Driving for real or on a fixed-base simulator: Is it so different? An explorative study

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 74-91

  Milleville Pennel, Isabelle ^a   Charron, Camilo ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ RENNES 2   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DETERIORATION; NASA; SURVEYS; VEHICLES;

DRIVING ABILITIES; DRIVING CONDITIONS; DRIVING SIMULATOR; FEELING OF PRESENCES; FIXED BASE SIMULATORS; MENTAL WORKLOAD; PERSONAL VEHICLES; REAL-WORLD DRIVINGS;

SIMULATORS;

EID: 84929347033     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/PRES_a_00216     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abdi, H., Williams, L. J., & Valentin, D. (2013). Multiple factor analysis: Principal component analysis for multi-and multi-block data sets. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 5, 149-179.
2. Anderson, S. W., Rizzo, M., Shi, Q., Uc, E. Y., & Dawson, J. D. (2005). Cognitive abilities related to driving performance in a simulator and crashing on the road. Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 286-292). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
3. Bella, F. (2008). Driving simulator for speed research on twolane rural roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 1078-1087.
4. Bittner, A. C., Simsek, O., Levison, W. H., & Campbell, J. L. (2002). On-road versus simulator data in driver model development. Driver performance experience. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1803, 38-44.
5. Blaauw, G. J. (1982). Driver experience and task demands in simulator and instrumented car: A validation study. Human Factors, 24, 473-486.
6. Brookhuis, K. A., & de Waard, D. (2010). Monitoring drivers' mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 898-903.
7. Cegarra, J., & Morgado, N. (2009, September). Étude des propriétés de la version francophone du NASA-TLX. Communication présentée à la cinquième édition du colloque de psychologie ergonomique (Epique), Nice, France.
8. Gerhard, M., Moore, D. J., & Hobbs, D. J. (2001). Continuous presence in collaborative virtual environments: Towards a hybrid avatar-agent model for user representation. In A. de Antonio, R. Aylett, and D. Ballin (Eds.), IVA 2001, LNAI 2190, pp. 137-155.
9. Gopher, D., and Donchin, E. (1986). Workload-An examination of the concept. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds), Handbook of perception and human performance, Volume 2, Cognitive processes and performance. 41(1), 41-49. New York: Wiley.
10. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical reasearch. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 239-250). Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
11. Hervé, A. (2007). RV coefficient and congruence coefficient. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp. 849-853). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Heuer, H., & Sülzenbrück, S. (2013). Towards mastery of complex visuo-motor transformations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi: 10. 3389/fnhum. 2013. 00032.
13. Jahn, G., Oehme, A., Krems, J. F., & Gelau, C. (2005). Peripheral detection as a workload measure in driving: Effects of traffic complexity and route guidance system use in a driving study. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 255-275.
14. Johnson, M. J., Chahal, T., Stinchcombe, A., Mullen, N., Weaver, B., & Bedard, M. (2011). Physiological responses to simulated and on-road driving. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 81, 203-208.
15. Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., & Van Der Horst, R. (1996). Driving simulator validity: Some considerations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1550, 30-36.
16. Lechner, D., Delanne, Y., Schaefer, G., & Schmitt, V. (1997). Méthodologie de validation du logiciel de dynamique automobile CALLAS. SIA 970202. In Congreés SIA Lyon, Avril 1997. Reprinted in Ingénieurs de l'Automobile, No. 713, May 1997.
17. Lećuyer, A. (2009). Simulating haptic feedback using vision: A survey of research and applications of pseudo-haptic feedback. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(1), 39-53.
18. Lew, H. L., Poole, J. H., Lee, E. A., Jaffe, D. L., Huang, H. C., & Brodd, E. (2005). Predictive validity of drivingsimulator assessments following traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. Brain Injury, 19, 177-188.
19. Matthews, R., Legg, S., & Charlton, S. (2003). The effect of cell phone type on drivers' subjective workload during concurrent driving and conversing. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 451-457.
20. Mayhew, D. R., Simpson, H. M., Wood, K. M., Lonero, L., Clinton, K. M., & Johnson, A. G. (2011). On-road and simulated driving: Concurrent and discriminant validation. Journal of Safety Research, 42, 267-275.
21. Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Insko, B., Whitton, M., & Brooks, F. (2005). Review of four studies on the use of physiological reaction as a measure of presence in stressful virtual environments. Applied Psychology and Biofeedback, 30(3), 239-258.
22. Meehan, M. (2001). Physiological reaction as an objective measure of presence in virtual environments. Doctoral dissertation, Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
23. Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J. F., & Dusek, J. A. (2009). The impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2138, 6-12.
24. Mehler, B., Reimer, B., & Coughlin, J. F. (2010). Physiological reactivity to graded levels of cognitive workload across three age groups: An on-road evaluation. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Francisco, CA, 2062-2066.
25. Milleville-Pennel, I., Pothier, J., Hoc, J. M., & Mathè, J. F. (2010). Consequences of cognitive impairments following traumatic brain injury: Pilot study on visual exploration while driving. Brain Injury, 24(4), 678-691.
26. Otmani, S., Rogé, J., & Muzet, A. (2005). Sleepiness in professional drivers: Effect of age and time of day. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 930-937.
27. Patomella, A. H., Tham, K., & Kottorp, A. (2006). P-drive: Assessment of driving performance after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38, 273-279.
28. Pennel, I., Ferrel, C., Coello, Y., & Orliaguet, J. P. (2002). Contrôle sensori-moteur en situation de téléopération: Données théoriques et perspectives ergonomiques. Le Travail Humain, 65(1), 29-58.
29. Regenbrecht, H., & Schubert, T. (2002). Real and illusory interaction enhance presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(4), 425-434.
30. Reimer, B., & Melher, B. (2011). The impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers: A field study and simulation validation. Ergonomics, 54(10), 932-942.
31. Robert, P., & Escoufier, Y. (1976). A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV-coefficient. Applied Statistics, 25(3): 257-265.
32. Robillard, G., Bouchard, S., Fournier, T., & Renaud, P. (2003). Anxiety and presence during VR immersion: A comparative study of the reactions of phobic and non-phobic participants in therapeutic virtual environments derived from computer games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(5), 467-476.
33. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (1999). Embodied presence in virtual environments. In R. Paton & I. Neilson (Eds.), Visual representations and interpretations (pp. 269-278). London: Springer-Verlag.
34. Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 364, 3549-3557.
35. Slater, M., Splanlang, B., & Corominas, D. (2010). Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 29(4), Article 92.
36. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1995). Taking steps: The influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction (TOCHI), 2(3), 201-219.
37. Stern, E. B. (2004). Driving simulation: A pilot study of persons with brain injury and matched controls. Sixth National Workshop for Driver Rehabilitation Specialists. Edmonton, Canada.
38. Törnros, J. (1998). Driving behaviour in a real and simulated road tunnel: A validation study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30, 497-503.
39. Villany, D., Repetto, C., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2012). May I experience more presence in doing the same thing in virtual reality than in reality? An answer from a simulated job interview. Interacting with Computers, 24, 265-272.
40. Vuadens, P., & Comte, P. A. (2001). Evaluation des aptitudes ála conduite automobile chez le cérébrolésé. Revue Médicale de la Suisse Romande, 121, 453-456.
41. Walshe, D., Lewis, E., O'Sullivan, K., & Kim, S. I. (2005). Virtually driving: Are the driving environments "real enough" for exposure therapy with accident victims? An explorative study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(6), 532-537.