Enhancing stewardship of community-engaged research through governance

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1161-1167

  Oetzel, John G ^a   Villegas, Malia ^b   Zenone, Heather ^b   White Hat, Emily R ^c   Wallerstein, Nina ^d   Duran, Bonnie ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^b National Congress of American Indians   (United States)

^c SANFORD RESEARCH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN INDIAN; ANCESTRY GROUP; ECONOMICS; FACTUAL DATABASE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (U.S.); COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; HUMANS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH DESIGN; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84929378005     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302457     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Atalay S. "We don't talk about Catalhoyuk, we live it": sustainable archaeological practice through community-based participatory research. World Archaeol. 2010;42(3):418-429.
2. Fisher PA, Ball TJ. Balancing empiricism and local cultural knowledge in the design of prevention research. J Urban Health. 2005;82(2 suppl 3):iii44-iii55.
3. nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2013.
4. Minkler M, Wallerstein N, eds. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
5. Newman SD, Gillenwater G, Toatley S, et al. A community-based participatory research approach to the development of a peer navigator health promotion intervention for people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Health J. 2014;7(4):478-484.
6. Lorway R, Thompson LH, Lazarus L, et al. Going beyond the clinic: confronting stigma and discrimination among men who have sex with men in Mysore through community-based participatory research. Crit Public Health. 2013;24(1):1-15.
7. nd ed. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2011. NIH publication no. 117782.
8. Barkin S, Schlundt D, Smith P. Community-engaged research perspectives: then and now. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(2):93-97.
9. Glasgow RE, Green LW, Klesges LM, et al. External validity: we need to do more. Ann Behav Med. 2006;31(2):105-108.
10. Greenlund KJ, Giles WH. The Prevention Research Centers program: translating research into public health practice and impact. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3 suppl 2):S91-S92.
11. Michener L, Cook J, Ahmed SM, Yonas MA, Coyne-Beasley T, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. Aligning the goals of community-engaged research: why and how academic health centers can successfully engage with communities to improve health. Acad Med. 2012;87(3):285-291.
12. nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:371-392.
13. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(suppl 1):S40-S46.
14. Khodyakov D, Stockdale S, Jones F, et al. An exploration of the effect of community engagement in research on perceived outcomes of partnered mental health services projects. Soc Ment Health. 2011;1(3):185-199.
15. Khodyakov D, Stockdale S, Jones A, Mango J, Jones F, Lizaola E. On measuring community participation in research. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):346-354.
16. Cornell S, Jorgensen M, Kalt J. The First Nations Governance Act: Implications of Research Findings From the United States and Canada. Tucson, AZ: Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona; 2002.
17. Hillabrant W. Research in Indian country: challenges and changes. In: Davis JD, Erickson JS, Johnson SR, Marshall CA, Running Wolf P, Santiago RL, eds. Work Group on American Indian Research and Program Evaluation Methodology (AIRPEM), Symposium on Research and Evaluation Methodology: Lifespan Issues Related to American Indians/Alaska Natives With Disabilities. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, Institute for Human Development, Arizona University Center on Disabilities, American Indian Rehabilitation Research and Training Center; 2002:19-31.
18. Brugge D, Missaghian M. Protecting the Navajo people through tribal regulation of research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006;12(3):491-507.
19. Colwell-Chanthaphonh C. Self-governance, selfrepresentation, self-determination and the questions of research ethics: commentary on "Protecting the Navajo people through tribal regulation of research." Sci Eng Ethics. 2006;12(3):508-510.
20. Dickert N, Sugarman J. Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1123-1127.
21. Mikesell L, Bromley E, Khodyakov D. Ethical community-engaged research: a literature review. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(12):e7-e14.
22. Shore N, Brazauskas R, Drew E, et al. Understanding community-based processes for research ethics review: a national study. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(suppl 1):S359-S364.
23. Morton DJ, Proudfit J, Calac D, et al. Creating research capacity through a tribally based institutional review board. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(12):2160-2164.
24. Harding A, Harper B, Stone D, et al. Conducting research with tribal communities: sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(1):6-10.
25. Manson S. Focus on research methods. In: Davis JD, Erickson JS, Johnson SR, Marshall CA, Running Wolf P, Santiago RL, eds. Work Group on American Indian Research and Program Evaluation Methodology (AIRPEM), Symposium on Research and Evaluation Methodology: Lifespan Issues Related to American Indians/Alaska Natives With Disabilities. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, Institute for Human Development, Arizona University Center on Disabilities, American Indian Rehabilitation Research and Training Center; 2002:81-90.
26. Schnarch B. Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: a critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. J Aborig Health. 2004;1(1):80-95.
27. Sobeck JL, Chapleski EE, Fisher C. Conducting research with American Indians: a case study of motives, methods, and results. J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work. 2003;12(1):69-84.
28. Malone RE, Yerger VB, McGruder C, Froelicher E. "It's like Tuskegee in reverse": a case study of ethical tensions in institutional review board review of community-based participatory research. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(11):1914-1919.
29. Flicker S. Who benefits from community-based participatory research? A case study of the Positive Youth Project. Health Educ Behav. 2008;35(1):70-86.
30. Flicker S, Travers R, Guta A, McDonald S, Meagher A. Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: recommendations for institutional review boards. J Urban Health. 2007;84(4):478-493.
31. Minkler M, Lee PT, Tom A, et al. Using community-based participatory research to design and initiate a study on immigrant worker health and safety in San Francisco's Chinatown restaurants. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53(4):361-371.
32. Community IRBs and Research Review Boards: Shaping the Future of Community-Engaged Research. New York, NY, and Seattle, WA: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx Linx, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health; 2012.
33. Pacheco CM, Daley SM, Brown T, et al. Moving forward: breaking the cycle of mistrust between American Indians and researchers. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(12):2152-2159.
34. Becenti-Pigman B, White K, Bowman B, Palmanteer-Holder N, Duran B. Research policies, processes, and protocol: the Navajo Nation human research review board. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, eds. Community-Based Participatory Research: From Processes to Outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:441-445.
35. "Walk Softly and Listen Carefully": Building Research Relationships With Tribal Communities. Washington, DC, and Bozeman, MT: National Congress of American Indians and Montana State University Center for Native Health Partnerships; 2012.
36. Sahota PC. Research Regulation in American Indian/Alaska Native Communities: Policy and Practice Considerations. Washington, DC: National Congress of American Indians; 2006.
37. Sahota PC. Community-Based Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities. Washington, DC: National Congress of American Indians; 2010.
38. Kelley A, Belcourt-Dittloff A, Belcourt C, Belcourt G. Research ethics and indigenous communities. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(12):2146-2152.
39. Gottlieb NH, Brink SG, Gingiss PL. Correlates of coalition effectiveness: the Smoke Free Class of 2000 program. Health Educ Res. 1993;8(3):375-384.
40. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB, Guzman JR. Critical issues in developing and following CBPR principles. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, eds. Community-Based Participatory Research: From Processes to Outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:47-66.
41. Hicks S, Duran B, Wallerstein N, et al. Evaluating community-based participatory research (CBPR) to improve community-partnered science and community health. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012;6(3):289-299.
42. National Institutes of Health. RePORTER database. Available at: http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm. Accessed November 15, 2014.
43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention Research Centers database. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/prc. Accessed November 15, 2014.
44. Native American Research Centers for Health database. Available at: http://www.nigms.nih.gov/training/NARCH/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed November 15, 2014.
45. University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Center for Participatory Research. CBPR Project: research for improved health. Available at: http://cpr.unm.edu/research-projects/cpbr-project/index.html. Accessed November, 15, 2014.
46. Oetzel JG, Zhou C, Duran B, et al. Establishing the psychometric properties of constructs in a community-based participatory research conceptual model. Am J Health Promot. 2014; Epub ahead of print.
47. Pearson C, Duran B, Magarati M, et al. Research for improved health: patterns in federally-funded community engaged research studies. Prog Community Health Partnersh. In press.
48. Tastle WJ, Wierman MJ. An information theoretic measure for the evaluation of ordinal scale data. Behav Res Methods. 2006;38(3):487-494.