Moving toward patient-centered care: Women's decisions, perceptions, and experiences of the induction of labor process

Birth

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 138-146

  Moore, Jennifer E ^a   Low, Lisa Kane ^b   Titler, Marita G ^b   Dalton, Vanessa K ^c   Sampselle, Carolyn M ^b  

^a AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Implementation science; Induction of labor; Informed shared decision making; Patient centered outcomes research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LABOR INDUCTION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LABOR, INDUCED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREGNANCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84901402775     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: 1523536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/birt.12080     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ehrenthal DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(1):35-42.
2. Kaufman KE, Balit JL, Grobman W. Elective induction: An analysis of economic and health consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(4):858-863.
3. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: Final data for 2007. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2010. Accessed July 8, 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_24.pdf.
4. Vardo JH, Thornburg LL, Glantz JC. Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor. J Reprod Med 2011;56(1-2):25-30.
5. Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, et al. Evidence report: Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evidence Report/TechnologyAssessment No. 176. Rockville, MD.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. Accessed December 16, 2009. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/elindlabor/eilabr.pdf.
6. Oshiro BT, Henry E, Wilson J, et al. Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113(4):804-811.
7. Moore JE, Low LK. Factors that influence the practice of elective induction of labor: What does the evidence tell us? J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2012;26(3):1-9.
8. Fleurence R, Selby JV, Odom-Walker K, et al. How the patient-centered outcomes research institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(2):393-400.
9. Glaser B. Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press, 1978.
10. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1985.
11. Mozurkewich E, Chilimigras J, Koepke E, et al. Indications for induction of labour: A best-evidence review. BJOG 2009;116(5):626-636.
12. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2011. Accessed January 13, 2012. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501156_eng.pdf.
13. Moffat MA, Bell JS, Porter MA, et al. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study. BJOG 2006;114(1):86-93.
14. Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Kishi GY. The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(6):1355-1361.
15. Dublin S, LydonRochelle M, Kaplan RC, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183(4):986-994.
16. Glantz JC. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes. J Reprod Med 2005;50(4):235-240.
17. Murthy K, Grobman WA, Lee TA, Holl JL. Trends in induction of labor at early-term gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204(5):435.e1-e6.
18. Baron J, Hershey JC. Outcome bias in decision evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54(4):569-579.
19. Glaser B, Strauss A. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press, 1967.
20. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 1984;39(4):341-350.
21. O'Connor AM, Pennie RA, Dales RE. Framing effects on expectations, decision, and side effects experienced: The case of the influenza immunization. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49(11):1271-1276.
22. Payne JW. Information processing theory: Some concepts and methods applied to decision research. In: Wallsten TS, ed. Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1980:95-115.
23. Sullivan KE, Hebert PC, Logan J, et al. What do physicians tell patients with end-stage COPD about intubation and mechanical ventilation? Chest 1996;109(1):258-264.
24. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211(4481):453-458.
25. Simpson KR, Newman G, Chirino OR. Patient education to reduce elective inductions. MCN 2010;35(4):188-194.
26. Simpson KR, Newman G, Chirino OR. Patients' perspectives on the role of prepared childbirth education in decision making regarding elective labor induction. J Perinat Educ 2010;19(3):21-32.
27. Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, et al. Listening to Mothers III: Pregnancy and Birth. New York: Childbirth Connection, 2013.
28. Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MA, Applebaum S. Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection, 2006.
29. Emmett CL, Shaw ARG, Montgomery AA, Murphy DJ. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: The role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG 2006;113(12):1438-1445.
30. ACOG Committee on Ethics. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439: Informed Consent. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114(2):401-408.
31. DeVries R, Salvesen H, Wiegers T, Williams A. What (and why) do women want? The desires of women and the design of maternity care. In: DeVries R, Benoit C, van Teijlingen E, Wrede S, Eds. Birth by Design: Pregnancy, Maternity Care, and Midwifery in North America and Europe. New York: Routledge, 2001: 243-267.