Impact of hybrid iterative reconstruction on agatston coronary artery calcium scores in comparison to filtered back projection in native cardiac CT

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 187, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 372-379

  Obmann, V C ^a   Klink, T ^b   Heverhagen, J T ^a   Stork, A ^c   Laqmani, A ^d   Adam, G ^d   Begemann, P G C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c Röntgeninstitut Düsseldorf   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

arteriosclerosis; calcifications calculi; cardiac; CT quantitative; image manipulation reconstruction; treatment effects

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ADULT; AGATSTON SCORE; ARTICLE; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM SCORE; FEMALE; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; HUMAN; HYBRID ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CALCINOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EVALUATION STUDY; IMAGE QUALITY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CALCINOSIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84929176554     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398850     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agatston A. S., Janowitz W. R., Hildner F. J. et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol: 1990; 15 827 832
2. Rumberger J. A., Brundage B. H., Rader D. J. et al. Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. Mayo Clin Proc: 1999; 74 243 252
3. Mark D. B., Anderson J. L., Brinker J. A. et al. ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/IAC/Mended Hearts/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SNMMI 2014 Health Policy Statement on Use of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Clinical Quality Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2014; 63 698 721
4. Becker A., Leber A., Becker C. et al. Predictive value of coronary calcifications for future cardiac events in asymptomatic individuals. Am Heart J: 2008; 155 154 160
5. Klass O., Walker M., Siebach A. et al. Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and effective radiation dose between 64- and 256-slice CT. Eur Radiol: 2010; 20 1124 1131
6. Hirai N., Horiguchi J., Fujioka C. et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology: 2008; 248 424 430
7. Hou Y., Liu X., Xv S. et al. Comparisons of image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol: 2012; 199 588 594
8. Hosch W., Stiller W., Mueller D. et al. Reduction of radiation exposure and improvement of image quality with BMI-adapted prospective cardiac computed tomography and iterative reconstruction. Eur J Radiol: 2012; 81 3568 3576
9. Klink T., Obmann V., Heverhagen J. et al. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: The influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol. Eur J Radiol: 2014; 83 1645 1654
10. Kurata A., Dharampal A., Dedic A. et al. Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification. Eur Radiol: 2013; 23 3246 3252
11. Schindler A., Vliegenthart R., Schoepf U. J. et al. Iterative Image Reconstruction Techniques for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison with Traditional Filtered Back Projection in Vitro and in Vivo. Radiology: 2014; 270 387 393
12. Gebhard C., Fiechter M., Fuchs T. A. et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. Int J Cardiol: 2013; 167 2932 2937
13. van Osch J. A., Mouden M., van Dalen J. A. et al. Influence of iterative image reconstruction on CT-based calcium score measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging: 2014; 10.1007/s10554-014-0409-9
14. Funama Y., Taguchi K., Utsunomiya D. et al. Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 2011; 35 480 485
15. Murazaki H., Funama Y., Hatemura M. et al. Quantitative evaluation of calcium (content) in the coronary artery using hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm on low-dose 64-detector CT: comparison of iDose and filtered back projection. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi: 2011; 67 360 366
16. Klink T., Hoffmann M. H., van Stevendaal U. et al. Automatic phase point determination of minimal motion reconstruction intervals with motion maps in ECG-gated CT diagnostics of coronary sclerosis. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2009; 181 675 682
17. Christner J. A., Kofler J. M., McCollough C. H. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AAm J Roentgenol: 2010; 194 881 889
18. Jessen K. A., Shrimpton P. C., Geleijns J. et al. Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. Appl Radiat Isot: 1999; 50 165 172
19. Vliegenthart R., Oudkerk M., Hofman A. et al. Coronary calcification improves cardiovascular risk prediction in the elderly. Circulation: 2005; 112 572 577
20. McClelland R. L., Chung H., Detrano R. et al. Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation: 2006; 113 30 37
21. Renker M., Nance J. W. Jr, Schoepf U. J. et al. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology: 2011; 260 390 399
22. Becker C. R., Kleffel T., Crispin A. et al. Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT. Am J Roentgenol: 2001; 176 1295 1298
23. Greenland P., LaBree L., Azen S. P. et al. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA: 2004; 291 210 215
24. Utsunomiya D., Weigold W. G., Weissman G. et al. Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT. Eur Radiol: 2012; 22 1287 1294
25. Takx R. A., Willemink M. J., Nathoe H. M. et al. The effect of iterative reconstruction on quantitative computed tomography assessment of coronary plaque composition. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging: 2014; 30 155 163
26. McCollough C. H., Ulzheimer S., Halliburton S. S. et al. Coronary artery calcium: a multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT. Radiology: 2007; 243 527 538
27. Willemink M. J., de Jong P. A., Leiner T. et al. Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: technical principles. Eur Radiol: 2013; 23 1623 1631
28. Noel P. B., Fingerle A. A., Renger B. et al. Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. Am J Roentgenol: 2011; 197 1404 1409
29. Budoff M. J., Achenbach S., Blumenthal R. S. et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation: 2006; 114 1761 1791
30. Palorini F., Origgi D., Granata C. et al. Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey. Eur Radiol: 2014; 24 469 483