Transforming Patient-Centered Care: Development of the Evidence Informed Decision Making through Engagement Model

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 276-282

  Moore, Jennifer E ^a   Titler, Marita G ^b   Kane Low, Lisa ^b   Dalton, Vanessa K ^c   Sampselle, Carolyn M ^b  

^a AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILDBIRTH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT CARE; PREGNANCY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; INTERVIEW; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LABOR, INDUCED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREGNANCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84929130649     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: 18784321     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Akinsipe D.C., Villalobos L.E., Ridley R.T. A systematic review of implementing an elective labor induction policy. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatal Nursing 2012, 41:5-16.
2. Angood P.B., Armstrong E.M., Ashton D., Burstin H., Corry M.P., Delbanco S.F., et al. Blueprint for action: Steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system. Women's Health Issues 2010, 20:S18-S49.
3. Carman K.L., Dardess P., Maurer M., Sofaer S., Adams K., Bechtel C., et al. Patient and family engagement: A framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs 2013, 32:223-231.
4. Caughey A.B., Sundaram V., Kaimal A.J., Cheng Y.W., Gienger A., Little S.E., et al. AHRQ Evidence report: Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor 2009, AHRQ, Rockville, MD, Available:, Accessed January 15, 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/elindlabor/eilabr.pdf.
5. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine 1997, 44:681-692.
6. Chewning B., Bylund C.L., Shah B., Arora N.K., Gueguen J.A., Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 2012, 86:9-18.
7. Coulter A. The autonomous patient. Ending paternalism in medical care 2002, The Nuffield Trust, London.
8. Dalton V.K., Harris L., Weisman C.D., Guire K., Castleman L., Lebovic D. Patient preferences, satisfaction, and resource use in office evacuation of early pregnancy failure. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006, 108:103-110.
9. Donovan E.F., Lannon C., Bailit J., Rose B., Iams J.D., Byczkowski T. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36 0/7-38 6/7 weeks gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010, 202:243.e1-243.e8.
10. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Gwyn R., Grol R. Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: Focus group study with general practice registrars. British Medical Journal 1991, 319:753-756.
11. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Kinnersley P., Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: The competencies of involving patients in healthcare choices. British Journal of General Practice 2000, 50:892-899.
12. Fisch J.M., English D., Pedaline S., Brooks K., Simhan H.N. Labor induction process improvement: A patient quality-of-care initiative. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2009, 113:797-803.
13. Fleurence R., Selby J.V., Odom-Walker K., Hunt G., Meltzer D. How the patient-centered outcomes research institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2013, 32:393-400.
14. Graham I.D., Logan J. Innovations in knowledge transfer and continuity of care research. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 2004, 36:89-103.
15. Greene J., Hibbard J.H. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2012, 27:520-526.
16. Hibbard J.H., Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: Better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Affairs 2013, 32:207-214.
17. Hibbard J.H., Stockard J., Mahoney E., Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research 2004, 39:1005-1026.
18. Perinatal care 2014, (The) Joint Commission, TJC, Oak Brook, IL, Available:. http://www.jointcommission.org/perinatal_care/.
19. Joosten E.A., Defuentes-Merillas L., deWeert G.H., Senseky T., van der Staak C.P., de Jong C.A. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 2008, 77:219-226.
20. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 1984, 39:341-350.
21. Kitson A.L., Rycroft-Malone J., Harvey G., McCormack B., Seers K., Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation Science 2008, 3.
22. Legare F., Ratte S., Gravel K., Graham I.D. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Education Counseling 2008, 73:526-535.
23. Legare F., Witteman H.O. Shared decision making: Examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Affairs 2013, 32:276-283.
24. Llewellyn-Thomas H.A., Sutherland H.J., Tritchler D.L., Lockwood G.A., Till J.E., Ciampi A., et al. Benign and malignant breast disease: The relationship between women's health status and health values. Medical Decision Making 1991, 11:180-188.
25. Logan J., Graham I.D. The Ottawa model of research use. Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice: Linking evidence to action 2010, 83-102. Wiley-Blackwell, NJ. J. Rycroft-Malone, T. Bucknall (Eds.).
26. Lomas J. Retailing research: Increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for childbirth. Milbank Quarterly 1993, 71:439-475.
27. Martin J.A., Hamilton B.E., Sutton P.D., Ventura S.J., Mathews T.J., Kirmeyer S., et al. Births: Final data for 2007 2007, CDC, Hyattsville, MD, Available:, Accessed July 12, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_24.pdf.
28. Mazur D.J., Hickman D. The effect of physician explanations on patients' treatment preferences: Five-year survival data. Medical Decision Making 1994, 14:255-258.
29. Moore, J. E. (2012). Moving towards patient centered care: Women's decisions, perceptions, and experiences of the induction of labor process (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Deep Blue. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96032.
30. Moore J.E., Kane Low L., Titler M.G., Sampselle C., Dalton V. Moving towards patient-centered care: Women's decisions, perceptions, and experience of the induction of labor process. Birth 2014, 41(2):138-146.
31. Moore J.E., Kane Low L. Factors that influence the practice of elective induction of labor: What does the evidence tell us?. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 2012, 26:242-250.
32. Mozurkewich E., Chilimigras J., Koepke E., Keeton K., King V.J. Indications for induction of labour: A best-evidence review. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaegology 2009, 116:626-636.
33. National voluntary consensus standards for perinatal care 2008: A consensus report 2008, National Quality Forum (NQF), Author, Washington, DC, Available:, Accessed March 2, 2014. https://www.premierinc.com/safety/topics/HAI/downloads/Perinatal_full_09142012.pdf.
34. O'Connor A.M., Pennie R.A., Dales R.E. Framing effects on expectations, decision, and side effects experienced: The case of the influenza immunization. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1996, 49:1271-1276.
35. O'Rourke T.P., Girardi G.J., Balaskas T.N., Havlisch R.A., Landstrom G., Kirby B., et al. Implementation of a system-wide policy for labor induction. American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 2011, 36:305-311.
36. Oshiro B.T., Henry E., Wilson J., Branch D.W., Varner M.W. Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2009, 113:804-811.
37. The PCORI Methodology Report 2013, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Author, Washington, DC, Available:. http://www.pcori.org/research-we-support/methodology/.
38. Payne J.W. Information processing theory: Some concepts and methods applied to decision research. Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior 1980, 95-115. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. T.S. Wallsten (Ed.).
39. Pierce P.F. When the patient chooses: Describing unaided decisions in health care. Human Factors 1996, 38:278-287.
40. Pierce P.F., Hicks F.D. Patient decision-making behavior: An emerging paradigm for nursing science. Nursing Research 2001, 50:267-274.
41. Podulka J., Stranges E., Steiner C. Hospitalizations related to childbirth, 2008. HCUP statistic brief #110 2008, AHRQ, Rockville, MD, Available:. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb110.jsp.
42. Reisner D.P., Wallin T.K., Zingheim R.W., Luthy D.A. Reduction of elective inductions in a large community hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2009, 200:674.e1-674.e7.
43. Stetler C.B. Updating the Stetler model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. Nursing Outlook 2001, 49:272-279.
44. Sullivan K.E., Hebert P.C., Logan J., O'Connor A.M., McNeely P.D. What do physicians tell patients with end-stage COPD about intubation and mechanical ventilation?. Chest 1996, 109:258-264.
45. Titler M.G., Kleiber C., Steelman V.J., Rakel B.A., Budreau G., Everett L.Q., et al. The Iowa model of evidence-based practice to promote quality care. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America 2001, 13:497-509.
46. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211:453-458.
47. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims 2009, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Author, Rockville, MD, Available:, Accessed December 3, 2011. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM071975.pdf.
48. Vardo J.H., Thornburg L.L., Glantz J.C. Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2011, 56:25-30.
49. Wong S.T., Peterson S., Black C. Patient activation in primary healthcare: A comparison between healthier individuals and those with a chronic illness. Medical Care 2011, 49:469-479.
50. WHO recommendations for induction of labour 2011, World Health Organization (WHO), Author, Geneva, Switzerland, Available:, Accessed December 3, 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501156_eng.pdf.