Application of 3-D imaging sensor for tracking minipigs in the open field test

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 235, Issue , 2014, Pages 219-225

  Kulikov, Victor A ^a   Khotskin, Nikita V ^b   Nikitin, Sergey V ^b   Lankin, Vasily S ^b   Kulikov, Alexander V ^b   Trapezov, Oleg V ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF AUTOMATION AND ELECTROMETRY   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

3 D image sensor; Automated tracking; Fear reaction test; Minipig; Open field test

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COLOR; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; MINIPIG; NONHUMAN; OPEN FIELD TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ACTIMETRY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; DEVICES; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PIG; PIGMENTATION; PROCEDURES; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ACTIGRAPHY; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PIGMENTATION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE;

EID: 84929131422     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arnfred S.M., Lind N.M., Gjedde A., Hansen A.K. Scalp recognition of mid-latency AEP SEP and auditory gating in the Gottingen minipig: a new animal model in information processing research. Int J Psychophysiol 2004, 52:267-275.
2. Arnfred S.M., Lind N.M., Hansen A.K., Hemmingsen R.P. Pre-puls inhibition of the acoustic startle eye-blink in the Gottingen minipig. Behav Brain Res 2003, 151:295-301.
3. Belyaev D.K. Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. J Hered 1979, 70:301-308.
4. Denenberg V.H. Open-field behavior in the rat: what does it mean?. Ann NY Acad Sci 1969, 159:852-859.
5. Donald R.D., Healy S.D., Lawrence A.B., Rutherford K.M.D. Emotionality in growing pigs: is the open field a valid test?. Physiol Behav 2011, 104:906-913.
6. Cumming P., Kretzschmar M., Brust P., Smith D. Quantitative radioluminography of serotonin uptake sites in the porcine brain. Synapse 2001, 39:351-355.
7. Forkman B., Boissu A., Mweunier-Sala'un M.C., Canali E., Jones R.B. A critical review of fear tests used in cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol Behav 2007, 92:340-374.
8. Keeler C.E. Coat color, physique, and temperament. J Hered 1947, 9:271-277.
9. Kulikov A.V., Tikhonova M.A., Kulikov V.A. Automated measurement of spatial preference in the open field test with transmitted lighting. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 170:345-351.
10. Kulikov V.A., Ivanova E.V. Method of abandoned object detection based on a sequence of depth images. Optoelectron Instrum Data Process 2012, 48:559-564.
11. Kulikov V.A., Ivanov V.A., Kirichuk V.S. Modeling and analysis of motion of biological objects on the basis of a sequence of images obtained in studying the motion activity. Optoelectron Instrum Data Process 2010, 46:64-69.
12. Lankin V. Factors of diversity of domestic behavior in sheep. Genet Sel Evol 1997, 29:73-92.
13. Lankin V.S. Genotypic modification variability of passive-defensive behavior toward human in domestic pigs. Russ J Genet Appl Res 2014, 4:60-73.
14. Lankin V.S., Bouissou M.F. Factors of diversity of domestication-related behavior in farm animals of different species. Russ J Genet 2001, 37:783-795.
15. Lind N.M., Vinther M., Hemmingsen R.P., Hansen A.K. Validation of a digital video tracking system for recording pig locomotor behavior. J Neurosci Methods 2005, 143:123-132.
16. Mikkelsen M., Moller A., Jensen L.H., Pedersen A., Harajehi J.B., Pakkenberg Y. MPTP-induced parkinsonism in minipigs: a behavioral, biochemical and histological study. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1999, 21:169-175.
17. Moustgaard A., Lind N.M., Hemmingsen R., Hansen A.K. Spontaneous object recognition in the Gottingen minipig. Neural Plast 2002, 9:255-259.
18. Noldus L.P.J.J., Spink A.J., Tegelenbosch R.A.J. Etho vision: a versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2001, 33:398-414.
19. Ollivier L., Sillier P. Pig genetics: a review. Ann Genet Sel Anim 1982, 14:481-544.
20. Parrott R.F., Vellucci S.V., Goode J.A. Behavioral effects of betacarbolines in pigs: anxiety or aversion?. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000, 66:713-719.
21. Pedernera-Romano C., Ruiz de la Torre J.L., Badiella L., Manteca X. Association between open-field behavior and stress-induced hyperthermia in two breeds of sheep. Anim Welf 2011, 20:339-346.
22. Prut L., Belzung C. The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol 2003, 463:3-33.
23. Spink A.J., Tegelenbosch R.A.J., Buma M.O.S., Noldus L.P.J.J. The etho vision video tracking system - a tool for behavioral phenotyping of transgenic mice. Physiol Behav 2001, 73:731-744.
24. Standford C. The open field test: reinventing the wheel. J Psychopharmacol 2007, 21:134-135.
25. Tecott L.H. The genes and brain of mice and men. Am J Psychiatry 2003, 160:646-656.
26. Tikhonov V.N. Formation of a gene pool of miniature Siberian swine "Minisibs" and their use in medico-genetic research. Genetika 2000, 36:829-836.
27. Trapezov O.V., Trapezova L.I., Sergeev E.G. Coat color mutations and defensive reaction towards man in farm-bred minks and sables. Scientifur 2012, 36:396-403.
28. Trut L.N. Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment. Am Sci 1999, 87:160-169.
29. Zebunke M., Puppe B., Lingbein J. Effect of cognitive enrichment on behavioral and physiological reaction of pig. Physiol Behav 2013, 118:70-79.