Erratum: International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data (European Journal of Human Genetics (2015) 23 (721-728) DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.197);International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 721-728

  Mascalzoni, Deborah ^a,b   Dove, Edward S ^c   Rubinstein, Yaffa ^d   Dawkins, Hugh J S ^e,f,g,h   Kole, Anna ⁱ   Mccormack, Pauline ^j   Woods, Simon ^j   Riess, Olaf ^j   Schaefer, Franz ^j   Lochmüller, Hanns ^j   Knoppers, Bartha M ^c   Hansson, Mats ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b University of Lubeck   (Italy)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^e DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (Australia)

^f CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^h MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

ⁱ EURORDIS   (France)

^j NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; GENETIC PRIVACY; HEALTH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; BIOBANK; CONTRACT; ETHICS; EUROPE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CONTRACTS; EUROPE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

EID: 84929288545     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.237     Document Type: Erratum

References (31)

1. Global Alliance White Paper. http://oicr.on.ca/oicr-programs-and-platforms/global-alliance/ white-paper.
2. OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. http:// www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/61/38500813.pdf.
3. Birney, Prepublication data sharing, Toronto International Data Release, Nature 461: 168-170.
4. European Council (EC 2009/c 151/02) Council recommendation on an action in the field of rare Diseases 2009.
5. Knoppers BM, Chisholm M, Kaye J et al: A P3G generic access agreement for population genomic studies. Nat Biotechnol 31: 384-385.
6. Ness RB. on behalf of the American College of Epidemiology Policy Committee: biospecimen "ownership": point. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16: 188-189.
7. Knoppers BM, Harris JR, Tassé AM, Budin-Ljøsne I, Kaye J, Deschênes M, Zawati MH: Towards a data sharing Code of Conduct for international genomic research. Genome Med 2011; 3: 46.
8. Fortier I, Burton PR, Robson PJ et al: Quality, quantity and harmony: the DataSHaPER approach to integrating data across bioclinical studies. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 1-11.
9. O'Brien SJ: Stewardship of human bio-specimens, DNA, genotype, and clinical data in the GWAS era. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2009; 10: 193-209.
10. McGuire A, Gibbs RA: No longer de-identified. Science 2006; 312: 370-371.
11. Gymrek M et al: Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science 2013; 339: 321.
12. Hansson MG, Gattorno M, Stjernschantz Forsberg J, Feltelius N, Martini A, Ruperto N: Ethics bureaucracy-a significant hurdle for collaborative follow-up of drug effectiveness in rare childhood diseases. Arch Dis Childhood 2012; 97: 561-563.
13. Kaye J: Broad consent is informed consent. BMJ 2011; 343.
14. Kaye J: From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13: 371-376.
15. Kaye J: The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2012; 13: 415-431.
16. Lunshof JE, Chadwick R, Vorhaus DB, Church GM: From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9: 406-411.
17. Hansson MG, Dillner J, Bartram CR, Carlsson J, Helgesson G: Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 266-269.
18. Caulfield T: Biobanks and blanket consent: the proper place of the public good and public perception rationales. Kings Law J 2007; 18: 209-226.
19. Arnason V: Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 2004; 18: 27-49.
20. Mascalzoni D, Hicks A, Pramstaller P, Wjst M: Informed consent in the genomics era. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e192.
21. Sheehan M, Martin J: Can broad consent be informed consent? Public Health Ethics 2011; 4: 226-235.
22. Mascalzoni D, Paradiso A, Hansson M: Rare disease research: breaking the privacy barrier. Appl Translational Genomics 2014; 3: 23-29.
23. Hoeyer K: Donors perceptions of consent to and feedback from biobank research: time to acknowledge diversity. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 345-352.
24. Steinsbekk KS, Solberg B: Biobanks-when is re-consent necessary? Public Health Ethics 2011; 4: 236-250.
25. Budin-Ljøsne I, Tassé AM, Knoppers BM, Harris JR: Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges? BMC Med Genomics 2011; 4: 69.
26. Van Veen EB et al: TuBaFrost 3: regulatory and ethical issues on the exchange of residual tissue for research across Europe. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 2914-2923.
27. Kaijser M: Examples from Swedish biobank research; in: Levin M, Hansson MG (eds.): Biobanks as Resources for Health. Uppsala: Uppsala University, 2003, pp 33-50, may be downloaded at www.crb.uu.se.
28. Helgesson G, Dillner J, Carlsson J, Bartram CR, Hansson MG: Ethical framework for previously collected biobank samples. Nat Biotech 2007; 25: 973-975.
29. Shamoo AE, Resnik DB: Responsible Conduct of Research. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
30. Hansson MG, Simonsson B, Feltelius N, Stjernschantz Forsberg J, Hasford J: Medical registries represent vital patient interests and should not be dismantled by stricter regulation. Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 36: 575-578.
31. Hansson MG: Ethics and biobanks. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 8-12.