Microfluidic devices for the analysis of gamete and embryo physiology

Human Gametes and Preimplantation Embryos: Assessment and Diagnosis

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 281-299

  Thouas, George A ^a   Potter, David L ^a   Gardner, David K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929554400     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6651-2_26     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Atencia J, Beebe DJ. Controlled microfluidic interfaces. Nature. 2005;437(7059):648-55.
2. DeMello AJ. Control and detection of chemical reactions in microfluidic systems. Nature. 2006;442(7101): 394-402.
3. Szekely L, Guttman A. New advances in microchip fabrication for electrochromatography. Electrophoresis. 2005;26(24):4590-604.
4. Weibel DB, Diluzio WR, Whitesides GM. Microfabrication meets microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5(3):209-18.
5. Wang JD et al. Quantitative analysis of molecular absorption into PDMS microfluidic channels. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40:1862-73.
6. Regehr KJ et al. Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture. Lab Chip. 2009;9(15):2132-9.
7. Lee CY et al. Microfluidic mixing: A review. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(5):3263-87.
8. Heng X et al. Optofluidic microscopy-A method for implementing a high resolution optical microscope on a chip. Lab Chip. 2006;6(10):1274-6.
9. Cui X et al. Lensless high-resolution on-chip optofluidic microscopes for Caenorhabditis elegans and cell imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(31):10670-5.
10. Lee LM, Cui X, Yang C. The application of on-chip optofluidic microscopy for imaging Giardia lamblia trophozoites and cysts. Biomed Microdevices. 2009; 11:951-8.
11. Cho SH et al. Human mammalian cell sorting using a highly integrated micro-fabricatedfluorescenceactivated cell sorter (microFACS). Lab Chip. 2010;10(12):1567-73.
12. Bao G, Suresh S. Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials. Nat Mater. 2003;2(11):715-25.
13. Burg TP et al. Weighing of biomolecules, single cells and single nanoparticles influid. Nature. 2007; 446(7139):1066-9.
14. Grover WH et al. Measuring single-cell density. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(27):10992-6.
15. Hwang H et al. Enhanced discrimination of normal oocytes using optically induced pulling-up dielectrophoretic force. Biomicrofluidics. 2009;3(1):14103.
16. Lane M et al. Assessment of metabolism of equine morulae and blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001; 59(1):33-7.
17. Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater. 2007;3(4):413-38.
18. Wan J, Ristenpart WD, Stone HA. Dynamics of shearinduced ATP release from red blood cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(43):16432-7.
19. Palermo GD et al. Oolemma characteristics in relation to survival and fertilization patterns of oocytes treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(1):172-6.
20. Ebner T et al. Developmental competence of oocytes showing increased cytoplasmic viscosity. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(6):1294-8.
21. Xie Y et al. Shear stress induces preimplantation embryo death that is delayed by the zona pellucida and associated with stress-activated protein kinasemediated apoptosis. Biol Reprod. 2006;75(1):45-55.
22. Kim MS et al. A microfluidic in vitro cultivation system for mechanical stimulation of bovine embryos. Electrophoresis. 2009;30(18):3276-82.
23. Saiki RK et al. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985; 230(4732):1350-4.
24. Telenius H et al. Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics. 1992;13(3):718-25.
25. Steuerwald NM et al. Maternal age-related differential global expression profiles observed in human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(6):700-8.
26. Sanger F, Coulson AR. A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J Mol Biol. 1975;94(3):441-8.
27. Cohen AS et al. High-performance capillary electrophoretic separation of bases, nucleosides, and oligonucleotides: retention manipulation via micellar solutions and metal additives. Anal Chem. 1987;59(7): 1021-7.
28. Rusk N. Torrents of sequence. Nat Methods. 2011; 8(1):44.
29. Njoroge SK et al. Integrated microfluidic systems for DNA analysis. Top Curr Chem. 2011;304:203-60.
30. Sieben VJ et al. FISH and chips: chromosomal analysis on microfluidic platforms. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2007;1(3):27-35.
31. Sieben VJ et al. An integrated microfluidic chip for chromosome enumeration usingfluorescence in situ hybridization. Lab Chip. 2008;8(12):2151-6.
32. Vedarethinam I et al. Metaphase FISH on a chip: miniaturized microfluidic device forfluorescence in situ hybridization. Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(11):9831-46.
33. Wang X et al. Microfluidic extraction and stretching of chromosomal DNA from single cell nuclei for DNAfluorescence in situ hybridization. Biomed Microdevices. 2012;14(3):443-51.
34. Fan HC, Quake SR. Detection of aneuploidy with digital polymerase chain reaction. Anal Chem. 2007;79(19):7576-9.
35. Lee HJ et al. Electrochemical cell lysis device for DNA extraction. Lab Chip. 2009;10(5):626-33.
36. Vulto P et al. A microfluidic approach for high efficiency extraction of low molecular weight RNA. Lab Chip. 2010;10(5):610-6.
37. Zhang Y et al. An all-in-one microfluidic device for parallel DNA extraction and gene analysis. Biomed Microdevices. 2010;12(6):1043-9.
38. Boles DJ et al. Droplet-based pyrosequencing using digital microfluidics. Anal Chem. 2011;83(22): 8439-47.
39. Pieprzyk M, High H. Fluidigm dynamic arrays provide a platform for single cell gene expression analysis. 2009. Nat. Meth. 6 (iii-iv)
40. Guo G et al. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev Cell. 2010;18(4):675-85.
41. May A et al. Multiplex rt-PCR expression analysis of developmentally important genes in individual mouse preimplantation embryos and blastomeres. Biol Reprod. 2009;80(1):194-202.
42. Morrill BH et al. Use of nanofluidic RT quantitative polymerase chain reaction to study variation in gene expression between single bovine oocyte and blastocyst samples. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011;24(1): 180-1.
43. Katz-Jaffe MG et al. The role of proteomics in defining the human embryonic secretome. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;15(5):271-7.
44. Latham KE et al. Analysis of embryonic mouse development: construction of a high-resolution, twodimensional gel protein database. Appl Theor Electrophor. 1992;2(6):163-70.
45. Shi CZ et al. Protein databases for compacted eightcell and blastocyst-stage mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;37(1):34-47.
46. Anderiesz C et al. Effect of recombinant human gonadotrophins on human, bovine and murine oocyte meiosis, fertilization and embryonic development in vitro. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(5):1140-8.
47. Navarrete Santos A et al. Two insulin-responsive glucose transporter isoforms and the insulin receptor are developmentally expressed in rabbit preimplantation embryos. Reproduction. 2004;128(5):503-16.
48. Wang Y et al. Increases in phosphorylation of SAPK/ JNK and p38MAPK correlate negatively with mouse embryo development after culture in different media. Fertil Steril. 2005;83 Suppl 1:1144-54.
49. Goldbard SB, Gollnick SO, Warner CM. A highly sensitive method for the detection of cell surface antigens on preimplantation mouse embryos. J Immunol Methods. 1984;68(1-2):137-46.
50. Noci I et al. Embryonic soluble HLA-G as a marker of developmental potential in embryos. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(1):138-46.
51. Mains LM et al. Identification of apolipoprotein A1 in the human embryonic secretome. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(2):422-7 e2.
52. Katz-Jaffe MG et al. A proteomic analysis of mammalian preimplantation embryonic development. Reproduction. 2005;130(6):899-905.
53. Angelucci S et al. Proteome analysis of human follicularfluid. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1764(11): 1775-85.
54. Katz-Jaffe MG, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Analysis of protein expression (secretome) by human and mouse preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(3):678-85.
55. Beardsley AJ, Li Y, O'Neill C. Characterization of a diverse secretome generated by the mouse preimplantation embryo in vitro. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:71.
56. Cortezzi SS et al. Secretome of the preimplantation human embryo by bottom-up label-free proteomics. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401(4):1331-9.
57. Gao J et al. Integrated microfluidic system enabling protein digestion, peptide separation, and protein identification. Anal Chem. 2001;73(11):2648-55.
58. Herrmann M, Veres T, Tabrizian M. Enzymaticallygeneratedfluorescent detection in micro-channels with internal magnetic mixing for the development of parallel microfluidic ELISA. Lab Chip. 2006;6(4):555-60.
59. Hoegger D et al. Disposable microfluidic ELISA for the rapid determination of folic acid content in food products. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;387(1):267-75.
60. Xue Q et al. Multiplexed enzyme assays in capillary electrophoretic single-use microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis. 2001;22(18):4000-7.
61. Chen SH et al. A disposable poly(methylmethacrylate)-based microfluidic module for protein identification by nanoelectrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis. 2001;22(18):3972-7.
62. Wheeler AR et al. Electrowetting-based microfluidics for analysis of peptides and proteins by matrixassisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2004;76(16):4833-8.
63. Young JB, Li L. An impulse-driven liquid-droplet deposition interface for combining LC with MALDI MS and MS/MS. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2006;17(3):325-34.
64. Goluch ED et al. A bio-barcode assay for on-chip attomolar-sensitivity protein detection. Lab Chip. 2006;6(10):1293-9.
65. Jebrail MJ, et al. Digital microfluidics for automated proteomic processing. J Vis Exp. 2009(33).
66. Leese HJ. Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development. Hum Reprod Update. 1995;1(1):63-72.
67. Gardner DK. Dissection of culture media for embryos: The most important and less important components and characteristics. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20(1):9-18.
68. Gardner DK et al. Glucose consumption of single post-compaction human embryos is predictive of embryo sex and live birth outcome. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(8):1981-6.
69. Thouas GA, Gardner DK. Metabolomic profiling for selection of the most viable clinical IVF embryo. Curr Women's Health Rev. 2010;6:254-60.
70. Urbanski JP et al. Noninvasive metabolic profiling using microfluidics for analysis of single preimplantation embryos. Anal Chem. 2008;80(17):6500-7.
71. Heo YS et al. Real time culture and analysis of embryo metabolism using a microfluidic device with deformation based actuation. Lab Chip. 2012;12(12):2240-6.
72. Botros L, Sakkas D, Seli E. Metabolomics and its application for non-invasive embryo assessment in IVF. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14(12):679-90.
73. Utz M, Landers J. Chemistry. Magnetic resonance and microfluidics. Science. 2010;330(6007):1056-8.
74. Greener J, Abbasi B, Kumacheva E. Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for on-chip monitoring of solute concentrations. Lab Chip. 2010;10(12):1561-6.
75. D'Alessandro A et al. A mass spectrometry-based targeted metabolomics strategy of human blastocoelefluid: A promising tool in fertility research. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8(4):953-8.
76. Gopichandran N, Leese HJ. Metabolic characterization of the bovine blastocyst, inner cell mass, trophectoderm and blastocoelfluid. Reproduction. 2003; 126(3):299-308.
77. Wei H et al. Cell signaling analysis by mass spectrometry under coculture conditions on an integrated microfluidic device. Anal Chem. 2011;83(24):9306-13.
78. Chen Q et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of tumor cell metabolism via stable isotope labeling assisted microfluidic chip electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2012;84(3):1695-701.
79. Lee J, Soper SA, Murray KK. Microfluidics with MALDI analysis for proteomics-A review. Anal Chim Acta. 2009;649(2):180-90.