Interurban road network planning model with accessibility and robustness objectives

Transportation Planning and Technology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 297-313

  Santos, Bruno F ^a   Antunes, António P ^a   Miller, Eric J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Optimization model; Reliability; Road network design; Robustness

Indexed keywords

INTER-URBAN ROAD NETWORKS; INVESTMENT DECISIONS; NETWORK ROBUSTNESS; NETWORK VULNERABILITY; OPTIMIZATION MODELS; OPTIMUM SOLUTION; RANDOM NETWORK; ROAD NETWORK; ROAD NETWORK PLANNING; ROBUSTNESS MEASURES; SPARE CAPACITY;

DESIGN; HIGHWAY PLANNING; INVESTMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NETWORK SECURITY; OPTIMIZATION; ROADS AND STREETS;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESSIBILITY; ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DECISION MAKING; NETWORK DESIGN; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING METHOD; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 77951681140     PISSN: 03081060     EISSN: 10290354     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081061003732375     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abdulaal, M. and Leblanc, L.J., 1979. Continuous equilibrium network design models. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological, 13 (1), 19-32.
2. Antunes, A., Seco, A., and Pinto, N., 2003. An accessibility-maximization approach to road network planning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 18 (3), 224-240.
3. Asakura, Y. and Kashiwadani, M., 1991. Road network reliability caused by daily fluctuation of traffic flow. In: Proceedings of the 19th PTRC summer annual meeting (Seminar G), July 1991. London: PTRC Education and Research Services, 73-84.
4. Bell, M.G.H. and Iida, Y., 1997. Transportation network analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
5. Berdica, K., 2002. An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy, 9 (2), 117-127.
6. Boyce, D.E. and Janson, B.N., 1980. A discrete transportation network design problem with combined trip distribution and assignment. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological, 14 (12),147-154.
7. Chen, A., et al., 1999. A capacity related reliability for transportation networks. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 33 (2), 183-200.
8. Chen, A., et al., 2007. Alpha reliable network design problem. Transportation Research Record, 2029, 49-57.
9. Chen, A., et al., 2008. A bi-objective reliable network design problem. In: Proceedings of the 87th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Compendium of papers DVD: Paper #08-0276, 13-17 January 2008. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
10. Clark, S. and Watling, D., 2005. Modelling network travel time reliability under stochastic demand. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological, 39 (2), 119-140.
11. D'Este, G.M. and Taylor, M.A.P., 2003. Network vulnerability: an approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategic transport networks. In: M.G.H. Bell and Y. Iida, eds. The network reliability of transport. Oxford: Elsevier, 23-44.
12. Friesz, T.L., et al., 1992. A simulated annealing approach to the network design problem with variational inequality constraints. Transportation Science, 26 (1), 18-26.
13. Gendreau, M. and Potvin, J.Y., 2005. Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 140 (1), 189-213.
14. Gutiérrez, G.J., 2001. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French Border. Journal of Transport Geography, 9 (4), 229-242.
15. Hansen, W., 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73-6.
16. Immers, L.H., et al., 2004. Robustness and resilience of transportation networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th international scientific conference MOBILITA, 6-7 May 2004. Bratislava, Slovakia: Slovak University of Technology. Available from: http://www.mech.kuleuven.be/cib/verkeer/publicaties.
17. Janson, B.N., Buckels, L.S., and Peterson, B.E., 1991. Network design programming of United-States highway improvements. Journal of Transportation Engineering-ASCE, 117 (4),457-478.
18. Jensen-Butler, C. and Madsen, B., 1996. Modelling the regional economic effects of the danish great belt link. Papers in Regional Science, 75 (1), 1-21.
19. Keeble, D., Owens, P.L., and Thompson, C., 1982. Regional accessibility and economic- potential in the European-community. Regional Studies, 16 (6), 419-431.
20. Leblanc, L.J., 1975. Algorithm for the discrete network design problem. Transportation Science, 39 (1), 63-79.
21. Lo, H.K. and Tung, Y.K., 2003. Network with degradable links: capacity analysis and design. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological, 37 (4), 345-363.
22. Michalewicz, Z. and Fogel, D.B., 2004. How to solve it: modern heuristics. Berlin: Springer- Verlag.
23. Paez, A., 2004. Network accessibility and the spatial distribution of economic activity in Eastern Asia. Urban Studies, 41 (11), 2211-2230.
24. Santos, B., Antunes, A., and Miller, E., 2005. Solving an accessibility-maximization road network design model: a comparison of heuristics. In: A. Jaszkiewicz, M. Kaczmarek, J. Zak, and M. Kubiak, eds. Advanced OR and AI methods in transportation. Poznan, Poland: Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology, 692-697.
25. Santos, B., Antunes, A., and Miller, E.J., 2007. A multi-objective approach to road network planning. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on transportation research. Compendium of papers DVD: Paper #989, 24-28 June 2007. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
26. Scaparra, M.P. and Church, R.L., 2005. A grasp and path relinking heuristic for rural road network development. Journal of Heuristics, 11 (1), 89-108.
27. Sumalee, A., Watling, D.P., and Nakayama, S., 2006. Reliable network design problem-case with uncertain demand and total travel time reliability. Transportation Research Record, 1964, 81-90.
28. Suwansirikul, C., Friesz, T.L., and Tobin, R.L., 1987. Equilibrium decomposed optimization: a heuristic for the continuous equilibrium network design problems. Transportation Science, 21 (4), 254-263.
29. Taylor, M.A.P., Sekhar, S.V.C., and D'Este, G.M., 2006. Application of accessibility based methods for vulnerability analysis of strategic road networks. Networks & Spatial Economics, 6 (3-4), 267-291.
30. Ukkusuri, S.V., Mathew, T.V., and Waller, S.T., 2007. Robust transportation network design under demand uncertainty. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22 (1), 6-18.
31. Vickerman, R., 1987. The channel tunnel-consequences for regional growth and development. Regional Studies, 21 (3), 187-197.
32. Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., and Wegener, M., 1999. Accessibility and economicdevelopment in europe. Regional Studies, 33 (1), 1-15.
33. Wakabayashi, H. and Iida, Y., 1992. Upper and lower bounds of terminal reliability of road networks: an efficient method with Boolean algebra. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 14, 22-44.
34. Yang, H. and Bell, M.G.H., 1998. Models and algorithms for road network design: a review and some new developments. Transport Reviews, 18 (3), 257-278.
35. Yang, H., Lo, H.K., and Tang, W.H., 2000. Travel time versus capacity reliability of a road network. In: M. Bell and C. Cassir, ed. Reliability of transport networks. Baldock, UK: Research Studies Press, 119-138.
36. Ziha, K., 2000. Redundancy and robustness of systems of events. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 15 (4), 347-357.