Biobanks-when is re-consent necessary?

Public Health Ethics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 236-250

  Steinsbekk, Kristin Solum ^a   Solberg, Berge ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GENE SEQUENCE; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 82055165433     PISSN: 17549973     EISSN: 17549981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/phe/phr031     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. andMe. (2011).-23andMe Genetics just got personal. Start filling in the gaps with your DNA online, available from: https://www.23andme.com/(accessed 20 October 2011).
2. Arnason, V. (2004). Coding and Consent: Moral Challenges of the Database Project in Iceland. Bioethics, 18, 27-49. (Pubitemid 38453590)
3. Baeyenes, A. J., Hakimian, R., Aamodt, R. and Spatz, A. (2002). 'The Use Of Human Biological Samples In Research: A Comparison Of The Laws In The United States And Europe. Bio-science Law Review, 5, 155-160.
4. Beskow, L. M., Burke, W., Merz, J. F., Barr, P. A., Terry, S., Penchaszadeh, V. B., Gostin, L. O., Gwinn, M. and Khoury, M. J. (2001). 'Informed Consent for Population-based Research Involving Genetics. JAMA, 286, 2315-2321. (Pubitemid 33063154)
5. Caulfield, T. and Kaye, J. (2009). 'Broad Consent in Biobanking: Reflections on Seemingly Insurmountable Dilemmas. Medical Law International, 10, 85-100.
6. Caulfield, T., McGuire, A. L., Cho, M., Buchanan, J. A., Burgess, M. M., Danilczyk, U., Diaz, C. M., Fryer-Edwards, K., Green, S. K., Hodosh, M. A., Juengst, E. T., Kaye, J., Kedes, L., Knoppers, B. M., Lemmens, T., Meslin, E. M., Murphy, J., Nussbaum, R. L., Otlowski, M., Pullman, D., Ray, P. N., Sugarman, J. and Timmons, M. (2008). Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement. PLoS Biology, 6, e73.
7. Caulfield, T., Upshur, R. and Daar, A. (2003). DNA Databanks and Consent: A Suggested Policy Option Involving an Authorization Model. BMC Medical Ethics, 4, 1.
8. Chen, D. T., Rosenstein, D. L., Muthappan, P., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Miller, F. G., Emanuel, E. J. and Wendler, D. (2005). Research With Stored Biological Samples: What Do Research Participants Want? Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 652-655. (Pubitemid 40393147)
9. Clayton, E. W., Steinberg, K. K., Khoury, M. J., Thomson, E., Andrews, L., Kahn, M. J. E., Kopelman, L. M. and Weiss, J. O. (1995). Informed Consent for Genetic Research on Stored Tissue Samples. JAMA, 274, 1786-1792.
10. Colditz, G. A. (2009). Constraints on Data Sharing: Experience from the Nursesapos Health Study. Epidemiology, 20, 169-171.
11. Dawson, A. (2010). The Future of Bioethics: Three Dogmas and a Cup of Hemlock. Bioethics, 24, 218-225.
12. deCODEme. (2011). deCODE your health online, available from: http://www.decodeme.com/(accessed 16 June 2011).
13. Dinamo. (2011). Edelman Trust Barometer: Norwayonline, available from: http://www.scribd.com/full/47667236?access-key=key-2axeq5u99rj6dxgi9jt8 (accessed 20 October 2011).
14. Dunn, L. B. and Jeste, D. V. (2001). Enhancing Informed Consent for Research and Treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology, 24, 595-607. (Pubitemid 32452207)
15. Edwards, L. C. (2008). Tissue Tug-Of-War: A Comparison of International and U.S. Perspectives on the Regulation of Human Tissue Banks. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 41, 639-675.
16. Elger, B. S. (2008). Consent and Use of Samples. In Elger, B., Biller-Andorno, N. and Capron, A. M. (eds), Ethical Issues in Governing Biobanks: Global Perspectives. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, pp. 57-87.
17. Eriksson, S. and Helgesson, G. (2005). Potential Harms, Anonymization, and the Right to Withdraw Consent to Biobank Research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 13, 1071-1076. (Pubitemid 43073615)
18. Eurobarometer (1995). Europeans and blood. Eurobarometer 41.0. European Commission, Directorate General, Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, online, available from: http://ec.europa.eu/public-opinion/archives/ ebs/ebs-083-en.pdf (accessed 2 October 2011).
19. Felt, U., Bister, M. D., Strassnig, M. and Wagner, U. (2009). Refusing the Information Paradigm: Informed Consent, Medical Research, and Patient Participation. Health, 13, 87-106.
20. Forsberg, J. S., Hansson, M. G. and Eriksson, S. (2011). The Risks and Benefits of Re-Consent. Science, 332, 306.
21. Forsberg, J. S., Hansson, M. G. and Eriksson, S. (2009). Changing Perspectives in Biobank Research: from Individual Rights to Concerns About Public Health Regarding the Return of Results. European Journal of Human Genetics, 17, 1544-1549.
22. Godard, B., Schmidtke, J., Cassiman, J.-J. and Aymé, S. (2003). Data Storage and DNA Banking for Biomedical Research: Informed Consent, Confidentiality, Quality Issues, Ownership, Return of Benefits. A Professional Perspective. European Journal of Human Genetics, 11(Suppl. 2), S88-S122. (Pubitemid 38263570)
23. Greely, H. T. (2007). The Uneasy Ethical and Legal Underpinnings of Large-Scale Genomic Biobanks. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 8, 343-364.
24. Hansson, M. G. (2010). Need for a Wider View of Autonomy in Epidemiological Research. BMJ, 340, 1172-1174.
25. Hansson, M. G. (2009). Ethics and Biobanks. British Journal of Cancer, 100, 8-12.
26. Hansson, M. G., Dillner, J., Bartram, C. R., Carlson, J. A. and Helgesson, G. (2006). Should Donors be Allowed to give Broad Consent to Future Biobank Research? Lancet Oncology, 7, 266-269. (Pubitemid 43286456)
27. Hawkins, N., de Vries, J., Boddington, P., Kaye, J. and Heeney, C. (2009). Planning for Translational Research in Genomics. Genome Medicine, 1, 87.
28. Heeney, C., Hawkins, N., de Vries, J., Boddington, P. and Kaye, J. (2011). Assessing the Privacy Risks of Data Sharing in Genomics. Public Health Genomics, 14, 17-25.
29. Hoeyer, K. (2008). The Ethics of Research Biobanking: A Critical Review of the Literature. Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews, 25, 429-452.
30. Hoeyer, K. (2005). The Role of Ethics in Commercial Genetic Research: Notes on the Notion of Commodification. Medical Anthropology, 24, 45-70. (Pubitemid 40313615)
31. Hoeyer, K., Olofsson, B.-O., Mjorndal, T. and Lynoe, N. (2005). The Ethics of Research Using Biobanks: Reason to Question the Importance Attributed to Informed Consent. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 97-100. (Pubitemid 40096089)
32. Hofmann, B. (2009). Broadening Consent-and Diluting Ethics? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 125-129.
33. Hofmann, B., Solbakk, J. H. and Holm, S. (2009). Consent to Biobank Research: One Size Fits All? In Solbakk, J. H., Holm, S. and Hofmann, B. (eds), The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 3-23.
34. Holmen, J. (2007). 'HUNT og næringsvirksomhet: En forskningsetisk betenkningHUNT and commercial activities: An ethical deliberation-Letter to the regional research ethics committee-Mid Norwayapos.
35. HUNT Biosciences. (2010). HUNT Biosciences Homepageonline, available from: http://www.hunt-biosciences.com/(accessed 10 September 2010).
36. HUNT Biosciences. (2008). HUNT Biosciences. Non-confidential Information HUNT Biobankonline, available from: http://www.ntnu.no/c/document- library/get-file?uuid=842820f7-6b7e-47d4-8341-a-d792b61eb83&groupId=10304 (accessed 20 August 2011).
37. Joffe, S., Cook, E. F., Cleary, P. D., Clark, J. W. and Weeks, J. C. (2001). Quality of Informed Consent in Cancer Clinical Trials: a Cross-Sectional Survey. Lancet, 358, 1772-1777. (Pubitemid 33153003)
38. Kakuk, P. (2008). Gene Concepts and Genethics: Beyond Exceptionalism. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 357-375.
39. Karlsen, J. R. and Strand, R. (2009). Annexation of Life: The Biopolitics of Industrial Biology. In Solbakk, J. H., Holm, S. and Hofmann, B. (eds), The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 315-329.
40. Karlsen, J. R., Solbakk, J. H. and Holm, S. (2011). 'Ethical Endgames: Broad Consent for Narrow Interests; Open Consent for Closed Minds. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20, 572-583.
41. Kaye, J., Boddington, P., de Vries, J., Hawkins, N., Heeney, C. and Melham, K. (2009a). Literature Review: Ethical, Legal and Social Issues Arising from the Use of GWAS in Medical Research. ReportWellcome Trust, online, available from: http://www.publichealth.ox.ac.uk/helex/images-and-documents/ WTConsultancy-for-website- publication-20091022-1.pdf (accessed 2 October 2011).
42. Kaye, J., Boddington, P., de Vries, J., Hawkins, N. and Melham, K. (2010). 'Ethical Implications of the Use of Whole Genome Methods in Medical Research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18, 398-403.
43. Kaye, J., Heeney, C., Hawkins, N., de Vries, J. and Boddington, P. (2009b). Data Sharing in Genomics Re-Shaping Scientific Practice. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 331-335.
44. Kettis-Lindblad, A., Ring, L., Viberth, E. and Hansson, M. G. (2007). Perceptions of Potential Donors in the Swedish Public Towards Information and Consent Procedures in Relation to use of Human Tissue Samples in Biobanks: a Population-Based Study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35, 148-156. (Pubitemid 46567459)
45. Knome. (2011). Knome: The whole genome interpretation company. Finding the genetic basis of human disease and drug response online, available from: http://knome.com (accessed 20 October 2011).
46. Knoppers, B. M. (2010). Consent to 'Personalapos Genomics and Privacy. EMBO Reports, 11, 416-419.
47. Knoppers, B. M., Harris, J. R., Burton, P. R., Murtagh, M., Cox, D., Deschênes, M., Fortier, I., Hudson, T. J., Kaye, J. and Lindpaintner, K. (2011). From Genomic Databases to Translation: a Call to Action. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 515-516.
48. Kraft, P. and Hunter, D. J. (2009). Genetic Risk Prediction-are we there yet? The New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1701-1703.
49. Lee, S. H., van der Werf, J. H. J., Hayes, B. J., Goddard, M. E. and Visscher, P. M. (2008). Predicting Unobserved Phenotypes for Complex Traits from Whole-Genome SNP Data. PLoS Genet, 4, e1000231.
50. Lunshof, J. E., Chadwick, R., Vorhaus, D. B. and Church, G. M. (2008). From Genetic Privacy to Open Consent. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 406-411. (Pubitemid 351556065)
51. MacIntyre, B. (2000). Battle For Profits Threatens Pact On Human Genome. The Times, London, 26th June, online, available from: http://www.common-dreams. org/headlines/062600-02.htm (accessed 16 June 2011).
52. Manson, N. C. and OaposNeill, O. (2007). Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. McGuire, A. L., Caulfield, T. and Cho, M. K. (2008). 'Research Ethics and the Challenge of Whole-Genome Sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 152-156. (Pubitemid 351147709)
54. Ministry of Health and Care Services. (2008). Helseforskningsloven Norwegian Health Research Act online, available from: http://www.regjerin-gen. no/upload/HOD/HRA/Helseforskning/Helseforskningsloven%20-%20ENGELSK% 20endelig%2029%2006%2009.pdf (accessed 30 April 2009).
55. Ministry of Health and Care Services. (2006). Ot.prp.nr.74 Proposition from the Norwegian Parliament on medical and health research (The Health Research Act)online, available from: http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/hod/dok/ regpubl/otprp/2006-2007/otprp-nr-74-2006-2007-.html?id=474780
56. Mir, K. U. (2009). Sequencing Genomes: From Individuals to Populations. Briefings in Functional Genomics & Proteomics, 8, 367-378.
57. NCBI. (2011). dbGaP Overviewonline, available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/about.html (accessed 15 June 2011).
58. NIH. (2003). National Institute of Health. Guide: Final NIH statement on sharing reserach dataonline, available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/ notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html (accessed 16 June 2011).
59. Nilstun, T. and Hermerén, G. (2006). Human Tissue Samples and Ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 9, 81-86. (Pubitemid 43632093)
60. Noble, S., Donovan, J., Turner, E., Metcalfe, C., Lane, A., Rowlands, M.-A., Neal, D., Hamdy, F., Ben-Shlomo, Y. and Martin, R. (2009). 'Feasibility and Cost of Obtaining Informed Consent for Essential Review of Medical Records in Large-Scale Health Services Research. Journal of Health Service Research Policy, 14, 77-81.
61. Nordgren, A. and Jungest, E. T. (2009). 'Can Genomics Tell me who I am? Essentialistic Rhetoric in Direct-to-Consumer DNA-Testing. New Genetics and Society, 28, 157.
62. NTNU. (2011). HUNT Biobank-en regional, nasjonal og internasjonal biobankressursonline, available from: http://www.ntnu.no/hunt/biobank (accessed 4 September 2011).
63. Petrini, C. (2010). "Broad" Consent, Exceptions to Consent and the Question of using Biological Samples for Research Purposes Different from the Initial Collection Purpose. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 217-220.
64. Porteri, C. and Borry, P. (2008). A Proposal for a Model of Informed Consent for the Collection, Storage and Use of Biological Materials for Research Purposes. Patient Education and Counseling, 71, 136-142.
65. Powers, R. (2008). The Book of Me. Center for Genetics and Societyonline, available from: http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=4323 (accessed 15 June 2011).
66. REK midt. (2011). Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics. Mid Norway. Notes from committee meeting March 18th 2011online, available from: http://helseforskning.etikkom.no/ikbViewer/Content/137883/M%F8tedokument%2018. 03.2011.pdf
67. Rhodes, R. (2005). Rethinking Research Ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB, 5, 7-28. (Pubitemid 41674014)
68. Rommetveit, K. (2011). Tackling Epistemological Naivety: Large-Scale Information Systems and the Complexities of the Common Good. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics: CQ: The International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees, 20, 584-595.
69. Rothstein, M. (2005). Expanding the Ethical Analysis of Biobanks. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 33, 89-101. (Pubitemid 40598047)
70. Rotimi, C. N. and Marshall, P. A. (2010). Tailoring the Process of Informed Consent in Genetic and Genomic Research. Genome Medicine, 2, 20.
71. Salvaterra, E., Lecchi, L., Giovanelli, S., Butti, B., Bardella, M. T., Bertazzi, P. A., Bosari, S., Coggi, G., Coviello, D. A., Lalatta, F., Moggio, M., Nosotti, M., Zanella, A. and Rebulla, P. (2008). Banking Together. A Unified Model of Informed Consent for Biobanking. EMBO Reports, 9, 307-313.
72. Sand, K., Loge, J. H., Berger, O., Grønberg, B. H. and Kaasa, S. (2008). Lung Cancer Patientsapos Perceptions of Informed Consent Documents. Patient Education and Counseling, 73, 313-317.
73. Schultz, A. L., Pardee, G. P. and Ensinck, J. W. (1975). 'Are Research Subjects Really Informed? Western Journal of Medicine, 123, 76-80.
74. Secko, D. M., Preto, N., Niemeyer, S. and Burgess, M. M. (2009). 'Informed Consent in Biobank Research: A Deliberative Approach to the Debate. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 781-789.
75. Sheehan, M. (2011). Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent? Public Health Ethicsonline, available from: http://phe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/ 08/03/phe.phr020.abstract (accessed 22 August 2011).
76. Shickle, D. (2006). 'The Consent Problem Within DNA Biobanks. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science, 37, 503-519. (Pubitemid 44356442)
77. Simon, C. M., Laposheureux, J., Murray, J. C., Winokur, P., Weiner, G., Newbury, E., Shinkunas, L. and Zimmerman, B. (2011). Active Choice but not too Active: Public Perspectives on Biobank Consent Models. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 13, 821-831.
78. Skolbekken, J.-A., Ursin, L. Ø., Solberg, B., Christensen, E. and Ytterhus, B. (2005). Not Worth the Paper itaposs Written on? Informed Consent and Biobank Research in a Norwegian Context. Critical Public Health, 15, 335.
79. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (2008). Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia: Politics of Trust and Scientific Advancement. 1st edn. Oxon: Routledge.
80. Solbakk, J. H. (2011). Risks of Biobank Research. Meeting Presentation: Nordic Biobank Research Obstacles and Opportunities. Uppsala 2011., Uppsalaonline available from: http://ncbio.org/nordisk/arkiv/solbakk.pdf
81. Steinsbekk, K. S., Solberg, B. and Myskja, B. K. (2009). From Idealism to Realism: Commercial Ventures in Publicly Funded Biobanks. In Dierickx, K. and Borry, P. (eds), New Challenges for Biobanks: Ethics, Law and Governance (GeneBanC Project). Antwerp: Intersentia, pp. 137-151.
82. Strand, R. (2011). Health Ideologies, Objectivism, and the Common Good: on the Rights of Dissidents. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20, 605-611.
83. Stratford, J. S. and Stratford, J. (1998). Data Protection and Privacy in the United States and Europe. IASSIST-Quarterly, 3, 17-20.
84. Sutorp, M. (2011). Changing Ethical Frameworks: From Individual Rights to the Common Good? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20, 533-545.
85. The Norwegian Biotechnology Advisory Board. (2010). 'Nordmenns arvestoff fellesskapsressurs og personlig informasjon.Genetic materials from Norwegians, common resource and personal information. Letter to the Ministry of Health and Care Servicesaposonline available from: http://www.bion.no/filarkiv/2011/01/ Nordmenns-arvestoff-HOD-201210.pdf
86. Toronto International Data Release Workshop. (2009). Prepublication Data Sharing. Nature, 461, 168-170.
87. Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Ludman, E. J., Jarvik, G. P., Larson, E. B. and Burke, W. (2011a). Research Practice and Participant Preferences: The Growing Gulf. Science, 331, 287-288.
88. Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Ludman, E. J., Jarvik, G. P., Larson, E. B. and Burke, W. (2011b). Response-The Risks and Benefits of Re-Consent. Science, 332, 306.
89. Tupasela, A., Sihvo, S., Snell, K., Jallinoja, P., Aro, A. R. and Hemminki, E. (2010). Attitudes Towards Biomedical Use of Tissue Sample Collections, Consent, and Biobanks Among Finns. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38, 46-52.
90. Ursin, L. Ø. and Solberg, B. (2008). 'When is Normative Recruitment Legitimate? Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 2, 93-113.
91. Verweij, M. and Dawson, A. (2009). Public Health Research Ethics: A Research Agenda. Public Health Ethics, 2, 1-6.
92. Wellcome Trust. (2011). Policy-Data sharingonline available from: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Data-sharing/ (accessed 16 June 2011).
93. Wellcome Trust. (2010). UK Biobank j Wellcome Trustonline available from: http://www.wellcome. ac.uk/Funding/Biomedical-science/Funded-projects/Major- initiatives/UK-Biobank/wtd003504.htm (accessed 14 June 2011).
94. Wendler, D. and Emanuel, E. (2002). The Debate Over Research on Stored Biological Samples: What do Sources Think? Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 1457-1462. (Pubitemid 34747478)
95. Wendler, D. (2006). One-Time General Consent for Research on Biological Samples. BMJ, 332, 544-547. (Pubitemid 44364375)
96. Widdows, H. and Cordell, S. (2011). Why Communities and Their Goods Matter: Illustrated with the Example of Biobanks. Public Health Ethics, 4, 14-25.
97. Winickoff, D. E. and Winickoff, R. N. (2003). The Charitable Trust as a Model for Genomic Biobanks. The New England Journal of Medicine, 349, 1180-1184. (Pubitemid 37122332)
98. World Health Organisation. (1998). Proposed International Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics and Genetics Services. Geneva: World Health Organisation, online Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO-HGN- GL-ETH-98.1.pdf