Framing effects on expectations, decisions, and side effects experienced: The case of influenza immunization

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 49, Issue 11, 1996, Pages 1271-1276

  O'Connor, Annette M ^b   Pennie, Ross A ^a   Dales, Robert E ^c  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Compliance; Consumer preferences; Decision making; Framing; Health behavior; Influenza immunization

Indexed keywords

INFLUENZA VACCINE;

ABSENTEEISM; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CHILL; DECISION MAKING; EXPECTATION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FEVER; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INFLUENZA; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYALGIA; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SELF REPORT; SIDE EFFECT; TELEPHONE;

AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INFLUENZA VACCINES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PILOT PROJECTS; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0030297930     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00177-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. 1. Shoemaker PJH. The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence, and limitations. J Econ Lit 1982; 20: 529-563.
2. 2. Payne JW, Bettman JR. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 1992; 43: 87-131.
3. 3. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979; 47: 263-291.
4. 4. O'Connor A. Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 119-126.
5. 5. O'Connor A, Boyd NF, Tritchler D, Kriukov Y, Sutherland H, Till J. Eliciting preferences for alternative cancer drug treatments: The influence of framing, medium, and rater variables. Med Decis Making 1985; 5: 453-463.
6. 6. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 1259-1262.
7. 7. Marreau TM. Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. Br J Soc Psychol 1989; 28: 89-94.
8. 8. Johnson RD. Making judgments when information is missing: Inferences, biases, and framing effects. Acta Psychol 1987; 66: 69-82.
9. 9. Wilson DK, Purdon SE, Wallston KA, Compliance to health recommendations: A theoretical overview of message framing. Health Educ Res: Theory and Practice 1988; 3(2): 161-171.
10. 10. Siminoff LA, Fetting JH. Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: Impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions. Med Decis Making 1989; 9: 262-271.
11. 11. Hughes KK. Decision making by breast cancer patients: The role of information in treatment selection. Oncol Nurs Forum 1993; 20: 623-628.
12. 12. Health and Welfare Canada. National Advisory Committee on Immunization statement on influenza vaccination for the 1988-1989 season. Can Dis Wkly Rep (May 14) 1988; 14: 77-82.
13. 13. Douglas RG Jr., Betts RF. Influenza virus. In: Mandell Gl, Douglas RG Jr., Bennett JE, Eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley & Sons; 1985: 849-866.
14. 14. Ruben FL. Prevention and control of influenza: Role of vaccine. Am J Med 1987; 82: 31-34.
15. 15. Stenius-Aarniala B, Huttunen JK, Pyhala R, Haahtela T, Jokela P, Jukkara A, et al. Lack of clinical exacerbations in adults with chronic asthma after immunization with killed influenza virus. Chest 1986; 6: 786-789.
16. 16. Howarth DM, Chaston TM, Lickiss K, Weekes JR, O'Doherty C, Foster RE, et al. Age-related responses to influenza vaccination in the Newcastle region during 1983 and 1984. Med J Aust 1987; 146: 514-517.
17. 17. Keitel WA, Cate TR, Couch RB. Efficacy of sequential annual vaccination with inactivated influenza virus vaccine. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 127: 353-364.
18. 18. Meyer HM, Hopps HE, Parkman PD, Ennis FA. Review of existing vaccines for influenza. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 70: 146-152.
19. 19. Scheifele DW, Bjornson G, Johnston J. Evaluation of adverse events after influenza vaccination of hospital personnel. Can Med Assoc J 1990: 142: 127-130.
20. 20. Douglas RG, Influenza prevention and treatment: the primary care physician's role. Postgrad Med 1988; 83: 207-214.
21. 21. Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP): Prevention and control of influenza. MMWR 1987; 36: 373-380.
22. 22. Betts RF, Douglas RG Jr. Comparative study of reactogenicity and immunogenicity of influenza A/New Jersey/8/76 (HswINI) virus vaccines in normal volunteers. J Infect Dis 1977; 136(Suppl): S443-S449.
23. 23. Centers for Disease Control. Influenza vaccination levels in selected states - Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1987. MMWR 1989; 38: 129-133.
24. 24. Kilbourne ED, Chanock RM, Coppin PW, Davenport FM, Fox JP, Gregg MB, et al. Influenza vaccines - Summary of influenza workshop. J Infect Dis 1974; 129: 750-771.
25. 25. Dolin R, Wise TG, Mazur MH, Tuazon CU, Ennis FA. B monovalent vaccines in adults: Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of influenza A/ New Jersey/76 virus vaccines in normal adults. J Infect Dis 1977; 136(Suppl):S435-S442.
26. 26. Wise TG, Dolin R, Mazur MH, Top FH, Edelman R, Ennis FA. C Bivalent vaccines in adults: Serologic responses and systemic reactions in adults after vaccination with hivalent A/Victoria/75-A/New Jersey/76 and monovalent B/Hong Kong/72 influenza vaccines. J Infect Dis 1977; 136(Suppl.):S507-S517.
27. 27. Mostow SR, Eickhoff TC, Ghelgren GA, Retailliau HF, Castle M. Studies of inactivated virus vaccines in hospital employees: Reactogenicity and absenteeism. J Infect Dis 1977; 136(Supph): S533-S538.
28. 2H. Pennic RA, O'Connor AM, Garvock MJ, Drake ER. A study of the factors influencing the acceptance of hepatitis B vaccine by students in health disciplines in Ottawa. Can J Public Health 1991; 82: 12-15.
29. 29. O'Connor AM, Davies BL, Dulberg CS, Buhler PL, Nadon C, Hastings-McBride B, et al. Psychometric properties of health risk attitude measures in predicting cessation among pregnant smokers. Med Care 1993; 31: 658-662.
30. 30. O'Connor AM. Decisional conflict. In: McFarland GK, McFarlane EA, Eds. Nursing Diagnosis and Intervention, 2nd ed. Toronto: CV Mosby, 1992: 468-478.
31. 31. O'Connor, A. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995; 15: 25-30.
32. 32. Scheifel DW, Bjornson G, Johnston J. Evaluation of adverse events after influenza vaccination in hospital personnel. Can Med Assoc J 1990; 142: 127-130.
33. 33. Lauver D, Rubin MB. Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal papanicolaou tests. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13: 199-207.
34. 34. Lerman C, Ross E, Boyce A, Gorchov P, McLaughlin R, Rimer B. The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 729-730.
35. 35. Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 52: 500-510.
36. 36. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
37. 37. Wilson DK, Kaplan RM, Schneiderman LJ. Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care. Soc Behav 1987; 2: 51-59.
38. 38. Wilson DK, Purdon SE, Wallston KA. Compliance to health recommendations: A theoretical overview of message framing. Health Educ Res 1988; 3: 161-171.