Genotypic and modification variability of passive-defensive behavior toward humans in domestic pigs

Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 60-73

  Lankin, V S ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

"genotype environment" interaction; genotypic and environmental differences; phenotypic variability; pigs; reaction of withdrawal from human

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894413235     PISSN: 20790597     EISSN: 20790600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S2079059714010055     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adam, T. C. and Epel, E. S., Stress, eating and the reward system, Physiol. Behav., 2007, vol. 91, pp. 449-458.
2. Albert, F. W., Carlborg, O., Plusnina, I., et al., Genetic architecture of tameness in a rat model of animal domestication, Genetics, 2009, vol. 182, pp. 541-554.
3. Arshavskii, V. V. and Rotenberg, V. S., Influence of different types of behavioral responses and emotional states on pathophysiological and clinical syndromes, Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 1993, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 49-72.
4. Bell, A. M., Hankison, S. J., and Laskowski, K. L., The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis, Anim. Behav., 2009, vol. 77, pp. 771-783.
5. Boissy, A., Fisher, A. D., Bouix, J., et al., Genetics of fear in ruminant livestock, Livest. Prod. Sci., 2005, vol. 93, pp. 23-32.
6. Caldwell, H. K., Lee, H.-J., Macbeth, A. H., and Young, S., Vasopressin: behavioral roles of an "original" neuropeptide, Prog. Neurobiol., 2008, vol. 84, pp. 1-24.
7. Engine, E. and Treit, D., Dissociation of the anxiolytic-like effects of avpr1a and avpr1b receptor antagonists in dorsal and ventral hippocampus, Neuropeptides, 2008, vol. 42, pp. 411-421.
8. Folkoner, D. S., Vvedenie v genetiku kolichestvennykh priznakov (Introduction to Genetics of Quantitative Traits), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985.
9. Fordyce, J. A., The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity, J. Exp. Biol., 2006, vol. 209, pp. 2377-2383.
10. Forkman, B., Boissy, A., Meunier-Salaun, M.-C., et al., Acritical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses, Physiol. Behav., 2007, vol. 92, pp. 340-374.
11. Gutierrez-Gil, B., Ball, N., Burton, D., et al., Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting cattle temperament, J. Hered., 2008, vol. 99, pp. 629-638.
12. Hiendleder, S. and Thomsen, H., Reinschn. et al. mapping of qtl for body conformation and behavior in cattle, J. Hered., 2003, vol. 94, pp. 496-506.
13. Holmes, I. S. and Hastings, I. M., Behavioural changes as a correlated response to selection, Genet. Res., 1995, vol. 66, pp. 27-33.
14. Houpt, T. R., Feeding and drinking patterns in young pigs, Physiol. Behav., 1988, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 99-109.
15. Kerje, S., Carlborg, O., Jacobsson, L., et al., The two fold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and white leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs, Anim. Genet., 2003, vol. 34, pp. 264-274.
16. Kozlovskaya, M. M., Identification of psychotropic activity using the model of experimentally induced shifts in the emotional state, in Neirofarmakologicheskaya regulyatsiya sistemnykh protsessov (Neuropharmacological Regulation of Systemic Processes), Leningrad: Nauka, 1974, pp. 12-29.
17. Kukekova, A. V., Trut, L. N., Chase, K., et al., Measurement of segregating behaviors in experimental silver fox pedigrees, Behav. Genet., 2008, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 185-194.
18. Lankin, V., Stakan, G., Khinkovski, Ts., et al., Effect of variability in the defensive behavior on the milk production by sheep, Mezhdunar. S.-Kh. Zh., 1988, no. 4, pp. 64-67.
19. Lankin, V. S., Domestikatsionnoe povedenie i ego adaptivnoe znachenie u kopytnykh zhivotnykh (Domesticational Behavior and Its Adaptive Significance in Ungulates), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1996.
20. Lankin, V. S., Domestication-related behavior of sheep, Genetika, 1997, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1119-1125.
21. Lankin, V. S., Role in domestication-related behavior in the formation of long-term adaptations of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system in sheep, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2000, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 340-347.
22. Lankin, V. S., The genetics of behavioral response of fear of the human in domestic pigs, Dokl. Ross. Akad. S.-Kh. Nauk, 2008, no. 2, pp. 45-49.
23. Lankin, V. S., Genetic components of behavior towards human in domestic pigs, Dokl. Ross. Akad. S.-Kh. Nauk, 2010, no. 1, pp. 43-46.
24. Lankin, V. S. and Bouissu, M. F., Method of identification and selection of stress-resistant animals, RF Pantent No. 2146444, Byul. Izobret., 2000, no. 8.
25. Lankin, V. S. and Bouissou, M.-F., Factors of diversity of domestication-related behavior in farm animals of different species, Russ. J. Genet., 2001, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 783-795.
26. Lankin, V. S., Bouissou, M.-F., Navu, J., et al., Factors of variability of domestication-related behavior of pigs of specialized lines, S.-Kh. Biol., 2007, no. 4, pp. 34-52.
27. Mather, K. and Jinks, J. L., Biometrical Genetics, the Study of Continuous Variation, 3rd ed., London: Chapman and Hall, 1982.
28. Mignon-Grasteau, S., Boissy, A., Bouix, J., et al., Genetics of adaptation and domestication in livestock, Livest. Prod. Sci., 2005, vol. 93, pp. 3-14.
29. Moretz, J. A., Martins, E. P., and Robison, B. D., Behavioral syndromes and the evolution of correlated behavior in zebrafish, Behav. Ecol., 2007, vol. 18, pp. 556-562.
30. Price, E. O., Behavioral genetics and the process of animal domestication, in Genetics and the Behavior of Domestication Animals, Grandin, T., Ed., New York: Academic Press, 1998, pp. 31-66.
31. Reale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., et al., Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution, Biol. Rev., 2007, vol. 82, pp. 291-318.
32. Rekila, T., Harri, M., and Ahola, L., Validation of the feeding test as an index of fear in farmed blue (Alopex lagopus) and silver foxes (vulpes vulpes), Phisiol. Behav., 1997, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 805-810.
33. Rothschild, M. E. and Ruvinsky, A., The Genetics of the Pig, New York: CAB International, 1998.
34. Rubin, C.-J., Zody, M. C., Eriksson, J., et al., Wholegenome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication, Nature, 2010, vol. 464, no. 7288, pp. 587-593.
35. Schutz, K. E., Kerje, S., Jacobsson, L., et al., Major growth QTLs in fowl are related to fearful behavior: possible genetic links between fear responses and production traits in a Red Jungle fowl × White Leghorn intercross, Behav. Genet., 2004, vol. 34, pp. 121-130.
36. Sih, A., Bell, A., and Johnson, J. C., Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2004, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 372-378.
37. Sokoloff, G., Parker, C. C., Lim, J. E., and Palmer, A. A., Anxiety and fear in a cross of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice: mapping overlapping and independent QTL for related traits, Genes, Brain, Behav., 2011, vol. 10, pp. 604-614.
38. Stakan, G. A., Martynova, V. N., Soskin, A. A., and Chernov, L. L., Variability and inheritance of behavior in fine-wool sheep. II. Character of inheritance of domesticated behavior and correlation of behavior with productivity traits in fine-wool sheep, Genetika, 1976, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 35-43.
39. Valdar, W., Solberg, L. C., Gauguier, D., et al., Genetic and environmental effects on complex traits in mice, Genetics, 2006, vol. 174, pp. 959-984.
40. Veenema, A. H., Meijer, O. C., de Kloet, E. R., and Koolhaas, J. M., Genetic selection for coping style predicts stressor susceptibility, J. Neuroendocrinol., 2003, vol. 15, pp. 256-267.
41. Wahlsten, D., Metten, P., and Crabbe, J. C., A rating scale for wildness and ease of handling laboratory mice: results for 21 inbred strains tested in two laboratories, Genes, Brain, Behav., 2003a, vol. 2, pp. 71-79.
42. Wahlsten, D., Metten, P., Phillips, T. J., et al., Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction, J. Neurobiol., 2003b, vol. 54, pp. 283-311.
43. Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Pedersen, V., et al., Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 2006, vol. 101, pp. 185-242.
44. Wiren, A. and Jensen, P., A growth QTL on chicken chromosome 1 affects emotionality and sociality, Behav. Genet., 2010, vol. 41, pp. 303-311.
45. Wright, D., Rubin, C.-J., Barrio, A. M., et al., The genetic architecture of domestication in the chicken: effects of pleiotropy and linkage, Molec. Ecol., 2010, vol. 19, pp. 5140-5156.
46. Zhivotovskii, L. A., Population variability indices based on polymorphic characters, in Fenetika populyatsii (Population Phenetics), Moscow, 1982, pp. 38-44.