The multiscale importance of road segments in a network disruption scenario: A risk-based approach

Risk Analysis

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 484-500

  Freiria, Susana ^a   Tavares, Alexandre O ^b   Pedro Julião, Rui ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Critical infrastructure; Interruption scenario; Multiscale analysis; Natural hazard; Road network connectivity

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES; DEFORESTATION; DISASTER PREVENTION; EMERGENCY SERVICES; HEALTH HAZARDS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

EMERGENCY RESPONSE; INNOVATIVE APPROACHES; INTERRUPTION SCENARIO; MULTI SCALE ANALYSIS; NATURAL HAZARD; NETWORK DISRUPTIONS; RISK BASED APPROACHES; ROAD NETWORK;

ROADS AND STREETS;

FOREST FIRE; HEALTH SERVICES; MASS MOVEMENT; NATURAL DISASTER; NATURAL HAZARD; NEW RECORD; RISK ASSESSMENT;

FOREST FIRES; HAZARDS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CAR DRIVING; DISASTER; FIRE; FLOODING; FOREST; PORTUGAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; DISASTERS; FIRES; FLOODS; FORESTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PORTUGAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 84929469491     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12280     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Reggiani A. Network resilience for transport security: Some methodological considerations. Transport Policy, 2013; 28:63-68.
2. Apostolakis GE, Lemon DM. A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. Risk Analysis, 2005; 25(2):361-376.
3. Lambert JH, Turley T. Priority setting for the distribution of localized hazard protection. Risk Analysis, 2005; 25(3):745-752.
4. Long J, Fischhoff B. Setting risk priorities: A formal model. Risk Analysis, 2000; 20(3):339-352.
5. Lambert JH, Parlak AI, Zhou Q, Miller JS, Fontaine MD, Guterbock TM, Clements J, Thekdi SA. Understanding and managing disaster evacuation on a transportation network. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2013; 50:645-648.
6. Ayyub BM, McGill WL, Kaminskiy M. Critical asset and portfolio risk analysis: An all-hazards framework. Risk Analysis, 2007; 27(4):789-801.
7. Jenelius E. Redundancy importance: Links as rerouting alternatives during road network interruptions. Procedia Engineering, 2010; 3:129-137.
8. Novelo-Casanova DA, Suárez G. Exposure of main critical facilities to natural and man-made hazards in Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands. Natural Hazards, 2012; 61(3):1277-1292.
9. Nyberg R, Johansson M. Indicators of road network vulnerability to storm-felled trees. Natural Hazards, 2013; 69(1):185-199.
10. PNPOT-Programa Nacional de Planeamento e Ordenamento do Território. Available at: http://www.dgotdu.pt/pnpot www.dgotdu.pt/pnpot, Accessed August 27, 2014.
11. Haimes YY, Kaplan S, Lambert JH. Risk filtering, ranking, and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling. Risk Analysis, 2002; 22(2):383-397.
12. Rocco SCM, Ramirez-Marquez JE. Vulnerability metrics and analysis for communities in complex networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011; 96(10):1360-1366.
13. Chen BY, Lam WH, Sumalee A, Li Q, Li ZC. Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2012; 46(3):501-516.
14. Berdica K, Mattsson L. Vulnerability: A model-based case study of the road network in Stockholm. Pp. 81-106 in Critical Infrastructure. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.
15. Jenelius E, Petersen T, Mattsson L-G. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 2006; 40:537-560.
16. Santos B, Antunes A, Miller EJ. Interurban road network planning model with accessibility and robustness objectives. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2010; 33(3):297-313.
17. Chandra S, Quadrifoglio L. Critical street links for demand responsive feeder transit services. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013;66(3):584-592.
18. Flores JL, Inza I, Larrañaga P, Calvo B. A new measure for gene expression biclustering based on non-parametric correlation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2013; 112(3):367-397.
19. Cheng Y, Church G. Biclustering of expression data. Pp. 93-103 in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, San Diego, CA, 2000.
20. Madeira S, Oliveira A. Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Computational Biololgy Bioinformatics, 2004; 1(1):24-45.
21. Demsar U, Spatenková O, Virrantaus K. Identifying critical locations in a spatial network with graph theory. Transactions in GIS, 2008; 12(1):61-82.
22. Yang J, Wang W, Haixun W, Yu P. Enhanced biclustering on expression data. Pp. 321-327 in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, New York, 2003.
23. Dhillon I. Co-clustering documents and words using bipartite spectral graph partitioning. Pp. 269-274 in Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'01), New York, 2001.
24. Ribeiro B, Chen N. Biclustering and subspace learning with regularization for financial risk analysis. Pp. 228-235 in Huang et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference Neural Information Processing Volume Part III Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS).Berlin: Springer, 2012.
25. Grubesic TH, Matisziw TC. A typological framework for categorizing infrastructure vulnerability. GeoJournal, 2011;78(20):287-301.
26. Eakin H, Amy LL Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2006; 31(1):365-394.
27. Adger, WN. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006; 16:268-281.
28. Teng L, Chan L. Biclustering gene expression profiles by alternately sorting with weighted correlated coefficient. Pp. 289-294 in Proceeding of IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, 2006.
29. CCDRC-Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento da Região Centro. Sumário executivo da proposta do Plano Regional de Ordenamento do Território da Região Centro (PROT C). Coimbra: CCDRC, 2010.
30. CCDRC-Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento da Região Centro. Sumário executivo da proposta do Plano Regional de Ordenamento do Território da Região Centro (PROT C). Coimbra: CCDRC, 2010.
31. Fernandes C, Viegas JM. Private financing of road infrastructure: The Portuguese experience. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999; 1659(1):23-30.
32. Jiang B, Liu, C. Street based topological representations and analyses for predicting traffic flow in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2009; 23(9):1119-1137.
33. Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
34. Alonso B, Moura JL, Ibeas Á, dell'Olio L. Using O-D matrices for decision making in road network management. Transport, 2013; 28(1):31-37.
35. Kwon J, Varaiya P. Real-time estimation of origin-destination matrices with partial trajectories from electronic toll collection tag data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005; 1923(1):119-126.
36. Kent J, Leitner M, Curtis A. Evaluating the usefulness of functional distance measures when calibrating journey-to-crime distance decay functions. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2006; 30(2):181-200.
37. Santos B, Antunes A, Miller E. Multiobjective approach to long-term interurban multilevel road network planning. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2009; 135(9):640-649.
38. Beckmann M. Traffic congestion and what to do about it. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2013; 1:1:103-109
39. Tavares AO, Santos PP. Re-scaling risk governance using local appraisal and community involvement. Journal of Risk Research, 2014; 17(7): 1-27.
40. Kwan MP, Weber J. Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land use-travel interaction. Applied Geography, 2008; 28(2):110-123.
41. Novak DC, Sullivan JL. A link-focused methodology for evaluating accessibility to emergency services. Decision Support Systems, 2014; 57:309-319
42. Schroeder MJ, Lambert JH. Scenario-based multiple criteria analysis for infrastructure policy impacts and planning. Journal of Risk Research, 2011; 14(2):191-214.