Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 1986, 3:823-833.
17. Kannurpatti S.S., Motes M.A., Rypma B., Biswal B.B. Neural and vascular variability and the fMRI-BOLD response in normal aging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 28:466-476. 10.1016/j.mri.2009.12.007.
18. Lieberman M.D., Cunningham W.A. Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2009, 4:423-428. 10.1093/scan/nsp052.
19. Logothetis N.K., Pfeuffer J. On the nature of the BOLD fMRI contrast mechanism. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004, 22:1517-1531. 10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.018.
20. Maggi C.A., Meli A. Suitability of urethane anesthesia for physiopharmacological investigations in various systems. Part 1: General considerations. Experientia 1986, 42:109-114.
21. Martin C., Martindale J., Berwick J., Mayhew J. Investigating neural-hemodynamic coupling and the hemodynamic response function in the awake rat. Neuroimage 2006, 32:33-48. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.021.
22. Masamoto K., Kanno I. Anesthesia and the quantitative evaluation of neurovascular coupling. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32:1233-1247. 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.50.
23. Masamoto K., Fukuda M., Vazquez A., Kim S.-G. Dose-dependent effect of isoflurane on neurovascular coupling in rat cerebral cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 30:242-250. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06812.x.
24. Nelder J.A., Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 1965, 7:308-313. 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308.
25. Paxinos G. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 2004, Gulf Professional Publishing.
26. Powell M.J. The NEWUOA software for unconstrained optimization without derivatives. Large Scale Nonlinear Opt. 2006, 83:255-297. 10.1007/0-387-30065-1_16.
27. Schroeter A., Schlegel F., Seuwen A., Grandjean J., Rudin M. Specificity of stimulus-evoked fMRI responses in the mouse: the influence of systemic physiological changes associated with innocuous stimulation under four different anesthetics. Neuroimage 2014, 94:372-384. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.046.
28. Schulz K., Sydekum E., Krueppel R., Engelbrecht C.J., Schlegel F., Schröter A., Rudin M., Helmchen F. Simultaneous BOLD fMRI and fiber-optic calcium recording in rat neocortex. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:597-602. 10.1038/nmeth.2013.
29. Sforazzini F., Schwarz A.J., Galbusera A., Bifone A., Gozzi A. Distributed BOLD and CBV-weighted resting-state networks in the mouse brain. Neuroimage 2014, 87:403-415. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.050.
30. Sinclair M.D. A review of the physiological effects of alpha2-agonists related to the clinical use of medetomidine in small animal practice. Can. Vet. J. 2003, 44:885-897.
31. Sloan H.L., Austin V.C., Blamire A.M., Schnupp J.W.H., Lowe A.S., Allers K.A., Matthews P.M., Sibson N.R. Regional differences in neurovascular coupling in rat brain as determined by fMRI and electrophysiology. Neuroimage 2010, 53:399-411. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.014.
32. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E.J., Johansen-Berg H., Bannister P.R., De Luca M., Drobnjak I., Flitney D.E., Niazy R.K., Saunders J., Vickers J., Zhang Y., De Stefano N., Brady J.M., Matthews P.M. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004, 23(Suppl. 1):S208-S219. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051.
33. Strebel S., Lam A.M., Matta B., Mayberg T.S., Aaslid R., Newell D.W. Dynamic and static cerebral autoregulation during isoflurane, desflurane, and propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995, 83:66-76.
34. Takuwa H., Matsuura T., Obata T., Kawaguchi H., Kanno I., Ito H. Hemodynamic changes during somatosensory stimulation in awake and isoflurane-anesthetized mice measured by laser-Doppler flowmetry. Brain Res. 2012, 1472:107-112. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.06.049.
35. Uludağ K., Dubowitz D.J., Yoder E.J., Restom K., Liu T.T., Buxton R.B. Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI. Neuroimage 2004, 23:148-155. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.013.
36. Woolrich M.W., Behrens T.E.J., Smith S.M. Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1748-1761. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.024.
37. Zhao F., Jin T., Wang P., Kim S.-G. Isoflurane anesthesia effect in functional imaging studies. Neuroimage 2007, 38:3-4. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.040.
38. Zhao F., Welsh D., Williams M., Coimbra A., Urban M.O., Hargreaves R., Evelhoch J., Williams D.S. fMRI of pain processing in the brain: a within-animal comparative study of BOLD vs CBV and noxious electrical vs. noxious mechanical stimulation in rat. Neuroimage 2012, 59:1168-1179. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.002.