Controlled surface topography regulates collective 3D migration by epithelial-mesenchymal composite embryonic tissues

Biomaterials

Volumn 58, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-9

  Song, Jiho ^a,b   Shawky, Joseph H ^b   Kim, YongTae ^a,e   Hazar, Melis ^a   LeDuc, Philip R ^a   Sitti, Metin ^a,c   Davidson, Lance A ^b,d  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell mechanics; Microstructure; Morphogenesis; Soft tissue biomechanics; Topology

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; HISTOLOGY; MICROSTRUCTURE; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TOPOGRAPHY; TOPOLOGY;

CELL MECHANICS; COLLECTIVE CELL MIGRATIONS; MESENCHYMAL CELLS; MICROENVIRONMENTS; MORPHOGENESIS; SOFT TISSUE BIOMECHANICS; THREEDIMENSIONAL (3-D); TOPOGRAPHICAL CUES;

TISSUE;

MITOMYCIN; BAYSILON; BIOMATERIAL; DIMETICONE; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE;

ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL MOTION; CELL SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; EMBRYO; EMBRYONAL TISSUE; EPITHELIUM; EPITHELIUM CELL; EXPLANT; MESENCHYME; MESENCHYME CELL; MICROENVIRONMENT; MICROTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY; XENOPUS LAEVIS; ANIMAL; CELL COMMUNICATION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; FEMALE; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; MESODERM; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; REGENERATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANURA; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ACTOMYOSIN; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL SIZE; DIMETHYLPOLYSILOXANES; EPITHELIAL-MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; EPITHELIUM; FEMALE; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MESODERM; MITOMYCIN; MORPHOGENESIS; REGENERATION; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 84929256742     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Curtis A., Varde M. Control of cell behavior: topological factors. JNatl Cancer Inst 1964, 33(1):15-26.
2. Tseng Q., Wang I., Duchemin-Pelletier E., Azioune A., Carpi N., Gao J., et al. Anew micropatterning method of soft substrates reveals that different tumorigenic signals can promote or reduce cell contraction levels. Lab Chip 2011, 11(13):2231-2240.
3. Chen C.S., Mrksich M., Huang S., Whitesides G.M., Ingber D.E. Micropatterned surfaces for control of cell shape, position, and function. Biotechnol Prog 1998, 14(3):356-363.
4. Poujade M., Grasland-Mongrain E., Hertzog A., Jouanneau J., Chavrier P., Ladoux B., et al. Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007, 104(41):15988-15993.
5. Mohr J.C., de Pablo J.J., Palecek S.P. 3-D microwell culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biomater 2006, 27(36):6032-6042.
6. Teixeira A.I., Abrams G.A., Bertics P.J., Murphy C.J., Nealey P.F. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro-and nanostructured substrates. JCell Sci 2003, 116(10):1881-1892.
7. Ghibaudo M., Di Meglio J.-M., Hersen P., Ladoux B. Mechanics of cell spreading within 3D-micropatterned environments. Lab Chip 2011, 11(5):805-812.
8. Kim Y., Hazar M., Vijayraghavan D.S., Song J., Jackson T.R., Joshi S.D., et al. Mechanochemical actuators of embryonic epithelial contractility. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2014, 111(40):14366-14371.
9. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126(4):677-689.
10. Rossier O.M., Gauthier N., Biais N., Vonnegut W., Fardin M.A., Avigan P., et al. Force generated by actomyosin contraction builds bridges between adhesive contacts. EMBO J 2010, 29(6):1055-1068.
11. Dembo M., Wang Y.L. Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys J 1999, 76(4):2307-2316.
12. Burton K., Park J.H., Taylor D.L. Keratocytes generate traction forces in two phases. Mol Biol Cell 1999, 10(11):3745-3769.
13. Tan J.L., Tien J., Pirone D.M., Gray D.S., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003, 100(4):1484.
14. Du Roure O., Saez A., Buguin A., Austin R.H., Chavrier P., Siberzan P., et al. Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005, 102(7):2390.
15. Saez A., Ghibaudo M., Buguin A., Silberzan P., Ladoux B. Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007, 104(20):8281.
16. Galbraith C.G., Sheetz M.P. Amicromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997, 94(17):9114.
17. Liu Z., Tan J.L., Cohen D.M., Yang M.T., Sniadecki N.J., Ruiz S.A., et al. Mechanical tugging force regulates the size of cell-cell junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010, 107(22):9944.
18. Sniadecki N.J., Anguelouch A., Yang M.T., Lamb C.M., Liu Z., Kirschner S.B., et al. Magnetic microposts as an approach to apply forces to living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007, 104(37):14553.
19. Burton K., Taylor D.L. Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata. Nature 1997, 385(6615):450-454.
20. Harris A.K., Wild P., Stopak D. Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science 1980, 208(4440):177.
21. Lee J., Leonard M., Oliver T., Ishihara A., Jacobson K. Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes. JCell Biol 1994, 127(6):1957.
22. Hoffman-Kim D., Mitchel J.A., Bellamkonda R.V. Topography, cell response, and nerve regeneration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2010, 12:203.
23. von Dassow M., Strother J.A., Davidson L.A. Surprisingly simple mechanical behavior of a complex embryonic tissue. PLoS One 2010, 5(12):e15359.
24. Sochol R.D., Higa A.T., Janairo R.R.R., Li S., Lin L. Unidirectional mechanical cellular stimuli via micropost array gradients. Soft Matter 2011, 7(10):4606-4609.
25. Yang M.T., Fu J., Wang Y.K., Desai R.A., Chen C.S. Assaying stem cell mechanobiology on microfabricated elastomeric substrates with geometrically modulated rigidity. Nat Protoc 2011, 6(2):187-213.
26. Martin P. Wound healing - aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 1997, 276(5309):75-81.
27. Gurtner G.C., Werner S., Barrandon Y., Longaker M.T. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 2008, 453(7193):314-321.
28. Petrie R.J., Doyle A.D., Yamada K.M. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10(8):538-549.
29. Yamaguchi H., Wyckoff J., Condeelis J. Cell migration in tumors. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005, 17(5):559-564.
30. Sheetz M.P., Felsenfeld D.P., Galbraith C.G. Cell migration: regulation of force on extracellular-matrix-integrin complexes. Trends Cell Biol 1998, 8(2):51-54.
31. Folkman J., Moscona A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978, 273:345-349.
32. Yamada K.M., Olden K. Fibronectins-adhesive glycoproteins of cell surface and blood. Nature 1978, 275:179-184.
33. Couchman J., Rees D. Actomyosin organisation for adhesion, spreading, growth and movement in chick fibroblasts. Cell Biol Int Rep 1979, 3(5):431-439.
34. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J.E.M., Pegrum S.M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture: IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res 1971, 67(2):359-367.
35. Pelham R.J., Wang Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997, 94(25):13661.
36. Yeung T., Georges P.C., Flanagan L.A., Marg B., Ortiz M., Funaki M., et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 2005, 60(1):24-34.
37. Guo W., Frey M.T., Burnham N.A., Wang Y.L. Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. Biophys J 2006, 90(6):2213-2220.
38. Gilbert S.F. Developmental biology 2013, Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, Mass., 719p. 10th ed.
39. Bravo-Cordero J.J., Hodgson L., Condeelis J. Directed cell invasion and migration during metastasis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012, 24(2):277-283.
40. Epstein F.H., Singer A.J., Clark R.A. Cutaneous wound healing. NEngl J Med 1999, 341(10):738-746.
41. Nieuwkoop P.D., Faber J. Normal tables of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) 1967, Elsevier North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.
42. Kay B.K., Peng H.B. Xenopus laevis: practical uses in cell and molecular biology 1991, Academic Press, New York, 581p.
43. Edelstein A., Amodaj N., Hoover K., Vale R., Stuurman N. Computer control of microscopes using μManager 2010, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
44. Gong Y., Mo C., Fraser S.E. Planar cell polarity signalling controls cell division orientation during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature 2004, 430(7000):689-693.
45. Zar J.H. Biostatistical analysis 1999, Pearson Education India.
46. Cooke J. Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis IV. Pattern formation and regulation following early inhibition of mitosis. JEmbryol Exp Morphol 1973, 30(1):49-62.
47. Lange J.R., Fabry B. Cell and tissue mechanics in cell migration. Exp Cell Res 2013, 319(16):2418-2423.
48. Lo C.M., Wang H.B., Dembo M., Wang Y. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J 2000, 79(1):144-152.
49. Khademhosseini A., Langer R., Borenstein J., Vacanti J.P. Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006, 103(8):2480-2487.
50. Theveneau E., Steventon B., Scarpa E., Garcia S., Trepat X., Streit A., et al. Chase-and-run between adjacent cell populations promotes directional collective migration. Nat Cell Biol 2013, 15(7):763-772.
51. Tambe D.T., Hardin C.C., Angelini T.E., Rajendran K., Park C.Y., Serra-Picamal X., et al. Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces. Nat Mater 2011, 10(6):469-475. Epub 2011/05/24.
52. Mayor R., Carmona-Fontaine C. Keeping in touch with contact inhibition of locomotion. Trends Cell Biol 2010, 20(6):319-328.
53. Abercrombie M., Dunn G. Adhesions of fibroblasts to substratum during contact inhibition observed by interference reflection microscopy. Exp Cell Res 1975, 92(1):57-62.
54. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J.E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture: I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp Cell Res 1953, 5(1):111-131.